2,531
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stakeholder arguments during the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax in South Africa and their influence: a content analysis

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Article: 2152638 | Received 30 Aug 2022, Accepted 24 Nov 2022, Published online: 12 Dec 2022

References

  • Gouda HN, Charlson F, Sorsdahl K, Ahmadzada S, Ferrari AJ, Erskine H, et al. Burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990–2017: results from the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct 1;7:e1375–12.
  • Micklesfield LK, Kagura J, Munthali R, Crowther NJ, Jaff N, Gradidge P, et al. Demographic, socio-economic and behavioural correlates of BMI in middle-aged black men and women from urban Johannesburg, South Africa. Global Health Action. 2018 Nov 16;11:1448250.
  • Modjadji P, Madiba S. The double burden of malnutrition in a rural health and demographic surveillance system site in South Africa: a study of primary schoolchildren and their mothers. BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19:1087.
  • Lachat C, Otchere S, Roberfroid D, Abdulai A, Seret FMA, Milesevic J, et al. Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review. PLOS Med. 2013;10:e1001465. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001465
  • Backholer K, Vandevijvere S, Blake M, Tseng M. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in 2018: a year of reflections and consolidation. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21:3291–3295.
  • Carriedo A, Koon AD, Encarnación LM, Lee K, Smith R, Walls H. The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Latin America: lessons from Mexico, Chile and Colombia. Globalization Health. 2021;17:1–14.
  • Thow AM, Karim SA, Mukanu MM, Ahaibwe G, Wanjohi M, Gaogane L, et al. The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an analysis from seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Global Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;14:1909267.
  • Milsom P, Smith R, Baker P, Walls H. Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review. Health Policy Plann. 2021;36:493–508.
  • Garton K, Thow AM, Swinburn B. International trade and investment agreements as barriers to food environment regulation for public health nutrition: a realist review. Int J Health Policy Manag. [Internet]. 2020 Oct 19 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.189
  • Abdool Karim S, Kruger P, Hofman K. Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping. Globalization Health. 2020 Dec 10;16:116.
  • Barlow P, Labonte R, McKee M, Stuckler D. Trade challenges at the World Trade Organization to national noncommunicable disease prevention policies: a thematic document analysis of trade and health policy space. PLOS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15:e1002590.
  • Mukanu MM, Karim SA, Hofman K, Erzse A, Thow AM. Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia. Global Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;14:1872172.
  • Kaldor JC, Thow AM, Schönfeldt H. Using regulation to limit salt intake and prevent non-communicable diseases: lessons from South Africa’s experience. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:1316–1325.
  • Myers A, Fig D, Tugendhaft A, Mandle J, Myers J, Hofman K. Sugar and health in South Africa: potential challenges to leveraging policy change. Glob Public Health. 2017 Jan 2;12:98–115.
  • Du M, Tugendhaft A, Erzse A, Hofman KJ. Focus: nutrition and food science: sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: industry response and tactics. Yale J Biol Med. 2018;91:185.
  • Kruger P, Abdool Karim S, Tugendhaft A, Goldstein S. An analysis of the adoption and implementation of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a multiple streams approach. Health Syst Reform. 2021 1;7:e1969721. DOI:10.1080/23288604.2021.1969721
  • Bosire EN, Stacey N, Mukoma G, Tugendhaft A, Hofman K, Norris SA. Attitudes and perceptions among urban South Africans towards sugar-sweetened beverages and taxation. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23:374–383.
  • Murukutla N, Cotter T, Wang S, Cullinan K, Gaston F, Kotov A, et al. Results of a mass media campaign in South Africa to promote a sugary drinks tax. Nutrients. 2020 Jun;12:1878.
  • Roberto CA, Pomeranz JL. Public health and legal arguments in favor of a policy to cap the portion sizes of sugar-sweetened beverages. Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105:2183–2190.
  • Mariath AB, Martins APB. Sugary drinks taxation: industry’s lobbying strategies, practices and arguments in the Brazilian Legislature. Public Health Nutr. 2021;25:1–10.
  • Parliamentary Monitoring Group [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 2]. Available from: https://pmg.org.za/
  • Minister of health budget vote speech & responses by DA [Internet]. Parliamentary Monitoring Group; 2016 [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https://pmg.org.za/briefing/22491/
  • Finance Standing Committee. Taxation laws amendment & tax administration laws amendment bill: briefing [Internet]. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. 2016 [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/23130/
  • Bill Tracker: rates and monetary amounts and amendment of revenue laws bill [Internet]. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. 2017 [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https://pmg.org.za/bill/731/
  • Hilton S, Buckton CH, Patterson C, Katikireddi SV, Lloyd-Williams F, Hyseni L, et al. Following in the footsteps of tobacco and alcohol? Stakeholder discourse in UK newspaper coverage of the soft drinks industry levy. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Aug;22:2317–2328.
  • James E, Lajous M, Reich MR. The politics of taxes for health: an analysis of the passage of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Mexico. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6:e1669122.
  • Pettigrew S, Coyle D, McKenzie B, Vu D, Lim SC, Berasi K, et al. A review of front-of-pack nutrition labelling in Southeast Asia: industry interference, lessons learned, and future directions. The Lancet Reg Health - Southeast Asia. 2022 Aug 1;3:100017. DOI:10.1016/j.lansea.2022.05.006
  • Brownell KD, Warner KE. The perils of ignoring history: big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Q. 2009;87:259–294.
  • Nestle M. Public health implications of front-of-package labels. Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108:320–321.
  • Mialon M, Swinburn B, Sacks G. A proposed approach to systematically identify and monitor the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health using publicly available information. Obesity Rev. 2015;16:519–530.
  • Mialon M, Crosbie E, Sacks G. Mapping of food industry strategies to influence public health policy, research and practice in South Africa. Int J Public Health. 2020;65:1027–1036.
  • Fooks GJ, Williams S, Box G, Sacks G. Corporations’ use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation. Globalization Health. 2019;15:1–20.
  • Juma PA, Mapa-Tassou C, Mohamed SF, Mwagomba BLM, Ndinda C, Oluwasanu M, et al. Multi-sectoral action in non-communicable disease prevention policy development in five African countries. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–11. DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5826-6
  • Southall R. The coming crisis of Zuma’s ANC: the party state confronts fiscal crisis. Rev African Political Econ. 2016;43:73–88.
  • Purtle J, Langellier B, Lê-Scherban F. A case study of the philadelphia sugar-sweetened beverage tax policymaking process: implications for policy development and advocacy. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Feb;24:4–8.
  • Thomas-Meyer M, Mytton O, Adams J. Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: a thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186750.