Publication Cover
Ethnopolitics
Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics
Volume 23, 2024 - Issue 3
119
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Determinants of Individual Support for International Criminal Tribunals

ORCID Icon

References

  • Aguilar, P., Balcells, L., & Cebolla-Boado, H. (2011). Determinants of attitudes toward transitional justice: An empirical analysis of the Spanish case. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 1397–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407468
  • Arzt, D. E. (2006). Views on the ground: The local perception of international criminal tribunals in the Former Yugoslavia and Sierra Leone. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603(1), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205281443
  • Bearce, D., & Scott, B. (2019). Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent? The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09351-3
  • Caldeira, G. A., & Gibson, J. L. (1995). The legitimacy of the court of justice in the European Union: Models of institutional support. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082430
  • Chapman, T. L., & Chaudoin, S. (2020). Public reactions to international legal institutions: The international criminal court in a developing democracy. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1305–1320. https://doi.org/10.1086/708338
  • Chaudoin, S. (2016). How contestation moderates the effects of international institutions: The International Criminal Court and Kenya. The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1086/684595
  • Daly, S. Z. (2018). Determinants of ex-combatants’ attitudes toward transitional justice in Colombia. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35(6), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894218788084
  • Dancy, G., Dutton, Y. M., Alleblas, T., & Aloyo, E. (2020). What determines perceptions of bias toward the International Criminal Court? Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(7-8), 1443–1469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719893740
  • David, R. (2017). What we know about transitional justice: Survey and experimental evidence. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12395
  • Dellmuth, L. M., & Tallberg, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000230
  • Dursun-Özkanca, O. (2018). The European Union rule of law mission in Kosovo: An analysis from the local perspective. Ethnopolitics, 17(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2017.1339456
  • Dyrstad, K. (2012). After ethnic civil war: Ethno-nationalism in the Western Balkans. Journal of Peace Research, 49(6), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312439202
  • Dyrstad, K. (2013). Does civil war breed authoritarian values? An empirical study of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo and Croatia. Democratization, 20(7), 1219–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.688032
  • Elcheroth, G., & Spini, D. (2009). Public support for the prosecution of human rights violations in the former Yugoslavia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910902837321
  • Ford, S. (2012). A social psychology model of the perceived legitimacy of International Criminal Courts: Implications for the success of transitional justice mechanisms. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 45(2), 405–476.
  • Ford, S. (2013). Fairness and politics at the ICTY: Evidence from the indictments. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 39(1), 45–114.
  • Gow, J. (2006). The ICTY, war crimes enforcement and Dayton: The ghost in the machine. Ethnopolitics, 5(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050600595480
  • Hartmann, F. (2009). The ICTY and EU conditionality. Institute for security studies. Chaillot Papers, 116, 67–81.
  • Iommi, G. L. (2020). Whose justice? The ICC ‘Africa problem’. International Relations, 34(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819842294
  • Kelmendi, P. (2022). Rebel successor parties and their electoral performance in the Balkans. Security Studies, 31(3), 446–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2112275
  • Kelmendi, P., & Pedraza, C. (2022). Determinants of individual support for independence: Evidence from Montenegro. Nationalities Papers, 50(3), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.23
  • Kelmendi, P., & Radin, A. (2018). UNsatisfied? Public support for postconflict international missions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(5), 983–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716674536
  • Kelmendi, P., & Skendaj, E. (2022). Protests in postwar societies: Grievances and contentious collective action in Kosovo. Nationalities Papers, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.7
  • Klarin, M. (2009). The impact of the ICTY trials on public opinion in the former Yugoslavia. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp009
  • Meernik, J. D. (2015). Explaining public opinion on international criminal justice. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000332
  • Meernik, J. D., Nichols, A., & King, K. L. (2010). The impact of international tribunals and domestic trials on peace and human rights after civil war. International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00414.x
  • Mertus, J. (2007). Findings from focus group research on public perceptions of the ICTY. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 55(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2007-550106
  • Milanović, M. (2015). Establishing the facts about mass atrocities: Accounting for the failure of the ICTY to persuade target audiences. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4), 1321–1378.
  • Milanović, M. (2016). The impact of the ICTY on the former Yugoslavia: An anticipatory postmortem. American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.0233
  • Mills, K., & Bloomfield, A. (2018). African resistance to the International Criminal Court: Halting the advance of the anti-impunity norm. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000407
  • Samii, C. (2013). Who wants to forgive and forget? Transitional justice preferences in postwar Burundi. Journal of Peace Research, 50(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312463713
  • Simkus, A. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction: The SEESSP project. International Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659370300
  • Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2004). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803773100066
  • Sokolić, I. (2016). Researching norms, narratives, and transitional justice: Focus group methodology in post-conflict Croatia. Nationalities Papers, 44(6), 932–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1183605
  • Stojarová, V., & Emerson, P. (Eds.). (2010). Party politics in the Western Balkans. Routledge.
  • Subotic, J. (2011). Expanding the scope of post-conflict justice: Individual, state and societal responsibility for mass atrocity. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310394696
  • Voeten, E. (2013). Public opinion and the legitimacy of international courts. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14(2), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2013-021
  • Warren, M., Koliqi, K., Maksimović, N., & Stappers, M. (2017). Public perception of the Kosovo Specialist Court. PAX.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.