V&V application in generic simulation models in logistics

References

• Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-1994-7104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. D., Hill, R. R., Pignatiello, J. J., Vining, G., White, E. D., & Chicken, E. (2017). Wavelet anova approach to model validation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 78, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdasaryan, A. (2011). Discrete dynamic simulation models and technique for complex control systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(4), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balci, O. (1998a). Verification, validation and accreditation. In D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, & M. S. Manivannan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 winter simulation conference (pp. 41–48).
   Google Scholar
• Balci, O. (1998b). Verification, validation, and testing. In J. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of simulation: Principles, methodology, advances, applications, and practice (Vol. 10, pp. 335–393). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Balci, O. (2012). A life cycle for modeling and simulation. Simulation, 88(7), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549712438469
   Google Scholar
• Bouchhima, F., Nicolescu, G., Aboulhamid, E. M., & Abid, M. (2007). Generic discrete– Continuous simulation model for accurate validation in heterogeneous systems design. Microelectronics Journal, 38(6–7), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4. ed. ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, A. K., & Botter, R. C. (2009). Method for assessing and selecting discrete event simulation software applied to the analysis of logistic systems. Journal of Simulation, 3(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2008.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagkakis, G., & Heavey, C. (2016). A review of open source discrete event simulation software for operations research. Journal of Simulation, 10(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2015.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koster, R., Le-Duc, T., & Roodbergen, K. J. (2007). Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A., & García, I. (2012). A simulation-based flexible platform for the design and evaluation of rail service infrastructures. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 27, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. (1998). No wilderness of single instances: Inductive inference in law. Journal of Legal Education, 48(3), 365–401. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42893559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, S., Reggelin, T., Müller, M., & Nahhas, A. (2021). Open-source discrete-event simulation software for applications in production and logistics: An alternative to commercial tools? Procedia Computer Science, 180, 978–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.349
   Google Scholar
• López, B. 2013. MORGAN & CLAYPOOL PUBLISHERS. Case-based reasoning: A concise introduction, Vol. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, T. W., Kelton, W. D., Sánchez, P. J., Sánchez, S. M., & Anderson, B. L. (2015). Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 62(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackulak, G. T., Lawrence, F. P., & Colvin, T. (1998). Effective simulation model reuse: A case study for AMHS modeling. In D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, & M. S. Manivannan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 winter simulation conference (pp. 979–984).
   Google Scholar
• Min, F.-Y., Yang, M., & Wang, Z.-C. (2010). Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18(5), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemirel, N. E., & Mackulak, G. T. (1993). A generic simulation module architecture based on clustering group technology model codings. Simulation, 60(6), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754979306000607
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemirel, N. E., Mackulak, G. T., & Cochran, J. K. (1993). A group technology classification and coding scheme for discrete manufacturing simulation models. International Journal of Production Research, 31(3), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549308956745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, M. L., Monks, T., Kazmierska, A. A., & Alkoheji, M. (2019). Towards GMling of hospital wards: Reuse and redevelopment of simple models. Journal of Simulation, 212(2), 1–12. doi:10.1080/17477778.2019.1664264.
   Google Scholar
• Pidd, M. (1992). Guidelines for the design of data driven generic simulators for specific domains. Simulation, 59(4), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754979205900403
   Google Scholar
• Popovics, G., Pfeiffer, A., & Monostori, L. (2016). Generic data structure and validation methodology for simulation of manufacturing systems: Economic development and wealth through globally competitive manufacturing systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(12), 1272–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2016.1187296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, M., Spieckermann, S., & Wenzel, S. (2008a). A new procedure model for verification and validation in production and logistics simulation. In Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference (pp. 1717–1726). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, M., Spieckermann, S., & Wenzel, S. (2008b). Verifikation und validierung für die simulation in produktion und logistik: Vorgehensmodelle und techniken. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, R. G. (2013). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation, 7(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulis, A., & Sechi, G. M. (2013). Comparison of generic simulation models for water resource systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 40, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. R., & Fujii, R. U. (1989). Software verification and validation: An overview. IEEE Software, 6(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.28119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wy, J., Jeong, S., Kim, B.-I., Park, J., Shin, J., Yoon, H., & Lee, S. (2011). A data-driven generic simulation model for logistics-embedded assembly manufacturing lines. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, A., & Ozturk, M. M. (2012). Formal verification and validation with devs-suite: Ospf case study. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 29, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2012.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar