Design thinking, wicked problems and institutioning change: a case study

References

• Badke-Schaub, P., N. Roozenburg, and C. Cardoso. 2010. “Design Thinking: A Paradigm on Its Way from Dilution to Meaninglessness.” Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, 39–49. Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2016. Design for Policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayazit, N. 2004. “Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research.” Design Issues 20 (1): 16–29. doi:10.1162/074793604772933739.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, E. E. 2002. “P for political—Participation Is Not Enough.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14: 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E. 2014. “Collaborative Design and Grassroots Journalism: Public Controversies and Controversial Publics.”
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2008. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review 86 (6): 84.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., and J. Wyatt. 2010. “Design Thinking for Social Innovation.” Development Outreach 12 (1): 29–43. doi:10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. 1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M. 2012. “Thinking outside the Box? Applying Design Theory to Public Policy.” Politics & Policy 40 (4): 704–724. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00372.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2001. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science.” Design Issues 17 (3): 49–55. doi:10.1162/074793601750357196.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2018. “A Brief History of the Design Thinking Research Symposium Series.” Design Studies 57: 160–164. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.007.
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. 1991. Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E. 2012. “Diversity and Constructive Conflict in Stakeholder Dialogue: Considerations for Design and Methods.” Policy Sciences 45 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9141-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dilnot, C. 2018. “Thinking Design: A Personal Perspective on the Development of the Design Research Society.” Design Studies 54: 142–145. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., T. Lodato, L. Fries, B. Schechter, and T. Barnwell. 2011. “The Collective Articulation of Issues as Design Practice.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 185–197. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630475.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2011. “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., and N. Watson. 2020. “Reframing and Strategic Transformation.” DRS 2020 International Conference: Synergy. Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 2008. “Participation in Design Things.” Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 92–101. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795248
   Google Scholar
• Halse, J., E. Brandt, B. Clark, and T. Binder. 2010. Rehearsing the Future. Copenhagen: Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–39. doi:10.1177/0095399713481601.
   Google Scholar
• Hillgren, P.-A., A. Seravalli, and A. Emilson. 2011. “Prototyping and Infrastructuring in Design for Social Innovation.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 169–183. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630474.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, T. 2016. “Surreptitious Communication Design.” Design Issues 32 (2): 64–77. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00383.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., J. Woodilla, and M. Çetinkaya. 2013. “Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures.” Creativity and Innovation Management 22 (2): 121–146. doi:10.1111/caim.12023.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. 2016. “Design in the Time of Policy Problems.” Proceedings of DRS2016: Design+ Research+ Society-Future-Focused Thinking, 8. Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. 2018. “The Divisiveness of Design Thinking.” Interactions 25 (3): 28–34. doi:10.1145/3194313.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A. 2016. Designing Publics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P. A., and J. A. Busby. 2001. “Softening up the Facts: Engineers in Design Meetings.” Design Issues 17 (3): 67–82. doi:10.1162/074793601750357213.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, S., and J. Reinecke. 2016. “A Modular Governance Architecture In-the-making: How Transnational Standard-setters Govern Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 45 (3): 618–633. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., and T. Heinemann. 2012. “Analysing Conversation: Studying Design as Social Action.” Design Studies 33 (6): 649–672. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2012. “Accommodating Disagreement: A Study of Effective Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 33 (1): 44–63. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Minneman, S. 1991. The Social Construction of a Technical Reality. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2010. “Design Thinking: A Useful Myth.” Core 77. https://www.core77.com/posts/16790/design-thinking-a-useful-myth-16790
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2013. “Rethinking Design Thinking.” Core77. https://www.core77.com//posts/24579/Rethinking-Design-Thinking
   Google Scholar
• Oak, A. 2011. “What Can Talk Tell Us about Design?: Analyzing Conversation to Understand Practice.” Design Studies 32 (3): 211–234. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Orlowski, S., B. Matthews, S. Lawn, G. Jones, N. Bidargaddi, and A. Venning. 2019. “Designing for Practice: Understanding Technology Use in Rural Community-based Youth Mental Health Contexts.” CoDesign 15 (2): 163–184. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1453844.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. 1971. “Some Principles for the Design of an Educational System for Design, Part 2.” DMG Newsletter 5 (1): 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, Horst. 1984. “Second-Generation Design Methods.” In Developments in Design Methodology, edited by Nigel Cross, 317–27. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P. G. 1991. Design Thinking. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, A. 2012. “Infrastructuring for Opening Production, from Participatory Design to Participatory Making?” Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume, 2, 53–56. Roskilde.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. 2005. “Participatory Design: The Will to Succeed.” Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, 29–38. doi:10.1145/1094562.1094567.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391. doi:10.1177/00027649921955326.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x.
   Google Scholar