Evaluation of genetic diversity among Saudi Arabian and Egyptian cultivars of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) using ISSR and SCoT markers

References

• Sayed MRI, Alshallash KS, Safhi FA, et al. Genetic diversity, analysis of some agro-morphological and quality traits and utilization of plant resources of alfalfa. Genes. 2022;13:1521. DOI:10.3390/genes13091521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam D, Ruselle M, Orloff S, et al. Alfalfa wildlife and the environment. The importance and benefits of alfalfa in the 21st century. Novato (CA): The California Alfalfa and Forage Association; 2001: 24 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni K, Tayade R, Asekova S, et al. Harnessing the potential of forage legumes, alfalfa, soybean, and cowpea for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1314. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.01314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer SD, Hannoufa A, Acharya S. Molecular improvement of alfalfa for enhanced productivity and adaptability in a changing environment. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:1955–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y, Hannoufa A, Yu P. The use of gene modification and advanced molecular structure analyses towards improving alfalfa forage. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(2):298. DOI:10.3390/ijms18020298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford EH. Tetrasomic inheritance in alfalfa. Agron J. 1951;43:222–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis JH. Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics. 1999;153:1885–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julier B, Flajoulot S, Barre P, et al. Construction of two genetic linkage maps in cultivated tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa) using microsatellite and AFLP markers. BMC Plant Biol. 2003;19:3–9. DOI:10.1186/1471-2229-3-9.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman RM. Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. New York: CRC Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Flajoulot S, Ronfort J, Baudouin P, et al. Genetic diversity among alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars coming from a breeding program, using SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;111(7):1420–1429. DOI:10.1007/s00122-005-0074-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-alfalfa-hay-market-2018-2023-saudi-arabia-imports-is-projected-to-grow-at-a-maximum-rate-due-to-the-countrys-banning-of-forage-crops-production-in-2019-300746502.html [cited 30 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/saudi-arabia-alfalfa-market [cited 30 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Alla WH, Bakheit BR, Abo-Elwafa A, et al. Evaluate of some varieties of alfalfa for forage yield and its components under the new valley conditions. J Agroalim Process Technol. 2014;19(4):413–418.
   Google Scholar
• CAPMAS. Central agency for public mobilization and statistics. Annual Bulletin of Statistical Crop Area and Plant Production, Egypt, 1 September 2019, Issue 71-22122-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jungers J, Cherney J, Martinson K, et al. Forage nutritive value of modern alfalfa cultivars. Crop Forage Turfgrass Manag. 2020;6(1):e20076. DOI:10.1002/cft2.20076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball DM, Collins M, Lacefield GD, et al. Understanding forage quality; 2001: 1–21. https://pss.uvm.edu/pdpforage/Materials/ForageQuality/Understanding_Forage_Quality_Ball.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Mar J, Zinn RA, Salinas-Chavira J. Influence of forage NDF level and source in growing–finishing diets on growth performance of feedlot lambs. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2017;67:134–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield RD, Ralph J, Grabber JH. Cell wall cross-linking by ferulates and diferulates in grasses. J Sci Food Agric. 1999;79:403–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield RD, Jung H-JG, Ralph J, et al. A comparison of the insoluble residues produced by the Klason lignin and acid detergent lignin procedures. J Sci Food Agric. 1994;65:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiam MA, Mohamed ES. Forage yield, quality characters and genetic variability of some promising Egyptian clover populations. Egypt J Plant Breed. 2020;24:839–858.
   Google Scholar
• Jenczewski E, Prosperi JM, Ronfort J. Evidence for gene flow between wild and cultivated Medicago sativa (Leguminosae) based on allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Am J Bot. 1999;86(5):677–687. DOI:10.2307/2656577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guines F, Julier B, Ecalle C, et al. Among and within-cultivar variability for histological traits of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) stem. Euphytica. 2003;130(2):293–301. DOI:10.1023/A:1022885320517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabderrahim MA, Mansour H, Ali F. Diversity of Lucerne (Medicago Sativa L.) populations in South Tunisia. Pak J Bot. 2009;41(6):2851–2861. pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/41(6)/PJB41(6)2851.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touil L, Bao A, Wang S, et al. Genetic diversity of Tunisian and Chinese alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Am J Plant Sci. 2016;7(6):967–979. DOI:10.4236/ajps.2016.76092.
   Google Scholar
• Alsamman AM, Ibrahim SD, Hamwieh A. KASPspoon: an in vitro and in silico PCR analysis tool for high-throughput SNP genotyping. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(17):3187–3190. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brejea R, Rosca S, Taut FD, et al. Quantitative GIS model for evaluating the favorability of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) culture for suitable varieties in Romania. Appl Sci. 2021;11:4205.
   Google Scholar
• Qiang H, Chen Z, Zhang Z, et al. Molecular diversity and population structure of a worldwide collection of cultivated tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa L.) germplasm as revealed by microsatellite markers. PLoS One. 2015;10:24–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier A. Efficient estimation of marker effects in plant breeding. G3. 2019;9(11):3855–3866. DOI:10.1534/g3.119.400728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsamman AM, Adawy SS, Ibrahim SD, et al. Selective amplification of start codon polymorphic loci (SASPL): a new pcr-based molecular marker in Olive. Plant Omics. 2017;10(2):64. DOI:10.21475/poj.10.02.17.pne385.
   Google Scholar
• Seçgin Z, Yunus Emre Arvas YE, Ssendawula SP, et al. Selection of root-knot nematode resistance in inbred tomato lines using CAPS molecular markers. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol. 2018;1(1):10–16. DOI:10.38001/ijlsb.427056.
   Google Scholar
• Pupilli F, Businelli S, Paolocci F, et al. Extent of RFLP variability in tetraploid populations of alfalfa, Medicago Sativa. Plant Breed. 1996;115(2):106–112. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengoni A, Gori A, Bazzicalupo M. Use of RAPD and microsatellite (SSR) variation to assess genetic relationships among populations of tetraploid alfalfa, Medicago Sativa. Plant Breed. 2000;119(4):311–317. DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00501.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccardelli M, Gnocchi S, Carelli M, et al. Variation among and within Italian alfalfa ecotypes by means of bio-agronomic haracters and amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses. Plant Breed. 2003;122(1):61–65. DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandemark GJ, Hughes TJ, Larsen RC. Genetic similarities between alfalfa cultivars based on sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) DNA markers. Plant & Animal Genomes XIII Conference. 2005; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Collard BCY, Mackill DJ. Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2009;27(1):86. DOI:10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faqian X, Zhong R, Han Z, et al. Start codon targeted polymorphism for evaluation of functional genetic variation and relationships in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(5):3487–3494. DOI:10.1007/s11033-010-0459-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakseresht F, Talebi R, Karami E. Comparative assessment of ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of landrace chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes collected from north-west of Iran. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013;19(4):563–574. DOI:10.1007/s12298-013-0181-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikendra L, Potshangbam AM, Dey A, et al. RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers based genetic stability assessment of micropropagated Dendrobium fimbriatum Lindl. var. oculatum Hk. f.- an important endangered orchid. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021;27(2):341–357. DOI:10.1007/s12298-021-00939-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A, Golabadi M, Etminan A, et al. Comparative assessment of SCoT and ISSR markers for analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in some Aegilops tauschii Coss. accessions. Plant Genet Resour. 2021;19(5):375–383. DOI:10.1017/S147926212100040X.
   Google Scholar
• Alotaibi MO, Abd-Elgawad ME. ISSR and SCoT for evaluation of hereditary differences of 29 wild plants in Al Jubail Saudi Arabian. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(5):3223–3231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igwe DO, Ihearahu OC, Osano AA, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity of Musa species accessions with variable genomes using ISSR and SCoT markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2022;69:49–70. DOI:10.1007/s10722-021-01202-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple equences alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2002. DOI:10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khodaee L, Azizinezhad R, Etminan AR, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity among Iranian Aegilops triuncialis accessions using ISSR, SCoT, and CBDP markers. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogoi B, Wann SB, Saikia SP. Comparative assessment of ISSR, RAPD, and SCoT markers for genetic diversity in Clerodendrum species of North East India. Mol Bio Rep. 2020;47(10):7365–7377. DOI:10.1007/s11033-020-05792-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieplak M, Okoń S, Werwińska K. Genetic similarity of Avena sativa L. varieties as an example of a narrow genetic pool of contemporary cereal species. Plants. 2021;10(7):1424. DOI:10.3390/plants10071424.
   Google Scholar
• Øyvind H, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4(1):9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Wen W, Falush D. Documentation for structure software: Version 2. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Liu K, Muse SV. Powermarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2128–2129. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donna M, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, et al. Entrez gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database Issue):D52–D57. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkl993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2006;23(1):127–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucky BJ. Seqtrace: a graphical tool for rapidly processing DNA sequencing chromatograms. J Biomol Tech. 2012;23(3):90–93. DOI:10.7171/jbt.12-2303-004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics. 1994;20:176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin ID, Aitken EAB, Smith LW. Application of Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:1524–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel S, Davis SB, Endo A, et al. Phylogenetic analyses of PheS, DnaA and AtpA genes for identification of Weissella confusa and Weissella cibaria isolated from a South African sugarcane processing factory. Curr Microbiol. 2019;76(10):1138–1146. DOI:10.1007/s00284-019-01740-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryam R, Farshadfar M, Safari H, et al. Utility of ISSR molecule marker in examine of genetic diversity 17 genotypes of perennial alfalfa (Medicago Sativa). J Nov Appl Sci. 2013;2:969–973.
   Google Scholar
• Amom T, Tikendra L, Apana N, et al. Efficiency of RAPD, ISSR, iPBS, SCoT and phytochemical markers in the genetic relationship study of five native and economical important bamboos of North-East India. Phytochemistry. 2020;174:112330. DOI:10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthiban S, Govindaraj P, Senthilkumar S. Comparison of relative efficiency of genomic SSR and EST-SSR markers in estimating genetic diversity in sugarcane. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(3):1–2. DOI:10.1007/s13205-018-1172-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorina P, Boldura OM, Ciulca S, et al. Evaluation of the genetic variability correlated with multileaflet trait in Alfalfa. Agro Life Sci J. 2016;5(2):125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Mulpuri S, Muddanuru T, Francis G. Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism in toxic and non-toxic accessions of Jatropha curcas L. and development of a codominant SCAR marker. Plant Sci. 2013;207:117–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajera HP, Bambharolia RP, Domadiya RK, et al. Molecular characterization and genetic variability studies associated with fruit quality of indigenous Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars. Plant Syst Evol. 2014;300(5):1011–1020. DOI:10.1007/s00606-013-0939-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faqian X, Zhong R, Han Z, et al. Start codon targeted polymorphism for evaluation of functional genetic variation and relationships in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(5):3487–3494. DOI:10.1007/s11033-010-0459-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivodík M, Balážová Z, Gálová Z, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Maize (Zea mays L.) using SCoT markers. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2017;6(5):1170–1173. DOI:10.15414/jmbfs.2017.6.5.1170-1173.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur J, Dwivedi MD, Singh N, et al. Applicability of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) and Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers in assessing genetic diversity in Crepidium acuminatum (D. Don) Szlach. J App Res Med Aromat Plants. 2021;23:100310. DOI:10.1016/j.jarmap.2020.100256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobadi G, Etminan A, Mehrabi AM, et al. Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):1–11. DOI:10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi R, Sharma V, Sureja AK, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure detection in sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica) using ISSR, SCoT and morphological markers. Physiol Mol Bio Plants. 2020;26(1):119–131. DOI:10.1007/s12298-019-00723-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou W, Tan X, Song K, et al. A specific single nucleotide polymorphism in the ATP synthase gene significantly improves environmental stress tolerance of Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(18):e01222–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva SR, Diaz YCA, Penha HA, et al. The chloroplast genome of Utricularia reniformis sheds light on the evolution of the Ndh gene complex of terrestrial carnivorous plants from the Lentibulariaceae family. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0165176. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0165176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regel RE, Ivleva NB, Zer H, et al. Deregulation of electron flow within photosystem II in the absence of the PsbJ protein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):41473–41478. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M102007200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar