Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle

References

• Aldunce, P., R. Bórquez, C. Adler, G. Blanco, and R. Garreaud. 2016. “Unpacking Resilience for Adaptation: Incorporating Practitioners’ Experiences Through a Transdisciplinary Approach to the Case of Drought in Chile [Urban Resilience and Urban Sustainability: From Research to Practice].” Sustainability 8 (9): 1–21. doi:10.3390/su8090905.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., P. Danholt, K. Halskov, N. B. Hansen, and P. Lauritsen. 2015. “Participation as a Matter of Concern in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 250–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Google Scholar
• Baibarac, C., and D. Petrescu. 2019. “Co-Design and Urban Resilience: Visioning Tools for Commoning Resilience Practices.” CoDesign 15 (2): 91–109. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, J. R. 2013. “Climate Change Adaptive Capacity in Santiago de Chile: Creating a Governance Regime for Sustainability Planning.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (6): 1916–1933. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12033.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, J., K. Krellenberg, and J. Harris. 2015. “Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Participatory Climate Change Adaptation Planning in Santiago de Chile.” Climate and Development 7 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1080/17565529.2014.934773.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00165.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren 2010. “Participatory Design and “Democratizing Innovation.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (Ehn 1988), 41–50. Doi: 10.1145/1900441.1900448.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, S., K. McSeveny, E. Lockley, D. Wolstenholme, M. Cobb, and A. Dearden. 2013. ”How Was It for You? Experiences of Participatory Design in the UK Health Service.” CoDesign 9: 230–246. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/15710882.2013.846384.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Method. 5th ed., 3–16.Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brysch, S. L., and D. Czischke. 2021. “Affordability Through Design: The Role of Building Costs in Collaborative Housing.” Housing Studies Journal. doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.2009778.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, D. 2021. “Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement.” Informal Logic 41 (2): 245–280. doi:10.22329/IL.V41I2.5580.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K., and R. Ison. 2009. “Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation.” Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (6): 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.523.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. M. 1988. “Multi-Sector Involvement Vital to Giving Programs.” National Civic Preview 77 (3): 249–257. http://geog.sdsu.edu/People/Pages/jankowski/public_html/web780/Connor_1988.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano Chile (CNDU). 2018. Informe CNDU. Sistema de Planificación Urbana Integrada. Propuestas Para la Implementacion de la Politica Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano. Santiago de Chile. Accessed 30 September 2022. https://cndu.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.-PROPUESTAS-PARA-IMPLEMENTAR-UN-SISTEMA-DE-PLANIFICACIÓN-URBANA-INTEGRADA-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drain, A., and E. B. N. Sanders. 2019. “A Collaboration System Model for Planning and Evaluating Participatory Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 13 (3): 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gaete Cruz, M., A. Ersoy, D. Czischke, and E. van Bueren. 2021. ”How Co-Design of Public Space Contributes to Strengthening Resilience: Lessons from Two Chilean Cases.” In Governance of Climate Responsive Cities, edited by E. Peker, and A. Ataov,105–125. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_7
   Google Scholar
• Gaete Cruz, M., A. Ersoy, D. Czischke, and E. van Bueren. 2022. ”A Framework for Co-Design Processes and the Use of Visual Collaborative Methods: An Action Research Through Design in the Atacama Desert [Co‐Creation and the City: Arts‐Based Methods and Participatory Approaches in Urban Planning].” Urban Planning Journal 7 (3): 363–378. doi:10.17645/up.v7i3.5349.
   Google Scholar
• Gofen, A. 2015. “Citizens’ Entrepreneurial Role in Public Service Provision.” Public Management Review 17 (3): 404–424. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822533.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., L. Hinton, T. Finlay, A. Macfarlane, N. Fahy, B. Clyde, and A. Chant. 2019. “Frameworks for Supporting Patient and Public Involvement in Research: Systematic Review and Co-Design Pilot.” Health Expectations 22 (4): 785–801. doi:10.1111/hex.12888.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and N. B. Hansen. 2015. “The Diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002-2012.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. B., C. Dindler, K. Halskov, O. S. Iversen, C. Bossen, D. A. Basballe, and B. Schouten 2019. “How Participatory Design Works: Mechanisms and Effects.” In OzCHI’19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, Fremantle, Australia. Doi:10.1145/3369457.3369460.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., and M. Teli. 2020. “The Politics of Co-Design.” CoDesign 16 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1728150.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, W. 2007. “Research Through DESIGN Through Research.” Kybernetes 36 (9/10): 1362–1380. doi:10.1108/03684920710827355.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela-Huotari, K., P. Friedrich, and M. Isomursu 2013. “Jungle of “Co” Jungle of “Co,” June.
   Google Scholar
• Krellenberg, K., and K. Barth. 2014. “Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research for Planning Climate Change Adaptation Responses: The Example of Santiago de Chile.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 39 (4): 360–375. doi:10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000097.
   Google Scholar
• Krellenberg, K., R. Jordán, J. Rehner, A. Schwarz, B. Infante, K. Barth, and A. Pérez. 2014. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Santiago, Chile: United Nations. Accessed 30 September 2022. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/35898/S2013069_en.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, R. 2002. “The Risk of ‘Going Observationalist’: Negotiating the Hidden Dilemmas of Being an Insider Participant Observer.” Qualitative Research 2 (1): 97–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001641.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. J., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, and C. J. Thomas, C. J. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (SUPPL. 1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Google Scholar
• Lecannelier, L. 2015. “Del Conflicto a la Oportunidad: Participación Ciudadana En el Desarrollo Urbano.” Urbano 14–19. http://revistas.ubiobio.cl/index.php/RU/article/view/455.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. 2008. ”Design Participation Tactics : The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-Design Process.” 0882. Doi:10.1080/15710880701875613.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs : An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 199–215. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T., and F. Sleeswijk Visser 2011. “Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of co‐design and co‐creation.” IASDR 2011 – 4th World Conference in Design Research. Diversity and unity, 31 October–4 November 2011, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2018. “Design Roulette: A Close Examination of Collaborative Decision-Making in Design from the Perspective of Framing.” Design Studies 57: 75–92. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, O. 2018. “Contain, Restore, Connect: Landscape as Infrastructure.” ARQ 2018 (99): 83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, I. 2015. “Opening Up: Towards a Sociable Smart City.” Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking 161–173. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-919-6_9.
   Google Scholar
• Munthe-Kaas, P. 2015. “Agonism and Co-Design of Urban Spaces.” Urban Research and Practice 8 (2): 218–237. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1050207.
   Google Scholar
• Orellana, A., F. Arenas, C. Marshall, and A. Rivera. 2016. “Resistance to Metropolitan Institutionality and Planning in Chile.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (4): 435–451. doi:10.1080/02697459.2016.1196535.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2007. ”Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. A. Sabatier 21. Colorado: Westview Press. Doi:10.1081/E-EPAP2-120041405.
   Google Scholar
• Palmås, K., and O. von Busch. 2015. “Quasi-Quisling: Co-Design and the Assembly of Collaborateurs.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 236–249. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081247.
   Google Scholar
• Poderi, G., M. Bettega, A. Capaccioli, and V. D’Andrea. 2018. “Disentangling Participation Through Time and Interaction Spaces–the Case of IT Design for Energy Demand Management.” CoDesign 14 (1): 45–59. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1416145.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., H. Sharp, and I. Rogers. 2001. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer interaction. Universal Access in the Information Society. Wiley. doi:10.1007/s10209-004-0102-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. 1995. “Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture.” World Development 23 (8): 1247–1263. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, and L. C. Stringer, B. Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, L. C. Stringer. 2010. “What is Social Learning?” Ecology and Society 15 (4). doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01.
   Google Scholar
• Ridder, H. G. 2017. “The Theory Contribution of Case Study Research Designs.” Business Research 10 (2): 281–305. doi:10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenburg, N. F. M., and J. Eekels. 1995. Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. 1st ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Sulonen, J., E. Eriksson, K. Halskov, H. Karasti, and J. Vines. 2018. “Unfolding Participation Over Time: Temporal Lenses in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (1): 4–16. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1426773.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. 2006. “Design Research in 2006.” Design Research Quarterly 1 (September): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. 2008. “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research.” Interactions 15.6 (November+December): 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. 2014. “Perspectives on Participation in Design.” Wer Gestaltet Die Gestaltung? Doi:10.14361/transcript.9783839420386.65.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, K., and E. van Bueren. 2018. “The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs.” Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (7): 21–33. doi:10.22215/timreview/1088.
   Google Scholar
• Szebeko, D., and L. Tan. 2010. “Co-Designing for Society.” The Australasian Medical Journal 3 (9): 580–590. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2010.378.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, F. H. M., R. P. H. Snep, S. Koole, R. Brolsma, R. Van der Brugge, J. Spijker, and T. Vergroesen. 2016. “Adaptation Planning Support Toolbox: Measurable Performance Information Based Tools for Co-Creation of Resilient, Ecosystem-Based Urban Plans with Urban Designers, Decision-Makers and Stakeholders.” Environmental Science & Policy 66: 427–436. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., and R. F. Lusch. 2004. “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., and R. F. Lusch. 2008. “Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, R., X. Bai, M. S. Smith, R. Costanza, D. Griggs, M. Moglia, and G. Thomson, P. Newman, P. Newton, B. Norman, C. Ryan. 2018. “Sustainable Urban Systems: Co-Design and Framing for Transformation.” Ambio 47 (1): 57–77. doi:10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6.
   Google Scholar