MWCNTs Alleviated saline-alkali stress by optimizing photosynthesis and sucrose metabolism in rice seedling

References

• Deinlein U, Stephan AB, Horie T, Luo W, Xu GH, Schroeder JI. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(6):371–13. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HT, Wang X, Liu L, Gao YH, Mu DP, Chen YD. Effects of carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes, mixed salt, and their combination on physiological characteristics of Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Sci J. 2019;37(4):540–550. doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.40540.
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Zhang GX, Zheng FC, Cao Y. Research progress in plant salt stress response. Mol Plant Breed. 2018;16(9):3006–3015. doi:10.13271/j.mpb.016.003006.
   Google Scholar
• Li XB, Li HS, Zhang ZM, Chen GK. Research progress on salt-stress in rice. Guangdong Agric Sci. 2014;41(12):6–11. doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2014.12.019.
   Google Scholar
• Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(5):295–300. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue QQ, Han BB, Wu XQ, Li P, Li YY, Wu QY. Application and prospective of nanomaterials in crop research. Curr Biotechnol. 2020;10(6):655–660. doi:10.19586/j.2095-2341.2020.0118.
   Google Scholar
• Peng YQ, Chen LL, Zhu L, Cui LJ, Yang L, Wu HH, Bie ZL. CsAKT1is a key gene for CeO2 nanoparticles improved cucumber salt tolerance: a validation from CRISPR-Cas9 lines. Environ Sci: Nano. 2022;9(12):4367–81. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1734803/v1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Chen L, Gu J, Ma H, Wu H. Carbon-Based nanomaterials for sustainable agriculture: their application as light converters, nanosensors, and delivery tools. Plants. 2022;11(4):511. doi:10.3390/plants11040511.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LL, Peng YQ, Zhu L, Huang Y, Bie ZL, Wu HH. CeO2 nanoparticles improved cucumber salt tolerance is associated with its induced early stimulation on antioxidant system. Chemosphere. 2022;299:299. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HH, Li ZH. Nano-enabled agriculture: How do nanoparticles cross barriers in plants? Plant Commun. 2022;3(6):100346. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li ZQ, Zhu L, Zhao FM, Li JQ, Zhang X, Kong XJ, Wu HH, Zhang ZY. Plant salinity stress response and nano-enabled plant salt tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:843994. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.843994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj SN, Anooj ES, Rajendran K, Vallinayagam S. A comprehensive review on regulatory invention of nano pesticides in Agricultural nano formulation and food system. J Mol Struct. 2021;1239(2):130517. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130517.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi S, Pourmadadi M, Yazdian F, Ghadami A. The synthesis and characterization of targeted delivery curcumin using chitosan-magnetite-reduced graphene oxide as nano-carrier. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;1(186):554–562. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.184.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JH, Li GJ, Chen LL, Gu JJ, Li ZH. Cerium oxide nanoparticles improve cotton salt tolerance by enabling better ability to maintain cytosolic K+/Na+ ratio. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19(1):153. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00892-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Tito N, Giraldo JP. Anionic cerium oxide nanoparticles protect plant photosynthesis from abiotic stress by scavenging reactive oxygen species. Acs Nano. 2017;11(11):11283–11297. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volder MD, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Sci. 2013;339(6119):535–539. doi:10.1126/science.1222453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanabe F, Biris AS. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. Acs Nano. 2012;6(8):3221–3227. doi:10.1021/nn302965w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari DK, Dasgupta-Schubert N, Villaseñor Cendejas LM, Villegas J, Carreto Montoya L, Borjas García SE. Interfacing carbon nanotubes (CNT) with plants: enhancement of growth, water and ionic nutrient uptake in maize (zea mays) and implications for nanoagriculture. Appl Nanosci. 2014;4(5):577–591. doi:10.1007/s13204-013-0236-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiani MH, Chen J, Irin F, Puretzky AA, Green MJ, Khodakovskaya MV. Interaction of carbon nanohorns with plants: uptake and biological effects. Carbon. 2015;81:607–619. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen DV, Nguyen HM, Le NT, Nguyen KH, Ha CV. Copper nanoparticle application enhances plant growth and grain yield in maize under drought stress conditions. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00344-021-10301-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raliya R, Biswas P, Tarafdar JC. TiO2 nanoparticle biosynthesis and its physiological effect on mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Biotechnol Reports. 2015;5:22–26. doi:10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Cao C, Huang J, Wang N, Yan CN, Peng C. Impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on seed germination of wetland plant. J Southeast Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2017;47(2):5. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.02.035.
   Google Scholar
• Cañas JE, Long M, Nations S, Vadan R, Dai L, Luo MX, Ambikapathi R, Lee EH, Olszyk D. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Enviro Toxic Chem. 2008;27(9):1922–1931. doi:10.1897/08-117.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wu F, Fang Q, Wu Z, Duan QY, Li XD, Ye WL. The mutual effects of graphene oxide nanosheets and cadmium on the growth，cadmium uptake and accumulation in rice. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2020;147:289–294. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Hong FS, Lu SP, Liu C. Effect of Nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. BTER. 2005;104(1):083–092. doi:10.1385/BTER:104:1:083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakovskaya MV, Kim BS, Kim JN, Alimohammadi M, Dervishi E, Mustafa T, Cernigla CE. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small. 2013;9(1):115–123. doi:10.1002/smll.201201225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey A, Basu R, Das S, Nandy P. Beneficial role of carbon nanotubes on mustard plant growth: An agricultural prospect. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13(10):4519–4528. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0406-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Yu F, Hu LJ, Sun LF. Recent progresses on the new condensed forms of single-walled carbon nanotubes and energy-harvesting devices. Chin Sci Bull. 2012;57(2–3):181–186. doi:10.1007/s11434-011-4818-z.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Zhao JB, Gong JM, Wem LL, Zhou L. New Multifunctional Porous materials Based on Inorganic–organic Hybrid single-walled carbon nanotubes: gas storage and high-sensitive detection of pesticides. Chem A Eur J. 2012;18(37):11804–11810. doi:10.1002/chem.201200383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi-Maleh H, Tahernejad-Javazmi F, Atar N, Mehmet Lütfi Yola ML, Gupta VK, Ensafi AA. A novel DNA biosensor Based on a pencil graphite electrode modified with Polypyrrole/functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes for determination of 6-mercaptopurine anticancer drug. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54(14):3634–3639. doi:10.1021/ie504438z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum P, Ikhtiari R, Fugetsu B. Potential impact of multi-walled carbon nanotubes exposure to the seedling stage of selected plant species. Nanomater Basel. 2014;4(2):203–221. doi:10.3390/nano4020203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrakchi M, Helali S, Camino JS, Soto J, Miguel C, Gonzalez-Martinez A, Abdelghani A, Hamdi M. Improvement of a pesticide immunosensor performance using site-directed antibody immobilisation and carbon nanotubes. Int J Nanotechnol. 2013;10(5–6–7):496–507. doi:10.1504/ijnt.2013.053519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Su YL, Chen Y, Li M, Huang H. The effects of carbon nanotubes on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from real wastewater in the activated sludge system. RSC Adv. 2014;4(86):45953–45959. doi:10.1039/c4ra04128c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y, Kumar DS. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci. 2010;179(3):154–163. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjiv S, Sung-Hoon A, Versha K. Nanotechnology and its impact on food and nutrition: a review. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2012;4(1):8–18. doi:10.2174/1876142911204010008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu HT, Wang X, Liu L, Gao YH, Mu DP, Chen YD. Effects of carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes, mixed salt, and their combination on physiological characteristics of Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Sci J. 2019;37(4):540–550. doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.40540.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Dai HF, Tang FX, Zhang J, Xu TT, Liu HY. Responses of growth and physiology of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling roots to MWCNTs-COOH combined with cd stress. Chinese J Ecol. 2020;39(1):252–259. doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202001.006.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cook JH, Gomez KA. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Dong L, Li L, Meng Y, Liu H, Li J, Yu Y, Qian C, Wei S, Gu W. Exogenous Spermidine Optimizes Nitrogen Metabolism and Improves Maize Yield under Drought Stress Conditions. Agriculture. 2022;12(8):1270. doi:10.3390/agriculture12081270.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Cao LY, Guo YH, Cheng SH. Correlation analysis and QTL mapping of some physiological traits related to drought resistance in rice. Chinese Jof Rice Sci. 2008;22(5):477–484. doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2008.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Wang WC Relationship between rice water status and heat resistance and its mechanisms [ Doctor’s Thesis]. Wuhan, China: Huazhong Agricultural University; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A. Root architecture and hydraulic conductance in nutrient deprived Pistacia lentiscus L. seedlings. Oecologia. 2012;170(4):899–908. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2380-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang YL The mechanism and effects of controlled root-divided alternative irrigation on nutrient uptake of maize [ Master’s Thesis]. Yangling, China: Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry Technology; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Nawata E, Hosokawa M, Domae Y, Sakuratani T. Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mung bean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Sci. 2002;163(1):117–123. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00080-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui LN, Gao RQ, Sun AQ, Dong ST, Zhang HY. Regularity of carotenoids and anthocyanins accumulation in various genotypes of maize kernel. Acta Agron Sin. 2010;36(5):818–825. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00818.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng LL. Xanthophyll cycle pool size and composition in relation to the nitrogen content of apple leaves. J Exp Bot. 2003;54(381):385–393. doi:10.1093/jxb/erg011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayre RT, Kennedy RA. Photosynthetic enzyme activities and localization in Mollugo verticillata populations differing in the levels of C3 and C4 cycle operation. Plant Physiol. 1979;64(2):293–299. doi:10.1104/pp.64.2.293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobu R, Dash GK, Lal JP, Swain P, Mahender A, Anandan A, Ali J. Unlocking the nexus between leaf-level water use efficiency and root traits together with gas exchange measurements in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants. 2022;11(9):1270. doi:10.3390/plants11091270.
   Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Liu S, Xiong D, Xiong Z, Zhang Z, Wang F, Huang J. Genome-wide association study for non-photochemical quenching traits in Oryza sativa L. Agronomy. 2022;12(12):3216. doi:10.3390/agronomy12123216.
   Google Scholar
• Li LJ Mitigation Effect and Regulation Mechanism of Exogenous Spermidine (Spd) on Maize under Drought Stress [ Doctor’s Thesis]. Harbin, China: Northeast Agricultural University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Sun Y, Yan F, Li Y, Wu Y, Guo C, Ma P, Yang G, Yang Z, Ma J. Coordinating postanthesis carbon and nitrogen metabolism of hybrid rice through different irrigation and nitrogen regimes. Agronomy. 2020;10(8):1187. doi:10.3390/agronomy10081187.
   Google Scholar
• Peng L, Chen G, Tu Y, Wang J, Lan Y, Hu M, Li C, He X, Li T. Effects of phosphorus application rate on lipid synthesis and eating quality of two rice grains. Agriculture. 2022;12(5):667. doi:10.3390/agriculture12050667.
   Google Scholar
• Meng Y Mitigation Effect and Physiological and Ecological Regulation Mechanism of Exogenous Hemin on Maize Seedling under Cadmium Stress and Field Validation Research [ Doctor’s Thesis]. Harbin, China: Northeast Agricultural University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kane NA, Danyluk J, Tardif G, Ouellet F, Jean-François Laliberté JF, Limin AE, Fowler DB, Sarhan F. TaVRT-2, a member of the StMADS-11 clade of flowering repressors, is regulated by vernalization and photoperiod in wheat. Plant Physiol. 2005;138(4):2354–2363. doi:10.1104/pp.105.061762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LJ, Cang J, Yu J, Wang X, Huang R, Wang JF, Lu BW. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on carbohydrate metabolism and the expression levels of correlative key enzymes in winter wheat under low temperature. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77(3):516–525. doi:10.1271/bbb.120752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmig-Adams B, Adams BB. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu Rev Plant Phys. 1992;43(1):599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.003123.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JX, Wang X, Li BP. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide donor on photosynthesis and xanthophyll cycle of peganum multisectum seedlings under NaCl stress. J Desert Res. 2011;31:137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuda T, Watanabe M, Ohshima K, Norinobu S, Choi SW, Ka-Wakishi S, Osawa T. Antioxidative activity of the anthocyanin pigments cyanidin 3-O-.Beta.-D-Glucoside and cyanidin. J Agr Food Chem. 1994;42(11):2407–2410. doi:10.1021/jf00047a009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attaran E, Major IT, Cruz JA, Rosa BA, Koo AJK, Chen J, Kramer DM, He SY, Howe SY. G.A. Temporal dynamics of growth and photosynthesis suppression in response to jasmonate signaling. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(3):1302–1314. doi:10.1104/pp.114.239004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monica RC, Cremonini R. Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia, Caryologia Firenze. 2009;62(2):161–165. doi:10.1080/00087114.2004.10589681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli V, Cellot G, Toma FM, Long CS, Caldwell JH, Zentilin L, Giacca M, Turco A, Prato M, Ballerini L. Carbon nanotubes promote growth and spontaneous electrical activity in cultured cardiac myocytes. Nano Lett. 2012;12(4):1831–1838. doi:10.1021/nl204064s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ken D, Robert A, Lang T, Vicki S, Rodger D, Gavin F, Andrew A. Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci Off J Soci Toxicol. 2006;92(1):5–22. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnab M, Sanghamitra M, Servin AD, Luca P, Parkash DO, White JC. Carbon nanomaterials in agriculture: a critical review. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:770. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum P, Ikhtiari R, Fugetsu B. Graphene phytotoxicity in the seedling stage of cabbage, tomato, red spinach, and lettuce. Carbon. 2011;49(12):3907–3919. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XP, Han HY, Liu XQ, Gu XX, Chen K, Lu DG. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes can enhance root elongation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants. J Nanopart Res. 2012;14(6):841–850. doi:10.1007/s11051-012-0841-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakovskaya MV, Kim BS, Kim JN, Nam J, Mohammad K, Enkeleda A, Thikra D, Carl M, Cernigla E. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, Reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small. 2012;9(1):115–123. doi:10.1002/smll.201201225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang YM, Liu Q, Zhao YQ, Liu QD, Wang F, Hua ZT. Effects of carbon nanotubes on seed germination and root growth of rice. Hubei Agric Sci. 2014;5:1010–1012. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2014.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Hu R, Chen Z, Chen L, Zhang J, Wu X, Li JB, Gao Y, Yang ST, Wang H. Phytotoxicity of VO2 nanoparticles with different sizes to pea seedlings. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2022;242:113885. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakovskaya MV, De SK, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarcia H. Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. Acs Nano. 2012;6(3):2128–2135. doi:10.1021/nn204643g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañas JE, Long M, Nations S, Vadan R, Dai L, Luo MX, Ambikapathi R, Lee EH, Olszyk D. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27(9):1922–1931. doi:10.1897/08-117.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao JL, Feng YZ, Lin XG. Review of researches on influences of engineered nanomaterials on plant microorganisms. Acta Pedologica Sin. 2016;53(1):1–11. doi:10.11766/trxb201506110191.
   Google Scholar
• Cao ZM, Stowers C, Rossi L, Zhang W, Lombardini L, Ma XM. Physiological effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the photosynthesis and water use efficiency of soybean (glycine max (L.) Merr.). Environ Sci: Nano. 2017;4(5):1086–1094. doi:10.1039/c7en00015d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam P, Priyanka N, Manikandan K, Ganeshbabu I, Indiraarulselvi P, Geetha N, Muralikrishna K, Bhattacharya RC, Tiwari M, Sharma N, et al. Enhanced plant growth promoting role of phycomolecules coated zinc oxide nanoparticles with P supplementation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;110:118–127. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu XH, Sun DQ, Zhang XM, Hu HG, Kong LX, Rookes JE, Xie JG, Cahill DM. Stimulation of photosynthesis and enhancement of growth and yield in phyllanthus thaliana treated with amine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2020;156:566–577. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MH, Whaib IMHA, Faisal M, Sahli AAA. Nano‐silicon dioxide mitigates the adverse effects of salt stress on Cucurbita pepo L. Enviro Toxic Chem. 2015;33(11):2429–2437. doi:10.1002/etc.2697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik WA, Mahmood I, Razzaq A, Afzal M, Shah GA, Iqbal A, Zain M, Ditta A, Asad SA, Ahmad I, et al. Exploring potential of copper and silver nano particles to establish efficient callogenesis and regeneration system for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). GM Crops & Food. 2021;12(1):564–585. doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.1917975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa MVJ, Sharma PK. Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica. 2016;54(1):110–119. doi:10.1007/s11099-015-0167-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajjadi M, Dadashi J. Pd-based nanoparticles: plant-assisted biosynthesis, characterization, mechanism, stability, catalytic and antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;276:102103. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2020.102103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa P. Positive effects of metallic nanoparticles on plants: overview of involved mechanisms. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2021;161(3):12–24. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.039.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH, Mohammad F. Nanotechnology and plant Sciences || plant-Based synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their characterization. 2015. pp. 271–288. 10.1007/978-3-319-14502-0 (Chapter 13). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14502-0_13.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi S, Sarkar S. Influence of water soluble carbon dots on the growth of wheat plant. Appl Nanosci. 2015;5(5):609–616. doi:10.1007/s13204-014-0355-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari DK, Dasgupta-Schubert N, Cendejas LMV, Villegas J, Montoya LC, García SEB. Interfacing carbon nanotubes (CNT) with plants: enhancement of growth, water and ionic nutrient uptake in maize (zea mays) and implications for nanoagriculture. Appl Nanosci. 2014;4(5):577–591. doi:10.1007/s13204-013-0236-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villagarcia H, Dervishi E, Silva KD, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV. Bioresponse to nanotubes: surface chemistry of carbon nanotubes impacts the growth and expression of water channel protein in tomato plants. Small. 2012;8(15):2328–2334. doi:10.1002/smll.201290081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JQ Effects of nano-carbon on growth and nutrient absorption of maize [ Master’s thesis]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Huang J, Lu F, Liu Y, Song YX, Sun YH, Zhong J, Huang H, Wang Y, Li SM, et al. Impacts of carbon dots on rice plants: boosting the growth and improving the disease resistance. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(3):663–672. doi:10.1021/acsabm.8b00345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang JQ, Liu Y, Li CG, Zhang SB, Sun SE, Zhang DY. Application of nanomaterials and related products on rice. Hybrid Rice. 2018;33(3):1–4, 15. doi:10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.20180326.092.
   Google Scholar
• Gui X Bio-effects and mechanisms of several nano-oxide materials [ Doctor’s thesis]. Beijing: China Agricultural University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Liu QL, Chen B, Wang QL, Shi XL, Xiao ZY, Lin JX, Fang XH. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 2009;9(3):1007–1010. doi:10.1021/nl803083u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan XM, Fugetsu B. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes interact with cultured rice cells: evidence of a self-defense response. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2007;3(3):285–288. doi:10.1166/jbn.2007.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan XM, Lin C, Fugetsu B. Studies on toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on suspension rice cells. Carbon. 2009;47(15):3479–3487. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SJ, Reppert J, Hu Q, Hudson JAS, Reid ML, Ratnikova TA, Rao AM, Luo H, Ke PC. Uptake, translocation, and transmission of carbon nanomaterials in rice plants. Small. 2009;5(10):1128–1132. doi:10.1002/smll.200801556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canas JE, Long MQ, Nations S, Lenore RV. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Enviro Toxic Chem. 2008;27(9):1922–1931. doi:10.1897/08-117.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen CX, Zhang QF, Li F, Bi FC, Yao N. Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single-wall carbon nanotubes. Am J Bot. 2010;97(10):1602–1609. doi:10.3732/ajb.1000073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Fugetsu B, Su YB, Watari F. Studies on toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on Arabidopsis T87 suspension cells. J Hazard Mater. 2009;170(2–3):578–583. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakovskaya MV, Silva KD, Nedosekin DA, Dervishi E, Biris AS, Shashkov EV, Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. Complex genetic, photothermal, and photoacoustic analysis of nanoparticle-plant interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;108(3):1028–1033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008856108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez S, Bernales I, Cristobal S. Early response to nanoparticles in the Arabidopsis transcriptome compromises plant defence and root-hair development through salicylic acid signalling. BMC Genom. 2015;16(1):341. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1530-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang F, Hong FS, You WJ, Liu C, Gao FQ, Wu C, Yang P. Influences of nano-anatase TiO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2006;110(2):179–190. doi:10.1385/bter:110:2:179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Liu C, Gao FQ, Su MY, Wu X, Zheng L, Hong FS, Yang P. The improvement of spinach growth by nano-anatase TiO2 treatment is related to nitrogen photoreduction. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007;119(1):77–88. doi:10.1007/s12011-007-0046-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tna B, Rdc D, Nn E, Grf G, Ec H, Ac I, Zr J, Ibb K. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles provoke transient increase in photosynthetic performance and differential response in antioxidant system in Raphanus sativus L. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2020;269:109418. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YD, Liu N, Wang W, Sun JT, Zhu LZ. Photosynthesis and related metabolic mechanism of promoted rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth by TiO2 nanoparticles. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2020;14(6):103. doi:10.1007/s11783-020-1282-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZJ, Liang TB, Chen QS, Hu LW, Zhang YL, Yin QS. The growth and development of plants regulated by carbon nano-materials. Crops. 2017;2:7–13. doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.002.
   Google Scholar