Propulsion and photovoltaic charging system parameter computation for an all-electric boat

References

• Ahlstrand F, Lindbergh E. 2020. Methods to predict hull resistance in the process of designing electric boats. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Engineering Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Aijjou A, Bahatti L, Raihani A. 2019. Influence of solar energy on ship energy efficiency: feeder container vessel as example. Int J Electr Energy. 7:1. doi:10.18178/ijoee.7.1.21-25.
   Google Scholar
• Baso S, Bochary L, Hasbullah M, Anggriani ADE, Ardianti A. 2020. Investigating the performance characteristics of a semi-planing ship hull at high speed. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beatrice C, Capasso C, Costa M, Di Blasio G, Di Luca G, Iantorno F, Martoriello G. 2022. Model based optimal management of a hybrid propulsion system for leisure boats. J Energy Storage. 46:103896. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.103896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertorello C, Oliviero L. 2007. Hydrodynamic resistance assessment of non-monohedral planing hull forms based on savitsky’s methodology. Aust J Mech Eng. 4(2):209–223. doi:10.1080/14484846.2007.11464527.
   Google Scholar
• Chai T, Draxler RR. 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Dev. 7(3):1247–1250. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daud MZ, Kin KZ, Norbakyah J, Salisa A. 2015. An optimal electric machine control system design used in plug-in hybrid electric boat. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 10(22):10703–10708.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz E, Atik K. 2007. Coğrafik ve meteorolojik veriler kullanılarak Zonguldak’ta güneş ışınım şiddetinin tahmini için bir çalışma (Article in Turkish). Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi. 12(2):35–42.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2022. EEXI – Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index. https://www.dnv.com/maritime/insights/topics/eexi/calculation.html (accessed February 22, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Faber J, Hanayama S, Zhang S, Pereda P, Comer B, Hauerhof B, Kosaka H. 2020. ‘Fourth IMO GHG study 2020—Final report. https://greenvoyage2050.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Fourth-IMO-GHG-Study-2020-Full-report-and-annexes_compressed.pdf (accessed February 22, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Gaber M, El-Banna SH, El-Dabah M, Hamad MS. 2021. Intelligent energy management system for an all-electric ship based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Eng Rep. 7:7989–7998. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.054.
   Google Scholar
• Gerr D. 2008. Boat mechanical systems handbook. London: International Marine/Ragged Mountain Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goksu B, Yuksel O, Bayraktar M. 2022. Determination of navigation speeds in a planing hull model using the optimum power calculation: a case study for a training boat. 2nd Global Conference on Engineering Research, Volume: Proceeding, pp 134-144.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M, Celik E, Aydin N, Gumus AT, Guneri AF. 2016. A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl Soft Comput. 46:60–89. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan G, Su YM. 2008. Determining the hydrodynamic forces on a planing hull in steady motion. J Mar Sci Appl. 7(3):147–156. doi:10.1007/s11804-008-7057-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hein K, Xu Y, Wilson G, Gupta AK. 2020. Coordinated optimal voyage planning and energy management of all-electric ship with hybrid energy storage system. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 36(3):2355–2365. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3029331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Sun J, Hofmann H. 2018. Control development and performance evaluation for battery/flywheel hybrid energy storage solutions to mitigate load fluctuations in all-electric ship propulsion systems. Appl Energy. 212:919–930. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova G. 2021. Analysis of the specifics in calculating the index of existing marine energy efficiency EEXI in force since 2023. 2021 13th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF) (pp. 1-4); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jahan A, Mustapha F, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Bahraminasab M. 2011. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des. 32(3):1215–1221. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JNGE. 2022. MPPT solar charge controller. https://www.hfjnge.com/24v-48v-96v-120v-192v-216v-240v-360v-384v-480v-584vhigh-voltage-mppt-solar-charge-controller_p107.html (accessed January 12, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Kasuya E. 2019. On the use of r and r squared in correlation and regression (Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 235-236). Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Khair U, Fahmi H, Al Hakim S, Rahim R. 2017. Forecasting error calculation with mean absolute deviation and mean absolute percentage error. J Phys: Conf Ser. 930(1):012002. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/930/1/012002.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Sarwat AI. 2021. Unified univariate-neural network models for lithium-ion battery state-of-charge forecasting using minimized akaike information criterion algorithm. IEEE Access. 9:39154–39170. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchgässner G, Wolters J. 2007. Introduction to modern time series analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Konur O, Yuksel O, Korkmaz SA, Colpan CO, Saatcioglu OY, Muslu I. 2022. Thermal design and analysis of an organic rankine cycle system utilizing the main engine and cargo oil pump turbine based waste heats in a large tanker ship. J Cleaner Prod. 368:133230. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegeskorte N. 2015. Crossvalidation in brain imaging analysis. In: Toga W. A., editor. Brain mapping. London: Academic Press; p. 635–639.
   Google Scholar
• Ku HK, Park CH, Kim JM. 2022. Full simulation modeling of All-electric ship with medium voltage DC power system. Energies. 15(12):4184. doi:10.3390/en15124184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukner A, Yasa AM. 2011. High speed planing hulls resistance prediction methods and comparison. 1st International Symposium on Naval Architecture and Maritime, Volume: Proceeding, pp 201-208.
   Google Scholar
• Lovibond O, Elbarghthi AF, Dvorak V, Wen C. 2023. Numerical analysis of propellers for electric boats using computational fluid dynamics modelling. Energy Convers Manage. X:100349. doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100349.
   Google Scholar
• Lu R, Turan O, Boulougouris E, Banks C, Incecik A. 2015. A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping. Ocean Eng. 110:18–28. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MGM. 2022. Electric Motors, https://www.mgm-compro.com/electric-motors/ (accessed August 05, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Mills TC. 2019. Applied time series analysis: a practical guide to modeling and forecasting. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mira JD, Mendoza F, Betancur E, Manrique T, Mejía-Gutiérrez R. 2021. A propulsion system design methodology based on overall efficiency optimization for electrically powered vessels. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification. 8(1):239–250. doi:10.1109/TTE.2021.3104763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar N, Monem MA, Firouz Y, Salminen J, Smekens J, Hegazy O, Gaulous H, Mulder G, Van den Bossche P, Coosemans T, Van Mierlo J. 2014. Lithium iron phosphate based battery–assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model. Appl Energy. 113:1575–1585. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res. 156(2):445–455. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovrum E, Bergh TF. 2015. Modelling lithium-ion battery hybrid ship crane operation. Appl Energy. 152:162–172. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panasonic. 2021. Specification for NCR18650GA. https://birikimpilleri.net/Resim/900095503030_1.pdf (accessed June 7, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Park C, Jeong B, Zhou P, Jang H, Kim S, Jeon H, Nam D, Rashedi A. 2022. Live-Life cycle assessment of the electric propulsion ship using solar PV. Appl Energy. 309:118477. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radojcic D, Zgradic A, Kalajdzic M, Simic A. 2014. Resistance prediction for hard chine hulls in the pre-planing regime. Pol Marit Res. doi:10.2478/pomr-2014-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reabroy R, Tiaple Y, Pongduang S, Nantawong T, Iamraksa P. 2015. The possibility of using electrical motor for boat propulsion system. Energy Procedia. 79:1008–1014. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.601.
   Google Scholar
• ResmiGazete. 2022. Gün Öncesi Piyasasında ve Dengeleme Güç Piyasasında Asgari ve Azami Fiyat Limitlerinin Berlirlenmesine İlişkin Usul ve Esaslarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Usul ve Esaslar. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2021/02/20210209.pdf (accessed September 27, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Roh MI. 2013. Determination of an economical shipping route considering the effects of sea state for lower fuel consumption. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 5(2):246–262. doi:10.2478/ijnaoe-2013-0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford D, Mao X, Comer B. 2020. Potential CO2 reductions under the energy efficiency existing ship index. International council on clean transportation. Working paper, 2020-27.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena S, Hendricks C, Pecht M. 2016. Cycle life testing and modeling of graphite/LiCoO2 cells under different state of charge ranges. J Power Sources. 327:394–400. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepasi S, Ghorbani R, Liaw BY. 2015. Inline state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries using state of charge calculation. J Power Sources. 299:246–254. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 27(3):379–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shu G, Liu P, Tian H, Wang X, Jing D. 2017. Operational profile based thermaleconomic analysis on an organic rankine cycle using for harvesting marine engine’s exhaust waste heat. Eng Convers Manag. 146:107–123. doi:10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2017.04.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMA. 2021. Sunny Central Storage. https://www.sma.de/en/products/battery-inverters/sunny-central-storage-1900-2200-2475-2900.html (accessed 21, June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Smith TW, Jalkanen JP, Anderson BA, Corbett JJ, Faber J, Hanayama S, O’keeffe E, Parker S, Johansson L, Aldous L, Raucci C. 2015. Third IMO greenhouse gas study 2014. https://greenvoyage2050.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/third-imo-ghg-study-2014-executive-summary-and-final-report.pdf. (accessed 21, September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Spagnolo GS, Papalillo D, Martocchia A, Makary G. 2012. Solar-electric boat. J Transp Technol. 2(2):144–149.
   Google Scholar
• Sreedevi ML, Joseph SC, Ajlif AM, Jayan PP, Dhanesh PR, Mineeshma GR, Chacko RV. 2022, January. Electric propulsion system powertrain estimation for houseboats using backward simulation. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Smart Grid, and Renewable Energy (PESGRE) (pp. 1-6); IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Zeng W, Gu B, Zhang Y, Yuan X. 2021. Energy, exergy, and economic (3E) analysis of an organic rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures based on marine engine waste heat and LNG cold energy. Eng Convers Manag. 228:113657. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommatech. 2022. TommaTech 460 w Watt 144PM M6 Half Cut Multibusbar Güneş Paneli Solar Panel Monokristal, https://www.gunesdukkan.com/gunes-paneli/tommatech-460-w-watt-144pm-m6-half-cut-multibusbar-gunes-paneli-solar-panel-monokristal(accessed August 05, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Villacreses G, Salinas SS, Ortiz WD, Villacís S, Martínez-Gómez J, Narváez C,RA. 2017. Environmental impact assessment of internal combustion and electric engines for maritime transport. Environ Processes. 4(4):907–922. doi:10.1007/s40710-017-0270-7.
   Google Scholar
• Xiros NI, Tzelepis V, Loghis EK. 2019. Modeling and simulation of planing-hull watercraft outfitted with an electric motor drive and a surface-piercing propeller. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(2):49. doi:10.3390/jmse7020049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MH, Yeh RH. 2018. The effects of composition ratios and pressure drops of R245fa/R236fa mixtures on the performance of an organic rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery. Eng Convers Manag. 175:313–326. doi:10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi R, Shafaghat R, Shakeri M. 2013. Hydrodynamic analysis techniques for high-speed planing hulls. Appl Ocean Res. 42:105–113. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2013.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksel O, Koseoglu B. 2023. Numerical simulation of the hybrid ship power distribution system and an analysis of its emission reduction potential. Ships Offsh Struct. 18(1):78–94. doi:10.1080/17445302.2022.2028435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou ZH, Yi Y, Sun JN. 2006. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci. 18(5):1020–1023. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar