An amusing optical toy for the hands?: reassessing nineteenth-century British paper peepshows through embodied knowledge

References

• Bak, Meredith A. 2016. “The Ludic Archive: The Work of Playing with Optical Toys.” The Moving Image 16 (1): 1–16. doi:10.5749/movingimage.16.1.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzer, Richard. 1998. Peepshows: A Visual History. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Barnaby, Alice. 2017. Light Touches: Cultural Practices of Illumination, 1780-1900. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315407708.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh, Christopher. 2004. “Stage Design from Loutherbourg to Poel.” In The Cambridge History of British Theatre, Vol. 2. 1660–1895, edited by Joseph Donohue, 309–330. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.015.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 2001. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calè, Luisa, and Patrizia Di Bello. 2010. Introduction to Illustrations, Optics and Objects in Nineteenth-Century Literary and Visual Cultures. Edited by Luisa Calè and Patrizia di Bello, 1–21. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230297395_1.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 2014. Biographia Literaria. Edited by Adam Roberts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Olive. 1963. Movement in Two Dimensions: A Study of the Animated and Projected Pictures Which Preceded the Invention of Cinematography. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield, Christina. 2020. “The Lesson in the Object: Reconstructing Early Visual Media in Paper.” Early Popular Visual Culture 18 (1): 58–69. doi:10.1080/17460654.2020.1761600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the Observer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Dora, Veronica. 2007. “Putting the World into a Box: A Geography of Nineteenth-Century “Travelling Landscapes.” Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography 89 (4): 287–306. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00262.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, Laura L. 2008. “Embodied Knowledge.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by Lisa M. Given, 244–245. Vol. 1. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaesser, Thomas. 2016. “Media Archaeology as Symptom.” New Review of Film & Television Studies 14 (2): 181–215. doi:10.1080/17400309.2016.1146858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faden, Eric. 2007. “Movables, Movies, Mobility: Nineteenth-Century Looking and Reading.” Early Popular Visual Culture 5: 71–89. doi:10.1080/17460650701269820.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Hannah. 2019. Playing with the Book: Victorian Movable Picture Books and the Child Reader. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Füsslin, Georg, Werner Nekes, Wolfgang Seitz, Karl-Heinz W. Steckelings, and Brigit Verwiebe. 1995. Der Guckkasten: Einblick, Durchblick, Ausblick. Stuttgard, Germany: Füsslin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Haining, Peter. 1979. Movable Books: An Illustrated History. London: New English Library.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtamo, Erkki. 2006. “The Pleasures of the Peephole: An Archaeological Exploration of Peep Media.” In Book of Imaginary Media: Excavating the Dream of the Ultimate Communication Medium, edited by Eric Kluitenberg, 74–155. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: NAI.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtamo, Erkki, and Jussi Parikka. 2011. “Introduction: An Archaeology of Media Archaeology.” In Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, edited by Erkki Huhtamo and Jussi Parikka, 1–21. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Verity Jane. 2009. “Technologies of Wonder: Optical Devices, Perception and the Book, 1851-1895.” PhD diss., University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Ralph. 2015. Paper Peepshows: The Jacqueline & Jonathan Gestetner Collection. Woodbridge: Antique Collectors’ Club.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Sandro. 2013. Introduction to British Literature and Print Culture. Edited by Sandro Jung. Cambridge, UK: D. S. Brewer.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaoka, A. 2016. “Chromostereopsis.” In Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology, edited by Ming Ronnier Luo, 114–125. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8071-7_210.
   Google Scholar
• Kleutghen, Kristina. 2015. “Peepboxes, Society, and Visuality in Early Modern China.” Art History 38 (4): 762–777. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, Brian. 2007. “Scraps and Sketches: Miscellaneity, Commodity Culture and Comic Prints, 1820–40.” 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 5. doi:10.16995/ntn.462.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Thomas. 1828. Sporting and Miscellaneous Works. London: Thomas McLean. Folder McLean (Thomas and Hector), John Johnson Collection of Printed Ephemera, Bodleian Libraries. University of Oxford, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• The Multigraph Collective. 2018. Interacting with Print: Elements of Reading in the Era of Print Saturation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226469287.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Janet H. 1998. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, Amy F. 2002. “Viewing Souvenirs: Peepshows and the International Expositions.” Journal of Design History 15 (2): 69–82. doi:10.1093/jdh/15.2.69.
   Google Scholar
• Opie, Iona. 1989. The Treasures of Childhood: Books, Toys and Games from the Opie Collection. London: Pavilion Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, J. H. 1982. “The Acceptance of Modernity.” In The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialisation of Eighteenth-Century England, edited by Neil McKendrick, John Brewer, and J. H. Plumb, 316–334. London: Europa Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, John. 2005. “Optical Recreations, Transparencies, and the Invention of the Screen.” In Visual Delights Two: Exhibition and Reception, edited by Vanessa Toulmin and Simon Popple, 175–194. Eastleigh, UK: John Libbey.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, John. 2015. “Peepshows for All: Performing Words and the Travelling Showman.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63 (1): 7–30. doi:10.1515/zaa-2015-0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid-Walsh, Jacqueline. 2018. Interactive Books: Playful Media Before Pop-Ups. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9780203797099.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, David. 1988. “Augsburg Peepshows.” Print Quarterly 5: 188–191.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2001. “Revealing Technologies/Magical Domains.” In Devices of Wonder: From the World in a Box to Images on a Screen, edited by Barbara Maria Stafford, 1–142. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2016. “Seizing Attention: Devices and Desires.” Art History 39 (2): 422–427. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauven, Wanda. 2021. Touchscreen Archaeology: Tracing Histories of Hands-On Media Practices. Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terpak, Frances. 2001. “Objects and Contexts.” In Devices of Wonder: From the World in a Box to Images on a Screen, edited by Barbara Maria Stafford, 143–364. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Marina. 2004. “Camera Ludica.” In Eyes, Lies and Illusions: The Art of Deception, edited by Laurent Mannoni, 13–35. London: Hayward Gallery in association with Lund Humphries.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Shijia. 2020. “Amusing, Interesting, and Curious: The Paper Peepshow in England, 1825-1851.” PhD diss., Birkbeck: University of London.
   Google Scholar