Toward a critique of neo-republican reason: the subject, discursive control, and power in Pettit’s political theory

References

• Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1997. Dialectic of enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Amy. 2010. Recognizing domination: Recognition and power in Honneth’s critical theory. Journal of Power 3, no. 1: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1988. The politics. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John Langshaw. 1976. How to do things with words. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1995. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of postmodernism. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell, and Nancy Fraser, 35–57. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 2016. Frames of war: When is life grievable? 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Samuel. 2013. The lessons of Rancière. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, Alan. 2020. A radical revolution in thought: Frederick Douglass on the slave’s perspective on republican freedom. In Radical republicanism: Recovering the tradition’s popular heritage, ed. Bruno Leipold, Karma Nabulsi, and Stuart White, 47–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, Denise Ferreira. 2007. Toward a global idea of race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1996. Remarks on deconstruction and pragmatism. In Deconstruction and pragmatism, ed. Chantal Mouffe, 79–90. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1997. The politics of friendship. Trans. George Collins. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 2000. Performative powerlessness – a response to Simon Critchley. Constellations 7, no. 4: 466–8.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 2002. The animal that therefore I am (more to follow). Trans. David Willis. Critical Inquiry 28, no. 2: 369–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devenney, Mark. 2020. Towards an improper politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Liam. 2020. The politics of non-domination: Populism, contestation and neo-republican democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 46, no. 7: 858–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer. 2011. The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. Trans. by Jeffrey Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer. 2013. A Kantian republican conception of justice as nondomination. In Republic democracy, ed. Andreas Niederberger and Philipp Schink, 154–68. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer. 2015. Noumenal power. The Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 2: 111–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer. 2017. Normativity and power: Analyzing social orders of justification. Trans. Ciaran Cronin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality Vol 1: An introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2011. The government of the self and others, lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gädeke, Dorothea. 2020. From neo-republicanism to critical republicanism. In Radical republicanism: Recovering the tradition’s popular heritage, ed. Bruno Leipold, Karma Nabulsi, and Stuart White, 23–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, Paul. 2014. Lecture I. Suffering and infrahumanity & Lecture II. Humanities and a new humanism, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Yale University 21 February 2014. https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Gilroy%20manuscript%20PDF.pdf (accessed March 10, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Saidiya. 2008. Venus in two acts. Caribbean Journal of Criticism 12, no. 2: 1–14. Small Axe Number 26.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, Mark. 2020. The four dimensions of power: Understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 1995. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 2012. Reification and recognition: A new look at an old idea. In Reification: A new look at an old idea, ed. Martin Jay, 17–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 2014. Freedom’s right: The social foundations of democratic life. Trans. Joseph Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. 2020. Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an anti-black world. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, Arto. 2015. Broader contexts of non-domination: Pettit and Hegel on freedom and recognition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18, no. 4: 390–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markell, Patchen. 2020. Power, attention and the tasks of critical theory. In Toleration, power and the right to justification: Rainer Forst in dialogue, 139–49. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, Achille. 2019. Necropolitics. Trans. Stephen Corcoran. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, John P. 2019. The new ochlophobia? Populism, majority rule and prospects for democratic republicanism. In Republican democracy, ed. Yiftah Elazar and Geneviève Rousselière, 130–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. 2004. On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Charles W. 2017a. Black rights/white wrongs: The critique of racial liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Charles W. 2017b. Criticizing critical theory. In Critical theory in critical times: Transforming the global political and economic order, ed. Penelope Deutscher and Cristina Lafont, 233–50. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, Carole, and Charles W. Mills. 2007. Contract and domination. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2001. A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2003. Deliberative democracy, the discursive dilemma, and republican theory. In Philosophy, politics and society Vol. 7: Debating deliberative democracy, ed. James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett, 138–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the people’s terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 1995. La mésentente: politique et philosophie. Paris: Galilée.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Trans. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The politics of aesthetics. Trans. Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Trans. Stephen Corcoran. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2016. Critical questions on the theory of recognition. In Axel Honneth and Jacques Rancière, recognition or disagreement: A critical encounter on the politics of freedom, equality, and identity, ed. Katia Genel and Jean-Philippe Deranty, 83–95. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Kevin. 2020. Refiguring childhood: Encounters with biosocial power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuppert, Fabian. 2013. Discursive control, non-domination and Hegelian recognition theory: Marrying Pettit’s account(s) of freedom with a Pippinian/Brandomian reading of Hegelian agency. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39, no. 9: 893–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. The partial constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, Sylvia. 2003. Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review 3, no. 3: 257–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar