110
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Not a black or white issue: choosing alternative organizational models for delivering early childhood services

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 162-184 | Received 30 Mar 2023, Accepted 11 Aug 2023, Published online: 05 Sep 2023

References

  • Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management. New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book13050.
  • Alonso, J. M., J. Clifton, and D. Díaz-Fuentes. 2015. “Did New Public Management Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Outsourcing and Decentralization Effects on Public Sector Size.” Public Management Review 17 (5): 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.822532.
  • ANCI. 2005. Le Unioni di Comuni, il vissuto dei cittadini e l’esperienza degli amministratori. rapporto di ricerca swg, mimeo, s.l.
  • Bel, G. I. B., S. Blåka, M. Casula, J. Lysek, P. Swianiewicz, A. F. Tavares, and B. Voorn. 2022. “Styles of Inter-Municipal Cooperation and the Multiple Principal Problem: A Comparative Analysis of European Economic Area Countries.” Local Government Studies 49 (2): 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2041416.
  • Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services? A Survey of Empirical Studies.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417528.
  • Bel, G., and X. Fageda, 2009. “Factors Explaining Charges in European Airports: Competition, Market Size, Private Ownership and Regulation,” Working Papers 2009-31, FEDEA.
  • Bel, G., R. Hebdon, and M. Warner. 2018. “Beyond Privatization and Cost-Savings: Alternatives for Local Government Reform.” Local Government Studies 44 (2): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1428190.
  • Bergman, M. 2008. Advances in Mixed Methods Research. ed. Bergman, M. M., London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024329.
  • Bolgherini, S., M. Casula, and M. Marotta. 2018a. Il dilemma del riordino. Unioni e fusioni dei comuni italiani. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Bolgherini, S., M. Casula, and M. Marotta. 2018b. “Municipal Reaction to Functional Rescaling in Italy.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (4): 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2016-0204.
  • Bolgherini, S., M. Casula, and M. Marotta. 2019. “Making Size and Democracy Multidimensional: Beyond the Gap Between Capacity and Proximity.” DisP - the Planning Review 55 (2): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2019.1630188.
  • Bolgherini, S., and S. Grimaldi. 2017. “Critical Election and a New Party System: Italy After the 2015 Regional Election.” Regional & Federal Studies 27 (4): 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1343718.
  • Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Managing Contract Performance: A Transaction Costs Approach.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2 (2): 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10117.
  • Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2005. “Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance & Management Review 28 (3): 326–351.
  • Brown, M. P., and D. Van Slyke. (April) 2016. “Managing Complex Contracts: A Theoretical Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (2): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv004.
  • Bryman, A. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is It Done?” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
  • Campomori, F., and M. Casula. 2021. “Institutionalizing Innovation in Welfare Local Services Through Co-Production: Towards a Neo-Weberian State?” Italian Political Science Review 52 (3): 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.43.
  • Capano, G., and M. T. Galanti. 2021. “From Policy Entrepreneurs to Policy Entrepreneurship: Actors and Actions in Public Policy Innovation.” Policy and Politics 49 (3): 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15906842137162.
  • Casula, M. 2016. “Between National Constraints and the Legacies of the Past: Explaining Variations in Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Italian Regions.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 3 (1): 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1255856.
  • Casula, M. 2020. “A Contextual Explanation of Regional Governance in Europe: Insights from Inter-Municipal Cooperation.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1819–1851. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665700.
  • Casula, M., C. Leonardi, and M. Zancanaro. 2022. “How Does Digital Technology Impact on the Co-Production of Local Services? Evidence from a Childcare Experience.” Public Money & Management 42 (2): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1728066.
  • Chandler, T., and P. Feuille. 1991. “Municipal Unions and Privatization.” Public Administration Review 51 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/976632.
  • Citroni, G., A. Lippi, and S. Profeti. 2013. “Remapping the State: Inter-Municipal Cooperation Through Corporatisation and Public-Private Governance Structures.” Local Government Studies 39 (2): 208–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.707615.
  • Clifton, J., M. E. Warner, R. Gradus, and G. Bel. 2019. “Re-Municipalization of Public Services: Trend or Hype?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 24 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1691344.
  • Coase, R. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” The Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1): 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560.
  • Dan, and C. Pollitt. 2015. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17 (9, October): 1305–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662.
  • della Porta, D. 2008. “Comparative Analysis: Case-Oriented versus Variable-Oriented Research.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. D. Porta and M. Keating, 198–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dente, B. 1997. “Sub‐National Governments in the Long Italian Transition.” West European Politics 20 (1): 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389708425180.
  • Dorigatti, L., A. Mori, and S. Neri. 2020. “Public, Private or Hybrid? Providing Care Services Under Austerity: The Case of Italy.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 40 (11/12): 1279–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-02-2019-0037.
  • ESPON. 2016. Polycentric Territorial Structures and Territorial Cooperation. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC.
  • Esteve, M., G. Boyne, V. Sierra, and T. Ysa. 2013. “Organizational Collaboration in the Public Sector: Do Chief Executives Make a Difference?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (4): 927–952. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus035.
  • Fargion, V. 1997. Geografia della cittadinanza sociale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Fargion, V., and E. Gualmini. 2012. Tra l‘incudine e il martello. Regioni e nuovi rischi sociali in tempo di crisi. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Feiock, R. C., eds. 2004. Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Feiock, R. C. 2007. “Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.
  • Fischer, F., and J. Forester, Eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press.
  • Galanti, M. T. 2019. “Weaving Nets: Housing and Leadership in Two Italian Cities.” Social Policy & Administration 53 (7): 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12448.
  • Greene, A. 2015. “Measuring Cognitive Engagement with Self-Report Scales Reflections from Over 20 Years of Research.” Educational Psychologist 50 (1): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.989230.
  • Grossi, G., and C. Reichard. 2008. “Municipal Corporatization in Germany and Italy.” Public Management Review 10 (5): 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802264275.
  • Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2011. “Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics, in.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2): 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur006.
  • Hefetz, A., M. E. Warner, and E. Vigoda-Gadot. 2012. “Privatization and Intermunicipal Contracting: The US Local Government Experience 1992-2007.” Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (4): 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11166.
  • Hood, C. 2007. “Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government After Two Decades.” Governance 20 (1): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x.
  • Hulst, R., and A. van Montfort, ed. 2007. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5379-7.
  • Koprić, I., H. Wollmann, and G. Marcou. 2018. Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe: More Evidence for Better Results. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61091-7.
  • Lippi, A., and T. Tsekos. 2019. Local Public Services in Times of Austerity Across Mediterranean Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76225-8.
  • Lund, T. 2012. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56 (2): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568674.
  • Mu, R., and T. Cui. 2023. “Facilitating Inter-Municipal Collaboration Through Mandated Collaborative Platform: Evidence from Regional Environmental Protection in China.” Public Management Review 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2212261.
  • OECD (2020), Regionalism in the Context of Decentralization Reforms. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/028bf97d-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/028bf97d-en.
  • Ostrom, E. 2005. Policies That Crowd Out Reciprocity and Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4771.003.0015.
  • Pallesen, T. 2004. “A Political Perspective on Contracting Out: The Politics of Good Times. Experiences from Danish Local Governments.” Governance 17 (4): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00258.x.
  • Petersen, O. H., K. Houlberg, and L. Ring Christensen. 2015. “Contracting Out Local Services: A Tale of Technical and Social Services.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12367.
  • Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Savas, E. S. 2000. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
  • Schoonenboom, J., and R. B. Johnson. 2017. “How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design.” Köln Z Soziol 69 (Suppl 2): 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1.
  • Silvestre, H. C., R. C. Marques, and R. C. Gomes. 2018. “Joined-Up Government of Utilities: A Meta-Review on a Public–Public Partnership and Inter-Municipal Cooperation in the Water and Wastewater Industries.” Public Management Review 20 (4): 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1363906.
  • Steiner, R., C. Kaiser, C. Tapscott, and C. Navarro. 2018. “Is Local Always Better? Strengths and Limitations of Local Governance for Service Delivery.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (4): 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0082.
  • Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher. 2002. Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4010-0.
  • Swianiewicz, P., and F. Teles. 2018. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe: Institutions and Governance. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6_3.
  • Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camöes. 2007. “Local Service Delivery Choices in Portugal: A Political Transaction Costs Framework.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417544.
  • Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camões. 2010. “New Forms of Local Governance.” Public Management Review 12 (5): 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719031003633193.
  • Tavares, A. F., and R. C. Feiock. 2018. “Applying an Institutional Collective Action Framework to Investigate Intermunicipal Cooperation in Europe.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (4): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx014.
  • Teles, F. 2016. Local Governance and Intermunicipal Cooperation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137445742.
  • Torres, L., and V. Pina. 2002. “Delivering Public Services-Mechanisms and Consequences: Changes in Public Service Delivery in the EU Countries.” Public Money & Management 22 (4): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00328.
  • Vassallo, S. 2013. Il divario incolmabile. Rappresentanza politica e rendimento istituzionale nelle regioni italiane. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Voorn, B., M. Van Genugten, and S. Van Thiel. 2019. “Multiple Principals, Multiple Problems: A Framework for Effective Governance and a Research Agenda for Joint Service Delivery.” Public Administration 97 (3): 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12587.
  • Warner, M. E. 2006. “Putting Child Care in the Regional Economy: Empirical and Conceptual Challenges and Economic Development Prospects.” Community Development 37 (2): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490204.
  • Warner, M. E., and R. Gradus. 2011. “The Consequences of Implementing a Child Care Voucher: Evidence from Australia, the Netherlands and USA.” Social Policy and Administration 45 (5): 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00787.x.
  • Warner, M. E., and S. Prentice. 2013. “Regional Economic Development and Child Care: Toward Social Rights.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (2): 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00622.x.
  • Williamson, O. 1997. “Transaction Cost Economics and Public Administration.” In Public Priority Settings: Rules and Costs, edited by P. A. K. S. A. Boorsma, 19–37. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1487-2_2.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.