Comparative analysis of sorghum (C4) and rice (C3) plant headspace volatiles induced by artificial herbivory

References

• Bruce TJA. Interplay between insects and plants: dynamic and complex interactions that have coevolved over millions of years but act in milliseconds. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(2):455–10. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wari D, Aboshi T, Shinya T, Galis I. Integrated view of plant metabolic defense with particular focus on chewing herbivores. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64:449–475. doi:10.1111/jipb.13204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezerra RHS, Sousa-Souto L, Santana AEG, Ambrogi BG, Bezerra. Indirect plant defenses: volatile organic compounds and extrafloral nectar. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2021;15(4):467–489. doi:10.1007/s11829-021-09837-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare JD. Ecological role of volatiles produced by plants in response to damage by herbivorous insects. In: Berenbaum M, Carde R Robinson G editors. Annual Review of Entomology, 2011 Vol. 56. pp. 161–180. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144753
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Erb M, Kanyuka K, Hammond-Kosack K. Volatile uptake, transport, perception, and signaling shape a plant’s nose. Essays Biochem. 2022;66(5):695–702. doi:10.1042/ebc20210092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce TJA, Pickett JA. Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects – Finding the right mix. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(13):1605–1611. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takabayashi J, Shiojiri K. Multifunctionality of herbivory-induced plant volatiles in chemical communication in tritrophic interactions. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019;32:110–117. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2019.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimura GI, Köpke S, Kunert M, Volpe V, David A, Brand P, Dabrowska P, Maffei ME, Boland W. Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves: IV. Diurnal and nocturnal damage differentially initiate plant volatile emission. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(3):965–973. doi:10.1104/pp.107.111088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo Y, Schuman MC, Goldberg JK, Kim SG, Yon F, Brutting C, Baldwin IT, Rasmann S. Herbivore-induced volatile blends with both “fast” and “slow” components provide robust indirect defence in nature. Funct Ecol. 2018;32(1):136–149. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou S, Jander G, Ort D. Molecular ecology of plant volatiles in interactions with insect herbivores. J Exp Bot. 2022;73(2):449–462. doi:10.1093/jxb/erab413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamiru A, Khan ZR. Volatile semiochemical mediated plant defense in cereals: A novel strategy for crop protection. Agronomy. 2017;7(3):58. doi:10.3390/agronomy7030058.
   Google Scholar
• Block AK, Hunter CT, Rering C, Christensen SA, Meagher RL, Block. Contrasting insect attraction and herbivore-induced plant volatile production in maize. Planta. 2018;248(1):105–116. doi:10.1007/s00425-018-2886-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujiono K, Tohi T, Sobhy IS, Hojo Y, Shinya T, Galis I. Herbivore-induced and constitutive volatiles are controlled by different oxylipin-dependent mechanisms in rice. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2021;44(8):2687–2699. doi:10.1111/pce.14126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwanze KF, Nwilene FE. Interactions of host plant resistance and biological control of stem borers in sorghum. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2011;18(3):261–266. doi:10.1017/S174275840002350X.
   Google Scholar
• Perumal R, et al. Sorghum breeding for biotic stress tolerance. In: Roney B editors. Achieving sustainable cultivation of sorghum, Volume 1: genetics, breeding and production techniques. Sawston: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing; 2018pp. 189–226.
   Google Scholar
• Osinde C, Sakamoto W, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Sobhy IS, Tugume AK, Nsubuga AM, Galis I. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with sorghum susceptibility to Asian stem borer damage. J Plant Interact. 2023;18(1). doi:10.1080/17429145.2022.2153182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andama JB, Mujiono K, Hojo Y, Shinya T, Galis I. Non-glandular silicified trichomes are essential for rice defense against chewing herbivores. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2020;43(9):2019–2032. doi:10.1111/pce.13775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang XF, Köllner TG, Zhao N, Li G, Jiang Y, Zhu L, Ma J, Degenhardt J, Chen F. Dynamic evolution of herbivore-induced sesquiterpene biosynthesis in sorghum and related grass crops. Plant J. 2012;69(1):70–80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04771.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui H, Cui H C. Challenges and approaches to crop improvement through C3-to-C4 engineering. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:715391. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.715391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burow GB, Klein RR, Franks CD, Klein PE, Schertz KF, Pederson GA, Xin Z, Burke JJ. Registration of the BTx623/IS3620C recombinant inbred mapping population of sorghum. J Plant Regist. 2011;5(1):141–145. doi:10.3198/jpr2010.04.0219crmp.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiya-Kanegae H, Takanashi H, Fujimoto M, Ishimori M, Ohnishi N, Wacera W. F, Omollo EA, Kobayashi M, Yano K, Nakano M, et al. RAD-seq-based high-density linkage map construction and QTL mapping of biomass-related traits in sorghum using the Japanese landrace Takakibi NOG. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020;61(7):1262–1272. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcaa056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebiyau J, Arach T, Serunjogi LK. Commercialisation of sorghum in Uganda. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc. 2005;7:695–696.
   Google Scholar
• Alamgir KM, Hojo Y, Christeller JT, Fukumoto K, Isshiki R, Shinya T, Baldwin IT, Galis I. Systematic analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) metabolic responses to herbivory. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2016;39(2):453–466. doi:10.1111/pce.12640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinya T, Hojo Y, Desaki Y, Christeller JT, Okada K, Shibuya N, Galis I. Modulation of plant defense responses to herbivores by simultaneous recognition of different herbivore-associated elicitors in rice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):32537. doi:10.1038/srep32537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobhy IS, Erb M, Sarhan AA, El-Husseini MM, Mandour NS, Turlings TCJ. Less is more: Treatment with BTH and laminarin reduces herbivore-induced volatile emissions in maize but increases parasitoid attraction. J Chem Ecol. 2012;38(4):348–360. doi:10.1007/s10886-012-0098-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stork W, Diezel C, Halitschke R, Galis I, Baldwin IT, Holm M. An Ecological analysis of the herbivory-elicited JA burst and its metabolism: Plant memory processes and predictions of the moving target model. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobhy IS, Miyake A, Shinya T, Galis I. Oral secretions affect HIPVs induced by generalist (Mythimna loreyi) and specialist (Parnara guttata) herbivores in rice. J Chem Ecol. 2017;43(9):929–943. doi:10.1007/s10886-017-0882-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong J, Soufan O, Li C, Caraus I, Li S, Bourque G, Wishart DS, Xia J. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W486–W494. doi:10.1093/nar/gky310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R-Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Guo H, Jiao YN, Tan X, Wang XY, Huang XZ, Jin HZ, Paterson AH. Gene duplication and genetic innovation in cereal genomes. Genome Res. 2019;29(2):261–269. doi:10.1101/gr.237511.118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature. 2009;457(7229):551–556. doi:10.1038/nature07723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventelon M, Deu M, Garsmeur O, Doligez A, Ghesquière A, Lorieux M, Rami JF, Glaszmann JC, Grivet L. A direct comparison between the genetic maps of sorghum and rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102(2–3):379–386. doi:10.1007/s001220051657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter A, Schaff C, Zhang Z, Lipka AE, Tian F, Köllner TG, Schnee C, Preiß S, Irmisch S, Jander G, et al. Characterization of biosynthetic pathways for the production of the volatile homoterpenes DMNT and TMTT in Zea mays. Plant Cell. 2016;28(10):2651–2665. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujiono K, Tohi T, Sobhy IS, Hojo Y, Ho NT, Shinya T, Galis I. Ethylene functions as a suppressor of volatile production in rice. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(20):6491–6511. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao CC, Du LX, Liu QS, Hu XY, Ye WF, Turlings TCJ, Li YH. Stemborer-induced rice plant volatiles boost direct and indirect resistance in neighboring plants. New Phytol. 2022;237(6):2375–2387. doi:10.1111/nph.18548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage RF, Sage TL, Kocacinar F. Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. In: Merchant S editor. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012 Vol. 63. pp. 19–47. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511
   Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Guo LY, Li YX, Wang Z. Systematic comparison of C3 and C4 plants based on metabolic network analysis. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6(Suppl 2):S9. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-6-s2-s9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng SY, Ashraf U, Nawaz M, Abbas G, Tang XR, Mo ZW. Water and nitrogen management at the booting stage affects yield, grain quality, nutrient uptake, and use efficiency of fragrant rice under the agro-climatic conditions of South China. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:907231. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.907231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinemets U, Reichstein M. Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: A sensitivity analysis. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2003a;108(D7):4211. doi:10.1029/2002jd002626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinemets U, Reichstein M. Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: Differential sensitivity of emission rates to stomatal closure explained. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2003b;108(D7):4208. doi:10.1029/2002jd002620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp AK. Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses - consequence of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology. 1993;74(1):113–123. doi:10.2307/1939506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxman TE, Monson RK. Stomatal responses of C3, C3-C4 and C4 Flaveria species to light and intercellular CO2 concentration: implications for the evolution of stomatal behaviour. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2003;26(2):313–322. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00964.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SH, Hulme SP, Rees M, Ripley BS, Woodward FI, Osborne CP. Ecophysiological traits in C3 and C4 grasses: a phylogenetically controlled screening experiment. New Phytol. 2010;185(3):780–791. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03102.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SH, Franks PJ, Hulme SP, Spriggs E, Christin PA, Edwards EJ, Woodward FI, Osborne CP. Photosynthetic pathway and ecological adaptation explain stomatal trait diversity amongst grasses. New Phytol. 2012;193(2):387–396. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03935.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He ZH, Webster S, He SY. Growth–defense trade-offs in plants. Curr Biol. 2022;32(12):R634–R639. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot B, Yao J, Montgomery BL, He SY. Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol Plant. 2014;7(8):1267–1287. doi:10.1093/mp/ssu049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninkuu V, Zhang L, Yan JP, Fu ZC, Yang TF, Zeng HM. Biochemistry of terpenes and recent advances in plant protection. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5710. doi:10.3390/ijms22115710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner T, Eisner M, Aneshansley DJ, Wu CL, Meinwald J. Chemical defense of the mint plant, Teucrium marum (Labiatae). Chemoecol. 2000;10(4):211–216. doi:10.1007/pl00001825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhu J, Zhang P, Han L, Reynolds OL, Zeng R, Wu J, Shao Y, You M, Gurr GM, et al. Silicon supplementation alters the composition of herbivore induced plant volatiles and enhances attraction of parasitoids to infested rice plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1265. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widhalm JR, Jaini R, Morgan JA, Dudareva N. Rethinking how volatiles are released from plant cells. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(9):545–550. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleadow RM, McKinley BA, Blomstedt CK, Lamb AC, Moller BL, Mullet JE. Regulation of dhurrin pathway gene expression during Sorghum bicolor development. Planta. 2021;254(6):119. doi:10.1007/s00425-021-03774-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andiku C, Shimelis H, Shayanowako AIT, Gangashetty PI, Manyasa E. Genetic diversity analysis of East African sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) germplasm collections for agronomic and nutritional quality traits. Heliyon. 2022;8(6):e09690. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavithamani D, Yuvaraja A, Selvi B. Principal component analysis and grouping of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) gene pool for genetic diversity. Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(4):1426–1434. doi:10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00182.0.
   Google Scholar
• Lwande W, Bentley MD. Volatiles of Sorghum bicolor seedlings. J Nat Prod. 1987;50(5):950–952. doi:10.1021/np50053a034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmaja PG, Woodcock CM, Bruce TJA. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of sorghum shoot fly, Atherigona soccata, to sorghum volatiles. J Chem Ecol. 2010;36(12):1346–1353. doi:10.1007/s10886-010-9882-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin ZJ, Li XW, Bian L, Sun XL. Tea green leafhopper, Empoasca vitis, chooses suitable host plants by detecting the emission level of (3Z)-hexenyl acetate. Bull Entomol Res. 2017;107(1):77–84. doi:10.1017/s000748531600064x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgarella C, Berger A, Glemin S, David J, Terrier N, Deu M, Pot D. The road to sorghum domestication: Evidence from nucleotide diversity and gene expression patterns. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:666075. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.666075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006;127(7):1309–1321. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanksley SD, McCouch SR. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science. 1997;277(5329):1063–1066. doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper EA, Brenton ZW, Flinn BS, Jenkins J, Shu S, Flowers D, Luo F, Wang Y, Xia P, Barry K, et al. A new reference genome for Sorghum bicolor reveals high levels of sequence similarity between sweet and grain genotypes: implications for the genetics of sugar metabolism. BMC Genom. 2019;20(1):420. doi:10.1186/s12864-019-5734-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ali AN, Wright MG. Response of Trichogramma papilionis to semiochemicals induced by host oviposition on plants. Biol Control. 2021;154:104510. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao HQ, Li Z, Leng C, Lu C, Luo H, Liu Y, Wu X, Liu Z, Shang L, Jing H-C, et al. Sorghum breeding in the genomic era: opportunities and challenges. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(7):1899–1924. doi:10.1007/s00122-021-03789-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar