Social Psychological Dynamics of the Intractable Kurdish Conflict in Turkey

References

• Arslan, S. (2011). Cinema in Turkey: A new critical history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. D., Jussim, L., & Wilder, D. (2001). Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aydinlik, Y. (2020). National fantasy, impossible gaze: The Kurdish question in popular Turkish cinema. Turkish Studies, 22(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2020.1743691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakiner, O. (2019). Why do peace negotiations succeed or fail? Legal commitment, transparency, and inclusion during peace negotiations in Colombia (2012–2016) and Turkey (2012–2015). Negotiation Journal, 35(4), 471–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Social-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social Psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., Oren, N., & Nets-Zehngut, R. (2014). Sociopsychological analysis of conflict-supporting narratives. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 662–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314533984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., & Dgani-Hirsh, A. (2009). The influence of the ethos of conflict on Israeli Jews' interpretation of Jewish—Palestinian encounters. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708325942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., & Teichman, Y. (2005). Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representations of arabs in Israeli Jewish society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2015). Do mass media interventions effectively promote peace in contexts of ongoing violence? Evidence from Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(4), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000124
   Google Scholar
• Bozarslan, H. (2008). Kurds and the Turkish state. In R. Kasaba (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Turkey – Vol.4: Turkey in the modern world (pp. 333–357). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Božic-Roberson, A. (2004). Words before war: Milosevic’s use of mass media and rhetoric to provoke ethnopolitical conflict in former Yugoslavia. East European Quarterly, 38(4), 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. W. (1990). Conflict: Human needs theory. St. Martin‘s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a metaframework-I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327949PAC0901_01
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Working Paper at The World Bank Development Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, A. B. (2010). Turkey: The Kurdish question and the coercive state. In T. Paffenholz (Ed.), Civil society and peacebuilding: Concepts, cases, lessons (153–179). Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, I. (2014). Humbling Turkishness: Undoing the strategies of exclusion and inclusion of Turkish modernity. Journal of Historical Sociology, 27(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dönmez-Colin, G. (2008). Turkish cinema: Identity, distance and belonging. Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin, M. (2008). ‘Is the Turk a white man?’ Towards a theoretical framework for race in the making of Turkishness. Middle Eastern Studies, 44(6), 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200802425973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, K. (1999). Doing data: The local organisation of a sociological review. British Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 675–695.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., & Keashly, L. (1991). The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention. Journal of Peace Research, 28(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343391028001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, M. E. S. (2017). The Third Pillar: The role of reconciliation in supporting peace agreements (Unpublished doctoral thesis). London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Garson, M. E. S. (2019). Defying gravity: Evaluating the trickle-up effects of reconciliation programmes. Ethnopolitics, 19(2), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1653017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, M. (1990). The Kurdish insurgency in Turkey. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 13(4), 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, M. (2016). The Kurdish issue in Turkey: Back to square one? Turkish Policy Quarterly, 14(4), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakyemez, S. (2017). Turkey’s failed peace process with the Kurds: A different explanation. Middle East Brief, 111, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, E. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(5), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708314665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish society. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311412642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, B., Porat, R., Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2016). Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(43), 12105–12110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606182113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, J. L. (2009). Conducting intensive interviews and elite interviews. Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. A., Stringer, M., & Watson, R. P. (1991). Intergroup violence and intergroup attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00943.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C. (2007). Social-psychological dimensions of international conflict. In E. W. Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods and techniques (pp. 191–236). U.S. Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Köse, T. (2017). Rise and fall of the Ak party’s Kurdish peace initiatives. Insight Turkey, 19(2), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2017192.08
   Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, L. (1998). Intractable conflicts. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332–342). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X27162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (1998). Literacy, textbooks and ideology. Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 515–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2014). The nature of intractable conflict. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oren, N. (2009). The Israeli ethos of conflict 1967-2006. Working Paper, No: 27. School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Oren, N., & Bar-Tal, D. (2004). Delegitimization as an obstacle to peace process. In M. Sanchez-Mazas, & L. Licata (Eds.), L’autre: Regards psychosociaux (pp. 171–208). Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Oren, N., Nets-Zehngut, R., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). Construction of the Israeli-Jewish conflict-supportive narrative and the struggle over its dominance. Political Psychology, 36(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdoğan, G. G. (2010). Turkish nationalism reconsidered: The ‘heaviness’ of statist patriotism in nation-building. In A. Aktar, N. Kizilyurek, & U. Özkirimli (Eds.), Nationalism in the troubled triangle (pp. 47–60). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Özpek, B. B. (2018). The peace process between Turkey and the Kurds: Anatomy of a failure. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, Y., Peristianis, N., & Welz, G. (2006). Divided Cyprus: Modernity, history, and an island in conflict. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Rosoux, V., & Anstey, M. (2017). Negotiating reconciliation in peacemaking: Quandries of relationship building. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. H. (1998). The cultural dynamics of ethnic conflict. In D. Jacquin, A. Oros, & M. Verweij (Eds.), Culture in world politics (pp. 156–186). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, S. W. (1991). Identity and ideology: Sociocultural theories of schooling. Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B., & Çelik, A. B. (2017). Ontological insecurity in asymmetric conflicts: Reflections on agonistic peace in Turkey’s Kurdish issue. Security Dialogue, 48(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617695715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. (2005). Terrorists, bandits, spooks and thieves: Russian demonisation of the chechens before and since 9/11. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000322937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E. Lyons, & A. Coyle (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179–194). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, M., & Liaras, E. (2010). Turkey’s new Kurdish Opening: Religious versus secular values. Middle East Policy, 17(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2010.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Genocide, mass killing and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention and reconciliation. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 710–751). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. (2005). Conflict resolution in the neighbourhood: Comparing the role of the EU in the Turkish–Kurdish and Israeli–Palestinian conflicts. Centre for European Policy Studies Working Documents, 221, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Uluğ, ÖM, & Cohrs, J. C. (2017). Examining the ethos of conflict by exploring lay people's representations of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 36(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216674969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustel, F. (2004). Zorunlu Iç Göç sonrasi köye dönüş: Ön rapor. Istanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler Vakfi.
   Google Scholar
• Vertzberger, Y. (1990). The world in their minds: Information processing, cognition and perception in foreign Policy decision making. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S. (1999). Written in blood: Ethnic identity and the struggle for human harmony. Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Yanarocak, H. E. C. (2016). Turkish staatsvolk vs. Kurdish identity: Denial of the Kurds in Turkish school textbooks. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 7(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520844.2016.1239176
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz, H., & Ozcan, N. A. (2006). The Kurdish question and Turkey’s justice and development party. Middle East Policy, 13(1), 102–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeğen, M. (2009). ‘Prospective-Turks’ or ‘pseudo-citizens’: Kurds in Turkey. The Middle East Journal, 63(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.3751/63.4.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeydanlıoğlu, W. (2008). The white Turkish man's burden: Orientalism, Kemalism and the Kurds in Turkey. Neo-colonial Mentalities in Contemporary Europe, 4(2), 155–174.
   Google Scholar