537
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Harsh environmental conditions promote cooperative behavior in an epiphytic fern

, & ORCID Icon
Article: 2335453 | Received 14 Feb 2024, Accepted 21 Mar 2024, Published online: 30 Mar 2024

References

  • Jetz W, Rubenstein DR. Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds. Curr Biol. 2011;21(1):72–5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.075.
  • Cornwallis CK, Botero CA, Rubenstein DR, Downing PA, West SA, Griffin AS. Cooperation facilitates the colonization of harsh environments. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1(3):0057. doi:10.1038/s41559-016-0057.
  • De Gasperin O, Blacher P, Grasso G, Chapuisat M. Winter is coming: harsh environments limit independent reproduction of cooperative-breeding queens in a socially polymorphic ant. Biol Lett. 2020;16(1):20190730. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2019.0730.
  • Shah SS, Rubenstein DR. Group augmentation underlies the evolution of complex sociality in the face of environmental instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(18):e2212211120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2212211120.
  • Rat M, Mathe‐Hubert H, McKechnie AE, Sueur C, Cunningham SJ. Extreme and variable environmental temperatures are linked to reduction of social network cohesiveness in a highly social passerine. Oikos. 2020;129(11):1597–1610. doi:10.1111/oik.07463.
  • Du Plessis MA, Williams JB. Communal cavity roosting in green woodhoopoes: consequences for energy expenditure and the seasonal pattern of mortality. Auk. 1994;111(2):292–299. doi:10.2307/4088594.
  • Hatchwell BJ, Sharp SP, Simeoni M, McGowan A. Factors influencing overnight loss of body mass in the communal roosts of a social bird. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(2):367–372. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01511.x.
  • Le Roux A, Cherry MI, Gygax L, Manser MB. Vigilance behaviour and fitness consequences: comparing a solitary foraging and an obligate group-foraging mammal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009;63(8):1097–1107. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0762-1.
  • Santema P, Clutton-Brock T. Meerkat helpers increase sentinel behaviour and bipedal vigilance in the presence of pups. Anim Behav. 2013;85(3):655–661. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.029.
  • Creel S, Creel NM. Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, lycaon pictus. Anim Behav. 1995;50(5):1325–1339. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80048-4.
  • Stacey PB, Ligon JD. Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat-saturation model of cooperative breeding. Am Nat. 1987;130(5):654–676. doi:10.1086/284737.
  • García-Ruiz I, Quiñones A, Taborsky M. The evolution of cooperative breeding by direct and indirect fitness effects. Sci Adv. 2022;8(21):eabl7853. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl7853.
  • Kingma SA. Social evolution: life is better in groups. Curr Biol. 2023;33(14):R773–R775. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.003.
  • Zotz G. Plants on plants - the biology of vascular epiphytes. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. Vol. 15. p. 282.
  • Burns KC. On the selective advantage of coloniality in staghorn ferns (platycerium bifurcatum, polypodiaceae). Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(11):1961063. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1961063.
  • Burns KC, Hutton I, Shepherd L. Primitive eusociality in a land plant? Ecology. 2021;102(9):e03373. doi:10.1002/ecy.3373.
  • R Core Team. 2021 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Matsuo T, Martínez‐Ramos M, Bongers F, van der Sande MT, Poorter L. Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession. J Ecol. 2021;109(8):2871–2884. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13680.
  • Wu J, Brock J. The invasion of non-native epiphyte platycerium bifurcatum in Auckland’s urban forest canopy. N Z J Ecol. 2023;47:3542. doi:10.20417/nzjecol.47.3542.