Validation, measurement uncertainty estimation and evaluation of UHPLC greenness for simultaneous determination of metoprolol tartrate and hydrochlorothiazide in binary tablet

References

• Ostchega Y, Fryar CD, Nwankwo T, et al. Hypertension prevalence among adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2017–2018. Natl Cent Health Stat Data Br. 2020;364:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, Hypertension, World Heal. Organ; 2022. [accessed 2024 April 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension.
   Google Scholar
• Mensah GA, Croft JB, Giles WH. The heart, kidney, and brain as target organs in hypertension. Cardiol Clin. 2002;20:225–247. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8651(02)00004-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;4(1):1–21. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong C. Jnc8 guidelines for the management of hypertension in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90:503–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison DH. Clinical pharmacology in diuretic use. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:1248–1257. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09630818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messerli FH, Bangalore S. Half a century of hydrochlorothiazide: facts, fads, fiction, and follies. Am J Med. 2011;124:896–899. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go AS, Yang J, Gurwitz JH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of beta-adrenergic antagonists (atenolol, metoprolol tartrate, carvedilol) on the risk of rehospitalization in adults with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:690–696. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya PA, Shah PA, Shrivastav PS. Application of supercritical fluid chromatography for separation and quantitation of 15 co-formulated binary anti-hypertensive medications using a single elution protocol. Biomed Chromatogr. 2021;35:e5035. doi: 10.1002/bmc.5035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, Zhang M, Cui X, et al. Simultaneous quantitation of hydrochlorothiazide and metoprolol in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009;52:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkar RM, Raju B, Srinivas R, et al. Identification and characterization of stressed degradation products of metoprolol using LC/Q-TOF-ESI-MS/MS and MS(n) experiments. Biomed Chromatogr. 2012;26:720–736. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan AA, Thaker AK, Mohanraj K. LC, LC-MS/MS studies for the identification and characterization of degradation products of hydrochlorothiazide and establishment of mechanistic approach towards degradation. J Braz Chem Soc. 2012;23:445–452. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532012000300010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevis M, Krug O, Geyer H, et al. Monitoring drug residues in donor blood/plasma samples using LC-(MS)/MS: a pilot study. Drug Test Anal. 2013;5:380–3. doi: 10.1002/dta.1457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahu ŞC, Hăncianu M, Agoroaei L, et al. Fixed dose combinations with selective beta-blockers: quantitative determination in biological fluids. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2015;119:585–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johannsen JO, Reuter H, Hoffmann F, et al. Reliable and easy-to-use LC-MS/MS-method for simultaneous determination of the antihypertensives metoprolol, amlodipine, canrenone and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with therapy-refractory arterial hypertension. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;164:373–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Ma W, Yao G, et al. A high throughput HPLC-MS/MS method for antihypertensive drugs determination in plasma and its application on pharmacokinetic interaction study with shuxuetong injection in rats. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2019/7537618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli C, Bicchi C, Stilo AD, et al. High-speed gas chromatography in doping control: fast-GC and fast-GC/MS determination of beta-adrenoceptor ligands and diuretics. J Sep Sci. 2006;29:2765–71. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200500387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Geyer H, Schänzer W, et al. Sensitive determination of prohibited drugs in dried blood spots (DBS) for doping controls by means of a benchtop quadrupole/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403:1279–89. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5655-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog DL, McCafferty JF, Fang X, et al. Development and validation of a stability-indicating HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of losartan potassium, hydrochlorothiazide, and their degradation products. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002;30:747–760. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(02)00385-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg G, Saraf S, Saraf S. Spectrophotometric and column high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for simultaneous estimation of metoprolol tartrate and hydrochlorothiazide in tablets. J AOAC Int. 2008;91:1045–50. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/91.5.1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawool ND, Venkatchalam A. Analytical method for the simultaneous estimation of hydrochlorothiazide and metoprolol tartrate using RP HPLC. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73:219–223. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.91565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaalan RA, Belal TS. Gradient HPLC-DAD determination of the antihypertensive mixture of amlodipine besylate, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide in combined pharmaceutical tablets. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2012;35:215–230. doi: 10.1080/10826076.2011.597071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q. Advancing USP compendial methods for fixed dose combinations: a case study of metoprolol tartrate and hydrochlorothiazide tablets. J Pharm Anal. 2019;9:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2018.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao DD, Satyanarayana NV, Sait SS, et al. Simultaneous determination of losartan potassium, atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide in pharmaceutical preparations by stability-indicating UPLC. Chromatographia. 2009;70(3-4):647–651. doi: 10.1365/S10337-009-1221-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalwade S, Reddy VR, Rao DD, et al. Rapid simultaneous determination of telmisartan, amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorothiazide in a combined poly pill dosage form by stability-indicating ultra performance liquid chromatography. Sci Pharm. 2011;79:69–84. doi: 10.3797/scipharm.1006-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salamanca-Neto CAR, Eisele APP, Resta VG, et al. Differential pulse voltammetric method for the individual and simultaneous determination of antihypertensive drug metoprolol and its association with hydrochlorothiazide in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Sens Actuators B. 2016;230:630–638. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolarczyk M, Ekiert R, Krzek J, et al. Determination of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide by derivative spectrophotometric method in pharmaceutical preparations. Acta Pol Pharm – Drug Res. 2006;63:169–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasad CVN, Bharadwaj V, Narsimhan V, et al. Simultaneous detrmination of metoprolol-hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol-hydrochlorothiazide in combined formulations by derivative spectroscopy. J AOAC Int. 1997;80(2):325–330. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/80.2.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerasekaran V, Shrinivas JK, Shivajirao SK, et al. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of hydrochlorothiazide and metoprolol tartrate from combined dosage form. Indian Drugs. 2001;38(4):187–189.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan NK, Mohamed HM, Mostafa AA. Miniaturized membrane sensors for potentiometric determination of metoprolol tartrate and hydrochlorothiazide. Acta Chim Slov. 2012;59:344–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnajjar AO, Idris AM, Attimarad MV, et al. Capillary electrophoresis assay method for metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide in their combined dosage form with multivariate optimization. J Chromatogr Sci. 2013;51(1):92–97. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bms107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żuromska-Witek B, Stolarczyk M, Szlósarczyk M, et al. Simple, accurate and multianalyte determination of thirteen active pharmaceutical ingredients in polypills by HPLC-DAD. Chemosensors. 2023;11(1):25. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors11010025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahajuddin, Singh SP, Raju KSR, et al. Simultaneous determination of nine model compounds in permeability samples using RP-HPLC: application to prove the cassette administration principle in single pass intestinal perfusion study in rats. J Pharm Biom Anal. 2012;67-68:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.03.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan NK, Mohamed HM, Mostafa AA. Chromatographic methods for the simultaneous determination of metoprolol tartrate and hydrochlorothiazide in the presence of hydrochlorothiazide degradation product. J Planar Chromatogr. 2013;26(6):510–516. doi: 10.1556/JPC.26.2013.6.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravisankar P, Devala Rao G, Krishna Chaitanya M, et al. Rapid separation of five anti-hypertensive agents – atenolol, metoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine and nebivolol: application to estimation of metoprolol succinate in tablet dosage form. J Chem Pharm Res. 2013;5(7):215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Patil AS, Sait SS, Deshamukh A, et al. An improved validated HPLC method for separation of metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide impurities in metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide tablets. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015;7(2):183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Mattrey FT, Makarov AA, Regalado EL, et al. Current challenges and future prospects in chromatographic method development for pharmaceutical research. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;95:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nováková L, Svoboda P, Pavlík J. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. In: S Fanali, PR Haddad, CF Poole, M-L Riekkola, editors. Liquid chromatography. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 719–769. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-805393-5.00029-4
   Google Scholar
• Maldaner L, Jardim ICSF. The state of the art of ultra performance liquid chromatography. Quim Nova. 2009;32:214–222. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422009000100036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter TH, Andrews RW. Recent innovations in UHPLC columns and instrumentation. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2014;63:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Płotka-Wasylka J. A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: green analytical procedure index. Talanta. 2018;181:204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M. AGREE – analytical GREEnness metric approach and software. Anal Chem. 2020;92:10076–10082. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konieczka P, Namieśnik J. Estimating uncertainty in analytical procedures based on chromatographic techniques. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:882–891. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor BN. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. Gaithersburg (MD); 1994. doi: 10.6028/NIST.tn.1297
   Google Scholar
• Leung GNW, Ho ENM, Kwok WH, et al. A bottom-up approach in estimating the measurement uncertainty and other important considerations for quantitative analyses in drug testing for horses. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1163:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Pharmacopeial Convention. United States pharmacopoeia – National Formulary (USP – NF). Rockville (MD): United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use: validation of analytical procedures (text and methodology). Q2(R1). 1995: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. Measurement uncertainty: a practical guide for secondary standards dosimetry laboratories. Vienna: Dosimetry & Medical Radiation Physics Section International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira SLC, Dos Santos WNL, Quintella CM, et al. Doehlert matrix: a chemometric tool for analytical chemistry – review. Talanta. 2004;63:1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teófilo RF, Ferreira MMC. Chemometrics II: spreadsheets for experimental design calculations, a tutorial. Quim Nova. 2006;29:338–350. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422006000200026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann C, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Massart DL, et al. Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998;17:193–218. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(97)00198-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration. Reviewer guidance: validation of chromatographic methods. Rockville (MD): FDA; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Huber L. Validation of analytical methods: review and strategy. Liq Gas Chromatogr. 1997;1:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison S, Williams A. Eurachem/CITAC guide quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 3rd ed. London: EURACHEM; 2012.
   Google Scholar