A review of modeling and control of remote-controlled capsule endoscopes

References

• Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A, et al. A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions. Gastroenterol. 2000;119(6):1431–1438. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.20844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Park S, Jee CY, et al. An earthworm-like locomotive mechanism for capsule endoscopes. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robots Syst; Edmonton, AB, Canada. 2005. p. 2997–3002.
   Google Scholar
• Kusuda Y. A further step beyond wireless capsule endoscopy. Sens Rev. 2005;25(4):259–260. doi: 10.1108/02602280510620105
   Google Scholar
• Hockstein NG, Gourin CG, Faust RA, et al. A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics. J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):113–118. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0021-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor RH, Menciassi A, Fichtinger G, et al. Medical robotics and computer-integrated surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 1199–1222.
   Google Scholar
• Butter M, Rensma A, van Boxsel J, et al. Robotics for healthcare - final report. European Commission EC. 2008;5(1):12.
   Google Scholar
• Pan G, Wang L. Swallowable wireless capsule endoscopy: progress and technical challenges. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/841691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain P, Toor A, Volke F, et al. Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(7):1290–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000;405(6785):417–418. doi: 10.1038/35013140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moglia A, Menciassi A, Dario P, et al. Capsule endoscopy: progress update and challenges ahead. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(6):353–361. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Karargyris A. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(24):3726–3746. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuti G, Menciassi A, Dario P. Capsule endoscopy: from current achievements to open challenges. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;4:59–72. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2011.2171182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toennies JL, Tortora G, Simi M, et al. Swallowable medical devices for diagnosis and surgery: the state of the art. Proc Inst Mech Eng C: J Mech Eng Sci. 2010;224(7):1397–1414. doi: 10.1243/09544062JMES1879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang X-M, Han Q-L. Event-triggered generalized dissipativity filtering for neural networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2016;27(1):77–88. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2411734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, She J, Zhang X-M, et al. Performance enhancement of RCS and application to tracking control of chuck-workpiece systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2020;67(5):4056–4065. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2921272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, She J, Zhou S. Robust H∞ control of an observer-based repetitive-control system. J Franklin Inst. 2018;355(12):4952–4969. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Han Q, Zhang X, et al. Sliding mode control with mixed current and delayed states for offshore steel jacket platforms. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2014;22(5):1769–1783. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2013.2293401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong D, Rao P, Chen Q, et al. Exponential synchronization and phase locking of a multilayer Kuramoto-oscillator system with a pacemaker. Neurocomputing. 2018;308:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier JP, Hammouri H, Othman S. A simple observer for nonlinear systems applications to bioreactors. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1992;37(6):875–880. doi: 10.1109/9.256352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xia J, Sun W, et al. Finite-time tracking control for stochastic nonlinear systems with full state constraints. Appl Math Comput. 2018;338(1):207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.05.040
   Google Scholar
• Tong D, Chen Q, Zhou W, et al. Multi-delay-dependent exponential synchronization for neutral-type stochastic complex networks with markovian jump parameters via adaptive control. Neural Process Lett. 2019;49(3):1611–1628. doi: 10.1007/s11063-018-9891-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Tong D, Zhou W, et al. Adaptive exponential state estimation for markovian jumping neural networks with Multi-delays and Lévy Noises. Circuits Syst Signal Process. 2019;38(7):3321–3339. doi: 10.1007/s00034-018-1004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong D, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al. Asymptotical synchronization for delayed stochastic neural networks with uncertainty via adaptive control. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2016;14(3):706–712. doi: 10.1007/s12555-015-0077-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Shi P, Yao D. Adaptive sliding-mode control of Markov jump nonlinear systems with actuator faults. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2017;62(4):1933–1939. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2588885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wang C, Su X, et al. Observer-based terminal sliding mode control of non-affine nonlinear systems: finite-time approach. J Franklin Inst. 2018;355(16):7985–8004. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua C, Li K, Li Y, et al. Decentralized adaptive tracking quantized control for interconnected pure feedback time delay nonlinear systems. J Franklin Inst. 2018;355(5):2313–2328. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.12.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tong D, Chen Q, et al. Exponential synchronization of chaotic systems with stochastic perturbations via quantized feedback control. Circuits Syst Signal Process. 2020;39(1):474–491. doi: 10.1007/s00034-019-01167-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Tong D, Chen Q, et al. Adaptive state estimation of stochastic delayed neural networks with fractional brownian motion. Neural Process Lett. 2019;50(2):2007–2020. doi: 10.1007/s11063-018-9960-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong D, Chen Q. Delay and its time-derivative-dependent model reduction for neutral-type control system. Circuits Syst Signal Process. 2017;36(6):2542–2557. doi: 10.1007/s00034-016-0411-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia J, Zhang J, Sun W, et al. Finite-time adaptive fuzzy control for nonlinear systems with full state constraints. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2019;49(7):1541–1548. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2854770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia J, Zhang J, Feng J, et al. Command filter-based adaptive fuzzy control for nonlinear systems with unknown control directions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(3):1945–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Guerra R, Yu W. Chaotic synchronization and secure communication via sliding-mode observer. Int J Bifurcat Chaos. 2008;18(1):235–243. doi: 10.1142/S0218127408020264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Gao Y, Su X, et al. Disturbance-observer-based control for air management of PEM fuel cell systems via sliding mode technique. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2019;27(3):1129–1138. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2802467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi R, Janbakhsh AA. Nonlinear adaptive sliding mode control for vehicle handling improvement via steer-by-wire. Int J Automot Technol. 2010;11(3):345–354. doi: 10.1007/s12239-010-0043-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed I, Abdulla A. Design of optimised linear quadratic regulator for capsule endoscopes based on artificial bee colony tuning algorithm. Int J Eng Model. 2018;31(1–2):77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chen D, Hue C, Wang L, et al. Active actuation system of wireless capsule endoscope based on magnetic. 2007 IEEE Int Conf Robot Biomim ROBIO; Sanya, China. 2007. p. 99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chi M, Zhang J, Liu R, et al. Coupled steering control of a low torsional torque capsule robot in the intestine. Mechatronics. 2021;77:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu E, et al. Accuracy of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy, compared with conventional gastroscopy, in detection of gastric diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(9):1266–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diller E, Giltinan J, Lum G, et al. Six-degrees-of-freedom remote actuation of magnetic microrobots. Int J Rob Res. 2015;35(1–3):114–128. doi: 10.1177/0278364915583539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer R, Sengul A, Kratochvil B, et al. OctoMag: An Electromagnetic System for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Trans Robot. 2010;26(6):1006–1017. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2010.2073030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpi F, Pappone C. Magnetic robotic manoeuvring of gastrointestinal video capsules: preliminary phantom tests. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62(8):546–549. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2008.07.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Choi H, Go G, et al. Active locomotive intestinal capsule endoscope (ALICE) system: a prospective feasibility study. EEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2015;20(5):2067–2074. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2014.2362117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Choi H, Go G, et al. Helical motion and 2D locomotion of magnetic capsule endoscope using precessional and gradient magnetic field. 2014 5th IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatronics BioRob; Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2014. p. 1063–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Pawashe C, Floyd S, Sitti M. Modeling and experimental characterization of an untethered magnetic micro-robot. Int J Rob Res. 2009;28(8):1077–1094. doi: 10.1177/0278364909341413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd S, Pawashe C, Sitti M. An untethered magnetically actuated micro-robot capable of motion on arbitrary surfaces. 2008 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom; Pasadena, CA, USA. 2008. p. 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini S, Mehrtash M, Khamesee MB. Design, fabrication and control of a magnetic capsule-robot for the human esophagus. Microsyst Technol. 2011;17(5–7):1145–1152. doi: 10.1007/s00542-011-1231-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang D, Ruan X, et al. Control strategy for multiple capsule robots in intestine. Sci China Technol Sci. 2011;54(11):3098–3108. doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4483-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousa A, Feng L, Dai Y, et al. Self-driving 3-legged crawling prototype capsule robot with orientation controlled by external magnetic field. Proc 1st WRC Symp Apdv Robot Autom; Beijing, China. 2018. p. 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Yang X, Song L, et al. High position accuracy and 5 degree freedom magnetic driven capsule robot. 2019 WRC Symp Adv Robot and Autom SARA. 2019; p. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Bao Z, Fu Q, et al. Design and implementation of a novel wireless modular capsule robotic system in pipe. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020;58(10):2305–2324. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02205-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jizhong L, Baolei W, Liangbo L, et al. Design of wireless drive and control system for capsule micro-robot. Proc 2011 Int Conf Electron Mech Eng Info Technol; Harbin, China. 2011:2324–2327.
   Google Scholar
• Ye B, Sun Z, Peng J, et al. Fabrication of a novel handheld actuator for use in wireless capsule endoscope. 2013 14th. Int Conf Electron Packag Technol; Dalian, China. 2013. p. 1240–1242.
   Google Scholar
• Tewari A. Modern control design with Matlab and SIMULINK. 1st ed. JWS LTD. 2002. p. 520.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbullah F, Faris W. A comparative analysis of LQR and fuzzy logic controller for active suspension using half car model. 2010 11thInt Conf Control Autom Robot Vis; Singapore. 2010. p. 2415–2420.
   Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Basturk B. A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim. 2007;39(3):459–471. doi: 10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proc ICNN’95 – Int Conf Neural Netw; Perth, WA, Australia. 1995. p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Robandi I, Nishimori K, Nishimura R, et al. Optimal feedback control design using genetic algorithm in multimachine power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2001;23(4):263–271. doi: 10.1016/S0142-0615(00)00062-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan D, Seow TH. Particle swarm inspired evolutionary algorithm (PS-EA) for multiobjective optimization problems. 2003 Congr Evol Comput CEC ’03; Canberra, ACT, Australia. 2003; 4:2292–2297.
   Google Scholar
• Yurtkuran A, Emel E. An enhanced artificial bee colony algorithm with solution acceptance rule and probabilistic multisearch. J Comput Intell neurosci. 2016;2016:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2016/8085953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta H, Kawashima M. Technical feasibility of patient-friendly screening and treatment of digestive disease by remote control robotic capsule endoscopes via the Internet. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Chicago, IL, USA. 2014. p. 7001–7004.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bai J, Chi M, et al. Optimal control of a universal rotating magnetic vector for petal-shaped capsule robot in curve environment. China J Mech Eng. 2014;27(5):880–889. doi: 10.3901/CJME.2014.0619.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang N, Du C, et al. Control theorem of a universal uniform-rotating magnetic vector for capsule robot in curved environment. Sci China Tehnol Sci. 2013;56(2):359–368. doi: 10.1007/s11431-012-5088-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Su Z, Chi M, et al. Magnitude and orientation error correction of a superimposed spatial universal rotating magnetic vector. IEEE Trans Magn. 2016;52(5):1–9. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosney A, Klingner A, Misra S, et al. Propulsion and steering of helical magnetic microrobots using two synchronized rotating dipole fields in three-dimensional space. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robot Syst IROS; Hamburg, Germany. 2015. p. 1988–1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ye X, Hasson C, Yoon WJ, et al. Design of a steering mechanism for a tethered capsule endoscope. Proc IEEE Int Conf Cybern Intell Syst CIS Robot Autom Mechatron RAM; Siem Reap, Cambodia. 2015. p. 234–238.
   Google Scholar
• Chernousko F. On the motion of a body containing a movable internal mass. Dokl Phys. 2005;50(11):593–597. doi: 10.1134/1.2137795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernousko F. Analysis and optimization of the motion of a body controlled by a movable internal mass. J Appl Math Mech. 2006;70(6):915–941.
   Google Scholar
• Figurina T. Optimal control of the motion of a two-body system along a straight line. J Comput Syst Sci Int. 2007;46(2):227–233. doi: 10.1134/S1064230707020086
   Google Scholar
• Bolotnik N, Figurina T. Optimal control of the rectilinear motion of a rigid body on a rough plane my means of the motion of two internal masses. J Appl Math Mech. 2008;72(2):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2008.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Egorov A, Zakharova O. The energy-optimal motion of a vibration-driven robot in a resistive medium. J Appl Math Mech. 2010;74(4):443–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2010.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Furuta K, Chernousko F. Motion generation of the capsubot using internal force and static friction. In: Proc 45th IEEE Conf Decis Control; San Diego, CA, USA. 2006. p. 6575–6580.
   Google Scholar
• Nunuparov A, Becker F, Bolotnik N, et al. Dynamics and motion control of a capsule robot with an opposing spring. Arch Appl Mech. 2019;89(10):2193–2208. doi: 10.1007/s00419-019-01571-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov A, Sakharov A. Dynamics of a rigid body carrying moving masses and a rotor on a rough plane. Nelineinaya Dinamika (Russian J Nonlinear Dyn). 1994;2(2):164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Páez Chávez J, Zhang J, et al. The vibro-impact capsule system in millimetre scale: numerical optimisation and experimental verification. Meccanica. 2020;55(1):885–902. doi: 10.1007/s11012-020-01237-8
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Ley E, Tian J, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of intestinal frictions for propulsive force optimisation of a vibro-impact capsule system. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;101(1):65–83. doi: 10.1007/s11071-020-05767-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo B, Liu Y, Birler R, et al. Self-propelled capsule endoscopy for small- bowel examination: proof-of-concept and model verification. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;174:105506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee N, Kamamichi N, Ishikawa J, et al. Positioning control of a capsule robot using sliding mode control. Proc 2009 IEEE int conf robot biomim. 2009; 19-23.
   Google Scholar
• Tang P, Liang L, Guo Z, et al. Orthogonal optimal design of multiple parameters of a magnetically controlled capsule robot. Micromach. 2021;12(7):802. doi: 10.3390/mi12070802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao M, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. Speed optimisation and reliability analysis of a self-propelled capsule robot moving in an uncertain frictional environment. Int J Mech Sci. 2022;221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov A. Analysis of an impact-driven capsule robot. Int J Nonlinear Mech. 2020;119:103257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yu H, Yang TC. Analysis and control of a capsubot. Proc 17th World Congr Int Fed Automat Control. 2008;41(2):756–761. doi: 10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.00130
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Tian J, Zhu D, et al. Design and experimental investigation of a vibro-impact self-propelled capsule robot with orientation control. 2022 int conf robot autom ICRA. Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wiercigroch M, Pavlovskaia E, et al. Modelling of a vibro-impact capsule system. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;66:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo B, Liu Y, Prasad S. Modelling of capsule-intestine contact for a self-propelled capsule robot via experimental and numerical investigation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019;98:3155–3167. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05061-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SynDaverLabs. Small intestine. Cited 2018 Sep 5. Available from: https://syndaver.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Tear-Sheet-130470-Small-Intestine.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Liu H, Tan R, et al. Modeling of velocity-dependent frictional resistance of a capsule robot inside an intestine. Tribol Lett. 2012;47(2):295–301. doi: 10.1007/s11249-012-9980-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Sung IH, Kim YT, et al. Analytical model development for the prediction of the frictional resistance of a capsule endoscope inside an intestine. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2007;221(8):837–845. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM173
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Alici G, Than TD, et al. Modeling and experimental investigation of rotational resistance of a spiral-type robotic capsule inside a real intestine. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013;18(5):1555–1562. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2012.2208121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernousko F. The optimum rectilinear motion of a two-mass system. J Appl Math Mech. 2002;66(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8928(02)00002-3
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Pavlovskaia E, Wiercigroch M, et al. Forward and backward motion control of a vibro-impact capsule system. Int J Mech Sci. 2015b;70:30–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Pavlovskaia E, Wiercigroch M. Experimental verification of the vibro-impact capsule model. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;83(1–2):1029–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2385-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian X, Fang H. Improving performance: recent progress on vibration-driven locomotion systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019;98(4):2651–2669. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04982-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Guo B, Prasad S. Resonance enhanced self-propelled capsule endoscopy for small bowel examination. Gut. 2019;68:A31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata Y, Higuchi T. A micropositioning device for precision automatic assembly using impact force of piezoelectric elements. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom; Nagoya, Japan. 1995;1:666–671.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Furuta K, Chernousko F. A pendulum-driven cart via internal force and static friction. Proc 2005 Int Conf Phys Control; Saint Petersburg, Russia. 2005. p. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yu H, Burrows B. Optimization and control of a pendulum-driven cart-pole system. Proc 2007 IEEE Int Conf on Netw Sens Control; London, UK. 2007. p. 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Liu Y, Yang TC. Tracking control of a pendulum-driven cart-pole underactuated system. Proc 2007 IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern; Montreal, Que. 2007.
   Google Scholar