785
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Neuroadaptive LBS: towards human-, context-, and task-adaptive mobile geographic information displays to support spatial learning for pedestrian navigation

Pages 340-354 | Received 08 Feb 2023, Accepted 06 Sep 2023, Published online: 18 Sep 2023

References

  • Aporta, C., and E. Higgs. 2005. “Satellite Culture.” Current Anthropology 46 (5): 729–753. https://doi.org/10.1086/432651.
  • Bartling, M., B. Resch, T. Reichenbacher, C. R. Havas, A. C. Robinson, S. I. Fabrikant, and T. Blaschke. 2022. “Adapting Mobile Map Application Designs to Map Use Context: A Review and Call for Action on Potential Future Research Themes.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 49 (3): 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.2015720.
  • Brügger, A., K.-F. Richter, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2019. “How Does Navigation System Behavior Influence Human Behavior?” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5.
  • Cheng, B. 2019. “Enhancing Spatial Learning with an Adaptive Navigation System That Employs Neurofeedback.” In Doctoral Colloquium. 14th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: COSIT 2019, Regensburg, Germany. September 9–13, 2019.
  • Cheng, B., E. Lin, A. Wunderlich, K. Gramann, and S. I. Fabrikant 2023. “Using Eye Blink-Related Brain Activity to Investigate Cognitive Load During Assisted Navigation.” In Frontiers in Neuroscience. Neural Technology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1024583.
  • Cheng, B., A. Wunderlich, K. Gramann, E. Lin, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2022. “The Effect of Landmark Visualization in Mobile Maps on Brain Activity During Navigation: A Virtual Reality Study.” Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.981625.
  • Coutrot, A., E. Manley, S. Goodroe, C. Gahnstrom, G. Filomena, D. Yesiltepe, R. C. Dalton. 2022. “Entropy of City Street Networks Linked to Future Spatial Navigation Ability.” Nature 604 (7904): 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04486-7.
  • Dahmani, L., and V. D. Bohbot. 2020. “Habitual Use of GPS Negatively Impacts Spatial Memory During Self-Guided Navigation.” Scientific Reports 10 (1): 6310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0.
  • Fabrikant, S. I. 2022. “Neuro-Adaptive LBS: Towards Human- and Context-Adaptive Mobile Geographic Information Displays (mGIDs) to Support Spatial Learning for Pedestrian Navigation.” In 17th International Conference on Location Based Services (LBS 2022), edited by J. Krisp and L. Meng, 48–58. Augsburg University, Munich, Germany, September. 12-14, 2022.
  • Fabrikant, S. I., S. R. Hespanha, and M. Hegarty. 2010. “Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (1): 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903362378.
  • Gardony, A. L., T. T. Brunyé, C. R. Mahoney, and H. A. Taylor. 2013. “How Navigational Aids Impair Spatial Memory: Evidence for Divided Attention.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 13 (4): 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2013.792821.
  • Gardony, A. L., T. T. Brunyé, and H. A. Taylor. 2015. “Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 15 (4): 246–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2015.1059432.
  • Griffin, A. L., T. White, C. Fish, B. Tomio, H. Huang, C. R. Sluter, J. V. M. Bravo, et al. 2017. “Designing Across Map Use Contexts: A Research Agenda.” International Journal of Cartography 3 (sup1): 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1315988.
  • Hegarty, M. 2011. “The Cognitive Science of Visual-Spatial Displays: Implications for Design.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3): 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x.
  • Kapaj, A., S. Lanini-Maggi, C. Hilton, B. Cheng, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2022. “How Does the Design of Landmarks on a Mobile Map Influence Wayfinding experts’ Spatial Learning During a Real-World Navigation Task?” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 50 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2183525.
  • Kapaj, A., S. Lanini-Maggi, C. Hilton, B. Cheng, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2023. “How Does the Design of Landmarks on a Mobile Map Influence Wayfinding experts’ Spatial Learning During a Real-World Navigation Task?” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 50 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2183525.
  • Lanini-Maggi, S., M. Lanz, C. Hilton, and S. I. Fabrikant in revision. “The Positive Effect of Blue Lighting on Urban Park Visitor’s Affective States: A Virtual Reality Online Study Measuring Facial Expressions and Self-Reports. Environment Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.
  • Lanini-Maggi, S., I. T. Ruginski, and S. I. Fabrikant 2021. “Improving Pedestrians’ Spatial Learning During Landmark-Based Navigation with Auditory Emotional Cues and Narrative.” In UC Santa Barbara: Center for Spatial Studies (Ed.), 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science. September 27–30, 2020, Poznan, Poland. https://doi.org/10.25436/E2NP43
  • Lanini-Maggi, S., I. T. Ruginski, T. F. Shipley, C. Hurter, A. T. Duchowski, B. B. Briesemeister, J. Lee, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2021. “Assessing How Visual Search Entropy and Engagement Predict Performance in a Multiple-Objects Tracking Air Traffic Control Task.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 4:100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100127.
  • Montello, D., S. I. Fabrikant, and C. Davies. 2018. “Cognitive Perspectives on Cartography and Other Geographic Information Visualizations (Chapter 10).” In Handbook of Behavioral and Cognitive Geography, 177–196. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717544.00018.
  • Reichenbacher, T. 2001. “Adaptive Concepts for a Mobile Cartography.” Journal of Geographical Sciences 11 (S1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837443.
  • Reichenbacher, T., M. Aliakbarian, A. Ghosh, and S. I. Fabrikant. 2022. “Tappigraphy: Continuous Ambulatory Assessment and Analysis of in-situ Map App Use Behaviour.” Journal of Location Based Services 16 (3): 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2022.2105410.
  • Ruginski, I., S. H. Creem-Regehr, J. K. Stefanucci, and E. Cashdan. 2019. “GPS Use Negatively Affects Environmental Learning Through Spatial Transformation Abilities.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 64:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001.
  • Ruginski, I., N. Giudice, S. Creem-Regehr, and T. Ishikawa. 2022. “Designing Mobile Spatial Navigation Systems from the User’s Perspective: An Interdisciplinary Review.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 22 (1–2): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2022.2053382.
  • Spiers, H. J., A. Coutrot, and M. Hornberger. 2023. “Explaining World‐Wide Variation in Navigation Ability from Millions of People: Citizen Science Project Sea Hero Quest.” Topics in Cognitive Science 15 (1): 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12590.
  • Sugimoto, M., T. Kusumi, N. Nagata, and T. Ishikawa. 2022. “Online Mobile Map Effect: How Smartphone Map Use Impairs Spatial Memory.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 22 (1–2): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.1969401.
  • Thoresen, J. C., R. Francelet, A. Coltekin, K.-F. Richter, S. I. Fabrikant, and C. Sandi. 2016. “Not All Anxious Individuals Get Lost: Trait Anxiety and Mental Rotation Ability Interact to Explain Performance in Map-Based Route Learning in Men.” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 132:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.04.008.
  • Thrash, T., S. I. Fabrikant, A. Brügger, C. T. Do, H. Huang, K.-F. Richter, S. Lanini-Maggi. 2019. “The Future of Geographic Information Displays from GIScience, Cartographic, and Cognitive Science Perspectives.” In Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, 142. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.19.
  • Yesiltepe, D., R. Conroy Dalton, and A. Ozbil Torun. 2021. “Landmarks in Wayfinding: A Review of the Existing Literature.” Cognitive Processing 22 (3): 369–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x.