Risk management strategies for common residential construction defects: the case of Queensland, Australia

References

• Aljassmi H, Perera J, Han S. 2013. Identifying and analyzing the correlations and inter-causalities of the root causes of construction defects. IJET. 5(4):469–472. doi: 10.7763/IJET.2013.V5.599.
   Google Scholar
• Alshboul O, Shehadeh A, Hamedat O. 2023. Development of integrated asset management model for highway facilities based on risk evaluation. Int J Construct Manag. 23(8):1355–1364. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1972204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayse AM, Manley K. 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Construct Innov. 4(3):143–154. doi: 10.1108/14714170410815060.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass B, Leaman A. 2005. Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: case studies of the use of techniques in the feedback portfolio. Buil Res Inform. 33(4):361–375. doi: 10.1080/09613210500162032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong WK, Low SP. 2005. Assessment of defects at construction and occupancy stages. J Perform Constr Facil. 19(4):283–289. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois A, Gadde L-E. 2002. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construct Manag Econom. 20(7):621–631. doi: 10.1080/01446190210163543.
   Google Scholar
• Fhloinn N, Maire D. 2019. Remedies for defective housing: devising a model for legal redress and regulatory reform [Doctoral dissertation]. Trinity College Dublin. School of Law. Discipline of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Göçer Ö, Hua Y, Göçer K. 2015. Completing the missing link in building design process: enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance. Build Environ. 89:14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyamfi TA, Aigbavboa C, Thwala WD. 2022. Confirmatory factor analysis of organizational culture influence on Public-Private Partnership risk management in construction industry in Ghana. Int J Construct Supply Chain Manag. 12(1):183–200. doi: 10.14424/ijcscm120122-183-200.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjri K, Crozier C. 2009. Post‐occupancy evaluation: purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities. 27(1/2):21–33. doi: 10.1108/02632770910923063.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann T, Van Meerveld H, Vossebeld N, Adriaanse A. 2012. Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods. Autom Constr. 22:605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal S, Choudhry RM, Holschemacher K, Ali A, Tamošaitienė J. 2015. Risk management in construction projects. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 21(1):65–78. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.994582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson M, Linderoth HC, Rowlinson S. 2017. The role of industry: an analytical framework to understand ICT transformation within the AEC industry. Construct Manag Econom. 35(10):611–626. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2017.1315148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingmond M, Ågren R. 2015. Unravelling causes of defects in construction. Construct Innov. 15(2):198–218. doi: 10.1108/CI-04-2014-0025.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YS, Oh SW, Cho YK, Seo JW. 2008. A PDA and wireless web-integrated system for quality inspection and defect management of apartment housing projects. Autom Constr. 17(2):163–179. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutsch E, Hall M. 2010. Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. Int J Project Manage. 28(3):245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambers R. 2019. Development of a model to risk manage construction defects in the residential sector [Doctoral dissertation]. Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lambers R, Lamari F, Skitmore M, Rajendra D. 2023. Key residential construction defects: a framework for their identification and correlated causes. CI. doi: 10.1108/CI-05-2022-0103.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzerini B, Pistolesi F. 2013. Profiling risk sensibility through association rules. Expert Syst Appl. 40(5):1484–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JY, Zou PXW, Gong W. 2013. Managing project risk at the enterprise level: exploratory case studies in China. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(9):1268–1274. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Edwards DJ. 2013. Curbing rework in offshore projects: systemic classification of risks with dialogue and narratives. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 9(11):1118–1135. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.667419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Edwards DJ, Irani Z, Walker DHT. 2009. Project pathogens: the anatomy of omission errors in construction and resource engineering project. Engineering. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 56(3):425–435. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2008.927774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Lopez R, Edwards DJ. 2013. Reviewing the past to learn in the future: making sense of design errors and failures in construction. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 9(7):675–688. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2011.605369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Smith J. 2016. Toward error management in construction: moving beyond a zero vision. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(11):04016058. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarulla M, Forcada N, Casals M, Gangolells M, Fuertes A, Roca X. 2013. Standardizing housing defects: classification, validation, and benefits. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(8):968–976. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique JD, Al-Hussein M, Bouferguene A, Nasseri R. 2015. Automated generation of shop drawings in residential construction. Autom Constr. 55:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memari AM, Huelman PH, Iulo LD, Laquatra J, Martin C, McCoy A, Nahmens I, Williamson T. 2014. Residential building construction: state-of-the-art review. J Archit Eng. 20(4):B4014005. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000157.
   Google Scholar
• Okoye C. 2022. Risk management and quality projects delivery in Nigeria’s construction industry. IJCECEM. 10(2):1–51. https://tudr.org/id/eprint/1022. doi: 10.37745/ijcecem.14/vol10n2151.
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Jin X, Nnaji C, Akomea-Frimpong I, Wuni IY. 2023. Review of risk management studies in public-private partnerships: a scientometric analysis. Int J Construct Manag. 23(14):2419–2430. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2063013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Karatas CG, Demirkesen S. 2014. A web-based database system for managing construction project knowledge. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 119:377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.043.
   Google Scholar
• Park C-S, Lee D-Y, Kwon O-S, Wang X. 2013. A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collection template. Autom Constr. 33:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partlett DF. 2007. Defective structures and economic loss in the United States law and policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pham HT, Pham T, Truong Quang H, Dang CN. 2023. Supply chain risk management research in construction: a systematic review. Int J Construct Manag. 23(11):1945–1955. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2029677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason J. 1990. Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostami A, Sommerville J, Wong IL, Lee C. 2015. Risk management implementation in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry. Eng Construct Architect Manag. 22(1):91–107. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2014-0057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy R, Low M, Waller J. 2005. Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building. Construct Manag Econom. 23(1):57–67. doi: 10.1080/0144619042000287787.
   Google Scholar
• Royal S, Lehoux N, Blanchet P. 2022. New home warranty schemes: developing a theoretical comparative framework using qualitative content analysis. IJBPA. 40(4):499–522. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-10-2020-0090.
   Google Scholar
• Royal S, Lehoux N, Blanchet P. 2023. Comparative case study research: an international analysis of nine home warranty schemes. IJBPA. 41(4):789–824. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0058.
   Google Scholar
• Sami Ur Rehman M, Thaheem MJ, Nasir AR, Khan KIA. 2022. Project schedule risk management through building information modelling. Int J Construct Manag. 22(8):1489–1499. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1728606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepasgozar SM, Davis S. 2018. Construction technology adoption cube: an investigation on process, factors, barriers, drivers and decision makers using NVIVO and AHP analysis. Buildings. 8(6):74. doi: 10.3390/buildings8060074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokri-Ghasabeh M, Chileshe N. 2014. Knowledge management: barriers to capturing lessons learned from Australian. Construct Contract Perspect Construct Innov. 14(1):108–134. doi: 10.1108/CI-06-2013-0026.
   Google Scholar
• Son H, Lee S, Kim C. 2015. What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions. Autom Constr. 49(Part A):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012.
   Google Scholar
• Ye G, Jin Z, Xia B, Skitmore M. 2015. Analyzing causes for reworks in construction projects in China. J Manage Eng. 31(6):04014097. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz AE, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2014. Using expert opinion for risk assessment: a case study of a construction project utilizing a risk mapping tool. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 119:519–528. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.058.
   Google Scholar
• Yusof NA, Lai KS, Kamal EM. 2017. Characteristics of innovation orientations in construction companies. JEDT. 15(4):436–455. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-06-2016-0037.
   Google Scholar