Pathologies of society and social philosophy: new perspectives from Finland

References

• Arentshorst, H. 2015. Social freedom in contemporary capitalism. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Arentshorst, H. 2016. Towards a reconstructive approach in political philosophy: Rosanvallon and Honneth on the pathologies of today’s democracy. Thesis Eleven 134, no. 10: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E.. 1893. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmgren, H. 2015. Recognition and the ideology of merit. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Elmgren, H. 2018. Merit, competition, distinction. Redescription 21, no. 1: 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and A. Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition: a political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Freyenhagen, F. 2015. Honneth on social pathologies: a critique. Critical Horizons 16, no. 1: 131–152. doi: 10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000044
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. 2019. Recovering the critical potential of social pathology diagnosis. European Journal of Social Theory 22, no. 1: 45–62. doi: 10.1177/1368431018766272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, O. 2015. Pathologies of collective recognition. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 210–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, O. 2017. Groups as persons? A suggestion for a Hegelian turn. Journal of Social Ontology 3, no. 2: 143–165. doi: 10.1515/jso-2016-0019
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1994. The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts, english translation by J. Anderson. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1996. Pathologies of the social, the past and the present of social philosophy. In Handbook of critical theory, ed. David M. Rasmussen, 369–398. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2002. Grounding recognition: A rejoinder to critical questions. Inquiry 45, no. 4: 499–519. doi: 10.1080/002017402320947577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2007. Recognition as ideology. In Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory, ed. B. van de Brink, and D. Owen, 323–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2011. Rejoinder. In Axel Honneth: critical essays, ed. Danielle Petherbridge, 391–421. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014a. The Diseases of society: Approaching a nearly impossible concept. Social Research 81, no. 3: 683–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014b. Freedom’s Right. English Translation by Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2017a. Is there an emancipatory interest? An attempt to answer critical theory's most fundamental question. European Journal of Philosophy 25, no. 4: 908–920. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., and B. Carnevali. 2017b. La libertà negli altri. Saggi di filosofia sociale. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen, R., A. Laitinen, and T. Wallgren 2019. Habermas in Finland: analytic philosophy, legal theory and Post-Marxist social theory in dialogue. In Habermas global: Wirkungsgeschichte eines Werks, ed. L. Corchia, S. Müller-Doohm, and W. Outwaite, 443–458. Berlin: Surhkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ikäheimo, H. 2002. On the genus and species of recognition. Inquiry 45, no. 4: 447–462. doi: 10.1080/002017402320947540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikäheimo, H., and A. Laitinen. 2007. Analyzing recognition: identification, acknowledgement, and recognitive attitudes towards persons. In Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory, ed. B. van de Brink, and D. Owen, 33–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikäheimo, H. 2015. Conceptualizing causes for lack of recognition: capacities, costs and understanding. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, H.J. 2019. Mediated recognition: Suggestions towards an articulation. In Recognition and religion: contemporary and historical perspectives, ed. M. Kahlos, H. J. Koskinen, and R. Palmén, 34–50. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A. 2002. Interpersonal recognition: A response to value or a precondition of personhood. Inquiry 45, no. 4: 463–478. doi: 10.1080/002017402320947559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A. 2003. Social equality, recognition and preconditions of good life. Social Inequality Today, Refereed Conference Proceedings, 12 November 2003, http://www.crsi.mq.edu.au/research_sit_aitinen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A. 2015. Social pathologies, reflexive pathologies, and the idea of higher-order disorders. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 44–65.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A., and A. Särkelä. 2019a. Four conceptions of social pathology. European Journal of Social Theory 22, no. 1: 80–102. doi: 10.1177/1368431018769593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen, A., and A. Särkelä. 2019b. Between normativism and naturalism: Honneth on social pathology. Constellations (oxford, England) 26: 286–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, L. 2008. The trouble with recognition: subjectivity, suffering, and agency. Sociological Theory 26, no. 3: 271–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen, R. 2016. Recognition and religion: A historical and systematic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Särkelä, A. 2014. Un dramma in tre atti: La lotta per il riconoscimento pubblico secondo John Dewey. In Contesti del riconoscimento, ed. F. Gregoratto, and F. Ranchio, 87–95. Milano/Udine: Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Särkelä, A. 2015. Ideology as artificial respiration: Hegel on stoicism, skepticism and unhappy consciousness. Studies in Social and Political Thought 25, no. 2: 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Särkelä, A. 2017. Degeneration of associated life: Dewey’s naturalism about social criticism. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 53, no. 1: 107–126. doi: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.1.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen, P. 2012. From mechanical to organic solidarity and back: with Honneth beyond Durkheim. European Journal of Social Theory 15, no. 4: 454–470. doi: 10.1177/1368431011423589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M.J. 2016. The domestication of critical theory. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wallgren, T. 2003. Critical theory. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80: 537–579.
   Google Scholar
• Zurn, C.F. 2011. Social pathologies as second-order disorders. In Axel Honneth: critical essays. with a reply by Axel Honneth, ed. D. Petherbridge, 345–370. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar