218
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Exploring nuanced approach to criminalization of late payers in the construction sector

, &
Pages 1136-1144 | Received 23 Jun 2022, Accepted 01 Dec 2022, Published online: 09 Jan 2023

References

  • Ayudha BIN. 2012. Factors causing delay in payment of residential projects in Thailand. FIG Working Week 2012, Knowing to Manage the Territory, Protect the Environment, Evaluate the Cultural Heritage; Rome, Italy. p. 1–11.
  • Babbie E. 2013. The practice of social research. 13th ed. Wadsworth (OH): Cengage Learning; p. 105–111.
  • Burrows AA. 2015. Casebook on contract. 5th ed. Oxford (UK): Hart Publishing.
  • Carmines EG, Zeller RA. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Vol. 17. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
  • Construction Excellence. 2016. The Payments Minefield – a review of payment practices within the UK construction industry; [accessed 2021 Jun 22]. https://constructingexcellence.org.uk/payments-minefield-review-payment-practices-within-uk-construction-industry/.
  • Cotter P. 2005. Late payment: why it pays to know your customers, Experian’s Business Information Division. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology Congress.
  • Creswell JW. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Washington, DC: SAGE Publications, Inc.; p. 43.
  • Dressler J. 2001. A good introduction to the nature of criminal law and to the common law and statutes. In: Paul Caron, editor. Understanding criminal law. 3rd ed. New York: Lexis; p. 28–32.
  • European Commission. 2021. European Construction Sector Observatory – indicators on late payment in the construction sector. EU Publication Analytical Report, August 2021.
  • European Union Directive (EU). 2011. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011. EU Publication.
  • Fletcher G. 2000. A challenging discussion of the history and philosophy of criminal law. In: Herbert Fingarette, editor. Rethinking criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 1007–1011.
  • Frimpong Y, Oluwoye J, Crawford L. 2003. Causes of delay and cost overruns in construction of groundwater projects in a developing country, Ghana as a case study. Int J Project Manag. 21(5):321–326.
  • Garner-Purkis Z. 2021. Payment survey: who’ll own up to paying beyond 75 days. Construction News; [accessed 2022 Feb 10]. https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/financial/late-payment-survey-results-when-will-things-change-22-02-2021/.
  • Gaskell G, Bauer MW. 2000. Towards public accountability: beyond sampling, reliability and validity. In: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. London (UK): SAGE Publications; p. 336–350.
  • Giorgi A. 1988. Validity and reliability from a phenomenological perspective. In Baker W, Mos L, Rappard H, Stain H, editors. Recent trends in theoretical psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag; p. 167–176.
  • Griffiths R, Lord W, Coggins J. 2017. Project bank accounts: the second wave of security of payment? J Financial Manag Prop Constr. 22(3):322–338.
  • Gross H. 1979. A highly sophisticated discussion of the philosophical basis of criminal law. In: Marc Bot, editor. A theory of criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 45–46.
  • HM Courts and Tribunal Services. 2019. Dominic Chappell v The Pensions Regulator: [2019] UKUT 0209 (TCC). Crown Copyright Open Government Licence for Public Sector Information V.30.
  • Hughes W, Hillebrant P, Murdoch J. 1998. Financial protection in the UK building industry: bond, retention and guarantees. London (UK): E & FN Spon.
  • Husserl E. 1970. Logical investigations. 2 Vols. (Findley JN, translator). New York: Humanities Press.
  • James S. 2019. Government announces proposed new powers to tackle late payment; [accessed 2021 Sep 23]. https://cpa.co.uk/government-announces-proposed-new-powers-to-tackle-late-payments/
  • Kenley R. 2002. Milking the cash cow. The New Zealand Herald; [accessed 2021 Mar 11]. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.
  • Krueger RA. 2002. Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Psychology. 20:3.
  • Kuzmanić M. 2009. Validity in qualitative research: interview and the appearance of truth through dialogue. Horiz Psychol. 18:39–50.
  • Kvale S. 1996. The 1000-page question. Qual Inq. 2(3):275–284.
  • Leedy PD, Ormrod JE. 2013. Practical research: planning and design. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
  • Linda B, Amoah C. 2022. Assessment of challenges and risk factors influencing the operation of emerging contractors in the Gauteng Province, South Africa. Int J Constr Manag. 22(11):2027–2036.
  • Makoye M, Mlinga RS, Ndanshau MOA. 2022. Impact of macroeconomic factors on performance of construction industry in Tanzania. Int J Constr Manag. 10(2):3–6.
  • McCann S. 1999. Time to pay subcontractor. New Law J Pract. 1078:4.
  • Munaaim MC, Dauurl MSM, Abdul-Rahman H. 2007. Is late or non-payment a significant problem to Malaysian contractors? J Des Built Environ. 8(3):35–41.
  • Nichols S. 2016. 2016: The year late payment got a little less payments; [accessed 2020 Oct 12]. https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/news/archive-news/2016-the-year-late-payment-got-a-little-less-late-03-03-2016/.
  • Peter LS, Arewa AO, Ugulu AS. 2020. Unfair payment issues in construction: re-thinking alternative payment method for tier-1 contractors to subcontractors. International Conference on Civil Infrastructure and Construction (CIC 2020); Feb 2–5; Doha, Qatar. p. 5–7.
  • Pettigrew R. 2005. Payment under construction contracts legislation. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
  • Ross I. 2021. Exposing fraud: skills, process and practicalities. Wiley Online Library. ISBN: 9781119177494.
  • Shavelson RJ, Cronbach LJ. 2004. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas. 64(3):391–418.
  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. London (UK): Cassell.
  • Wu J, Kumaraswamy M, Soo G. 2008. Payment problems and regulatory responses in the construction industry: mainland China perspective. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 134(4):399–407.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.