Evaluating the Efficiency of Decision Making Units in Fuzzy two-stage DEA Models

References

• Kiaei H, Nasseri SH. Allocation of weights using simultaneous optimization of inputs and outputs’ contribution in cross-efficiency evaluation of DEA. Yugoslav J Oper Res. 2018;28(4):521–538.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2:429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasseri SH, Kiaei H. Ranking of efficient units on the basis of distance from virtual ideal and anti-ideal units. Int J Appl Decis Sci. 2019;12(4):361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Nasseri SH, Kiaei H. The new neutral secondary goal based on ideal DMU evaluation in cross-efficiency. Iran J Manag Stud. 2018;12(4):509–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koronakos G. A taxonomy and review of the network data envelopment analysis literature. In: Tsihrintzis G, Virvou M, Sakkopoulos E, Jain L, editors. Machine learning paradigms, Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, Vol. 1; 2019. p. 255–311.
   Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S. Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic; 1996a.
   Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach. Econ Lett. 1996b;50:65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis HF. Performance measurement of major league baseball teams using network DEA. In: A ES, editor. Data envelopment analysis, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 208. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 475–535.
   Google Scholar
• Zha T, Liang N, Wu M, et al. Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: a dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach. Omega. 2016;60:60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Li ZQ, Cook WD, et al. DEA efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback. IIE Trans. 2011;43:309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashim R, Kasim MM, Rosshairy AR. Measuring efficiency of a university faculty using a hierarchical network data envelopment analysis model. Int J Inf Commun Technol. 2018;17(4):569–585.
   Google Scholar
• Kao C, Hwang SN. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;185:418–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang SN, Kao TL. Measuring managerial efficiency in non-life insurance companies: An application of two-stage data envelopment analysis technique. Int J Manage. 2006;23:699–720.
   Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Ketabi S, Ghandehari M. A novel fuzzy network DEA model to evaluate efficiency of Iran’s electricity distribution network with sustainability considerations. Sustain Energ Technol Assess. 2022;52:102269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C. Network data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;239(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiaei H, Matin RK, Nasseri SH. Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Int J Appl Decis Sci. 2020;13(1):21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Guo C, Shureshjani RA, Foroughi AA, et al. Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 2017;257:896–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega. 2010;38:423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford LM, Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Manage Sci. 1999;45:1270–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Gopal RD, Zionts S. Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann Oper Res. 1997;73:191–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two stage DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;196:1170–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe R, Whittaker G. An intermediate input model of diary production using complex survey data. J Agric Econ. 1995;46:201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J. DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Logist. 2008;55:643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, et al. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res. 2006;145:35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen Y, Liang L, et al. DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega. 2012;40(5):611–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfati M, Yuan W, Khan A, et al. A new approach to solve fuzzy data envelopment analysis model based on uncertainty. IEEE Access. 2020;8:167300–167307.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta JK. A fuzzy systems approach in data envelopment analysis. Comput Math Appl. 1992;24(9):259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Liu ST. Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000;113:427–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad A, Tavana M, Hatami-Marbini A. The state of the art in fuzzy data envelopment analysis. In: Emrouznejad A, Tavana M, editors. Performance measurement with fuzzy data envelopment analysis, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 309. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2014. p. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Foroughi AA, Shureshjani RA. Solving generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis model: a parametric approach. Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2017;25(4):889–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadikhah M, Azadi M, Toloo M, et al. Sustainably resilient supply chains evaluation in public transport: a fuzzy chance-constrained two-stage DEA approach. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;113:107879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasseri SH, Ebrahimnejad A, Gholami O. Fuzzy stochastic input-oriented primal data envelopment analysis models with application to insurance industry. Int J ApplDecis Sci. 2016;9(3):259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Nasseri SH, Ebrahimnejad A, Gholami O. Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs and its application to banking industry. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2018;20(2):534–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad A, Nasseri SH, Gholami O. Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with application to NATO enlargement problem. RAIRO Oper Res. 2019;53(2):705–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasseri SH, Khatir MA. Fuzzy stochastic undesirable two-stage data envelopment analysis models with application to banking industry. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2019;37(5):7047–7057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad A, Tavana M, Nasseri SH, et al. A new method for solving dual DEA problems with fuzzy stochastic data. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2019;18:147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Liu ST. Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011;176:20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano S. Process efficiency of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2014;243:36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K. A new two-stage stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model. Measurement. 2014;53:277–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ST. Restricting weight flexibility in fuzzy two-stage DEA. Comput Ind Eng. 2014a;74:149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ST. Fuzzy efficiency ranking in fuzzy two-stage data envelopment analysis. Optim Lett. 2014b;8:633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH. Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1985;17:113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana M, Khalili Damghani K. Arteaga FJS, et al. Efficiency decomposition and measurement in two-stage fuzzy DEA models using a bargaining game approach. Comput Ind Eng. 2018; 118:394–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrat A, Sanei M, Payan A, et al. Using credibility theory to evaluate the fuzzy two-stage DEA: sensitivity and stability analysis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2019;37(4):5777–5796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya A, Singh S. Development of two-stage parallel-series system with fuzzy data: a fuzzy DEA approach. Soft Comput. 2020;25:3225–3245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Klein CM. A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst (Part B). 1997;27:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostovan S, Mozaffari MR, Jamshidi A, et al. Evaluation of two-stage networks based on average efficiency using DEA and DEA-R with fuzzy data. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2020;22:1665–1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peykani P, Mohammadi E, Emrouznejad A. An adjustable fuzzy chance-constrained network DEA approach with application to ranking investment firms. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;166:113938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;197(1):243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo BK, Zhu J, Tone K, et al. Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;233:584–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shureshjani RA, Askarinejad S, Foroughi AA. (2017). Evaluating the efficiency of decision making units in fuzzy two-stage data enve­lopment analysis models. DEA2017 Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Nuttle HLW, et al. Fuzzy BCC model for data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making. 2003;2:337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Shureshjani RA, Darehmiraki M. A new parametric method for ranking fuzzy numbers. Indag Math. 2013;24:518–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Arteaga FJS, et al. Efficiency decomposition and measurement in two-stage fuzzy DEA models using a bargaining game approach. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;118:394–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S. Efficiency evaluation in two-stage data envelopment analysis under afuzzy environment: a common-weights approach. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;72:156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar