Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Volume 22, 2024 - Issue 2: Mind in Action: The Interplay of Cognition and Action in Skilled Performance
Submit an article Journal homepage
205
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Africa

You can’t con a conman: the perception of deceptive actions performed by the self and others

Ryan Raffana Department of Human Movement Science, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa;b Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
David Mannb Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-6939View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Geert Savelsberghb Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands;c Faculty of Sports and Nutrition, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsView further author information
Pages 517-532 | Received 15 Jan 2023, Accepted 11 Oct 2023, Published online: 14 Feb 2024

References

  • Abernethy, B., Gill, D. P., Parks, S. L., & Packer, S. T. (2001). Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception, 30(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2872
  • Bischoff, M., Zengraf, K., Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Balser, N., Baumgartner, E., Hohmann, T., Stark, R., Vaitl, D., & Munzert, J. (2012). Motor familiarity: Brain activation when watching kinematic displays of one’s own movements. Neuropsychologia, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.009
  • Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190152
  • Cañal-Bruland, R. (2017). Deception detection in action: Embodied simulation in antisocial human interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00166
  • Cañal-Bruland, R., & Schmidt, M. (2009). Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica, 130(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.009
  • Dicks, M., Davids, K., & Button, C. (2010). Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football. Human Movement Science, 29(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.02.008
  • Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230027
  • Grèzes, J., Firth, C. D., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21(2), 744–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00665-7
  • Hohmann, T., Troje, N. F., Olmas, A., & Munzert, J. (2011). The influence of motor expertise and motor experience on action and actor recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.525504
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  • Jackson, R. C., Barton, H., Ashford, K. J., & Abernethy, B. (2018). What Can lexical tone training studies in adults tell US about tone processing in children? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001
  • Jackson, R. C., Warren, S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.002
  • Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception Psychophysiology, 14, 195–204.
  • Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00387
  • Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.456
  • Loffing, F., Schorer, J., Hagemann, N., & Baker, J. (2012). On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: Further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(2), 446–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0252-1
  • Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and "nonparametric" indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.401
  • Mulligan, D., Lohse, K. R., & Hodges, N. J. (2016). Evidence for dual mechanisms of action prediction dependent on acquired visual-motor experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(10), 1615. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000241
  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752551
  • Raffan, R., Mann, D. L., & Savelsbergh, G. J. (2023). Skilled deceivers are better action perceivers and vice versa. Human Movement Science, 89, 103073.
  • Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity. Psychological Science, 15(9), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00727.x
  • Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2009). Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.170
  • Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.