Disrupting the self: script development within the academy

References

• Aronson, Linda. 2010. The 21st Century Screenplay: A Comprehensive Guide to Writing Tomorrow’s Films. Los Angeles: Silman-James Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Asexuality Visibility Network. 2023. Accessed 10 February 2023. https://www.asexuality.org.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, Margaret. 2002. Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Dallas J. 2013. “Scriptwriting as Creative Writing Research: A Preface.” TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses (Special Issue) 19:1–8. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue19/content.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Dallas J. 2016. “The screenplay as text: academic scriptwriting as creative research.” New Writing 13 (1): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2015.1133654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Dallas John. 2022. “Spinning and Singing: Exploring Memory and Gender non-Conformity Through Screenwriting for Publication First.” Journal of Screenwriting 13 (3): 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00104_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, Craig, Louise Sawtell, and Stayci Taylor. 2016. “Thinking Through the Screenplay: The Academy as a Site for Research-Based Script Development.” Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 9 (1): 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.9.1-2.149_1.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, Gillie, and Russell Delderfield, eds. 2018. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, Stephen. 1994. “Tales from the Dark Side: A Phenomenography of Adult Critical Reflection.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 13 (3): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137940130303.
   Google Scholar
• Cake, Susan. 2018. “Transformative Learning: Writing Narrative Comedy as Creative Resistance.” Reflective Practice 19 (6): 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1539653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cake, Susan. 2021. “A Collaborative Reflection Between Writer, Director and Actors: Table Read as Scriptwriting ‘Intervention’.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Script Development, edited by Stayci Taylor and Craig Batty, 425–436. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_29.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Philip. 2003. “Narrative and Reflective Practice: Recording and Understanding Experience.” Educational Action Research 11 (3): 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790300200229.
   Google Scholar
• de Lauretis, Teresa. 1987. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diffrient, David Scott. 2014. Omnibus Films: Theorizing Transauthorial Cinema. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, Robyn and Azriel Grysman. 2019. “Emotion and Gender in Personal Narratives.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion, edited by Sonya Pritzker, Janina Fenigsen and James M Wilce, 344–360. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Ross. 2010. “The Known World.” TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses Special Issue 8:1–11. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue8/content.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hambly, Glenda. 2020. “Cultural Influences in Screenwriting: Australia vs. Hollywood.” Journal of Screenwriting 11(1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00012_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Graeme. 2008. “Creative Writing: Words as Practice-led Research.” Journal of Visual Arts Practice 7 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.161_1
   Google Scholar
• Haseman, Brad, and Daniel Mafe. 2009. “Acquiring Know-How: Research Training for Practice-led Researchers.” In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts, edited by Hazel Smith and Roger Dean, 211–228. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, Christopher, Sally Burnie, Simon Lee, Susan Brooks and Jill Jarvis. 2013. Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, Carolin. 2004. “An Analysis of two Models of Reflection and Their Implications for Educational Development.” International Journal for Academic Development 9 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296044.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jason. 2013. The Psychology of Screenwriting: Theory and Practice. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• McVeigh, Margaret. 2014. “Lighting the Fire: Can Creativity be Taught?” Screen Education 75:56–63. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.204339.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Eric. 1998. Being & Doing: A Workbook for Actors. Los Angeles: Ermor Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, Margot. 2013. “Unknown Spaces and Uncertainty in Film Development.” Journal of Screenwriting 4 (2): 149–162.https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.4.2.149_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelmes, Jill. 2007. “Some Thoughts on Analysing the Screenplay, the Process of Screenplay Writing and the Balance Between Craft and Creativity.” Journal of Media Practice 8 (2): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.8.2.107_1.
   Google Scholar
• Orwell, George. 1946. “Why I Write.” Accessed February 2, 2023. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/why-i-write/.
   Google Scholar
• Sawtell, Louise. 2019. “One in a Million Girl: A Fictocritical Screenplay for a Feminist Film”. PhD diss., RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Screen Australia. 2022. “Gender Matters Results 2021/22.” Screen Australia, October 13. https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/screen-news/2022/10-13-gender-matters-results-2021-22.
   Google Scholar
• Screen Australia. 2023. “Screen Australia Announces New Gender Matters Taskforce.” Screen Australia, May 4. https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/sa/screen-news/2023/05-04-new-gender-matters-taskforce?utm_source = social&utm_medium = facebook&utm_campaign = 2023-05-04-new-gender-matters-taskforce&fbclid = IwAR072_DN9sFza0layPtXTE-SFD6pymggnbeoiKqJzWzEuTUPLlzDNx-qT9s&mibextid = Zxz2cZ.
   Google Scholar
• Seger, Linda. 1996. When Women Call the Shots: The Developing Power and Influence of Women in Television and Film. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy E. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hazel, and Roger T. Dean. 2009. Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Graeme. 2009. “Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-led Research.” In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts, edited by Hazel Smith and Roger T. Dean, 41–65. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Edward W. 2007. “An Update of Transformative Learning Theory: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research”. International Journal of Lifelong Education 26 (2): 173–191.https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475.
   Google Scholar
• Vorhaus, John. 1994. The Comic Toolbox: How to be Funny Even if You're Not. 1st ed. West Hollywood: Silman-James Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, Robert and Allanah Johnston. 2012. “Reclaiming Authentic Selves: Control, Resistive Humour and Identity Work in the Office.” Organization 19 (6): 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411422583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, Julia and Amy Janel Eisenbraun. 2009. “Humor Theories and the Physiological Benefits of Laughter.” Holistic Nursing Practice 23 (6): 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181bf37ad.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar