Seismic Retrofit of Pilotis Buildings by Novel Aluminium Buckling-Restrained Braces (Al-BRBs). Application to a Modernist Architecture Building in Lisbon

References

• AISC. 2016. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, A., R. Ferreira, J. M. Proença, and A. S. Gago. 2017. Seismic retrofit of RC building structures with Buckling-Restrained Braces. Engineering Structures 130:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci, R., F. Balducci, M. G. Castellano, and F. Donà (2006), “Pre-casted RC buildings with Buckling-Restrained braces: The example of the new building of the faculty of engineering in Ancona”. Proceedings of the Second International fib Congress, Napoli, Italy, June.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-40. (1996), “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings”. Report No. SSC 96-01 (two volumes). Applied Technical Council, Redwood City, California, US.
   Google Scholar
• Avci-Karatas, C., and O. Celik (2013), “Cyclic testing of aluminum alloy core Buckling-Restrained braces (BRBs)”. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering (10th CUEE), Tokyo, Japan, March.
   Google Scholar
• Avci-Karatas, C., O. Celik, and C. Yalcin. 2018. Experimental investigation of aluminum alloy and steel core Buckling-Restrained braces (BRBs). International Journal of Steel Structures 18 (2):10.1007/s13296-018-0025-y. doi:10.1007/s13296-018-0025-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2005. EN 1998-3:2005 Eurocode 8 – Part 3: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation: European Committee for Standardization. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2010. EN 15129:2010 Anti-seismic devices. Instituto Português da Qualidade: European Committee for Standardization. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• CEN/CT 115(LNEC) (2010) NP EN 1998-1:2010: Eurocódigo 8 — Projeto de estruturas para resistência aos sismos — Parte 1: Regras gerais, ações sísmicas e regras para edifícios, European Committee for Standardization/Comissão Técnica 115 (Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil), Instituto Português da Qualidade (IPQ). [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• CEN/CT 115(LNEC) (2017) NP EN 1998-3:2017: Eurocódigo 8 — Projeto de estruturas para resistência aos sismos — Parte 3: Avaliação e reabilitação de edifícios, European Committee for Standardization/Comissão Técnica 115 (Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil), Instituto Português da Qualidade (IPQ). [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., D. P. Clough, and R. W. Clough. 1973. Earthquake resistance of buildings with a ‘soft’ first storey. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1 (4):347–55. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290010405.
   Google Scholar
• Corbusier, L. 1923. Vers une Architecture, Collection de “L’esprit nouveau”. Paris, France: G. Crès et Cie.
   Google Scholar
• Crisafulli, F. J. (1997), “Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Masonry Infills”. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, F., G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2014. Eurocode-based seismic assessment of modern heritage RC structures: The case of the Tower of the Nations in Naples (Italy). Engineering Structures 74:96–110. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusicka, P., and J. Tinker. 2013. Global restraint in ultra-lightweight buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Composites for Construction 17 (1):139–50. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. 2000. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra 16 (3):573–93. doi:10.1193/1.1586128.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R., A. C. Ferro, J. Proença, and A. Gago. 2021. Aluminum alloys for hysteretic dissipative devices: mechanical characterization. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 30 (1):10.1007/s11665-021-05847-5. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-05847-5.
   Google Scholar
• Fintel, M., and F. R. Khan. 1969. Shock absorbing soft story concept for multistory earthquake structure. Journal of the American Concrete Institute 66:381–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fip Industriale (2006), Strutture prefabbricate com controventi dissipativi: l’esempio del nuovo polo didattico della Facoltá di Ingegnaria dell’Università Politecnica delle Marche di Ancona. Fip Industriale Report, Padova, Italy. [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, A. Costa, and A. Tostões (2008), “Restauro ou conservação no reforço sísmico da unidade tipo A da Avenida Infante Santo”. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Defects and Repair (CINPAR 2008), Aveiro, Portugal, June. [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Foti, D. 2014. Shear vulnerability of historical reinforced-concrete structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (4):453–67. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.800920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2016. Evaluation of different strengthening techniques’ efficiency for a soft storey building. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 1–18. doi:10.1080/19648189.2015.1119064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, A., and P. E. Pinto. 1970. Il comportamento del cemento armato per sollecitazioni cicliche di forte intensità. Giornale del Genio Civile 108:391–408. in Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, M., Z. Zuo, X. Wang, X. Lu, and L. Xie. 2019. Comparing seismic performances of pilotis and bare RC frame structures by shaking table tests. Engineering Structures 199 (2):109442. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109442.
   Google Scholar
• Green, N. B. 1935. Flexible first story construction for earthquake resistance. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 100 (1):645–74. doi:10.1061/TACEAT.0004638.
   Google Scholar
• Guevara-Perez, T. (2012), ““Soft Story” and “Weak Story” in Earthquake Resistant Design: A Multidisciplinary Approach”. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, September.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, L. S. 1938. Effects of a flexible first storey in a building located on vibrating ground. In S. Timoshenko 60th Anniversary Volume, 93–103. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, M. Z., and P. Shadan (2011), “Seismic Performance of 3D-Panel Wall on Piloti RC Frame Using Shaking Table Equipment”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011, Leuven, Belgium, July.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, M. Z., P. Shadan, and H. Kabir. 2018. A numerical and experimental study on the dynamical behavior of 3D-Panel Wall on Piloti RC Frame. International Journal of Structural Integrity 9(6): doi:10.1108/IJSI-09-2017-0053. 00-00.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai, K., Y. Fu, and A. Watanabe. 1998. Passive control systems for seismic damage mitigation. J Struct Eng-ASCE 124 (5):501–12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(501).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbach, R. 2007. From “Opus Craticium” to the “Chicago Frame”: Earthquake-Resistant Traditional Construction. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1 (1):29–59. doi:10.1080/15583050601125998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., L. Zhou, and C. -L. Wang. 2016. Low-cycle fatigue testing of a novel aluminum alloy buckling-restrained brace. Key Engineering Materials 710:345–50. https://www.scientific.net/doi:10.4028/KEM.710.345.
   Google Scholar
• Mahin, S. A., V. V. Bertero, A. K. Chopra, and R. G. Collins (1976), “Response of the Olive View hospital main building during the san fernando earthquake”, Report No. EERC 76-22, Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 114 (8):1804–26. 1804-1826.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel, R. R. 1929. The effects of earthquakes on buildings with a flexible first story. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 19 (3):167–78. doi:10.1785/BSSA0190030167.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Rueda, J., and A. Elnashai. 1997. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Materials and Structures 30 (3):139–47. doi:10.1007/BF02486385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto (1973), “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R. C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending”. Preliminary report, IABSE Symposium, IABSE Reports, Vol. 13, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, F. (1990), “Influência das Paredes de Alvenaria no Comportamento de Estruturas Reticuladas de Betão Armado Sujeitas a Ações Horizontais”. Specialist Thesis (eq. PhD Thesis), Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC), Lisbon. [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, V. (2021), “Avaliação da Vulnerabilidade Sísmica de Estruturas de Edifícios com “Pilotis””, MSc Dissertation, Instituto Superior Técnico – University of Lisbon, Lisbon. [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., J. Fonseca, A. Costa, H. Varum, and A. Tostões (2005), “Seismic vulnerability of Modern Architecture building’s -Le Corbusier style: A case study”. Proceedings of the International Conference on the 250th Anniversary of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake, Lisbon, Portugal, November.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2008. A non-linear masonry infill macro-model to represent the global behaviour of buildings under cyclic loading. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design 4 (2):123–35. doi:10.1007/s10999-008-9070-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblueth, E., and R. Meli. 1986. The 1985 earthquake: Causes and effects in Mexico City. Concrete International 8 (5):23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, S., and R. Diederich. 1989. The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—The Seismic Performance of Buildings with Weak First Storey. Earthquake Spectra 5 (1):89–102. doi:10.1193/1.1585512.
   Google Scholar
• Santhi, M. H., G. Knight, and K. Muthumani. 2005. Evaluation of seismic response of soft-storey infilled frames. Computers and Concrete 2 (6):423–37. doi:10.12989/cac.2005.2.6.423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. (2004). SeismoStruct – a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures [online]. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.compossiblyin2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. (2021), “SeismoStruct 2021 – a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures”, available from https://seismosoft.com/
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V. P., and D. C. Rai (2014), “Aluminum Buckling-Restrained braces for seismic resistance of truss moment frames”. Proceedings of the 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, 10NCEE, Anchorage, US, July. NCEE 2014. 10.4231/D3JS9H83P
   Google Scholar
• Smyrou, E., C. Blandon, S. Antoniou, R. Pinho, and F. Crisafulli. 2011. Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (5):1519–34. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9262-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorace, S., and G. Terenzi. 2013. Structural assessment of a modern heritage building. Engineering Structures 49:743–55. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terenzi, G., E. Fuso, S. Sorace, and I. Costoli. 2020. Enhanced seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete building of architectural interest. Buildings 10 (11):211. doi:10.3390/buildings10110211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usami, T., C. -L. Wang, and J. Funayama. 2012. Developing high‐performance aluminum alloy buckling‐restrained braces based on series of low‐cycle fatigue tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (4):643–61. doi:10.1002/eqe.1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigh, L., Á. Zsarnóczay, and T. Balogh. 2017. Eurocode conforming design of BRBF – Part I: Proposal for codification. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 135:265–76. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. -L., T. Usami, J. Funayama, and F. Imase. 2013. Low-cycle fatigue testing of extruded aluminium alloy buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures 46:294–301. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeris, C., S. Mahin, and V. Bertero (1986), “Analysis of the seismic performance of the imperial county services building”. Proceedings of the Third U. S. National Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Charleston, North Carolina, US, August.
   Google Scholar
• Zeris, C., and A. Scodeggio (2016), “An Investigation of the inelastic response of RC pilotis systems”. Proceedings of the 17th Hellenic Concrete Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, November.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., S. Hetian, Y. Cao, and E. Lui. 2021. Application of buckling-restrained braces to earthquake-resistant design of buildings: A review. Engineering Structures 246(5): doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112991. 112991. 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Zsarnóczay, Á., V. Budaházy, L. Vigh, and L. Dunai. 2013. Cyclic hardening criteria in EN 15129 for steel dissipative braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 83:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar