Short-term planning of open pit mines with Semi-Mobile IPCC: a shovel allocation model

References

• A. Moradi Afrapoli and H. Askari-Nasab, Mining fleet management systems: A review of models and algorithms, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 33 (1) (2017), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/17480930.2017.1336607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M.L., Optimizing short-term production schedules in surface mining: Integrating mine modeling software with AMPL/CPLEX, Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 12 (4) (1998), pp. 149–155. doi:10.1080/09208118908944038.
   Google Scholar
• J. Gholamnejad, A zero-one integer programming model for open pit mining sequences, J. South African Inst Min. Metall. 108 (2008), pp. 759–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Eivazy and H. Askari-Nasab, A mixed integer linear programming model for short-term open pit mine production scheduling, Trans. Institutions Min. Metall. Sect. A Min. Technol 121 (2) (2012), pp. 97–108. doi:10.1179/1743286312Y.0000000006.
   Google Scholar
• G. L’Heureux, M. Gamache, and F. Soumis, Mixed integer programming model for short term planning in open-pit mines, Trans. Institutions Min. Metall. Sect. A Min. Technol 122 (2) (2013), pp. 101–109. doi:10.1179/1743286313Y.0000000037.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kozan, S. Liu, and R. Wolff, A short-term production scheduling methodology for open-pit mines, Proceedings Of The 36th Application Of Computers And Operations Research In The Mineral Industry (APCOM) Symposium 2013 (2013), pp. 465–473.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kozan and S. Q, Liu 2016 a new open-pit multi-stage mine production timetabling model for drilling, blasting and excavating operations, Min. Tech. 125 (1) (2016), pp. 47–53. doi:10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Q. Liu and E. Kozan, Integration of mathematical models for ore mining industry, Int. J. Syst. Sci: Oper. Logist. 6 (2017), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1080/23302674.2017.1344330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Blom, A.R. Pearce, and P.J. Stuckey, Short-term scheduling of an open-pit mine with multiple objectives, Eng. Optim. 49 (5) (2017), pp. 777–795. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2016.1218002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P. Upadhyay and H. Askari-Nasab, Truck-shovel allocation optimisation: A goal programming approach, Trans. Institutions Min. Metall. Sect. A Min. Technol 125 (2) (2016), pp. 82–92. doi:10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000024.
   Google Scholar
• S.P. Upadhyay and H. Askari-Nasab, Dynamic shovel allocation approach to short-term production planning in open-pit mines, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 33 (1) (2017), pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/17480930.2017.1315524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Manríquez, J. Pérez, and N. Morales, A simulation–optimization framework for short-term underground mine production scheduling, Optim. Eng. 21 (3) (2020), pp. 939–971. doi:10.1007/s11081-020-09496-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Konak, A.H. Onur, and D. Karakus, Selection of the optimum in-pit crusher location for an aggregate producer, J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 107 (2007), pp. 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• M. Taheri, M. Irannajad, and P. Ataee 2009 An approach to determine the locations of in-pit crushers in deep open-pit mines. 9th International Multidicsciplinary Scientific Geoconference and EXPO, SGEM 2009, June 14, 2009 - June 19, 2009, Albena, Bulgaria, 2009. Vol. 1, pp. 341–347. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rahmanpour, M. Osanloo, and N. Adibi, An approach to determine the location of an in pit crusher in open pit mines, 23rd International Mining Congress And Exhibition Of Turkey, IMCET 2013 1 (2013), pp. 141–149.
   Google Scholar
• M. Paricheh, M. Osanloo, and M. Rahmanpour, A heuristic approach for in-pit crusher and conveyor system’s time and location problem in large open-pit mining, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 32 (1) (2016), pp. 35–55. doi:10.1080/17480930.2016.1247206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paricheh, In-pit crusher location as a dynamic location problem, J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 117 (6) (2017), pp. 599–607. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2017/v117n6a11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paricheh and M. Osanloo, A new search algorithm for finding Candidate crusher locations inside open pit mines, Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES, 30.11.2019, Springer International Publishing, 10–25, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33954-8_2.
   Google Scholar
• Norgate T. and N. Haque, The greenhouse gas impact of IPCC and ore-sorting technologies, Min. Eng. 42 (2013), pp. 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2012.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Awuah-Offei and H. Askari-Nasab, Valuation of belt conveyor and truck haulage systems in an open pit mine using life cycle assessment, The Canadian Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Bull. 102 (2009), pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• M. Erkayaoğlu and N. Demirel, A comparative life cycle assessment of material handling systems for sustainable mining, J. Environ. Manage. 174 (2016), pp. 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Fuming, C. Qingxiang, C. Shuzhao, and W. Zhou, A comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions for different modes of transportation in open-cut coal mines, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 25 (2) (2015), pp. 261–266. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Shamsi and M. Nehring, Determination of the optimal transition point between a truck and shovel system and a semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying system, J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 121 (9) (2021), pp. 497–504. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/1564/2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paricheh and M. Osanloo, Concurrent open-pit mine production and in-pit crushing–conveying system planning, Eng. Optim. 52 (3) (2019a), pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2019.1678150.
   Google Scholar
• Samavati M., D. Essam, M. Nehring, and R. Sarker, Production planning and scheduling in mining scenarios under IPCC mining systems, Comput. Oper. Res. 115 (2020), pp. 104714. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2019.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsi M., Y. Pourrahimian, and M. Rahmanpour, Optimisation of open-pit mine production scheduling considering optimum transportation system between truck haulage and semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 36 (2) (2022), pp. 142–158. doi:10.1080/17480930.2021.1996983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Liu and Y. Pourrahimian, A framework for open-pit mine production scheduling under semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying systems with the high-angle conveyor, Mining 1 (1) (2021), pp. 59–79. doi:10.3390/mining1010005.
   Google Scholar
• D. La Vergne and Jack. Evaluating rules of thumb using conveyor costs, in Canadian Mining Journal, GLACIER MEDIA GROUP, Canada, 2022, https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/featured-article/evaluating-rules-of-thumb-using-conveyor-costs/.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tabesh and H. Askari-Nasab, Automatic creation of ore-Selection and blast polygons using clustering algorithms, J. Min. Sci. 49 (3) (2013), pp. 426–440.
   Google Scholar
• US Depertment of Energy, Iron Ore Price Worldwide from September2016 to July 2023, statista, USA, 2023, https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10326.
   Google Scholar