As if we were not friends: from (de)objectifying and (re)positioning and back

References

• Alvesson, Mats. 2009. “At-Home Ethnography: Struggling with Closeness and Closure.” In Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexity of Everyday Life, edited by Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow, Harry Wels, and Frans Kamsteeg, 156–174. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aumais, Nancy, and Consuelo Vásquez. 2023. “Tisser des relations : dialogue autour de la pratique de la filature.” Recherches Qualitatives 42 (1): 92–113. https://doi.org/10.7202/1100246ar.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. “Posthuman Knowledge.” Video, Harvard University, March 13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CewnVzOg5w&t=2s.
   Google Scholar
• Butz, David, and Kathryn Besio. 2009. “Autoethnography.” Geography Compass 3 (5): 1660–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00279.x.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Dána-Ain, and Christa Craven. 2023. Feminist Ethnography: Thinking Through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, Barbara, and Pengfei Zhao. 2022. “Storyworlding: An Outline of the Philosophic Commitments and Research Applications of a New Feminist Methodology*.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 35 (10): 1036–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2061631.
   Google Scholar
• De Toledo, Camille. 2021. Le Fleuve Qui Voulait Écrire: Les Auditions Du Parlement de Loire. Paris: Les liens qui libèrent. http://www.editionslesliensquiliberent.fr/livre-Le_fleuve_qui_voulait_%C3%A9crire-661-1-1-0-1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Michelle. 1994. “Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 70–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Edinburgh: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haiven, Max, and Alex Kasnabish. 2014. The Radical Imagination. Halifax & Winnipeg: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Anne, and Stacy Holman Jones. 2019. “Activist Affect.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (6): 563–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418800753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, bell. 2016. All About Love: News Visions. William Morrow. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2014. “That’s Enough About Ethnography!.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 383–395. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim, and Gisli Palsson, eds. 2013. Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198394.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Katherine. 2006. “Into the Dark Heart of Ethnography: The Lived Ethics and Inequality of Intimate Field Relationships.” Qualitative Sociology 29 (2): 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9011-3.
   Google Scholar
• Koro, Mirka, Gaile S. Cannella, M. Francyne Huckaby, and Jennifer R. Wolgemuth. 2022. “Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Justice Matters(Ings) in (En)Tangled Times.” International Review of Qualitative Research 14 (4): 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447211012656.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2007. “Making a Mess with Method.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology, edited by William Outhwaite and Stephen Turner, 595–606. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London, England EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607958.n33.
   Google Scholar
• Linstead, Stephen. 1994. “Objectivity, Reflexivity, and Fiction: Humanity, Inhumanity, and the Science of the Social.” Human Relations 47 (11): 1321–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404701102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, D. Soyini. 2011. Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, Daniel. 2007. Organizational Ethnography. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209526.
   Google Scholar
• Owton, Helen, and Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson. 2014. “Close but Not Too Close: Friendship as Method (Ology) in Ethnographic Research Encounters.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 43 (3): 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613495410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul, George E. Marcus, James D. Faubion, and Tobias Rees. 2008. Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. A John Hope Franklin Center Book. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, Victoria. 2020. “Ethnographic Toolkit: Strategic Positionality and Researchers’ Visible and Invisible Tools in Field Research.” Ethnography 21 (2): 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118805121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, Jessica, and Emma Renold. 2014. “‘F**k Rape!’: Exploring Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, Renato. 1989. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon. https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Truth-Remaking-Social-Analysis/dp/080704623X.
   Google Scholar
• Sassi, Kelly, and Ebony Elizabeth Thomas. 2012. “‘If You Weren’t Researching Me and a Friend … ’: The Mobius of Friendship and Mentorship as Methodological Approaches to Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 18 (10): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412456958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, James. 2016. The Ethnographic Interview. Waveland Press. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann-Healy, Lisa M. 2003. “Friendship as Method.” Qualitative Inquiry 9 (5): 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undurraga, Serra, and Jacqueline Karen Andrea. 2020. “Reflexivities as Affective Ways of Relating That Produce.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (7): 920–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419885408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, John. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, Robin. 2011. “The Politics of Friendship in Feminist Anthropology.” Anthropology in Action 18 (1): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2011.180107.
   Google Scholar
• Ybema, Sierk, Dvora Yanow, Harry Wels, and Frans Kamsteeg. 2009. Studying Everyday Organizational Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar