Plant ultrasound detection: a cost-effective method for identifying plant ultrasonic emissions

References

• Milburn JA, Johnson RPC. The conduction of sap: II. Detection of vibrations produced by sap cavitation in ricinus xylem. Planta. 1966;69(1):43–10. doi:10.1007/BF00380209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliano M. Green symphonies: a call for studies on acoustic communication in 510 plants. Behav Ecol. 2012;24(4):789–796. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khait I, Lewin-Epstein O, Sharon R, Sade N, Yovel Y, Hadany L. Sounds emitted by plants under stress are airborne and informative. Cell. 2023;186(7):1328–1336.e10. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuta SB, Lo Gullo MA, Nardini A, Richter H, Salleo S. Ultrasound acoustic emissions from dehydrating leaves of deciduous and evergreen trees. Plant, Cell & Environ. 1997;20(11):1381–1390. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-34.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritman KT, Milburn JA. Acoustic emissions from plants: ultrasonic and audible compared. J Exp Bot. 1988;39(206):1237–1248. doi:10.1093/jxb/39.9.1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyree MT, Dixon MA. Cavitation events in Thuja occidentalis L.? - ultrasonic acoustic emissions from the sapwood can be measured. Plant Physiol. 1983;72(4):1094–1099. doi:10.1104/pp.72.4.1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry JS, Holbrook NM, Zimmermann MH, Tyree MT. Spring filling of xylem vessels in wild grapevine. Plant Physiol. 1987;83(2):414–417. doi:10.1104/pp.83.2.414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr S, Zublasing V. Ultrasonic emissions from conifer xylem exposed to repeated freezing. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167(1):34–40. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElrone AJ, Jackson S, Habdas P. Hydraulic disruption and passive migration by a bacterial pathogen in oak tree xylem. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(10):2649–2657. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabella E, Aprile A, Genga A, Siciliano T, Nutricati E, Nicoli F, Vergine M, Negro C, De Bellis L, Luvisi A. Xylem cavitation susceptibility and refilling mechanisms in olive trees infected by Xylella fastidiosa. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9602. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46092-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yazaki K, Takanashi T, Kanzaki N, Komatsu M, Levia DF, Kabeya D, Tobita H, Kitao M, Ishida A. Pine wilt disease causes cavitation around the resin canals and irrecoverable xylem conduit dysfunction. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(3):589–602. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschimke R, Burger M, Vallen H. Acoustic emission analysis and experiments with physical model systems reveal a peculiar nature of the xylem tension. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163(10):996–1007. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2006.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk HJ, Steppe K, Jansen S. Nanobubbles: a new paradigm for air-seeding in xylem. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(4):199–205. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr S, Rosner S. Cavitation in dehydrating xylem of Picea abies: energy properties of ultrasonic emissions reflect tracheid dimensions. Tree Physiol. 2011;31(1):59–67. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpq099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Chen Z, Kaiser E, Matamoros PM, Steeneken PG, Verbiest GJ. Ultrasound pulse emission spectroscopy method to characterize xylem conduits in plant stems. Research (Washington DC). 2022. doi:10.34133/2022/9790438.
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä T, Vesala T, Nikinmaa E, Perämäki M, Siivola E, Mencuccini M. Field measurements of ultrasonic acoustic emissions and stem diameter variations. New insight into the relationship between xylem tensions and embolism. Tree Physiol. 2005;25(2):237–243. doi:10.1093/treephys/25.2.237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson G, Grace J. Cavitation and water transport in trees. Endeavour. 1994;18(2):50–54. doi:10.1016/0160-9327(94)90062-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oletic D, Rosner S, Zovko M, Bilas V. Time-frequency features of grapevine’s xylem acoustic emissions for detection of drought stress. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;178:105797. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner S. Acoustic emission related to drought stress response of four deciduous broad-leaved woody species. J Acoust Emiss. 2012;30:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sause MGR. Investigation of pencil-lead breaks as acoustic emission sources. J Acoust Emiss. 2011;29:184–196.
   Google Scholar
• Tyree MT, Fiscus EL, Wullschleger SD, Dixon MA. Detection of xylem cavitation in corn under field conditions. Plant Physiol. 1986;82(2):597–599. doi:10.1104/pp.82.2.597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford AP, Grace J. The measurement and interpretation of ultrasound from woody stems. J Exp Bot. 1985;36(163):298–311. doi:10.1093/jxb/36.2.298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomarenko A, Vincent O, Pietriga A, Cochard HÉB, Marmottant P. Ultrasonic emissions reveal individual cavitation bubbles in water-stressed wood. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11(99):20140480. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeynst LL, Sause MGR, Hamstad MA, Steppe K. Deciphering acoustic emission signals in drought stressed branches: the missing link between source and sensor. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:494. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips N, Remedios SW, Nikolaidou A, Baracskai Z, Adamatzky A. No ultrasounds detected from fungi when dehydrated. Ultrasonics. 2023;135:107111. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar