Local delivery of bus transportation services: a model of interdependency of provision and production choices

References

• Albalate, D., G. Bel, and J. Calzada. 2012. “Governance and Regulation of Urban Bus Transportation: Using Partial Privatization to Achieve the Better of Two Worlds.” Regulation & Governance 6 (1): 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01120.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., I. Bischoff, S. Blåka, M. Casula, J. Lysek, P. Swianiewicz, A. Tavares, and B. Voorn. 2023. “Styles of Inter-Municipal Cooperation and the Multiple Principal Problem: A Comparative Analysis of European Economic Area Countries.” Local Government Studies 49 (2): 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2041416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2006. “Between Privatization and Intermunicipal Cooperation: Small Municipalities, Scale Economies and Transaction Costs.” Urban Public Economics Review 6:13–31. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/504/50400601.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2007. “Why Do Local Governments Privatise Public Services? A Survey of Empirical Studies.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2010. “Partial Privatisation in Local Services Delivery: An Empirical Analysis of the Choice of Mixed Firms.” Local Government Studies 36 (1): 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903435856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2017. “What Have We Learnt After Three Decades of Empirical Studies on Factors Driving Local Privatization?” Local Government Studies 43 (4): 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1303486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2013. “Why do Municipalities Cooperate to Provide Local Public Services? An Empirical Analysis.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2014. “Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (1): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus059.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and A. Miralles. 2003. “Factors Influencing Privatization of Urban Solid Waste Collection: Some Evidence from Spain.” Urban Studies 40 (7): 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Warner. 2016. “Factors Explaining Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Service Delivery: A Meta-Regression Analysis.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 19 (2): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1100084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. E. Warner. 2015. “Inter‐Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence.” Public administration 93 (1): 52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berechman, J., and G. Giuliano. 1985. “Economies of Scale in Bus Transit: A Review of Concepts and Evidence.” Transportation 12 (4): 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bognetti, G., and L. Robotti. 2007. “The Provision of Local Public Services Through Mixed Enterprises: The Italian Case.” Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics 78 (3): 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2007.00340.x.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camões, P., A. Tavares, and F. Teles. 2021. “Assessing the Intensity and Diversity of Cooperation: A Study of Joint Delegation of Municipal Functions to Intermunicipal Communities.” Local Government Studies 47 (4): 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1857245.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Alba, C., D. Prior, G. Pérez-López, and J. Zafra-Gómez. 2020. “Long-Term Cost Efficiency of Alternative Management Forms of Urban Public Transport from the Public Sector Perspective.” Transport Policy 88:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J., K. Leroux, and M. Shrestha. 2009. “Institutional Ties, Transaction Costs, and External Service Production.” Urban Affairs Review 44 (3): 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408323939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, T. D., and P. Feuille. 1994. “Cities, Unions, and the Privatization of Sanitation Services.” Journal of Labor Research 15 (1): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz, N., and R. Marques. 2012. “Mixed Companies and Local Governance: No Man Can Serve Two Masters.” Public Administration 90 (3): 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02020.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz, N., and R. Marques. 2014. “Rocky Road of Urban Transportation Contracts.” Journal of Management in Engineering 30 (5): 05014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R., J. Clingermayer, and C. Dasse. 2003. “Sector Choices for Public Service Delivery: The Transaction Cost Implications of Executive Turnover.” Public Management Review 5 (2): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667032000066390.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, J., and E. Graddy. 1986. “Contracting Out: For What? With Whom?” Public Administration Review 46 (4): 332–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/976307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard, P., R. D. Mohr, S. C. Deller, and J. M. Halstead. 2009. “Public-Private Partnerships and Cooperative Agreements in Municipal Service Delivery.” International Journal of Public Administration 32 (5): 370–392.
   Google Scholar
• Hultquist, A., D. M. Harsell, R. S. Wood, and D. T. Flynn. 2017. “Assessing the Impacts of Transaction Costs and Rapid Growth on Local Government Service Provision and Delivery Arrangement Choices in North Dakota.” Journal of Rural Studies 53:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joassart-Marcelli, P., and J. Musso. 2005. “Municipal Service Provision Choices within a Metropolitan Area.” Urban Affairs Review 40 (4): 492–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404272305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. Warner. 2016. “Pragmatic Municipalism: Local Government Service Delivery After the Great Recession.” Public Administration 94 (3): 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. 1992. “Population Growth, Density and the Costs of Providing Public Services.” Urban Studies 29 (2): 273–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, R., S. Deller, and J. Halstead. 2010. “Alternative Methods of Service Delivery in Small and Rural Municipalities.” Public Administration Review 70 (6): 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02221.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. 1997. “Municipal Government Approaches to Service Delivery: An Analysis from a Transactions Cost Perspective.” Economic Inquiry 35 (1): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01896.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen, T. 2004. “A Political Perspective on Contracting-Out: The Politics of Good Times. Experiences from Danish Local Governments.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17 (4): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00258.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, H., U. Hjelmar, and K. Vrangbæk. 2018. “Is Contracting Out of Public Services Still the Great Panacea? A Systematic Review of Studies on Economic and Quality Effects from 2000 to 2014.” Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 130–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., A. Tavares, and F. Araújo. 2012. “Municipal Service Delivery: The Role of Transaction Costs in the Choice Between Alternative Governance Mechanisms.” Local Government Studies 38 (5): 615–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.666211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K., and R. C. Feiock. 2011. “Transaction Cost, Exchange Embeddedness, and Interlocal Cooperation in Local Public Goods Supply.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910370683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarts, D., and M. Warner. 2014. “Hybrid Firms and Transit Delivery: The Case of Berlin.” Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics 85 (1): 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12026.
   Google Scholar
• Szmigiel-Rawska, K., J. Łukomska, and A. Tavares. 2021. “The Anatomy of Choice: An Analysis of the Determinants of Local Service Delivery in Poland.” Local Government Studies 47 (5): 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1777108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and P. J. Camões. 2023. “Municipal Corporatisation in Portugal: From Mania to Depression.” In Corporatisation in Local Government: Context, Evidence and Perspectives from 19 Countries, edited by M. Van Genugten, B. Voorn, R. Andrews, U. Papenfuss, and H. Torsteinsen, 315–333. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A., and P. Camões. 2007. “Local Service Delivery Choices in Portugal: A Political Transaction Costs Framework.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A., and P. Camões. 2010. “New Forms of Local Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Municipal Corporations in Portugal.” Public Management Review 12 (5): 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719031003633193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A., and M. Rodrigues. 2017. “The Same Deep Water As You? The Impact of Alternative Governance Arrangements of Water Service Delivery on Efficiency.” Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation 3 (2): 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563617728744.
   Google Scholar
• Teles, F. 2016. Local Governance and Inter-Municipal Cooperation. (1sted.) UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M., and R. Hebdon. 2001. “Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (2): 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., and A. Hefetz. 2008. “Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public – Private Delivery of City Services.” Public Administration Review 68 (1): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00845.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenaar, M., T. Groot, and R. Gradus. 2013. “Municipalities’ Contracting Out Decisions: An Empirical Study on Motives.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.778830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. 1997. “What Conclusions Can Be Drawn About Bus Deregulation in Britain?” Transport Reviews 17 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441649708716965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra‐Gómez, J. L., D. Prior, A. M. P. Díaz, and A. M. López‐Hernández. 2013. “Reducing Costs in Times of Crisis: Delivery Forms in Small and Medium Sized Local governments’ Waste Management Services.” Public Administration 91 (1): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., L. E. Pedauga, A. M. Plata-Díaz, and A. M. López-Hernández. 2014. “Do Local Authorities Use NPM Delivery Forms to Overcome Problems of Fiscal Stress?” Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad 43 (1): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2014.890823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zullo, R. 2009. “Does Fiscal Stress Induce Privatization? Correlates of Private and Intermunicipal Contracting, 1992–2002.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 22 (3): 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar