Electronic representations of conceptual models for simulation – A scoping review

References

• Abid, A., Hammadi, M., Barkallah, M., Choley, J., Louati, J., Riviere, A., & Haddar, M. (2018). Generic framework for holonic modelling and multi-agent based verification of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19(12), 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0208-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Fedaghi, S., & Al-Huwais, N. (2018). Conceptual modeling of inventory management processes as a thinging machine. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(11), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.091161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpay Karagöz, N., & DemIrörs, O. (2006). Developing conceptual models of the mission space (CMMS) - A metamodel based approach. In Proceedings of Simulation Interoperability Workshop (SIW). 410–417. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84865632771&partnerID=40&md5=023fa3614d642ce85371544b058c46c1
   Google Scholar
• Angelopoulou, A., Mykoniatis, K., & Karwowski, W. (2015). A framework for simulation-based task analysis the development of a universal task analysis simulation model. In 2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision. 77–81. doi:10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108178.
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z., (Editors.) (2017). Joanna briggs institute reviewer’s manual. JBI - Joanna Briggs Institute. https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/
   Google Scholar
• Barber, K. S., Graser, T. J., Jernigan, S. R., McGiverin, B. J., & White, E. R. (1998). The application of the systems engineering process activities in the population of conceptual models of the mission space. Proceedings of the 1998 Summer Computer Simulation Conference: Simulation and Modeling Technology for the Twenty-First Century. In summer computer simulation conference. society for computer simulation, etc., 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Batarseh, O. G., Goldlust, E. J., &Day, T. E. (2013). Sysml for conceptual modeling and simulation for analysis: A case example of a highly granular model of an emergency department. 2013 Winter Simulation Conference (Wsc). IEEE, 2398–2409.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A. B. L., Butler, K. A., Harrington, C., Braxton, M. O., Walker, A. J., Pete, N., andHaselkorn, M. (2016). Using conceptual work products of health care to design health IT. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 59(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolshchikov, S., Somekh, J., Mazor, S., Wengrowicz, N., Choder, M., & Dori, D. (2015). Cognition-based visualization of the dynamics of conceptual models: The vivid OPM scene player. Systems Engineering, 18(5), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchlaghem, D., Kimmance, A. G., & Anumba, C. J. (2004). Integrating product and process information in the construction sector. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410525771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozlu, B., & Demirörs, O. (2008). A conceptual modeling methodology: From conceptual model to design. Paper presented at the 242–252. Summer Computer Simulation Conference. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84865443812&partnerID=40&md5=f5ddb4f8ec478f5dd50bf272d0c12660
   Google Scholar
• Braga, B. F. B., & Almeida, J. P. A. (2015). Modeling stories for conceptual model assessment. Advances in Conceptual Modeling, Er 2015 Workshops, Springer, Cham, 9382, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25747-1_29
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M. (2017). Model-driven software engineering in practice. M. Wimmer & J. Cabot, Eds. (Second edition.). Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Burmester, L., & Goeken, M. (2007). Multidimensional representation of system dynamics simulation models . In C. Rolland, M. Collard, O. Pastor, A. Flory, & J. L. Cavarero, (Eds.). Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (pp. 253-262). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya, D., Verbraeck, A., & Seck, M. D. (2010). Towards a component based conceptual modeling language for discrete event simulation . In G. K. Janssens, K. Ramaekers, & A. Caris, (Eds.).European simulation and modelling conference. (pp. 67-74).
   Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya, D., Verbraeck, A., & Seck, M. D. (2012). Model transformation from BPMN to DEVS in the MDD4MS framework. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Devs Integrative M&S Symposium 2012, 44(4), 304–309 . Devs 2012.https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2346616.2346644
   Google Scholar
• Chanpuypetch, W., & Kritchanchai, D. (2017). A design pattern for modelling and simulation in hospital pharmacy management . In Z. Z. Paprika, P. Horak, K. Varadi, P. T. Zwierczyk, A. VidovicsDancs, & J. P. Radics, Eds.(pp. 222-228). ECMS.
   Google Scholar
• Choren, R., & Lucena, C. (2005). Modeling multi-agent systems with ANote. Software and Systems Modeling, 4(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-004-0065-y
   Google Scholar
• Chwif, L., Paul, R. J., & Barretto, M. R. P. (2006). Discrete event simulation model reduction: A causal approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 14(7), 930–944. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T., Sammut, P., & Willans, J. (2015). Applied metamodelling: A foundation for language driven development. (third ed). https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00149
   Google Scholar
• Cubert, R. M., & Fishwick, P. A. (1998). Software architecture for distributed simulation multimodels. Enabling Technology for Simulation Science Ii, Aug 24(3369), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.319330
   Google Scholar
• de la, B., Maria, G., Marriott, K., Rafeh, R., & Wallace, M. (2006). The modelling language zinc. Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – Cp, Sep 25(4204), 700–705. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11889205_54
   Google Scholar
• De Nicola, A., Tofani, A., Vicoli, G., & Villani, M. L. (2011). Modeling collaboration for crisis and emergency management. Colla 2011: The First International Conference on Advanced Collaborative Networks, Systems and Applications, IARIA, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• El-Kady, M., Bahgat, R., & Fahmy, A. (2008). A UML heavyweight extension for MAS modeling. The Eighth International Conference on Quality Software, 435–440. IEEE .https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2008.15
   Google Scholar
• Evermann, J., & Wand, Y. (2009). Ontology based object-oriented domain modeling: Representing behavior. Journal of Database Management, 20(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2009010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fall, A., & Fall, J. (2001). A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 141(1–3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-38000100334-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furian, N., Neubacher, D., Vössner, S., O’Sullivan, M., & Walker, C. Towards holistic modeling and simulation of discrete event and individual based behavior. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference. Porto. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.2452.1049
   Google Scholar
• Furian, N., O’Sullivan, M., Walker, C., Vössner, S., & Neubacher, D. (2015). A conceptual modeling framework for discrete event simulation using hierarchical control structures. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 56(Oct 22), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garro, A., & Russo, W. (2010). easyABMS: A domain-expert oriented methodology for agent-based modeling and simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18(10), 1453–1467. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genero, M., Fernández-Saez, A. M., James Nelson, H., Poels, G., & Piattini, M. (2011). A systematic literature review on the quality of UML models. Journal of Database Management, 22(3), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2011070103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., Dijkema, G. P. J., Bots, P., Alderwereld, H., & Dignum, V. (2014). Model-driven agent-based simulation: Procedural semantics of a MAIA model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 49(Dec 1), 27–40. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2014.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golzarpoor, H., González, V. A., O’Sullivan, M., Shahbazpour, M., Walker, C. G., & Poshdar, M. (2017). A non-queue-based paradigm in discrete-event-simulation modelling for construction operations. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 77(Sep 1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobshtein, Y., & Dori, D. (2011). Generating SysML views from an OPM model: Design and evaluation. Systems Engineering, 14(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grueau, C. (2014). Towards a domain specific modeling language for agent-based modeling of land use/cover change. Advances in Conceptual Modeling, Er, 8697(Nov 11), 267–276. Springer, Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14139-8_28
   Google Scholar
• Guizzardi, G., & Wagner, G. (2012). Conceptual simulation modeling with onto-uml advanced tutorial. Winter Simulation Conference (Wsc), Dec 9 ,1-15. IEEE. doi:10.1109/WSC.2012.6465133
   Google Scholar
• Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Andrade Almeida, J. P., & Guizzardi, R. S. S. (2015). Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: The unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Applied Ontology, 10(3–4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollmann, D. A., Cristiá, M., & Frydman, C. (2015). CML-DEVS: A specification language for DEVS conceptual models. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 57(Sep 1), 100–117. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsley, T., Dingwall, O., Sampson, M., & Horsley, T. (2011). Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Library, 2011(8), MR000026. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000026.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishna, A., Vilkomir, S. A., & Ghose, A. K. (2009). Consistency preserving co-evolution of formal specifications and agent-oriented conceptual models. Information and Software Technology, 51(2), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Yoo, S. H., & Jeong, C. S.(2005). HLA-based object-oriented modeling/simulation for military system. Systems Modeling and Simulation: Theory and Applications, 3398(Oct 4), 122–130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30585-9_14
   Google Scholar
• Levytskyy, A., Vangheluwe, H., Rothkrantz, L. J. M., & Koppelaar, H. (2009). MDE and customization of modeling and simulation web applications. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 17(2), 408–429. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Pu, W., & Zhao, X. (2019). Agent action diagram: Toward a model for emergency management system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 94(Jul 1), 66–99. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Gu, H., & Wang, H. (ICAMCS 2016) (2016). A conceptual modeling method of simulation system based on MCM. Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Computer Science, Atlantis Press, 80(Jun), 400–405.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, W., Storey, V. C., & Kowatsch, T. (2011). Effects of external conceptual models and verbal explanations on shared understanding in small groups. Conceptual Modeling - Er, 6998, 92-+. Oct 31 (pp. 92-103). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Mandutianu, S., Moshir, M., & Donahue, K. (2009). Conceptual model for space mission systems design. Paper presented at the, Jul (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 110-131). INCOSE International Symposium. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84878053291&partnerID=40&md5=c9fa92e0aeb52cf6c30868c30ed12bba
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, L., & Ustun, V. (2009). A simple example of sysml-driven simulation. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (Wsc 2009), Vol 1-4(Dec 13), 1670–1677. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, C., Kim, S., Son, Y., & Kubota, C. (2013). A sysml-based simulation model aggregation framework for seedling propagation system. 2013 Winter Simulation Conference (Wsc), Dec 8, 2180–2191.IEEE .
   Google Scholar
• Ming-qing, Z., Hai, S., Jun, T., & Li-jun, Y. (2008). Research on the V&V technology of the conceptual model described by UML. Asia Simulation Conference-7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing 2008 Oct 10 (pp. 898-902). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASC-ICSC.2008.4675490
   Google Scholar
• Moros, B., Vicente-Chicote, C., & Toval, A. (2007). A model-driven engineering approach to requirements engineering - how these disciplines may benefit each other . InJ. Filipe, M. Helfert, & B. Shishkov, (Eds.). CSOFT (SE) ,(pp. 296-303).
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, B. A., Azzouz, R., Heavey, C., & Ehm, H. (2019a). A survey of model-based system engineering methods to analyse complex supply chains: A case study in semiconductor supply chain. IFAC PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1254–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.370
   Google Scholar
• Papajorgji, P., Clark, R., & Jallas, E. 2009. The model driven architecture approach: A framework for developing complex agricultural systems. Advances in modeling agricultural systems . (pp. 1-18). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75181-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Robert, M., Dury, J., Thomas, A., Therond, O., Sekhar, M., Badiger, S., and Bergez, J. (2016). CMFDM: A methodology to guide the design of a conceptual model of farmers’ decision-making processes. Agricultural Systems, 148(Oct 1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Brooks, R., Kotiadis, K., & Van Der Zee, D. (2010). Conceptual modeling for discrete-event simulation. CRC Press. http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9781439810385
   Google Scholar
• Sales, T. P., & Guizzardi, G. (2015). Ontological anti-patterns: Empirically uncovered error-prone structures in ontology-driven conceptual models. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 99(Sep 1), 72–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, F., Nunes, I., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2018). Model-driven agent-based simulation development: A modeling language and empirical evaluation in the adaptive traffic signal control domain. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 83(Apr 1), 162–187. h ttps://d oi.org/doi://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.simpat.2017.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino-Vazquez, N. N., & Puigjaner, R. (1999). A UML-based method to specify the structural component of simulation-based queuing network performance models. 32nd Annual Simulation Symposium, Proceedings, Apr 11, 71–78. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMSYM.1999.766456
   Google Scholar
• Sha, Z., Le, Q., & Panchal, J. H. (2011). Using sysml for conceptual representation of agent-based models. Paper presented at the, 2(PARTS A AND B) 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47476 Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, P., & Onggo, B. S. S. (2014). Graphical representation of agent-based models in operational research and management science using UML. In Proceedings of the 7th Operation Research Society Simulation Workshop. Operational Research Society. 143–153. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982318394&partnerID=40&md5=d04f27b925a55c2c2609d903cf5d0e24
   Google Scholar
• Somarathna, K. (2020). An agent-based approach for modeling and simulation of human resource management as a complex system: Management strategy evaluation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 104(Nov 1), 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen Topper, J., & Horner, N. C. (2013). Model-based systems engineering in support of complex systems development. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory), 32(1), 419–432. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84881335447&partnerID=40&md5=b5b88bc4bd283efea787575e7603a21a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, C., & Kim, T. G. (2012). Collaborative modeling process for development of domain-specific discrete event simulation systems. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews, 42(4), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2135850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiacci, L. (2020). Object-oriented event-graph modeling formalism to simulate manufacturing systems in the industry 4.0 era. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 99(Feb 1), 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.102027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, S., Van Tendeloo, Y., Meyers, B., & Vangheluwe, H. (2017). Domain-specific modelling for human-computer interaction. Handbook of Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, 435–463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51838-1_16
   Google Scholar
• Wen, K., Zeng, Y., Li, R., & Lin, J. (2012). Modeling semantic information in engineering applications: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 37(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9221-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaroker, Y., Perelman, V., & Dori, D. (2013). An OPM conceptual model-based executable simulation environment: Implementation and evaluation. Systems Engineering, 16(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar