Patterns of land use change, land governance, and the supply of ecosystem services in a multifunctional landscape: A case study from Upstate SC, USA

References

• Adams, T.O., Danskin, S.D., & Aries, E.F. (2019). The wave of wood: Forestry’s economic contribution to South Carolina’s economy in 2018. South Carolina Forestry Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczak, J.R., Delesantro, J.M., Zhong, Y., Urban, D.L., & Bernhardt, E.S. (2019). Watershed urban development controls on urban streamwater chemistry variability. Biogeochemistry, 144(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00572-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., Van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Machler, M., & Bolker, B.M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M.G., & Quinn, J.E. (2018). Zoning does not improve the availability of ecosystem services in urban watersheds. A case study from Upstate South Carolina, USA. Ecosystem Services, 34, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M.L. and Samuelson, L.J. (2008). Influence of urbanization on riparian forest diversity and structure in the Georgia Piedmont, US. Plant Ecology, 195(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9305-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, T.M., & Lathrop, R.G. (2005). Modeling the ecological consequences of land-use policies in an urbanizing region. Environmental Management, 35(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-4067-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debbage, N., & Shepherd, J.M. (2018). The influence of urban development patterns on streamflow characteristics in the Charlanta Megaregion. Water Resources Research, 54(5), 3728–3747. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitz, J., & U.S. Geological Survey. (2021). National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 products (ver. 2.0, June 2021). U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E.C., Gauthier, N., Klein Goldewijk, K., Bird, R.B., Boivin, N., Díaz, S., Fuller, D.Q., Gill, J.L., Kaplan, J.O., Kingston, N., Locke, H., McMichael, C.N.H., Ranco, D., Rick, T.C., Shaw, M.R., Stephens, L., Svenning, J.-C., & Watson, J.E.M. (2021). People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2023483118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023483118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., & Snyder, P.K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 309(5734), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
   Google Scholar
• Fuhlendorf, S.D., Harrell, W.C., Engle, D.M., Hamilton, R.G., Davis, C.A., & Leslie, D.M., Jr. (2006). Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland bird response to fire and grazing. Ecological Applications, 16(5), 1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1706:SHBTBF]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, D.M., & Quinn, J.E. (2017). Application of anthromes to frame scenario planning for landscape-scale conservation decision making. Land, 6(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6020033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenville County Geographic Information Systems. (2020a). Zoning [Data set]. Greenville County. https://www.gcgis.org/AccessDistribution.html#
   Google Scholar
• Greenville County Geographic Information Systems. (2020b). Tax parcels & ownership information [data set]. Greenville County. https://www.gcgis.org/Access.Distribution.html#
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, P., Guerry, A.D., Polasky, S., Han, B., Douglass, J.A., Hamann, M., Janke, B., Kuiper, J.J., Levrel, H., Liu, H., Lonsdorf, E., McDonald, R.I., Nootenboom, C., Ouyang, Z., Remme, R.P., Sharp, R.P., Tardieu, L., Viguié, V. … Zheng, H. (2021). Mapping the benefits of nature in cities with the InVEST software. Npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00027-9
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A.J., Knight, R.L., Marzluff, J.M., Powell, S., Brown, K., Gude, P.H., & Jones, K. (2005). Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications, 15(6), 1893–1905. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-5221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölting, L., Jacobs, S., Felipe-Lucia, M.R., Maes, J., Norström, A.V., Plieninger, T., & Cord, A.F. (2019). Measuring ecosystem multifunctionality across scales. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ccb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Young, M.H., & Hardee, K. (2008). Population, urbanization and the environment. World Watch, 5, 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Löf, M., Brunet, J., Filyushkina, A., Lindbladh, M., Skovsgaard, J.P., & Felton, A. (2016). Management of oak forests: Striking a balance between timber production, biodiversity and cultural services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12(1–2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1120780
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R.I., Weber, K.F., Padowski, J., Boucher, T., & Shemie, D. (2016). Estimating watershed degradation over the last century and its impact on water-treatment costs for the world’s large cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(32), 9117–9122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605354113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.E., Awada, T., Trindade, F., Fulginiti, L., & Perrin, R. (2017). Combining habitat loss and agricultural intensification improves our understanding of drivers of change in avian abundance in a North American cropland anthrome. Ecology and Evolution, 7(3), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.E., Brandle, J.R., & Johnson, R.J. (2012). The effects of land sparing and wildlife-friendly practices on grassland bird abundance within organic farmlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 161, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.E., Johnson, R.J., & Brandle, J.R. (2014). Identifying opportunities for conservation embedded in cropland anthromes. Landscape Ecology, 29(10), 1811–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0098-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.E., & Wood, J.M. (2017). Application of a coupled human natural system framework to organize and frame challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation on private lands. Ecology and Society, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09132-220139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2014). Sustainability Principles and Practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., Engel, B.A., Pijanowski, B.C., & Lim, K.J. (2005). Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turubanova, S., Potapov, P.V., Tyukavina, A., & Hansen, M.C. (2018). Ongoing primary forest loss in Brazil, democratic republic of the Congo, and Indonesia. Environmental Research Letters, 13(7), 074028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacd1c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ureta, J.C., Clay, L., Motallebi, M., & Ureta, J. (2020). Quantifying the landscape’s ecological benefits—an analysis of the effect of land cover change on ecosystem services. Land, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. (2021) Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/greenvillecountysouthcarolina
   Google Scholar
• USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer. 2020. Published crop-specific data layer. USDA-NASS. Retrieved June, 2020; Verified June, 2020 [Online]. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/
   Google Scholar
• USGS Water Resources of the U.S. (2020). The watershed boundary dataset [data set]. USGS. https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/huc.html
   Google Scholar
• Vanbergen, A.J., & the Insect Pollinators Initiative. (2013). Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1890/120126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet, J., Eitelberg, D.A., & Verburg, P.H. (2017). A global analysis of land take in cropland areas and production displacement from urbanization. Global Environmental Change, 43, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, J., Homer, C., Vogelmann, J., McKerrow, A., Mueller, R., Herold, N., & Coulston, J. (2014). The multi-resolution land characteristics (MRLC) consortium—20 years of development and integration of USA national land cover data. Remote Sensing, 6(8), 7424–7441. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6087424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabel, J., & Dalton, M. (2011). The impact of minimum lot size regulations on house prices in Eastern Massachusetts. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(6), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziter, C. (2016). The biodiversity–ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: A quantitative review. Oikos, 125(6), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar