Accessibility and participatory design: time, power, and facilitation

References

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 205–224. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angela Glover, B. 2017. “THE Curb-Cut EFFECT.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 15 (1): 28.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, E. 2018. “The Promise of Co‐Design for Public Policy.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (4): 729–743. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., and M. Kyng. 2018. “Participatory Design That Matters-Facing the Big Issues.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1145/3152421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., C. Dindler, and O. Iversen. 2016. “Evaluation in Participatory Design.” August 15 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. 1998. “Doing Democracy Up Close: Culture, Power and Communication in Community Building.” Journal of Planning Education & Research 18 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/0739456X9801800101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderon, C. 2020. “Unearthing the Political: Differences, Conflicts and Power in Participatory Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 25 (1): 50–64. doi:10.1080/13574809.2019.1677146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, E. R., L. Craigo, P. P. Hoontis, E. Jaffe, L. McGee, and J. Sayegh. 2020. “Creating a Charrette Process to Ignite the Conversation on Equity and Inclusion.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 45 (8): 608–618. doi:10.1080/10668926.2020.1756534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draffan, E. A., A. James, M. Wald, and A. Idris. 2016. “Framework for Selecting Assistive Technology User-Participation Methods.” Journal of Assistive Technologies 10 (2): 92–101. doi:10.1108/JAT-01-2016-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Drain, A. 2021. “Insights, Solutions and Empowerment: A Framework for Evaluating Participatory Design.” CoDesign 17 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1540641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drain, A., and E. B. N. Sanders. 2019. “A Collaboration System Model for Planning and Evaluating Participatory Design Projects.” International journal of design 13:39.
   Google Scholar
• Drain, A., A. Shekar, and N. Grigg. 2018. “Participatory Design with People with Disability in Rural Cambodia: The Creativity Challenge.” Design Journal 21 (5): 685–706. doi:10.1080/14606925.2018.1488923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 2008. “Participation in Design Things.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, Indiana University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, J., W. Douven, J. Van der Stroom, S. Hasan, C. Seijger, and H. L. Phi. 2019. “A Framework to Assess the Performance of Participatory Planning Tools for Strategic Delta Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (9): 1636–1653. doi:10.1080/09640568.2019.1603843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L. 2022. “George Brown College’s Institute without Boundaries.” World Design Organization. https://wdo.org/george-brown-colleges-institute-without-boundaries/
   Google Scholar
• Flyberg, B., and T. Richardson. 2002. “Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory.” In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, edited by Philip Allmendinger and Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2013. Planning in the Face of Conflict: The Surprising Possibilities of Facilitative Leadership. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, C., J. Good, G. Fitzpatrick, and O. Sejer Iversen. 2015. “In Pursuit of Rigour and Accountability in Participatory Design.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 93–106. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, C., J. Good, and W. Keay-Bright. 2011. “Designing Technology for Children with Special Needs: Bridging Perspectives Through Participatory Design.” CoDesign 7 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.587013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorio, B.-E. 2002. “Contributions of Caucusing and Pre-Caucusing to Mediation.” Group Facilitation (4): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, S. 2018. “Design Anthropology as Social Design Process.” Journal of Business Anthropology 7 (2): 210–234. doi:10.22439/jba.v7i2.5604.
   Google Scholar
• Hamraie, A., and K. Fritsch. 2019. “Crip Technoscience Manifesto.” Catalyst (San Diego, California) 5 (1): 1–33. doi:10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607.
   Google Scholar
• Hasso Plattner Institute of Design. 2021. “Design Thinking Bootleg; Barriers and Challenges to Equity Work; Ethnography Fieldguides.”
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. K.-L., M. Jin, and Y. Lee. 2011. “Empathy @ Design Research: A Phenomenological Study on Young People Experiencing Participatory Design for Social Inclusion.” CoDesign 7 (2): 95–106. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.609893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Z., and M. M. Somerville. 2014. “A comparative study of two design charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research.” CoDesign 10 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.881883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., M. Teli, M. Zuljevic, and M. Bettega. 2020. “Visions That Change. Articulating the Politics of Participatory Design.” 16 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1728907.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, S., and P. Sartoretto. 2020. “Research Ethics: Critical Reflections on Horizontal Media Activism Research Practices.” In Media Activist Research Ethics, 27–50. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_2.
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., C. Raphael, and A. S. Hammond. 2009. “Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation Among the Disempowered.” Politics & Society 37 (4): 576–615. doi:10.1177/0032329209349226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2017. “Scotland’s Approach to Participatory Planning: Characterising the Charrette.” International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 11 (2): 101. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., N. Bernardi, and C. Martin. 2015. “Universal Design Pedagogy Through a Charrette to Increase Professional Sensitivity.” Journal of Accessibility & Design for All 5 (1): 47–76. doi:10.17411/jacces.v5i1.91.
   Google Scholar
• Kraff, H. 2018. “A Tool for Reflection—On Participant Diversity and Changeability Over Time in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (1): 60–73. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1424204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2012. “The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities.” Paper presented at the Participatory Design, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. 2018. Crip Times: Disability, Globalization, and Resistance. New York: NYU Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9nj.
   Google Scholar
• Merter, S., and D. Hasırcı. 2018. “A Participatory Product Design Process with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.” CoDesign 14 (3): 170–187. doi:10.1080/15710882.2016.1263669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. R., and T. J. Elliott. 2016. “From Participatory Design to a Listening Infrastructure.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 30 (1): 59–84. doi:10.1177/1050651915602294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti. 2018. “Politics of Mattering in the Practices of Participatory Design.” Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Roggema, R. 2014. The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., and G. Marsden. 2013. “Does He Take Sugar?: Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Compassion.” Interactions (New York, NY) 20 (4): 48–57. doi:10.1145/2486227.2486238.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. M. 2014. “Participatory Action Research. Improving Professional Practices and Local Situations.” In SAGE Research MethodsCases Part 1. London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/978144627305014534165.
   Google Scholar
• Spiel, K., E. Brulé, C. Frauenberger, G. Bailley, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2020. “In the Details: The Micro-Ethics of Negotiations and in-Situ Judgements in Participatory Design with Marginalised Children.” CoDesign 16 (1): 45–65. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1722174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S., and S. Kemp. 2006. “Integrating Social Science and Design Inquiry Through Interdisciplinary Design Charrettes: An Approach to Participatory Community Problem Solving.” American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (1): 125–139. doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9065-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swerhun, Inc. 2012. Discuss.Decide.Do. Toronto: Swerhun Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Swist, T., B. Hodge, and P. Collin. 2016. ““Cultural making”: How Complexity and Power Relations are Modulated in Transdisciplinary Research.” Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.) 30 (4): 489–501. doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1186606.
   Google Scholar
• Swist, T., L. Magee, J. Phuong, and D. Sweeting. 2017. “The labour of communicating publics: Participatory platforms, socio-technical intermediaries and pluralistic expertise.” Communication and the Public 2 (3): 210–225. doi:10.1177/2057047317719294.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education & Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar