Numerical simulation of wave impact and high pressure characteristics due to violent sloshing in a rectangular tank

References

• Abdolmaleki K, Thiagarajan K, Morris-Thomas M. 2004. Simulation of the dam break problem and impact flows using a Navier–Stokes solver. Simulation. 13:17.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen B, Faltinsen O. 2012a. The natural frequency of the pressure oscillations inside a water-wave entrapped air pocket on a rigid wall. J Fluids Struct. 35:200–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen B, Faltinsen O. 2012b. A numerical model of an air pocket impact during sloshing. Appl Ocean Res. 37:54–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasingame T, Johnston J, Lee W. 1989. Type-curve analysis using the pressure integral method. SPE California Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock G, Obhrai C, Peregrine D, Bredmose H. 2007. Violent breaking wave impacts. Part 1: results from large-scale regular wave tests on vertical and sloping walls. Coastal Eng. 54(8):602–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherfils J-M, Pinon G, Rivoalen E. 2012. JOSEPHINE: a parallel SPH code for free-surface flows. Comput Phys Commun. 183(7):1468–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colagrossi A, Landrini M. 2003. Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys. 191(2):448–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 2017. Slamming. Encyclopedia Maritime Offshore Eng. 2(95):1325–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Fluent. 2006. User's guide. Lebanon: Fluent Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Vassalos D, Gao Q. 2010. Numerical simulation of water flooding into a damaged vessel's compartment by the volume of fluid method. Ocean Eng. 37(16):1428–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong K, Shao S, Liu H, Wang B, Tan S-K. 2016. Two-phase SPH simulation of fluid–structure interactions. J Fluids Struct. 65:155–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim RA. 2005. Liquid sloshing dynamics: theory and applications. New York (United States of America): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Kim ES, Shin S-c., Kwon SH. 2019. Sources of the measurement error of the impact pressure in sloshing experiments. J Marine Sci Eng. 7(7):207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S-Y, Kim Y, Lee J. 2017. Comparison of sloshing-induced pressure in different scale tanks. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(2):244–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y. 2007. Experimental and numerical analyses of sloshing flows. J Eng Math. 58(1–4):191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Shin Y-S, Lee KH. 2004. Numerical study on slosh-induced impact pressures on three-dimensional prismatic tanks. Appl Ocean Res. 26(5):213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larocque LA, Imran J, Chaudhry MH. 2013. 3D numerical simulation of partial breach dam-break flow using the LES and k– ϵ turbulence models. J Hydraul Res. 51(2):145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Kim BJ, Seo JK, Ha YC, Matsumoto T, Byeon SH, Paik JK. 2015. Nonlinear impact response analysis of LNG FPSO cargo tank structures under sloshing loads. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(5):510–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Gatin I, Obhrai C, Ong MC, Jasak H. 2019. CFD simulations of violent breaking wave impacts on a vertical wall using a two-phase compressible solver. Coastal Eng. 154:103564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugni C, Bardazzi A, Faltinsen OM, Graziani G. 2014. Hydroelastic slamming response in the evolution of a flip-through event during shallow-liquid sloshing. Phys Fluids. 26(3):032108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugni C, Brocchini M, Faltinsen O. 2010a. Evolution of the air cavity during a depressurized wave impact. ii. The dynamic field. Phys Fluids. 22(5):056102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugni C, Miozzi M, Brocchini M, Faltinsen O. 2010b. Evolution of the air cavity during a depressurized wave impact. i. The kinematic flow field. Phys Fluids. 22(5):056101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddada S, Hariharan K, Sanapala V, Patnaik B. 2021. Circular cylinder wakes and their control under the influence of oscillatory flows: a numerical study. J Ocean Eng Sci. 6(4):389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddada S, Patnaik BSV. 2010. An assessment of turbulence models for the prediction of flow past a circular cylinder with momentum injection. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 98(10–11):575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor C, Mohajernasab S, Abdussamie N. 2022. Numerical investigation into water entry problems of a flat plate with air pockets. J Ocean Eng Sci.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenFOAM. 2014. The open source CFD toolbox of OpenFOAM: user guide, the OpenFOAM foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Paik J, Shin Y. 2006. Structural damage and strength criteria for ship stiffened panels under impact pressure actions arising from sloshing, slamming and green water loading. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(3):249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Park I-R, Kim K-S, Kim J, Van S-H. 2012. Numerical investigation of the effects of turbulence intensity on dam-break flows. Ocean Eng. 42:176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregrine D. 2003. Water-wave impact on walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 35(1):23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Peregrine D, Bredmose H, Bullock G, Obrhai C, Müller G, Wolters G. 2005. Water wave impact on walls and the role of air. In: Coastal Engineering 2004: (In 4 Volumes). World Scientific. p. 4005–4017.
   Google Scholar
• Pochet F, Hillewaert K, Geuzaine P, Remacle J-F, Marchandise É. 2013. A 3D strongly coupled implicit discontinuous Galerkin level set-based method for modeling two-phase flows. Comput Fluids. 87:144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasanna Kumar SS, Patnaik BSV, Ramamurthi K. 2018. Prediction of air blast mitigation in an array of rigid obstacles using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Phys Fluids. 30(4):046105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh W-J, Cho S-H, Park JI. 2005. Simulation of sloshing in fuel tanks and parametric study on noise reduction by decreasing impact pressure. SAE Trans. 114:2431–2436.
   Google Scholar
• Sanapala VS. 2017. Studies on the dynamics of liquid sloshing in storage tanks [PhD thesis]. Chennai: Indian Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sanapala VS, Sajish SD, Velusamy K, Ravisankar A, Patnaik BSV. 2019. An experimental investigation on the dynamics of liquid sloshing in a rectangular tank and its interaction with an internal vertical pole. J Sound Vib. 449:43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanapala VS, Velusamy K, Patnaik BSV. 2016. CFD simulations on the dynamics of liquid sloshing and its control in a storage tank for spent fuel applications. Ann Nucl Energy. 94:494–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanapala VS, Velusamy K, Patnaik BSV. 2022. Numerical study of coupled slosh modes in a 3D vessel subjected to multi-directional excitations. Ann Nucl Energy. 175:109197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsoddini R, Abolpour B. 2021. Bingham fluid sloshing phenomenon modelling and investigating in a rectangular tank using SPH method. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(5):557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsoddini R, Abolpur B. 2019. Investigation of the effects of baffles on the shallow water sloshing in a rectangular tank using a 2D turbulent ISPH method. China Ocean Eng. 33:94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Arun C, Krishna IP. 2019. Development and validation of a simple two degree of freedom model for predicting maximum fundamental sloshing mode wave height in a cylindrical tank. J Sound Vib. 461:114906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto-Iglesias A, Bulian G, Botia-Vera E. 2015. A set of canonical problems in sloshing. Part 2: influence of tank width on impact pressure statistics in regular forced angular motion. Ocean Eng. 105:136–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman M. 2003. A second order coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing growth and collapse of vapor bubbles. J Comput Phys. 187(1):110–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmasebi MK, Shamsoddini R, Abolpour B. 2020. Performances of different turbulence models for simulating shallow water sloshing in rectangular tank. J Marine Sci Appl. 19:381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong DD, Jang B -S, Ju H -B, Han SW. 2022. Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid–structure interaction. Part I: numerical simulations. Ships Offshore Struct. 17(1):7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uras RA. 1995. Sloshing impact in roofed tanks. Argonne National Lab. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilev A, Hadid HB, El Hajem M, Botton V. 2007. Experimental and numerical investigation of an air pocket immersed and immobilized in a horizontal water duct flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 28(4):673–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman AE, Gerrits J, Luppes R, Helder JA, Vreeburg J. 2007. The numerical simulation of liquid sloshing on board spacecraft. J Comput Phys. 224(1):82–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violeau D, Rogers BD. 2016. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for free-surface flows: past, present and future. J Hydraul Res. 54(1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan D, Mikkola T, Kujala P, Hirdaris S. 2022. Hydroelastic analysis of slamming induced impact on stiff and flexible structures by two-way CFD–FEA coupling. Ships Offshore Struct. 0(0):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ishihara T. 2020. Numerical study of distributed hydrodynamic forces on a circular heave plate by large-eddy simulations with volume of fluid method. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(6):574–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Liu D-y., Ou C-q. 2011. Simulation of flow transients in a water filling pipe containing entrapped air pocket with VOF model. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 5(1):127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, De Kat J, Buchner B. 1999. A nonlinear 3D approach to simulate green water dynamics on deck. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics; Nantes, France. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar