Stimulatory effects of smoke solution and biogas digestate slurry application on photosynthesis, growth, and methylation profiling of solanum tuberosum

References

• Rouphael Y, Colla G. Biostimulants in agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:40. Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerssa GW, Hailemariam M, Tadele KT. Improving the sustainability of agriculture: challenges and opportunities. In: Lousada S, editor. Land-Use Management-Recent Advances, New Perspectives, and Applications. Intech Open; 2023. doi:10.5772/intechopen.112857.
   Google Scholar
• Devi PI, Manjula M, Bhavani RV. Agrochemicals, environment, and human health. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2022;47(1):399–13. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-111015.
   Google Scholar
• Kurniawati A, Toth G, Ylivainio K, Toth Z. Opportunities and challenges of bio-based fertilizers utilization for improving soil health. Org Agric. 2023;13(3):335–350. doi:10.1007/s13165-023-00432-7.
   Google Scholar
• Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2017;7:2049. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.02049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2017;4(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Geelen D. Developing biostimulants from agro-food and industrial by-products. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1567. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobek M, Frąc M, Cybulska J. Plant biostimulants: importance of the quality and yield of horticultural crops and the improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stress—A review. Agronomy. 2019;9(6):335. doi:10.3390/agronomy9060335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera B, Supraja KV, Paramasivan B. Integrated microalgal biorefinery for the production and application of biostimulants in circular bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol. 2021;339:125588. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puglia D, Pezzolla D, Gigliotti G, Torre L, Bartucca ML, Del Buono D. The opportunity of valorizing agricultural waste, through its conversion into biostimulants, biofertilizers, and biopolymers. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2710. doi:10.3390/su13052710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funes-Pinter I, Pisi G, Aroca M, Uliarte EM. Compost tea and bioslurry as plant biostimulants. Part 2: biofertilizer test in ornamental flowers. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46(13):3041–3052. doi:10.1080/01904167.2023.2171883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav R, Sudhishri S, Khanna M, Lal K, Dass A, Kushwaha HL, Bandyopadhyay K, Dey A, Kushwah A, Nag RH. et al. Temporal characterization of biogas slurry: a pre-requisite to sustainable nutrigation in crop production. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:1234472. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1234472.
   Google Scholar
• You L, Yu S, Liu H, Wang C, Zhou Z, Zhang L, Hu D. Effects of biogas slurry fertilization on fruit economic traits and soil nutrients of camellia oleifera Abel. PloS One. 2019;14(5):e0208289. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wu D, Zakharchenko E, Qn L, A G, F L, Y W, M F. Review on effects of biogas slurry application on crop growth. Explore (New York, NY). 2022;19(4):571–577. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2022.11.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khatoon A, Rehman SU, Aslam MM, Jamil M, Komatsu S. Plant-derived smoke affects biochemical mechanism on plant growth and seed germination. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7760. doi:10.3390/ijms21207760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni MG, Rengasamy KRR, Pendota SC, Gruz J, Plačková L, Novák O, Doležal K, Van Staden J. Bioactive molecules derived from smoke and seaweed ecklonia maxima showing phytohormone-like activity in Spinacia oleracea L. N Biotechnol. 2019;48:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2018.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil M, Kanwal, M, Aslam, MM Khan, SU, Malook, I,Tu, J, ur Rehman, S. Effect of plant-derived smoke priming on physiological and biochemical characteristics of rice under salt stress condition. Aust J Crop Sci. 2014;8(2):159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Uddin M, Khan MMA, Chishti AS, Singh S, Bhat UH. The role of plant-derived smoke and karrikinolide in abiotic stress mitigation: an omic approach. Plant Stress. 2023;7:100147. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2023.100147.
   Google Scholar
• Shah G, Tu J, Fayyaz M, Masood S, Ullah H, Jamil M. Moringa oleifera smoke induced positive changes in biochemical, metabolic, and antioxidant profile of rice seedling under cadmium stress. Int J Phytorem. 2023;25(10):1337–1347. doi:10.1080/15226514.2022.2157793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinit S, Ariyakulkiat L, Chaiwanon J. Rice straw-derived smoke water promotes rice root growth under phosphorus deficiency by modulating oxidative stress and photosynthetic gene expression. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):14802. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41987-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayat N, Afroz N, Rehman S, Bukhari SH, Iqbal K, Khatoon A, Taimur N, Sakhi S, Ahmad N, Ullah R. et al. Plant-derived smoke ameliorates salt stress in wheat by enhancing expressions of stress-responsive genes and antioxidant enzymatic activity. Agronomy. 2021;12(1):28. doi:10.3390/agronomy12010028.
   Google Scholar
• Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15(3):473–497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran M, Imran Q, Khatoon A, Lee I, Rehman S. Effect of plant extracted smoke and reversion of abscisic acid stress on lettuce. Pak J Bot. 2013;45:1541–1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association APH. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington DC, USA: American Public Health Association; 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Odnell A, Recktenwald M, Stensén K, Jonsson B-H, Karlsson M. Activity, life time and effect of hydrolytic enzymes for enhanced biogas production from sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2016;103:462–471. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun S, Xing T, Han F, Shi J, Wang Z, Fan Q, Xu H. Enhanced direct interspecies electron transfer with transition metal oxide accelerants in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2021;320:124294. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeb I, Yousaf S, Ali M, Yasmeen A, Khan AZ, Tariq JA, Zhao Q, Abbasi AM, Ahmad R, Khalil TM. et al. In-situ microaeration of anaerobic digester treating buffalo manure for enhanced biogas yield. Renewable Energy. 2022;181:843–850. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsar S, Bibi G, Ahmad R, Bilal M, Naqvi TA, Baig A, Shah MM, Huang B, Hussain J. Evaluation of salt tolerance in eruca sativa accessions based on morpho-physiological traits. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9749. doi:10.7717/peerj.9749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi AZ, Bilal M, Khurshid G, Yiotis C, Zeb I, Hussain J, Baig A, Shah MM, Chaudhary SU, Osborne B. et al. Expression of cyanobacterial genes enhanced CO2 assimilation and biomass production in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. PeerJ. 2021;9:e11860. doi:10.7717/peerj.11860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barickman TC, Kopsell DA, Sams CE. Abscisic acid impacts tomato carotenoids, soluble sugars, and organic acids. HortScience. 2016;51(4):370–376. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.51.4.370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow PS, Landhäusser SM. A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues. Tree Physiol. 2004;24(10):1129–1136. doi:10.1093/treephys/24.10.1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad M, Mary H, Amjid U, Shabir G, Aslam K, Shah SM, Khan AR. Photoperiodic stress induces genotype-specific shift in DNA methylation in tartary buckwheat. Biol Futur. 2019;70(4):278–285. doi:10.1556/019.70.2019.31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmad RC, Bilal M, Jeon J-H, Kim HS, Park Y-I, Shah MM, Kwon S-Y. Improvement of biomass accumulation of potato plants by transformation of cyanobacterial photorespiratory glycolate catabolism pathway genes. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2016;10(5):269–276. doi:10.1007/s11816-016-0403-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce SM, Esler K, Cowling RM. Smoke-induced germination of succulents (mesembryanthemaceae) from fire-prone and fire-free habitats in South Africa. Oecologia. 1995;102(4):520–522. doi:10.1007/BF00341366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeel A, Khan MMA, Jaleel H, Uddin M. Smoke-saturated water and karrikinolide modulate germination, growth, photosynthesis and nutritional values of carrot (Daucus carota L.). J Plant Growth Regul. 2019;38(4):1387–1401. doi:10.1007/s00344-019-09941-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal M, Asif S, Ilyas N, Raja NI, Hussain M, Shabir S, Ashraf Faz MN, Rauf A. Effect of plant derived smoke on germination and post germination expression of wheat (triticum aestivum L.). AJPS. 2016;7(6):806–813. doi:10.4236/ajps.2016.76075.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni MG, Ascough GD, Van Staden J. Effects of foliar applications of smoke-water and a smoke-isolated butenolide on seedling growth of okra and tomato. HortScience. 2007;42(1):179–182. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.42.1.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley JE. Smoke-induced flowering in the fire-lily Cyrtanthus ventricosus. South African J Bot. 1993;59(6):638. doi:10.1016/S0254-6299(16)30681-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni MG, Ascough GD, Van Staden J. Smoke-water and a smoke-isolated butenolide improve growth and yield of tomatoes under greenhouse conditions. Horttechnology. 2008;18(3):449–454. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.18.3.449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Fang L, Wang X, Guo L, Huang L. Effects of smoke-water on photosynthetic characteristics of isatis indigotica seedlings. Sustain Agric Res. 2013;2(2):24. doi:10.5539/sar.v2n2p24.
   Google Scholar
• Aremu AO, Kulkarni MG, Bairu MW, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Growth stimulation effects of smoke-water and vermicompost leachate on greenhouse grown-tissue-cultured ‘Williams’ bananas. Plant Growth Regul. 2012;66(2):111–118. doi:10.1007/s10725-011-9634-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Uddin M, Chishti AS, Bhat UH, Khan S, Khan MMA. Plant-derived smoke water and karrikinolide (KAR1) enhance physiological activities, essential oil yield and bioactive constituents of mentha arvensis L. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1129130. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1129130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabir S, Ilyas N, Asif S, Iqbal M, Kanwal S, Ali Z. Deciphering the role of plant-derived smoke solution in ameliorating saline stress and improving physiological, biochemical, and growth responses of wheat. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41(7):2769–2786. doi:10.1007/s00344-021-10473-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal M, Asif S, Ilyas N, Raja NI, Hussain M, Ejaz M, Saira H. Smoke produced from plants waste material elicits growth of wheat (triticum aestivum L.) by improving morphological, physiological and biochemical activity. Biotechnol Rep. 2018;17:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.btre.2017.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Swapnil P, Meena M, Singh SK, Dhuldhaj UP, Marwal A, Marwal A. Vital roles of carotenoids in plants and humans to deteriorate stress with its structure, biosynthesis, metabolic engineering and functional aspects. Curr Plant Biol. 2021;26:100203. doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waheed MA, Jamil M, Khan MD, Shakir SK, Rehman SU. Effect of plant-derived smoke solutions on physiological and biochemical attributes of maize (zea mays L.) under salt stress. Pak J Bot. 2016;48:1763–1774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola R, Roberts AG, Haupt S, Gazzani S, Hancock RD, Marmiroli N, Machray GC, Oparka KJ. Tuberization in potato involves a switch from apoplastic to symplastic phloem unloading. Plant Cell. 2001;13(2):385–398. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H-L, Dusengemungu L, Igiraneza C, Rukundo P. Molecular regulation of potato tuber dormancy and sprouting: a mini-review. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2021;15(4):417–434. doi:10.1007/s11816-021-00689-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Zhu Y, Wang X, Ji L, Wang H, Yao L, Lin C. The effect of biogas slurry application on biomass production and forage quality of lolium multiflorum. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3605. doi:10.3390/su13073605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu J, Liu C, Huang M, Liu K, Yan D. Effects of foliar fertilization: a review of current status and future perspectives. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(1):104–118. doi:10.1007/s42729-020-00346-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otálora G, Piñero MC, López-Marín J, Varó P, Del Amor FM. Effects of foliar nitrogen fertilization on the phenolic, mineral, and amino acid composition of escarole (cichorium endivia L. var. latifolium). Sci Hortic. 2018;239:87–92. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou H, Zhou S, Hosomi M, Toyota K, Yosimura K, Mutou Y, Nisimura T, Takayanagi M, Motobayashi T. Ammonia emissions from anaerobically-digested slurry and chemical fertilizer applied to flooded forage rice. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;183(1–4):37–48. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9353-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg RN, Pathak H, Das DK, Tomar RK. Use of flyash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of soil. Environ Monit Assess. 2005;107(1–3):1–9. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-2021-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Scheller E, Raubuch M, Ludwig B, Joergensen RG. CO2 evolution and N mineralization after biogas slurry application in the field and its yield effects on spring barley. Appl Soil Ecol. 2009;42(3):297–302. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, Kluß C, Kage H, Herrmann A. Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;130:69–80. doi:10.1016/j.still.2013.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Fan J, Cui J, Wang Y, Zhou J, Ye M, Sun M. Effects of biogas slurry application on peanut yield, soil nutrients, carbon storage, and microbial activity in an ultisol soil in southern China. J Soils Sediments. 2016;16(2):449–460. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1254-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Choi HL, Yao HQ, Suresh A, Oh DI. Effects of anaerobically digested pig slurry application on runoff and leachate. Chem Ecol. 2009;25(5):359–369. doi:10.1080/02757540903193114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MR, Rahman SME, Rahman MM, Oh DH, Ra CS. The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder. Turkish J Agric For. 2010;34(1):91–99. doi:10.3906/tar-0902-44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian H, Watanabe Y, Nguyen KH, Tran CD, Abdelrahman M, Liang X, Xu K, Sepulveda C, Mostofa MG, Van Ha C. et al. KARRIKIN UPREGULATED F-BOX 1 negatively regulates drought tolerance in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2022;190(4):2671–2687. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam MM, Khatoon A, Jamil M, Ur Rehman S, Komatsu S. Plant-derived smoke solution: a stress alleviator in crop. J Plant Growth Regul. 2024;1–18. doi:10.1007/s00344-023-11221-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Liang G, Molloy PL, Jones PA. DNA methylation enables transposable element-driven genome expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(32):19359–19366. doi:10.1073/pnas.1921719117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mager S, Ludewig U. Massive loss of DNA methylation in nitrogen-, but not in phosphorus-deficient zea mays roots is poorly correlated with gene expression differences. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:497. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhang X, Xiao J. Epigenetic regulation of nitrogen signaling and adaptation in plants. Plants. 2023;12(14):2725. doi:10.3390/plants12142725.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford ML, Dean A, Gutierrez RA, Coruzzi GM, Birnbaum KD. Cell-specific nitrogen responses mediate developmental plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(2):803–808. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709559105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Brooks M, Yeoh-Wang J, McCoy RM, Rock TM, Pasquino A, Moon CI, Patrick RM, Tanurdzic M, Ruffel S. et al. SDG8-mediated histone methylation and RNA processing function in the response to nitrate signaling. Plant Physiol. 2020;182(1):215–227. doi:10.1104/pp.19.00682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian P, Lin Z, Lin D, Dong S, Huang J, Huang T. The pattern of DNA methylation alteration, and its association with the changes of gene expression and alternative splicing during phosphate starvation in tomato. Plant Journal. 2021;108(3):841–858. doi:10.1111/tpj.15486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labra M, Grassi F, Imazio S, Di Fabio T, Citterio S, Sgorbati S, Agradi E. Genetic and DNA-methylation changes induced by potassium dichromate in Brassica napus L. Chemosphere. 2004;54(8):1049–1058. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar