Synthesis, antifungal, antibacterial activity, and computational evaluations of some novel coumarin-1,2,4-triazole hybrid compounds

References

• Gavrilescu M, Pogăcean MO. Plant protection products and their sustainable and environmentally friendly use. Environ Eng Manag J. 2009;8:607–627. doi: 10.30638/eemj.2009.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas C, Nirmala Devi D, Narasimha Murthy K, et al. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causal agent of vascular wilt disease of tomato: biology to diversity– A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(7):1315–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherm B, Balmas V, Spanu F, et al. The wheat pathogen Fusarium culmorum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;14:323–341. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ćosić J, Vrandečić K, Šimić B, et al. Fusarium species isolated from plant debris in Eastern Croatia. Cereal Res Commun. 2008;36:55–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MM, Sultana F, Li W, et al. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de bary: insights into the pathogenomic features of a global pathogen. Cells. 2023;12:1063. doi: 10.3390/cells12071063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez N, Giachero ML, Declerck S, et al. Macrophomina phaseolina: general characteristics of pathogenicity and methods of control. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:634397. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.634397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan CA, Belt K, Thatcher LF. Tackling control of a cosmopolitan phytopathogen: sclerotinia. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:707509. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.707509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin XF, Kvitko B, He S. Pseudomonas syringae: what it takes to be a pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:316–328. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaouadi S, Mougou AH, Rhouma A. The plant pathogen Rhodococcus fascians. History, disease symptomatology, host range, pathogenesis and plant–pathogen interaction. Ann Appl Biol. 2020;177:4–15. doi: 10.1111/aab.12600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission: Opinion on azole antimycotic resistance. https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-12/sci-com_ssc_out278_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith K, Evans DA, El-Hiti GA. Role of modern chemistry in sustainable arable crop protection. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:623–637. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellin P, King R, Urban M, et al. The adaptation of fusarium culmorum to DMI fungicides Is mediated by major transcriptome modifications in response to azole fungicide, including the overexpression of a PDR transporter (FcABC1). Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1385. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger S, Chazli YE, Babu AF, et al. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a consequence of antifungal use in agriculture? Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1024. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damalas CA, Eleftherohorinos IG. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(5):1402–1419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacholak A, Burlaga N, Frankowski R, et al. Azole fungicides: (Bio)degradation, transformation products and toxicity elucidation. Sci Total Environ. 2022;802:149917. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Kennedy R, Thornes RD. Coumarins: biology, applications and mode of action. New York: Wiley Chichester; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Matos MJ, Santana L, Uriarte E, et al. Coumarins — an important class of phytochemicals. In: Phytochemicals - isolation, characterisation and role in human health. InTech; 2015. doi: 10.5772/59982
   Google Scholar
• Annunziata F, Pinna C, Dallavalle S, et al. An overview of coumarin as a versatile and readily accessible scaffold with broad-ranging biological activities. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(13):4618. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song PP, Zhao J, Liu Z-L, et al. Evaluation of antifungal activities and structure–activity relationships of coumarin derivatives. Pest Manag Sci. 2017;73:94–101. doi: 10.1002/ps.4422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Peng W, Wanf D, et al. Design, synthesis, antifungal activity, and 3D-QSAR of coumarin derivatives. J Pestic Sci. 2018;43:88–95. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D17-075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Chen J, Ren D, et al. Synthesis of osthol-based botanical fungicides and their antifungal application in crop protection. Bioorg Med Chem. 2021;40:116184. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin W, Mao Y, Lu F, et al. In vitro fungicidal activity and in planta control efficacy of coumoxystrobin against Magnaporthe oryzae. Pestic Biochem Phys. 2020;162:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S-G, Wan Y-Q, Wen Y, et al. Novel coumarin 7-carboxamide/sulfonamide derivatives as potential fungicidal agents: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Molecules. 2022;27(20):6904. doi: 10.3390/molecules27206904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Yu Y, Li S, et al. Resveratrol and coumarin: novel agricultural antibacterial agent against Ralstonia solanacearum in vitro and in vivo. Molecules. 2016;21:1501. doi: 10.3390/molecules21111501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekić BD, Radulović NS, Dekić VS, et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of new 4-heteroarylamino coumarin derivatives containing nitrogen and sulfur as heteroatoms. Molecules. 2010;15:2246–2256. doi: 10.3390/molecules15042246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastija V, Vrandečić K, Ćosić J, et al. Biological activities related to plant protection and environmental effects of coumarin derivatives: QSAR and molecular docking studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7283. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavela R, Maggi F, Benelli G. Coumarin (2H-1-benzopyran-2-one): a novel and eco-friendly aphicide. Nat Prod Res. 2021;35(9):1566–1571. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2019.1660334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang TJ, Ma Z, Ma H, et al. Metabolic pathways modulated by coumarin to inhibit seed germination and early seedling growth in Eleusine indica. Plant Physiol Biochem PPB. 2023;203:108035. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Shreeve JNM. Azole-based energetic salts. Chem Rev. 2011;111:7377–7436. doi: 10.1021/cr200039c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükgüzel ŞG, Çıkla-Süzgün P. Recent advances bioactive 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;97:830–870. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Sumran G. An insight on medicinal attributes of 1,2,4-triazoles. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;205:112652. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang R, Jin L, Mou C, et al. Synthesis, antifungal and antibacterial activity for novel amide derivatives containing a triazole moiety. Chem Cent J. 2013;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shao WB, Wang PY, Fang ZM, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1,2,4-triazole thioethers as both potential virulence factor inhibitors against plant bacterial diseases and agricultural antiviral agents against tobacco mosaic virus infections. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(50):15108–15122. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz H, Khodabin G. The role of uniconazole in improving physiological and biochemical attributes of bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to drought stress. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2019;22:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher RA, Gilley A, Davis TD, et al. Triazoles as plant growth regulators and stress protectants. Hortic Rev. 2000;24:55–138. doi: 10.1002/9780470650776.ch3
   Google Scholar
• Hajihashemi S. Physiological, biochemical, antioxidant and growth characterizations of gibberellin and paclobutrazol-treated sweet leaf (Stevia rebaudiana B.) herb. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2017;27(2):237–240. doi: 10.1007/s13562-017-0428-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchenauer H. Mechanism of action of triazolyl fungicides and related compounds. In: Lyr H, Buchenauer H, editor. Modern selective fungicides: properties, applications, mechanisms of action. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical; 1987. p. 205–231.
   Google Scholar
• Monk BC, Sagatova AA, Hosseini P, et al. Fungal Lanosterol 14α-demethylase: a target for next-generation antifungal design. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2020;1868(3):140206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2019.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnaš M, Rastija V, Šubarić D, et al. Green synthesis and acetylcholinesterase inhibition of coumarin-1,2,4-triazole hybrids. Curr Org Chem. 2023;27:883–892. doi: 10.2174/1385272827666230817145725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayashree BS, Sahu AR, Srinivasa MM, et al. Synthesis, characterization and determination of partition coefficient of some triazole derivatives of coumarins for their anti-microbial activity. Asian J Chem. 2007;19:73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kokil GR, Rewatkar PV, Gosain S, et al. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of novel 1, 2, 4-triazole derivatives as antifungal agents. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2010;7:46–49. doi: 10.2174/157018010789869415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Zhou CH. Synthesis and evaluation of a class of new coumarin triazole derivatives as potential antimicrobial agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21(3):956–960. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda SS, Malik R, Chand M, et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some new 4-triazolylmethoxy-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives. Med Chem Res. 2012;21:3750–3756. doi: 10.1007/s00044-011-9881-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damu GL, Cui SF, Peng XM, et al. Synthesis and bioactive evaluation of a novel series of coumarinazoles. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24(15):3605–3608. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar M, Periš I, Komar M. Choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents as a tuneable medium for synthesis of Coumarinyl 1,2,4-triazoles: effect of solvent type and temperature. Eur J Org Chem. 2019;15:2688–2694. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201900249
   Google Scholar
• Reddy KR, Mamatha R, Babu MSS, et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of some triazole, thiadiazole, and oxadiazole substituted coumarins. J Heterocycl Chem. 2014;51(1):132–137. doi: 10.1002/jhet.1745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Amiery AA, Musa AY, Kadhum AA, et al. The use of umbelliferone in the synthesis of new heterocyclic compounds. Molecules. 2011;16(8):6833–6843. doi: 10.3390/molecules16086833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siber T, Bušić V, Zobundžija D, et al. An improved method for the quaternization of nicotinamide and antifungal activities of its derivatives. Molecules. 2019;24:1001. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bušić V, Vrandečić K, Siber T, et al. A rapid microwave induced synthesis of isonicotinamide derivatives and their antifungal activity. Croat Chem Acta. 2019;92:125–135. doi: 10.5562/cca3527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistica 14.1.0. TIBCO, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hanckok REW. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, et al. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminform. 2012;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquet A, Langgård M. An evaluation of the MM+ force field. J Mol Model. 1998;4:94–112. doi: 10.1007/s008940050128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JJP. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I. Method. J Comput Chem. 1989;10:209–220. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540100208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetko IV, Gasteiger J, Todeschini R, et al. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory – design and description. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2005;19:453–463. doi: 10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica P, Chirico N, Papa E, et al. QSARINS: a new software for the development, analysis, and validation of QSAR MLR models. J Comput Chem. 2013;34:2121–2132. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica P. Principles of QSAR modeling: comments and suggestions from personal experience. IJQSPR. 2020;5:61–97. doi: 10.4018/IJQSPR.20200701.oa1
   Google Scholar
• Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci. 2003;22:69–77. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200390007
   Google Scholar
• Gramatica P. Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci. 2007;26:694–701. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200610151
   Google Scholar
• Consonni V, Ballabio D, Todeschini R. Comments on the definition of the Q2 parameter for QSAR validation. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49(7):1669–1678. doi: 10.1021/ci900115y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, et al. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(10):1361–1375. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyndall JD, Sabherwal M, Sagatova AA, et al. Structural and functional elucidation of yeast lanosterol 14α-demethylase in complex with agrochemical antifungals. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(16):2785–2791. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassault Systemes BIOVIA Discovery studio visualizer, release 2016. Dassault Systèmes Biovia Corp, San Diego, CA, USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert PF, Al-Hatmi AMS, de Oliveira Salvador GL, et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility of clinical fusarium species from Brazil. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:737. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi Y, de Jong A, Frenzel E, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of bacillus mycoides strains in response to potato-root exudates reveals different genetic adaptation of endophytic and soil isolates. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1487. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griebsch A, Matschiavelli N, Lewandowska S, et al. Presence of bradyrhizobium sp. under continental conditions in central Europe. Agriculture. 2020;10(10):446. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10100446
   Google Scholar
• Kiralj R, Ferreira MMC. Basic validation procedures for regression models in QSAR and QSPR studies: theory and application. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009;20(4):770–787. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532009000400021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masand VH, Mahajan DT, Nazeruddin GM, et al. Effect of information leakage and method of splitting (rational and random) on external predictive ability and behavior of different statistical parameters of QSAR model. Med Chem Res. 2015;24:1241–1264. doi: 10.1007/s00044-014-1193-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todeschini R, Consonni V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics. Chichester: Wiley-VCH; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Consonni V, Todeschini R, Pavan M. Structure/response correlations and similarity/diversity analysis by GETAWAY descriptors. 1. Theory of the novel 3D molecular descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002;42(3):682–692. doi: 10.1021/ci015504a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devinyak O, Havrylyuk D, Lesyk R. 3D-MoRSE descriptors explained. J Mol Graph Model. 2014;54:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Li L, Lv Q, et al. The fungal CYP51s: their functions, structures, related drug resistance, and inhibitors. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J Med Chem. 2003;46(12):2287–2303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenk R, Vetter SW, Boyce SE, et al. Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site. J Mol Biol. 2006;357(5):1449–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar