Investigating the depositional environments using particle-size analysis of Lower Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs, Biyadh Formation, Saudi Arabia

References

• Baiyegunhi C, Liu K, Gwavava O. Grain size statistics and depositional pattern of the Ecca Group sandstones, Karoo Supergroup in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Open Geosci. 2017;9(1):554–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil R. Grain-Size Analysis of Middle Cretaceous Sandstone Reservoirs, the Wasia Formation, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):7983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasim SA, Ismail MS, Ahmed N. Grain size statistics and morphometric analysis of Kluang-Niyor, Layang-Layang, and Kampung Durian Chondong Tertiary Sediments, Onshore Peninsular Malaysia: Implications for paleoenvironment and depositional processes. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2023;35(2):102481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blott, S., Grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments by sieving or by laser granulometer. Grandistat 2000, 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Folk RL, Ward WC. Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sediment Res. 1957;27(1):3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Passega R. Texture as characteristic of clastic deposition. AAPG Bulletin. 1957;41(9):1952–1984.
   Google Scholar
• Passega R. Grain size representation by CM patterns as a geologic tool. J Sediment Res. 1964;34(4):830–847.
   Google Scholar
• Visher GS. Grain size distributions and depositional processes. J Sediment Res. 1969;39(3.
   Google Scholar
• Khanam S, Khan K, Quasim M, et al. Proterozoic sandstone of Rajgarh Formation, Alwar sub-basin, Northeastern Rajasthan: sedimentological and paleo-hydrodynamical implications. J Sediment Environ. 2022;7(2):261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Quasim M, Ahmad A, et al. Depositional mechanism of fort member sandstone (early-late bathonian), jaisalmer formation, western rajasthan: Insights from granulometric analysis. Geol Ecol Landsc. 2021;5(2):119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Quasim MA, Ghosh SK, Ahmad AHM, et al. Integrated approach of lithofacies and granulometric analysis of the sediments of the Proterozoic Upper Kaimur Group of Vindhyan Supergroup, Son Valley, India: Palaeo-environmental implications. Geol J. 2020;55(9):5991–6012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggs S. Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman GM. Distinction between dune, beach, and river sands from their textural characteristics. J Sediment Res. 1961;31(4):514–529.
   Google Scholar
• Powers R, Ramirez L, Redmond C, et al. Geology of the Arabian Peninsula. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Steineke, M.; Bramkamp, R.; Sander, N., Stratigraphic relations of Arabian Jurassic oil: Middle East. 1958, In: Weeks, L.G. (Ed.), Habitat of Oil. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Special Publication 18, 1294-1329.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulrazzak MJ. Ground water system evaluation for Wadi Nisah, Saudi Arabia. 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Entsminger, L. D. In Sedimentary response to tectonic and eustatic changes: an example from the mid-Cretaceous Wasia Formation, Saudi Arabia, Middle East Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1981; OnePetro: 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Moshrif MA. Recognition of fluvial environments in the Biyadh-Wasia sandstones (Lower-Middle Cretaceous) as revealed by textural analysis. J Sediment Res. 1980;50(2):603–612.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman F, Al Shamlan A. Review on the geology of the Cretaceous sediments of the Rub'al-Khali, Saudi Arabia. Cretaceous Res. 1982;3(1-2):187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Le Nindre Y-M, Vaslet D, Maddah SS, et al. Stratigraphy of the Valanginian? to Early Paleocene succession in central Saudi Arabia outcrops: Implications for regional Arabian sequence stratigraphy. GeoArabia. 2008;13(2):51–86.
   Google Scholar
• Alsharhan A, Nairn A. A review of the Cretaceous formations in the Arabian peninsula and gulf: Part II. mid-Cretaceous (Wasia Group) stratigraphy and paleogeography. J Pet Geol. 1988;11(1):89–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller M, Bohnsack D, Koch R, et al. Outcrop Analog Studies of the Wasia—Biyadh and Aruma Aquifers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gomaah M, Al-Bassam A. Geochemistry and origin of the hyper salinity of groundwater in Wasia-Biyadh Aquifer, Saudi Arabia. J Geosci Environ Prot. 2021;9(11):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vaslet, D.; Al-Muallem, M.; Maddeh, S.; Brosse, J.; Fourniquet, J.; Breton, J.; Le Nindre, Y., Explanatory notes to the geologic map of the Ar Riyad Quadrangle, Sheet 24 I, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources, Jeddah, Geosciences Map, GM-121 1991, 54.
   Google Scholar
• Alshehri F, Mohamed A. Analysis of groundwater storage fluctuations using GRACE and remote sensing data in Wadi As-Sirhan, northern Saudi Arabia. Water (Basel). 2023;15(2):282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ghamdi, N. M. Facies, Sequence Framework, and Evolution of Rudist Buildups, Shu'aiba Formation, Saudi Arabia. Virginia Tech, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes G. Saudi Arabian Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous agglutinated foraminiferal associations and their application for age, palaeoenvironmental interpretation, sequence stratigraphy, and carbonate reservoir architecture. Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication. 2000;7:149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Hakimi MH, Shalaby MR, Abdullah WH. Diagenetic characteristics and reservoir quality of the Lower Cretaceous Biyadh sandstones at Kharir oilfield in the western central Masila Basin, Yemen. J Asian Earth Sci. 2012;51:109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AM, Al-Juhani SG, Abdul S. Digital viscoelastic seismic models and data sets of central Saudi Arabia in the presence of near-surface karst features. J Seism Explor. 2020;29:15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumbein W, Monk G. Permeability as a function of the size parameters of unconsolidated sand. Trans. AIME. 1943;151(01):153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu BK. Depositional mechanisms from the size analysis of clastic sediments. J Sediment Res. 1964;34(1):73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Baiyegunhi TL, Liu K, Gwavava O, et al. Textural characteristics, mode of transportation and depositional environment of the Cretaceous sandstone in the Bredasdorp Basin, off the south coast of South Africa: Evidence from grain size analysis. Open Geosci. 2020;12(1):1512–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman GM. Dynamic processes and statistical parameters compared for size frequency distribution of beach and river sands. J Sediment Res. 1967;37(2):327–354.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Shi C. Sediment grain-size characteristics and its sources of ten wind-water coupled erosion tributaries (the Ten Kongduis) in the Upper Yellow River. Water (Basel). 2019;11(1):115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav S, Kanhaiya S, Singh S, et al. Facies architecture and textural attributes of the Late Quaternary cliff embankment sections of the Sai River, Central Ganga Plain, India. Geosys Geoenviron. 2023;2(4):100216.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad F, Quasim M, Ghaznavi A, et al. Depositional environment of the Fort Member of the Jurasic Jaisalmer Formation (western Rajasthan, India), as revealed from lithofacies and grain-size analysis. Geologica Acta. 2017;15(3):0153–0167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaznavi AA, Quasim M, Ahmad A, et al. Granulometric and facies analysis of Middle–Upper Jurassic rocks of Ler Dome, Kachchh, western India: an attempt to reconstruct the depositional environment. Geologos. 2019;25(1):51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moiola R, Weiser D. Textural parameters; an evaluation. J Sediment Res. 1968;38(1):45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tijani MN, Nton ME, Kitagawa R. Textural and geochemical characteristics of the Ajali Sandstone, Anambra Basin, SE Nigeria: implication for its provenance. CR Geosci. 2010;342(2):136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passega R, Byramjee R. Grain-size image of clastic deposits. Sedimentology. 1969;13(3-4):233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar