The “plant neurobiology” revolution

References

• Brenner ED, Stahlberg R, Mancuso S, Vivanco J, Baluška F, Van Volkenburgh E. Plant neurobiology: an integrated view of plant signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11(8):413–18. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouteau F, Grésillon E, Chartier D, Arbelet-Bonnin D, Kawano T, Baluška F, Mancuso S, Calvo P, Laurenti P. Our sisters the plants? Notes from phylogenetics and botany on plant kinship blindness. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(12):2004769. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.2004769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock TH. Goals of neuroethology. Bioscience. 1990;40(4):244–248. doi:10.2307/1311260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpi A, Amrhein N, Bertl A, Blatt MR, Blumwald E, Cervone F, Dainty J, De Michelis IM, Epstein E, Galston AW. et al. Plant neurobiology: no brain, no gain? Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(4):135–136. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taiz L, Alkon D, Draguhn A, Murphy A, Blatt M, Hawes C, Thiel G, Robinson DG. Plants neither possess nor require consciousness. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24(8):677–687. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallatt J, Blatt MR, Draguhn A, Robinson DG, Taiz L. Debunking a myth: plant consciousness. Protoplasma. 2021;258(3):459–476. doi:10.1007/s00709-020-01579-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallatt J, Robinson DG, Blatt MR, Draguhn A, Taiz L. Plant sentience: the burden of proof. Anim Sentience. 2023;8(33):15. doi:10.51291/2377-7478.1802.
   Google Scholar
• Pollan M. The intelligent plant. New Yorker. 2013 December 23:92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Madness and civilization: a history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Routledge; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson JB. On the 50th anniversary of our society. Plant Physiol. 1974;54(4):419. doi:10.1104/pp.54.4.419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boney AD. The ‘Tansley manifesto’ affair. New Phytol. 1991;118(1):3–21. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00561.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kull K. An introduction to phytosemiotics: semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Syst Stud. 2000;28:326–350. doi:10.12697/SSS.2000.28.18.
   Google Scholar
• Witzany G. Plant communication from a biosemiotic perspective. Plant Signal Behav. 2006;1(4):169–178. doi:10.4161/psb.1.4.3163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carello C, Vaz D, Blau JJ, Petrusz S. Unnerving intelligence. Ecol Psych. 2012;24(3):241–264. doi:10.1080/10407413.2012.702628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier PA. On the possibility of plant consciousness: a view from ecointeractivism. Mind Matter. 2021;19:229–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly CK. Plant foraging: a marginal value model and coiling response in Cuscuta subinclusa. Ecology. 1990;71(5):916–1925. doi:10.2307/1937599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JP, Cain ML. A spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant. Ecology. 1995;76(4):1147–1155. doi:10.2307/1940922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson MF, Burley N. Mate choice in plants. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman AG. Habitat selection in a clonal plant. Science. 1985;228(4699):603–604. doi:10.1126/science.3983647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JK. Kin selection in the annual plant Impatiens capensis. Am Natur. 1996;147(6):899–918. doi:10.1086/285885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvertown J, Gordon GM. A framework for plant behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1989;20(1):349–366. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.002025.
   Google Scholar
• Ganeshaiah KN, Shaakar RU. Foraging decisions by plants – making a case for plant ethology. Curr Sci. 1993;65:371–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitis DA, Lidicker WZ Jr., Freund G. Behavioural biologists don’t agree on what constitutes behaviour. Anim Behav. 2009;78(1):103–110. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun AJ, El Hady A. Everyone knows what behavior is but they just don’t agree on it. Iscience. 2023;26(11):11. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen N. The study of instinct. Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press; 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Aleklett K, Boddy L. Fungal behaviour: a new frontier in behavioural ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021;36(9):787–796. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money NP. Hyphal and mycelial consciousness: the concept of the fungal mind. Fungal Biol. 2021;125(4):257–259. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2021.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosalba B, Fabrizio E. The ethology of protozoa and the adaptive space hypothesis: a heuristic approach to the biology of these eukaryotic, unicellular organisms. Protistology. 2003;3:58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall WF. Cellular cognition: sequential logic in a giant protist. Curr Biol. 2019;29(24):R1303–R1305. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon P. The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:264. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher SG, Bernardo-Garcia FJ, van Giesen L, Hartenstein V, Reichert H, Neves R, Bailly X, Martinez P, Brauchle M. Functional brain regeneration in the acoel worm Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Biol Open. 2015;4(12):1688–1695. doi:10.1242/bio.014266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon E, Satter RL, Galston AW. Circadian rhythmicity in excised Samanea pulvini. I. Sucrose-white light interactions. Plant Physiol. 1976;58(3):417–420. doi:10.1104/pp.58.3.417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget J. Behaviour and evolution. New York and London: Routledge; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Santo Domingo M, Ruggieri V, Argyris J, Phillips MA, Zhao G, Lian Q, He Y, Huang S, Pujol M. et al. Genetic dissection of climacteric fruit ripening in a melon population segregating for ripening behavior. Hortic Res. 2020;7(1):1–18. doi:10.1038/s41438-020-00411-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzayen M, Latché A, Nath P, Pech JC. Mechanism of fruit ripening. In: Pua E, and Davey M. editors Plant Developmental Biology-Biotechnological Perspectives: Volume 1. New York and Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 319–339.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens M. Color change, phenotypic plasticity, and camouflage. Front Ecol Evol. 2016;4:51. doi:10.3389/fevo.2016.00051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzan WJ, Robison RR, Zhao S, Fernald RD. Color change as a potential behavioral strategy. Horm Behav. 2008;54(3):463–470. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson Sköld H, Aspengren S, Wallin M. Rapid color change in fish and amphibians – function, regulation, and emerging applications. Pigm Cell Melanoma R. 2013;26(1):29–38. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eacock A, Rowland HM, van’t Hof AE, Yung CJ, Edmonds N, Saccheri IJ. Adaptive colour change and background choice behaviour in peppered moth caterpillars is mediated by extraocular photoreception. Commun Biol. 2019;2(1):286. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0502-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karban R. Plant sensing and communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Burdon-Sanderson JS. I. Note on the electrical phenomena which accompany irritation of the leaf of Dionæa muscipula. P R Soc London. 1873; 21:495–496.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RK, Stitzer SN. Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose: his legacy and pioneering work [reverberations]. IEEE Microw Mag. 2009;10(2):113–115. doi:10.1109/MMM.2009.932237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S. Jagadis Chandra Bose and the Indian response to Western science. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Minorsky PV. American racism and the lost legacy of Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose, the father of plant neurobiology. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(1):e1818030–2. doi:10.1080/15592324.2020.1818030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto H. On the excitation phenomena in embryonic plants of Vigna sesquipedalis caused by electric stimuli, and presence of polarities concerning the excitability. Bot Mag. 1955;68(803):141–149. doi:10.15281/jplantres1887.68.141.
   Google Scholar
• Scott BIH. Electricity in plants. Sci Am. 1963;207(4):107–118. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1062-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallaghy CK. Electrophysiological studies in guard cells of tobacco. Planta. 1968;80(2):147–153. doi:10.1007/BF00385590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinyukhin AM, Gorchakov VV. Action potentials of higher plants not possessing motor activity. Biophysics. 1966;11:966–975.
   Google Scholar
• Lou CH, Shao LM, Chu TL. Electrochemical wave transmission in plants. J Peking Agric Univ. 1959;5:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard BG. Action potentials in higher plants. Bot Rev. 1973;39(2):172–201. doi:10.1007/BF02859299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S, VanVolkenburgh E, Barbara G. Pickard – queen of plant electrophysiology. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(6):1911400. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1911400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose JC. Comparative electro-physiology: a physico-physiological study. London (UK): Longmans Green; 1907.
   Google Scholar
• Bose JC. Researches on irritability of plants. London (UK): Longmans Green; 1913.
   Google Scholar
• Kôketsu R. Über die Wirkungen der Elektrischen Reizung an den Pflanzlichen Zellgebilden. J Dept Agr Kyushu Imp Univ. 1923;1(1):1–133. doi:10.5109/22324.
   Google Scholar
• Asida Z. Thermal stimulation and thermal adaptation of Aldrovanda leaves, with a note on cold-rigor. Mem Coll Sci, Kyoto Imp Univ, Ser B. 1939;14:353–386.
   Google Scholar
• Sibaoka T. Transmission of action potentials in Biophytum. Bot Mag Tokyo. 1973;86(2):51–61. doi:10.1007/BF02488515.
   Google Scholar
• Klejchova M, Silva-Alvim FAL, Blatt MR, Alvim JC. Membrane voltage as a dynamic platform for spatio-temporal signaling, physiological and developmental regulation. Plant Physiol. 2021;185(4):1523–1541. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt MR. A charged existence: a century of transmembrane ion transport in plants. Plant Physiol. 2024. in press. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiad630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins P, Bird C. The secret life of plants. New York: Harper and Row; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Enders TA, Strader LC. Auxin activity: past, present, and future. Am J Bot. 2015;102(2):180–196. doi:10.3732/ajb.1400285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller EC. Forty years of plant physiology: some general impressions. Science. 1943;97(2519):315–319. doi:10.1126/science.97.2519.315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant physiology and development. 5th edn. Sunderland (MD): Sinauer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Pickard BG. Receptor potentials and action potentials in Drosera tentacles. Planta. 1972;103(3):193–221. doi:10.1007/BF00386844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd VA, Shimmen TA, Beilby MJ. Mechanosensory ion channels in Chara: the influence of cell turgor pressure on touch-activated receptor potentials and action potentials. Aust J Plant Physiol. 2001;28(7):551–566. doi:10.1071/PP01035.
   Google Scholar
• Bose JC. The nervous mechanism of plants. London (UK): Longmans Green; 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Molisch H. Nervous impulse in Mimosa pudica. Nature. 1929;123(3102):562–563. doi:10.1038/123562a0.
   Google Scholar
• Vodoneev V, Akinchits E, Sukhov V. Variation potential in higher plants: mechanisms of generations. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(9):e1057365. doi:10.1080/15592324.2015.1057365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann MR, Maischak H, Mithöfer A, Boland W, Felle HH. System potentials, a novel electrical long-distance apoplastic signal in plants, induced by wounding. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(3):1593–1600. doi:10.1104/pp.108.133884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson SL. Receptor response in Venus’s fly-trap. J Gen Physiol. 1965;49(1):117–129. doi:10.1085/jgp.49.1.117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Bakker JM, Coronel R. Summation of activation at the branch-stem transition of Mimosa pudica; a comparison with summation in cardiac tissue. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(5):e0286103. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer W. Physiologische Untersuchungen. Leipzig: W Engelmann; 1873.
   Google Scholar
• Bose JC. Plant response as a means of physiological investigation. London (UK): Longmans Green; 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. 6th edn. Sunderland (MD): Sinauer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kiegle E, Moore CA, Haseloff J, Tester MA, Knight MR. Cell-type-specific calcium responses to drought, salt and cold in the Arabidopsis root. Plant. 2000;23(2):267–278. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00786.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis BD, Karlin-Neumann G, Davis RW, Spalding EP. Ca2+-activated anion channels and membrane depolarizations induced by blue light and cold in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1997;114(4):1327–1334. doi:10.1104/pp.114.4.1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaki Y. Blue light pulse-induced transient changes of electrical potential and turgor pressure in the motor cells of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988;29:1041–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden CJ. Metaphyta. In Comparative psychology: a comprehensive treatise: Plants and invertebrates. Vol. II Warden CJ, Jenkins TN, Warner LH. New York: Ronald Press; 1940,180–286.
   Google Scholar
• Crellin C. Whatever happened to plant psychology? Hist Philos Psychol Newsl. 1992;15:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Parker I. Psychology after deconstruction: erasure and social reconstruction. New York and London: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson CI, Chicas-Mosier AM. Learning in plants: lessons from Mimosa pudica. Front Psychol. 2016;7:417. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello U. (Re)claiming plants in comparative psychology. J Comp Psychol. 2021;135(1):127–141. doi:10.1037/com0000239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes RM. Psychology: a question of definitions. J Philos Psychol Sci Meth. 1913;10(21):580–582. doi:10.2307/2012437.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser FC. Gustav Theodor Fechner. In: Zalta E, ed. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Redwood City (CA): Stanford University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner GT. Nanna oder über das Seelenleben der Pflanzen. Leipzig: Leopold Voß; 1848.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliano M. Thus spoke the plant: a remarkable journey of groundbreaking scientific discoveries and personal encounters with plants. Berkeley (CA): North Atlantic Books; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Liester MB. Near-death experiences and ayahuasca-induced experiences: two unique pathways to a phenomenologically similar state of consciousness. J Transpersonal Psychol. 2013;45:24.
   Google Scholar
• Gould SJ. Nonoverlapping magisteria. Nat Hist. 1997;106:16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscowitz A. L’âme de la plante. Paris: P. Ducrocq; 1867.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay WL. Mind in plants. J Ment Sci. 1876;21(96):513–532. doi:10.1192/bjp.21.96.513.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JE. The sagacity & morality of plants. London: Chatto and Windus; 1884.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry TG. Intelligence in plants and animals. New York: Doubleday Page; 1900.
   Google Scholar
• Roth RR. Raoul H. Francé and the doctrine of life. Indianapolis (IN): 1st Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Francé RH. Pflanzenpsychologie als Arbeitshypothese der Pflanzenphysiologie. Stuttgart: Franck’sche Verlagshandlung; 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Francé RH. Germs of minds in plants. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr; 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsell MF. Effects of routine handling on maize. Functional Plant Biol. 1977;4(6):857–861. doi:10.1071/PP9770857.
   Google Scholar
• Roblin G. Mimosa pudica : a model for the study of the excitability in plants. Biol Rev. 1979;54(2):135–153. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1979.tb00870.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AM, Edgerton MD. The anatomy of phytochrome, a unique photoreceptor in plants. Semin Cell Biol. 1994;5(5):295–302. doi:10.1006/scel.1994.1036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toh S, Holbrook-Smith D, Stogios PJ, Onopriyenko O, Lumba S, Tsuchiya Y, Savchenko A, McCourt P. Structure-function analysis identifies highly sensitive strigolactone receptors in Striga. Science. 2015;350(6257):203–207. doi:10.1126/science.aac9476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Choi J, Cao Y, Stacey G. Extracellular ATP acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) signal in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:446. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscatiello R, Mariani P, Sanders D, Maathuis FJ. Transcriptional analysis of calcium-dependent and calcium-independent signalling pathways induced by oligogalacturonides. J Exp Bot. 2016;57(11):2847–2865. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl043.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell JB, Sowders JM, He R, Willis MA, Gang DR, Tanaka K. Extracellular ATP shapes a defense-related transcriptome both independently and along with other defense signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(3):1144–1158. doi:10.1104/pp.18.01301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassizadeh L, Cervero R, Flors V, Gamir J. Extracellular DNA as an elicitor of broad-spectrum resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2021;312:111036. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RJ Jr., Fichman Y, Stacey G, Mittler R. Extracellular ATP plays an important role in systemic wound response activation. Plant Physiol. 2022;189(3):1314–1325. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Muñoz I, Duran-Flores D, Fernández-Fernández ÁD, Heyman J, Ritter A, Stael S. Breaking bad news: dynamic molecular mechanisms of wound response in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:610445. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.610445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Seo PJ. Wound-induced systemic responses and their coordination by electrical signals. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:880680. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.880680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi SA, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE. GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature. 2013;500(7463):422–426. doi:10.1038/nature12478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso S. Hydraulic and electrical transmission of wound-induced signals in Vitis vinifera. Funct Plant Biol. 1999;26(1):55–61. doi:10.1071/PP98098.
   Google Scholar
• Stahlberg RC, Cosgrove DJ. The propagation of slow wave potentials in pea epicotyls. Plant Physiol. 1997;113(1):209–217. doi:10.1104/pp.113.1.209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MJ, Morris RJ. Chemical agents transported by xylem mass flow propagate variation potentials. Plant. 2017;91(6):1029–1037. doi:10.1111/tpj.13624.
   Google Scholar
• Stanković B, Davies E. The wound response in tomato involves rapid growth and electrical responses, systemically up-regulated transcription of proteinase inhibitor and calmodulin and down-regulated translation. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998;39(3):268–274. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo AJK, Gao X, Daniel Jones A, Howe GA. A rapid wound signal activates the systemic synthesis of bioactive jasmonates in Arabidopsis. Plant. 2009;59(6):974–986. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03924.x.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Timko MP. Jasmonic acid signaling and molecular crosstalk with other phytohormones. Int J Molec Sci. 2021;22(6):2914. doi:10.3390/ijms22062914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovečka M, Sojka J, Tichá M, Komis G, Basheer J, Marchetti C, Šamajova O, Kuběnová L, Šamaj J. Imaging plant cells and organs with light-sheet and super-resolution microscopy. Plant Physiol. 2022;188(2):683–702. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Ding M, Gao S, Yu-Strzelczyk J, Krischke M, Duan X, Leide J, Reiderer M, Mueller MJ, Hedrich R. et al. Optogenetic control of plant growth by a microbial rhodopsin. Nat Plants. 2021;7(2):144–151. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00853-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coatsworth P, Gonzalez-Macia L, Collins ASP, Bozkurt T, Güder F. Continuous monitoring of chemical signals in plants under stress. Nat Rev Chem. 2023;7(1):7–25. doi:10.1038/s41570-022-00443-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew TTS, Koman VB, Silmore KS, Seo JS, Gordiichuk P, Kwak SY, Park M, Ang MC, Khong DT, Lee MA. et al. Real-time detection of wound-induced H2O2 signalling waves in plants with optical nanosensors. Nat Plants. 2020;6(4):404–415. doi:10.1038/s41477-020-0632-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabricant A, Iwata GZ, Scherzer S, Bougas L, Rolfs K, Jodko-Władzińska A, Voight J, Hedrich R, Budker D. Action potentials induce biomagnetic fields in carnivorous Venus flytrap plants. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1438. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81114-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascut FC, Couvreur V, Dietrich D, Leftley N, Reyt G, Boursiac Y, Calvo-Polanco M, Casimiro I, Maurel C, Salt DE. et al. Non-invasive hydrodynamic imaging in plant roots at cellular resolution. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4682. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24913-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne WZ, Kurouski D. Raman spectroscopy enables phenotyping and assessment of nutrition values of plants: a review. Plant Methods. 2021;17(1):1–20. doi:10.1186/s13007-021-00781-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahir SADM, Omar AF, Jamlos MF, Azmi MAM, Muncan J. A review of visible and near-infrared (vis-NIR) spectroscopy application in plant stress detection. Sensors Actuat A-Phys. 2022;338:113468. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2022.113468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gente R, Koch M. Monitoring leaf water content with THz and sub-THz waves. Plant Meth. 2015;11(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0057-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castro-Camus E, Palomar M, Covarrubias AA. Leaf water dynamics of Arabidopsis thaliana monitored in-vivo using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):2910. doi:10.1038/srep02910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrero-Huerta M, Lindenbergh R, Gard W. Leaf movements of indoor plants monitored by terrestrial LiDAR. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:189. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling JJ. Observations of plant growth with the recording ultramicrometer. Nature. 1921;107(2695):523. doi:10.1038/107523a0.
   Google Scholar
• Kristie DN, Jolliffe PA. High-resolution studies of growth oscillations during stem elongation. Can J Bot. 1985;64(11):2399–2405. doi:10.1139/b86-318.
   Google Scholar
• Liptay A, Barron JL, Jewett T, van Wesenbeeck I. Oscillations in corn seedling growth as measured by optical flow. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1995;120(3):379–385. doi:10.21273/JASHS.120.3.379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima M, Matsushita N. A circadian and an ultradian rhythm are both evident in root growth of rice. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(17):2072–2080. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2011.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott BIH. Electric oscillations generated by plant roots and a possible feedback mechanism responsible for them. Aust J Bio Sci. 1957;10(2):164–179. doi:10.1071/BI9570164.
   Google Scholar
• Toko K, Souda M, Matsuno T, Yamafuji K. Oscillations of electrical potential along a root of a higher plant. Biophys J. 1990;57(2):269–279. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82529-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAinsh M, Webb AA, Taylor JE, Hetherington AM. Stimulus-induced oscillations in guard cell cytosolic free calcium. Plant Cell. 1995;7(8):1207–1219. doi:10.2307/3870096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabala SN, Newman IA, Morris J. Oscillations in H+ and Ca2+ ion fluxes around the elongation region of corn roots and effects of external pH. Plant Physiol. 1997;113(1):111–118. doi:10.1104/pp.113.1.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabala S, Knowles A. Rhythmic patterns of nutrient acquisition by wheat roots. Funct Plant Biol. 2002;29(5):595–605. doi:10.1071/PP01130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazareva NP, Borisova TA, Zholkevich VN. Autooscillatory nature of pumping work of the root. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1986;289:761–764. in Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi GA, Stone JF, Todd GW. Oscillatory transpiration in a cotton plant: I. Experimental characteristics. J Exp Bot. 1976;27(4):608–618. doi:10.1093/jxb/27.4.608.
   Google Scholar
• McLamore ES, Diggs A, Calvo Marzal P, Shi J, Blakeslee JJ, Peer WA, Murphy AS, Porterfield DM. Non‐invasive quantification of endogenous root auxin transport using an integrated flux microsensor technique. Plant. 2010;63(6):1004–1016. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04300.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary RM, Sinha SK. Ultradian rhythm in rate of respiration in Brassica juncea leaves. J Plant Physiol. 1995;146(4):450–452. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(11)82007-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa T. Simple oscillations in photosynthesis of higher plants. BBA– Bioenergetics. 1982;681(1):103–109. doi:10.1016/0005-2728(82)90283-3.
   Google Scholar
• Brilli F, Tsonev T, Mahmood T, Velikova V, Loreto F, Centritti M. Ultradian variation of isoprene emission, photosynthesis, mesophyll conductance, and optimum temperature sensitivity for isoprene emission in water-stressed Eucalyptus citriodora saplings. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(2):519–528. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasulov B, Talts E, Niinemets Ü. Spectacular oscillations in plant isoprene emission under transient conditions explain the enigmatic CO2 response. Plant Physiol. 2016;172(4):2275–2285. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyan’ko AK, Ischenko AA. Rhythmical changes of a level nitric oxide (NO) in roots etiolated seedlings of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and influence of exogenous calcium. J Stress Physiol Biochem. 2014;10:56–66. in Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Due G. Frequency as a property of physiological signals in plants. Plant Cell Env. 1989;12(2):145–149. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01926.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Goldbeter A. Frequency specificity in intercellular communication. Influence of patterns of periodic signaling on target cell responsiveness. Biophys J. 1989;55(1):125–145. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82785-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veits M, Khait I, Obolski U, Zinger E, Boonman A, Goldshtein A, Saban F, Seltzer Y, Ben-Dor U, Estlein P. et al. Flowers respond to pollinator sound within minutes by increasing nectar sugar concentration. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(9):1483–1492. doi:10.1111/ele.13331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguet-Parramona C, Wang Y, Hills A, Vialet-Chabrand S, Griffiths H, Rogers S, Lawson T, Lew VL, Blatt MR. An optimal frequency in Ca2+ oscillations for stomatal closure is an emergent property of ion transport in guard cells. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(1):33–42. doi:10.1104/pp.15.01607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwano M, Ngo QA, Entani T, Shiba H, Nagai T, Miyawaki A, Isogai A, Grossniklaus U, Takayama S. Cytoplasmic Ca2+ changes dynamically during the interaction of the pollen tube with synergid cells. Development. 2012;39(22):4202–4209. doi:10.1242/dev.081208.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Lenaghan SC, Zhang M. Nonlinear dynamics of the movement of the Venus flytrap. Bull Math Biol. 2012;74(10):2446–2473. doi:10.1007/s11538-012-9760-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JP, Engelmann W, Baier G. Nonlinear dynamics in the ultradian rhythm of Desmodium motorium. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 1995;50(12):1113–1116. doi:10.1515/zna-1995-1208.
   Google Scholar
• Ito T, Ito K. Nonlinear dynamics of homeothermic temperature control in skunk cabbage, Symplocarpus foetidus. Phys Rev E. 2005;72(5):051909. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.051909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Zhang Q, Wang W, Hao S. Nonlinear dynamics behavior analysis of the spatial configuration of a tendril-bearing plant. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132(3):1–14. doi:10.1140/epjp/i2017-11352-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prytz G, Futsaether CM, Johnsson A. Self‐sustained oscillations in plant water regulation: induction of bifurcations and anomalous rhythmicity. New Phytol. 2003;158(2):259–267. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00742.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabala S, Delbourgo R, Newman I. Observations of bifurcation and chaos in plant physiological responses to light. Funct Plant Biol. 1997;24(1):91–96. doi:10.1071/PP96075.
   Google Scholar
• Rand RH, Upadhyaya SK, Cooke JR, Storti DW. Hopf bifurcation in a stomatal oscillator. J Math Biol. 1982;12(1):1–11. doi:10.1007/BF00275199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocchi F. Complexity and the reductionism–holism debate in systems biology. Syst Biol Med. 2012;4(5):413–427. doi:10.1002/wsbm.1181.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow PW, Mikulecký M, Střeštík J. Tree-stem diameter fluctuates with the lunar tides and perhaps with geomagnetic activity. Protoplasma. 2010;247(1–2):25–43. doi:10.1007/s00709-010-0136-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minorsky PV. Do geomagnetic variations affect plant function? J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys. 2007;69(14):1770–1774. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2006.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M. Romantic biology, 1890–1945. New York and London: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi S, Bossi M. eds. Romanticism in science: science in Europe, 1790-1840. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham A, Jardine N. eds. Romanticism and the sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Diderot D. Éléments de physiologie. [1778], critical edition. J Mayer, ed. Paris: Marcel Didier;1964.
   Google Scholar
• Breidbach O. Goethe’s metamorphosenlehre. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ, Kutschera U. From Goethe’s plant archetype via Haeckel’s biogenetic law to plant evo-devo 2016. Theory Biosci. 2017;136(1–2):49–57. doi:10.1007/s12064-016-0237-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettelbach M. The face of nature: precise measurement, mapping, and sensibility in the work of Alexander von Humboldt. Stud Hist Philos Sci, Pt C. 1999;30(4):473–504. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00011-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan AV, Tamma K. The lasting contribution of Alexander von Humboldt to our understanding of the natural world. Resonance. 2021;26(8):1041–1050. doi:10.1007/s12045-021-1207-z.
   Google Scholar
• Richards RJ, Ruse M. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Beer G. Darwin and romanticism. The Wordsworth Circle. 2010;41(1):3–9. doi:10.1086/TWC24043679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X. Humboldt, Darwin, and romantic resonance in science. Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022;92:196–208. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansley M. Charles Darwin’s debt to the Romantics [ dissertation]. Winchester (UK), University of Winchester; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin C. The power of movement in plants. London: John Murray; 1880.
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D, Barlow PW. Root apices as plant command centres: the unique ‘brain-like’ status of the root apex transition zone. Biologia (Bratislava). 2004;59:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow PW. Charles Darwin and the plant root apex. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S Volkmann D. editors Communication in plants: neuronal aspects of plant life. Berlin: Springer; 2016. pp. 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur JC, MacDougal DT. Living plants and their properties: a collection of essays. New York: Baker and Taylor; 1898.
   Google Scholar
• De Duve C, Beaufay H. A short history of tissue fractionation. J Cell Biol. 1981;91(3):293s–299s. doi:10.1083/jcb.91.3.293s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington A. Reenchanted science: holism in German culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bose JC. The action of drugs on plants. Lancet. 1914;184(4758):1105–1110. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)96503-6.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm J, Spanswick R. Characteristics of action potentials in willow (Salix viminalis L.). J Exp Bot. 1993;44(7):1119–1125. doi:10.1093/jxb/44.7.1119.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson RE, Ashley CC. Free Ca2+ and cytoplasmic streaming in the alga Chara. Nature. 1982;296(5858):647–651. doi:10.1038/296647a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger D, Fessard A. Sur une variation négative graduable et non propagée obtenue par stimulation sous- liminaire d’une cellule végétale. CR Soc Biol (Paris) 1935; 118:1059–1060.
   Google Scholar
• Bose JC. On diurnal variation of moto-excitability in Mimosa. Ann Bot. 1913;27(4):759–779. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089486.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace RH. Studies on the sensitivity of Mimosa pudica III. The effect of temperature, humidity, and certain other factors upon seismonic sensitivity. Am J Bot. 1931;18(4):288–307. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1931.tb09591.x.
   Google Scholar
• Burge WE, Wickwire GC, Fuller HJ. Daily variation in the sensitivity of Mimosa with special reference to the action of light. Bot Gaz. 1936;97(3):672–677. doi:10.1086/334590.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller HJ, Hanley JH. Fatigue, summation, and daily variation of irritability in sensitive stigmas. Bot Gaz. 1938;99(4):877–880. doi:10.1086/334755.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Bernadas C, Cornelissen G, Turner CM, Koukkari WL. Rhythmic nature of thigmomorphogenesis and thermal stress of Phaseolus vulgaris L. shoots. J Plant Physiol. 1997;151(5):575–580. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80233-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd AN, Jakobsen MK, Baker AJ, Telzerow A, Hou SW, Laplaze L, Barrot L, Poethig RS, Haseloff J, Webb AA. Time of day modulates low-temperature Ca2+ signals in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006;48(6):962–973. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02933.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov AG, Wooten JD, Waite AJ, Brown CR, Markin VS. Circadian rhythms in electrical circuits of Clivia miniata. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(15):1753–1760. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2011.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndung’u RW, Kamweru PK, Kirwa AT. Action and variation potential electrical signals in higher plants. Afr J Biol Sci. 2021;3(1):1–18. doi:10.33472/AFJBS.3.1.2021.1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Dziubińska H, Trȩbacz K, Zawadzki T. The effect of excitation on the rate of respiration in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Physiol Plant. 1989;75(3):417–423. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb04648.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner M, Ford ED, van Volkenburgh E. Development of erect leaves in a modern maize hybrid is associated with reduced responsiveness to auxin and light of young seedlings in vitro. Plant Signal Behav. 2006;1(4):201–211. doi:10.4161/psb.1.4.3106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruska D. Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior. In: Intelligence and evolutionary biology, edited by Jerison H, Jerison, I. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer; 1988. pp. 211–250.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso S. Federico Delpino and the foundation of plant biology. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5(9):1067–1071. doi:10.4161/psb.5.9.12102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calvo Garzon F. The quest for cognition in plant neurobiology. Plant Signal Behav. 2007;2(4):208–211. doi:10.4161/psb.2.4.4470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Guerra S, Ceccarini F, Bonato B, Castiello U. Sowing the seeds of intentionality: motor intentions in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(11):1949818. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1949818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel-Tomé S, Llinàs RR. Broadening the definition of a nervous system to better understand the evolution of plants and animals. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(10):e1927562. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1927562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder M. Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant intelligence. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(11):1365–1372. doi:10.4161/psb.21954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marder M. Plant intelligence and attention. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8(5):e23902. doi:10.4161/psb.23902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koechlin F. The dignity of plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(1):78–79. doi:10.4161/psb.4.1.7315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zerubavel E. The rigid, the fuzzy, and the flexible: notes on the mental sculpting of academic identity. Soc Res. 1995;62:1093–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin C. The descent of man. London: John Murray; 1871.
   Google Scholar
• Mallatt J, Robinson DG, Draguhn A, Blatt MR, Taiz L. Understanding plant behavior: a student perspective: response to Van Volkenburgh et al. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(11):1089–1090. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelders HAM. Romanticism and Dutch scientists. In: Poggi S Bossi M. editors Romanticism in science: science in Europe 1790-1840. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. pp. 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Taiz L, Taiz L. Flora unveiled: the discovery and denial of sex in plants. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Holdrege C. Goethe and the evolution of science. Context. 2014;31:10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson M. Alexander von Humboldt and the geography of vegetation. In: Cunningham A Jardine N. editors Romanticism and the sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 169–185.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch J. Darwin and barnacles. CR Biol. 2010;333(2):99–106. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2009.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Richards RJ. Darwin’s metaphysics of mind. In: Hösle V Illies C. editors Darwin and philosophy. Notre Dame (IN): Notre Dame University Press; 2005. pp. 166–180.
   Google Scholar
• Tandon PN. Jagdish Chandra Bose & plant neurobiology. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(5):593. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_392_19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley HB. The early history of the Royal Society. Hertford: Stephen Austin; 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Paszewski A, Zawadzki T, Dziubinska H. Higher plant biopotentials and the integration of biological sciences. Folia Societ Scient Lublin. 1977;19:95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Tully T, Bolwig G, Christensen J, Connolly J, DelVecchio M, DeZazzo J, Dubnau J, Jones C, Pinto S, Regulski M. et al. A return to genetic dissection of memory in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol. 1996;61:207–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timiriazeff CA. The movement of plants: a history of our time. Mod Rev (Calcutta). 1926 December:577–581.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo Garzón P, Keijzer F. Plants: adaptive behavior, root-brains, and minimal cognition. Adapt Behav. 2011;19(3):155–171. doi:10.1177/1059712311409446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki K. The effects of raising animals on children’s biological knowledge. Brit J Dev Psychol. 2000;8(2):119–129. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.x.
   Google Scholar
• Coley JD. Where the wild things are: informal experience and ecological reasoning. Child Dev. 2012;83(3):992–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01751.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerrett IM, Williams JB. A structural and functional comparison of gap junction channels composed of connexins and innexins. Dev Neurobiol. 2017;77(5):522–547. doi:10.1002/dneu.22447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdaway‐Clarke TL. Plasmodesmata. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. 2018 Regulation of plasmodesmatal conductance. 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Trębacz K, Dziubinska H, Krol E. Electrical signals in long-distance communication in plants. In: Baluška FF, Mancuso S Volkmann D. editors Communication in plants: neuronal aspects of plant life. Berlin: Springer; 2006. pp. 277–290.
   Google Scholar
• Scherzer S, Böhm J, Huang S, Iosip AL, Kreuzer I, Becker D, Heckmann M, Al-Rasheid KAS, Dreyer I, Hedrich R. A unique inventory of ion transporters poises the Venus flytrap to fast-propagating action potentials and calcium waves. Current Biology. 2022;32(19):4255–4263. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwink AL. The conduction of excitation in Mimosa pudica. Recl Trav Bot Néerl. 1935;32:51–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso S, Viola A. Brilliant green: the surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Washington DC: Island Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Plieth C, Hansen UP, Knight H, Knight MR. Temperature sensing by plants: the primary characteristics of signal perception and calcium response. Plant J. 1999;18(5):491–497. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00471.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minorsky PV. Temperature sensing by plants: a review and hypothesis. Plant Cell Env. 1989;12(2):119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01924.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussotour A. Learning in single-celled organisms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;564:92–102. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.02.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisseau RP, Vogel D, Dussutour A. Habituation in non-neural organisms: evidence from slime moulds. Proc R Soc B. 2016;283(1829):20160446. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan D, Makushok T, Kalish A, Acuna L, Bonville A, Almanza KC, Garibay B, Tang E, Voss M, Lin A. et al. Single-cell analysis of habituation in Stentor coeruleus. Curr Biol. 2023;33(2):241–251. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer SM, Westerhoff HV, Hellingwerf KJ, Postma PW, Tommassen JAN. Autoamplification of a two-component regulatory system results in “learning” behavior. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(16):4914–4917. doi:10.1128/JB.183.16.4914-4917.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duijn M. Phylogenetic origins of biological cognition: convergent patterns in the early evolution of learning. Interface Focus. 2017;7(3):20160158. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2016.0158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz EM. Plants compared to animals: the broadest comparative study of development. Science. 2002;295(5559):1482–1485. doi:10.1126/science.1066609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Reber AS. Sentience and consciousness in single cells: how the first minds emerged in unicellular species. BioEssays. 2019;41(3):e1800229. doi:10.1002/bies.201800229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor S, Vasas V, Husbands P, Fernando C. Evolution of associative learning in chemical networks. PLOS Comput Biol. 2012;8(11):e1002739. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontes AC, Mobley RB, Ofria C, Adami C, Dyer FC. The evolutionary origin of associative learning. Am Nat. 2020;195(1):E1–E19. doi:10.1086/706252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armus HL, Montgomery AR, Jellison JL. Discrimination learning in paramecia (P. caudatum). Psychol Rec. 2006;56(4):489–498. doi:10.1007/BF03396029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando CT, Liekens AM, Bingle LE, Beck C, Lenser T, Stekel DJ, Rowe JE. Molecular circuits for associative learning in single-celled organisms. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6(34):463–469. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman SJ, Balbi PE, Gallistel CR, Gunawardena J. Reconsidering the evidence for learning in single cells. Elife. 2021;10:e61907. doi:10.7554/eLife.61907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco-Pujante J, Bringas C, Malaina I, Fedetz M, Martínez L, Pérez-Yarza G, Boyano MD, Berieva M, Goodkov A, López JI. et al. Associative conditioning is a robust systemic behavior in unicellular organisms: an interspecies comparison. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:707086. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.707086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kippenberger S, Pipa G, Steinhorst K, Zöller N, Kleemann J, Özistanbullu D, Scheller B. Learning in the single-cell organism Physarum polycephalum: effect of propofol. IJMS. 2023;24(7):6287. doi:10.3390/ijms24076287.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsonne G, Appelgren A, Axelsson J, Fredrikson M, Lekander M. Learning in a simple biological system: a pilot study of classical conditioning of human macrophages in vitro. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7(47):1–5. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-7-47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagliano M, Vyazovskiy VV, Borbély AA, Grimonprez M, Depczynski M. Learning by association in plants. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):38427. doi:10.1038/srep38427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markel K. Lack of evidence for associative learning in pea plants. eLife. 2020;9:e57614. doi:10.7554/eLife.57614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponkshe A, Blancas Barroso J, Abramson CI, Calvo P. A case study of learning in plants: lessons learned from pea plants. Q J Exp Psychol. 2023;17470218231203078. doi:10.1177/17470218231203078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galviz YC, Ribeiro RV, Souza GM. Yes, plants do have memory. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2020;32(3):195–202. doi:10.1007/s40626-020-00181-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szechyńska-Hebda M, Kruk J, Górecka M, Karpińska B, Karpiński S. Evidence for light wavelength-specific photoelectrophysiological signaling and memory of excess light episodes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(7):2201–2218. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.069302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Yamashita F. Boquila trifoliolata mimics leaves of an artificial plastic host plant. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2021;17(1):e1977530. doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1977530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianoli E, Carrasco-Urra F. Leaf mimicry in a climbing plant protects against herbivory. Current Biology. 2014;24(9):984–988. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Vision in plants via plant-specific ocelli? Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(9):727–730. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner-Rooney L, Ullrich-Lüter J. Extraocular vision in echinoderms. In: Buschbeck N Bok M. editors Distributed vision: from simple sensors to sophisticated combination eyes. Cham: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 49–85.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo P. What is it like to be a plant? J Conscious Stud. 2017;4:205–227.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Sahi V, Trewavas A. Are plants sentient? Plant Cell Env. 2017;40(11):2858–2869. doi:10.1111/pce.13065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aru J, Suzuki M, Rutiku R, Larkum ME, Bachmann T. Coupling the state and contents of consciousness. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:43. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aru J, Suzuki M, Larkum ME. Cellular mechanisms of conscious processing. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2020;24(10):814–825. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwig R. A manual of zoology. New York: Henry Holt; 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Filhol H. Études sur les mammifères fossiles de Sansan. Bibliothèque de l´École des Hautes Études, section Sciences naturelles Paris. 1890;37:1–319.
   Google Scholar
• Blatt M. Challenging research. Plant Physiol. 2021;186(2):802–803. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm H, Gradmann D. Intelligent plants or stupid studies. Lab Times. 2010;3:30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Myers N. Conversations on plant sensing: notes from the field. NatureCulture. 2015;3:35–66.
   Google Scholar