Crafting a ‘senseplace’: the touch, sound and smell of graffiti

References

• Adams, M., G. Moore, T. Cox, B. Croxford, M. Refaee, and S. Sharples. 2007. “The 24-Hour City: Residents’ Sensorial Experiences.” The Senses & Society 2 (2): 201–215. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589307X203092.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, A. A. 1998. “Urban Graffiti on the City Landscape.” Unpublished manuscript. www.streetgangs.com.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2009. “Affective Atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1986. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. 1988. “Ethnomethodology: A Critical Review.” Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1): 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002301.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. 2022. Crafting Ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 1999. Globalization: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, B. 1993. “Introduction.” In Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, edited by B. Bender, 1–18. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. 2018. “Place-Based Elicitation: Interviewing Graffiti Writers at the Scene of the Crime.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 47 (2): 171–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, T. 2010. “Reading Gestures and Reading Codes: The Visual Literacy of Graffiti as Both Physical/Performative Act and Digital Information Text.” In Mapping Minds, edited by M. Raesch, 85–94. Oxford: InterDisciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D. D., and M. L. Miller. 1990. “Bombing and Burning: The Social Organization and Values of Hip Hop Graffiti Writers and Implications for Policy.” Deviant Behavior 11 (4): 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1990.9967858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmel, S. 2013. “The Craft of Intensive Care Medicine.” Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (5): 731–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01524.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, M., and T. Thor. 2017. “The Reciprocal City: Performing Solidarity - Mediating Space Through Street Art and Graffiti.” International Communication Gazette 79 (6–7): 584–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048517727183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 1997. “Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses.” International Social Science Journal 49 (153): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00032.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. 2023. “Using an ‘Ethnogram’ to Visualize Talk in the Classroom.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 47 (2): 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2263373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R., and J. Hockey. 2023. “Gravel Cycling Craft and the Senses: Scenes, Sounds, Vibrations, Fatigue and Typifications on Off-Road Tracks.” The Senses & Society 18 (3): 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2023.2181138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 1992. “The Crucial ‘Where’ of Graffiti: A Geographical Analysis of Reactions to Graffiti in New York.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10 (3): 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1068/d100329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, T. 2006. “Material Civilization: Things and Society.” The British Journal of Sociology 57 (2): 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00110.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desjarlais, R. 2005. “Movement, Stillness: On the Sensory World of a Shelter for the ‘Homeless Mentally Ill.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D Howes, 369–379. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• dos Anjos Craveiro, R. P. C. 2017. “The Influence of Graffiti Writing in Contemporary Typography.” SAUC-Street Art and Urban Creativity 3 (2): 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, S. 2005. “Places Sensed, Senses Placed: Toward a Sensuous Epistemology of Environments.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 179–191. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. 1995. “Urban graffiti: Crime, control, and resistance.” Youth & Society 27 (1): 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X95027001005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. 1997. “Criminological Verstehen: Inside the Immediacy of Crime.” Justice Quarterly 14 (1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093201.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. 2013. “Cultural Criminology and the Politics of Meaning.” Critical Criminology: An International Journal 21 (3): 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9186-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J., and R. D. Weide. 2010. “Spot Theory.” City 14 (1–2): 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903525157.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. 2005. “Dystoposthesia; Emplacing Environmental Sensitivities.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 380–396. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Fransberg, M., M. Myllylä, and J. Tolonen. 2021. “Embodied Graffiti and Street Art Research.” Qualitative Research 23 (2): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211028795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1992. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, L. 2014. Graffiti Art Styles: A Classification System and Theoretical Analysis. London: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Gowlland, G. 2019. “The Sociality of Enskilment.” Ethnos 84 (3): 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2018.1455726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasseni, C. 2018. “Skilled Vision.” In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1657.
   Google Scholar
• Hacer, A. K. E. R., and S. Erdem. 2022. “Graffiti as a Communication Tool and Use of Experimental Graphic Design in Graffiti Applications.” Contemporary Issues of Communication 1 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 2006. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 2019. “Everyday Routines as Transformative Processes: A Sporting Case.” Sociological Research Online 24 (2): 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418790273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2005. “HYPERESTHESIA, Or, the Sensual Logic of Late Capitalism.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 281–303. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2018. Senses and Sensation: Critical and Primary Sources. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2022. “In Defense of Materiality: Attending to the Sensori-Social Life of Things.” Journal of Material Culture 27 (3): 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835221088501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta, R. 2010. “I Like Cities; Do You Like Letters? Introducing Urban Typography in Art Education.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 29 (1): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01633.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. 2010. “Painting with Permission: Legal Graffiti in New York City.” Ethnography 11 (2): 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138109339122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. H. 2018. “What Can the Parkour Craftsmen Tell Us About Bodily Expertise and Skilled Movement?” In Skills, Knowledge and Expertise in Sport, edited by G. Breivek, 79–93. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LeFebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lyng, S. 1990. “Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (4): 851–886. https://doi.org/10.1086/229379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng, S. 2005. Edgework: The Sociology of Voluntary Risk-Taking. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T. H. J. 2018a. “Built Environment.” In The International Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan and S. Coleman, 1–18. Wiley: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1741.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T. H. J. 2018b. “Embodied Learning.” In The International Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan and S. Coleman, 1–10. Blackwell: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1905.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T. H. J. 2021. The Pursuit of Pleasurable Work: Craftwork in Twenty-First Century England. Vol. 4. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, T. H., R. Fardon, O. Harris, M. Nuttall, C. Shore, V. Strang, and R. A. Wilson. 2012. Knowledge in Hand: Explorations of Brain, Hand and Tool. The Sage Handbook of Social Anthropology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, C. 2015. “Young People and the Spatial Politics of Graffiti Writing.” In Identities and Subjectivities: Geographies of Children and Young People, edited by T. Skelton, N. Worth and C. Dwyer, 451–473. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 2005. “Inside the Five Sense Sensorium.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D Howes, 43–52. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George H. 1962/1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. 1938/1972. The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, S. 2015. “Keeping it Real? Subcultural Graffiti, Street Art, Heritage and Authenticity.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (4): 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.934902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monto, M. A., J. Machalek, and T. L. Anderson. 2013. “Boys Doing Art: The Construction of Outlaw Masculinity in a Portland, Oregon, Graffiti Crew.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 42 (3): 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241612465981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllylä, M. 2019. “From Experiencing Sites of Past to the Future of the Demolition Man and How Graffiti Fits to All.” UXUC - User Experience & Urban Creativity 1 (1): 26–37. http://sauc.website/index.php/UXUC/article/view/105.
   Google Scholar
• Nilan, P. 2002. “Dangerous fieldwork’ Re-Examined: The Question of Researcher Subject Position.” Qualitative Research 2 (3): 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200305.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, C. 2009. Agency and Embodiment: Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. 2005. “Embodied Knowledge: The Experience of Meaning and the Struggle Towards Proficiency in Glassblowing.” Ethnography 6 (2): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138105057551.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. 2017. “Touching Tacit Knowledge: Handwork as Ethnographic Method in a Glassblowing Studio.” Qualitative Research 17 (2): 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116686651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okley, J. 2007. “‘Fieldwork Embodied’.” In Embodying Sociology: Retrospect, Progress and Prospects, edited by C Shilling, 65–79. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B. 2003. “Material Culture After Text: Re‐Membering Things.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (2): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, S., and D. Zahavi. 2009. “Phenomenological Sociology - the Subjectivity of Everyday Life.” In Encountering the Everyday: An Introduction to the Sociologies of the Unnoticed, edited by M. Hviid Jacobsen, 93–115. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, E., and B. Drechsel. 1955. Meaning in the Visual Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931. Collected Writings: Volumes 1–8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. S. 1991. Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2008. “An Urban Tour: The Sensory Sociality of Ethnographic Place-Making.” Ethnography 9 (2): 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2009. “Situating Sensory Ethnography: From Academia to Intervention.” In Doing Sensory Ethnography, 7–23. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2011. “From Embodiment to Emplacement: Rethinking Competing Bodies, Senses and Spatialities.” Sport, Education and Society 16 (3): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.565965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2018. Doing Sensory Ethnography. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polsky, N. 1969. Hustlers, Beats, and Others. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, P. 1991. “Discourse on Difference: Street Art/Graffiti Youth.” Visual Anthropology Review 7 (2): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1991.7.2.77.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. I. 2016. Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, M. B. 1999. The Material Life of Human Beings. Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, ILL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2005. “Capitalism and the City: Globalization, Flexibility, and Indifference.” In Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements, and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion, edited by Y. Kazepov, 109–122. England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2008. The Craftsman. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shatford, S. 1986. “Analyzing the Subject of a Picture: A Theoretical Approach.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 6 (3): 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v06n03_04.
   Google Scholar
• Shep, S. J. 2015. “Urban Palimpsests and Contending Signs.” Social semiotics 25 (2): 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. 2001. “Extending and Broadening Blumer’s Conceptualization of Symbolic Interactionism.” Symbolic Interaction 24 (3): 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.3.367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., C. Morrill, and L. Anderson. 2003. “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking Fieldwork and Theory.” Ethnography 4 (2): 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042002.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. J. 2006. “Graffiti Media and the Perpetuation of an Illegal Subculture.” Crime, Media, Culture 2 (1): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006061716.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg, H. 1975. Doing Phenomenology: Essays on and in Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1995. “On the Epistemology of Reflective Practice.” Teachers & Teaching 1 (1): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060950010104.
   Google Scholar
• Waskul, D. D., and P. Vannini. 2006. “Introduction: The Body in Symbolic Interaction.” In Body/Embodiment: In Body/Embodiment Symbolic Interaction and the Sociology of the Body, edited by D. D. Waskul and P. Vannini, 1–18. England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar