Exploring the future of fashion design education for generation Z through ‘Co-design as community-based participatory research’

References

• Anderson, M., and J. Jiang. 2018. “Teens, Social Media & Technology.” Pew Research Center, May 31. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Androutsos, A., and V. Brinia. 2019. “Developing and Piloting a Pedagogy for Teaching Innovation, Collaboration, and Co-Creation in Secondary Education Based on Design Thinking, Digital Transformation, and Entrepreneurship.” Education Science 9 (2): 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020113.
   Google Scholar
• BoF (Business of Fashion). 2020. “The BoF Podcast: Li Edelkoort Says the Coronavirus is a Representation of Our Conscience.” Business of Fashion, March 27. https://www.businessoffashion.com/podcasts/luxury/the-bof-podcast-li-edelkoort-on-how-covid-19-is-ushering-in-the-age-of-the-amateur.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2019. Change by Design, Revised and Updated. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bye, E. 2010. A Direction for Clothing and Textile Design Research. Clothing and Textiles Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 28 (3): 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X10371505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicca, J., and T. Shellenbarger. 2018. “Connecting with Generation Z: Approaches in Nursing Education.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 13 (3): 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collina, L., L. Galluzzo, S. Maffei, and V. Monna. 2017. “Designing Design Education. An Articulated Programme of Collective Open Design Activities.” The Design Journal 20 (1): s1000–s1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353044.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. W. 2019. Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2007. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. New Work: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Damhorst, M. L., K. Miller-Spillman, and S. O. andMichelman. 2005. The Meaning of Dress. 2nd ed. New York: Fairchild Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938) 2015. Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dimock, M. 2019. “Defining Generations: Where the Millennials End and Generation Z Begins.” Pew Research Center, January 17. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.
   Google Scholar
• Donaghy, R. 2014. “Innovation Imperative: Meet Generation Z.” News @ Northeastern University, November 18. https://news.northeastern.edu/2014/11/18/generation-z-survey/on.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, K., T. Mawhinney, and K. Betts. (n.d.). “Welcome to Generation Z.” Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/consumer-business/welcome-to-gen-z.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• González, N. 2005. “Beyond Culture: The Hybridity of Funds of Knowledge.” In Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms, edited by N. González, L. C. Moll, and C. Amanti, 29–46. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannsson, K., L. Forlano, J. H. J. Choi, C. Disalvo, T. C. Pargman, S. Bardzell, S. Lindtner, and S. Joshi. 2018. “Provocation, Conflict, and Appropriation: The Role of the Designer in Making Publics.” Design Issues 34 (4): 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C. N., S. Erete, and A. M. Piper. 2019. “Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Toward More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (216): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin, T. 2015. “Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research.” Design and Culture 7 (2): 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jekal, M. 2020. “A Balanced Curriculum for Student-Oriented Learning in Art + Design Education: Toward Community-Based Participatory Design Research.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota. ProQuest (28002644).
   Google Scholar
• Katherine, T., and S. Ania. 2020. “Re-Making Fashion Experience: A Model for ‘Participatory Research Through Clothing design’.” Journal of Arts and Communities 11 (1–2): 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00012_1.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, S. J., and M. B. Garner. 2008. Beyond Design: The Synergy of Apparel Product Development. 2nd ed. New York: Fairchild.
   Google Scholar
• Kumashiro, K. K. 2004. Going Against Common Sense: Teaching and Learning Toward Social Justice. New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 1995. “Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (3): 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, M. M. L., E. P. H. Li, W. S. Liu, and E. Y. Lam. 2020. “Introducing Participatory Action Research to Vocational Fashion Education: Theories, Practices, and Implications.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 74 (3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1765844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, V. L., and J. M. Morris Jr. 2019. “Multigenerational Classrooms in Higher Education: Equity and Learning with Technology.” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 36 (2): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2018-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2014. “Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design.” Design Issues 30 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLain, M. 2018. “Emerging Perspectives on the Demonstration as a Signature Pedagogy in Design and Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28:985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9425-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., and D. Norman. 2019. “Changing Design Education for the 21st Century.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6 (1): 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. C., and B. Mills. 2019. “‘If They Don’t Care, I Don’t care’: Millennial and Generation Z Students and the Impact of Faculty Caring.” Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 19 (4): 78. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i4.24167.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K., N. Graf, and R. Igielnik. 2019. “Generation Z Looks a Lot Like Millennials on Key Social and Political Issues.” Pew Research Center, January 17. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/01/17/generation-z-looks-a-lot-like-millennials-on-key-social-and-political-issues/.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K., and R. Igielnik. 2020. “On the Cusp of Adulthood and Facing an Uncertain Future: What We Know About Gen Z so Far.” Pew Research Center, May 14. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/essay/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and-facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far/#fn-28453-1.
   Google Scholar
• Penprase, B. E. 2018. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Higher Education”. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, edited by N. W. Gleason, 207–229. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-981-13-0194-0_9.
   Google Scholar
• Pontis, S., and K. V. D. andWaarde. 2020. “Looking for Alternatives: Challenging Assumptions in Design Education.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6 (2): 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Rickes, P. C. 2016. “Generations in Flux: How Gen Z Will Continue to Transform Higher Education Space.” Planning for Higher Education 44 (4): 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, C. L., L. S. Martinez, J. Chu, K. Hacker, D. Brugge, A. Pirie, N. Allukian, A. M. Rodday, and L. K. Leslie. 2012. “Community-Engaged Pedagogy: A Strengths-Based Approach to Involving Diverse Stakeholders in Research Partnerships.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 6 (4): 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N. 2017. “Design Research at the Crossroads of Education and Practice.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Schroth, H. 2019. “Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?” California Management Review 61 (3): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., and M. Grace. 2016. Generation Z Goes to College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Souleles, N. 2017. “Design for Social Change and Design Education: Social Challenges versus Teacher Centered Pedagogies.” Design Journal 20 (1): S927–S936. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353037.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2013. “Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination.”Design Issues.” Design Issues 29 (2): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tselepis, T. J. 2018. “When Clothing Designers Become Business People: A Design Centered Training Methodology for Empowerment Incubation.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 11 (3): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1431809.
   Google Scholar
• Twinge, J. M. 2017. “Have Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” The Atlantic. September issue. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/has-the-smartphone-destroyed-a-generation/534198/.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N. B., and B. Duran. 2006. “Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Health Disparities.” Health Promotion Practice 7 (3): 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906289376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, S., and L. Dunne. 2015. Functional Clothing Design: From Sportswear to Spacesuits. New York: Fairchild Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmer, T. 2015. “Generations Do Differ: Best Practices in Leading Traditionalists, Boomers, and Generations X, Y, and Z.” Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 82 (1): 51–58. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1770514324?accountid=2909.
   Google Scholar