Exploring genre-based EN<>IT specialised translation training and its effects on self-efficacy

References

• Andrich, D. 2005. “The Rasch Model Explained.” In Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars, edited by S. Alagumalai, D. D. Durtis, and N. Hungi, 308–328. Berlin: Springer-Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 1992. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., and C. Maier. 2011. “Ethics in Interpreter & Translator Training.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh, D. 2019. “The Role of Genres and Text Selection in Legal Translator Training.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 58 (71): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1982. “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.” American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1995. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. H. 1994. “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, edited by A. Freedman and P. Medway, 79–101. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Beeby, A. 1996. Teaching Translation from Spanish to English. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. 1997. “Translating Legal Genres.” In Text Typology and Translation, edited by A. Trosborg, 203–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.26.15bha.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Biel, Ł. 2017. “Genre Analysis and Translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics, edited by K. Malmkjær, 151–164. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolaños-Medina, A., and J. L. Núñez. 2018. “A Preliminary Scale for Assessing Translators’ Self-Efficacy.” Across Languages and Cultures 19 (1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2018.19.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, L., D. J. Hacker, P. O’Shea, and D. Allen. 2005. “The Influence of Overt Practice, Achievement Level, and Explanatory Style on Calibration Accuracy and Performance.” The Journal of Experimental Education 73 (4): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.4.269-290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovi, F., and A. Pokropek. 2019. “Seeing is Believing: Task-Exposure Specificity and the Development of Mathematics Self-Efficacy Evaluations.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (2): 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borja Albi, A. 2013. “A Genre Analysis Approach to the Study of the Translation of Court Documents”. In Linguistica Antverpiensia 12, Special Issue on Research Models and Methods in Legal Translation, edited by Ł. Biel and J. Engberg, 34–53.https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v12i.235.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. A. 2019. “Asking the Right Questions: Demystifying Writing Assignments Across the Disciplines.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 41: 100776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. A. and M. Farling. 2017. “A Dozen Heads are Better Than One: Collaborative Writing in Genre-Based Pedagogy.” TESOL Journal 8: 564–581. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. 2018. Genre and Graduate-Level Research Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., S. M. Gully, and D. Eden. 2001. “Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale.” Organizational Research Methods 4 (1): 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., and D. Dunning. 2009. “How Chronic Self-Views Influence (And Mislead) Self-Assessments of Task Performance: Self-Views Shape Bottom-Up Experiences with the Task.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (6): 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. 2000. “A Complex-Skill Approach to Translation.” In Tapping and Mapping the Processes of Translation and Interpreting, edited by S. Tirkkonen-Condit and R. Jääskeläinen, 53–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. 2009. “Teaching Critical Genre Awareness.” In Genre in a Changing World, edited by C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo, 341–354. Anderson: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger, J., K. Johnson, M. Banner, D. Dunning, and J. Kruger. 2008. “Why the Unskilled are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight Among the Incompetent.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105 (1): 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund Dimitrova, B. 2005. Expertise and Explicitation in the Translation Process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• EUATC. 2021. “ELIS 2021. European Language Industry Survey 2021”. Presentation at the T-UPDATE 21 Virtual Conference, April 15-16 2021.
   Google Scholar
• EUATC. 2022. “ELIS 2022. European Language Industry Survey 2022”. Presentation at the Translating Europe – Survey Result Workshop, 15 March 2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization. 2006. European Standard EN 15038. Translation Services – Service Requirements. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• European Masters in Translation. 2017. “Competence Framework 2017”. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/emt_competence_fwk_2017_en_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2006. Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García Izquierdo, I. 2000. “The Concept of Text Type and Its Relevance to Translator Training.” Target 12 (2): 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.06gar.
   Google Scholar
• García Izquierdo, I., and V. Montalt i Resurrecció. 2021. “Translating into Textual Genres.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies 1:1. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v1i.12.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., and T. R. Mitchell. 1992. “Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability.” Academy of Management Review 17 (2): 183–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/258770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göpferich, S. 1995. “A Pragmatic Classification of LSP Texts in Science and Technology.” Target 7 (2): 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.7.2.07gop.
   Google Scholar
• Göpferich, S. 2009. “Towards a Model of Translation Competence and Its Acquisition: The Longitudinal Study TransComp.” In Behind the Mind. Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, edited by S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen, and I. M. Mees, 11–37. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H., and M. Mohe. 2012. “Professional Knowledge is (Also) Knowledge About Errors.” In Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning, edited by J. Bauer and C. Harteis, 71–87. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_5.
   Google Scholar
• Haro-Soler, M. M., and D. Kiraly. 2019. “Exploring Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Symbiotic Collaboration with Students: An Action Research Project.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13 (3): 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatim, B., and I. Mason. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hervey, S., and I. Higgins. 2002. Thinking Translation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., D. Galbraith, and D. White. 2011. “Perceived Competence: A Common Core for Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept?” Journal of Personality Assessment 93 (3): 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.559390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado Albir, A. 2017. Researching Translation Competence by PACTE Group. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hvelplund, K. T., and B. Dragsted. 2018. “Genre Familiarity and Translation Processing.” In Innovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research, edited by I. Lacruz and R. Jääskeläinen, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xviii.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2015. ISO 17100: 2015 Translation Services —. Geneva: Requirements for Translation Services. ISO.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. 1989. “Genre Analysis and the Translator.” Target: International Journal of Translation Studies 1 (1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.1.1.04jam.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M. 2008. “Genre Awareness for the Novice Academic Student: An Ongoing Quest.” Language Teaching 41 (2): 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. A. 2002. “Un Modelo de Competencia Traductora: Bases Para el Diseño Curricular.” Puentes: hacia nuevas investigaciones en la mediación intercultural 1 :9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesling, S. F., U. Pavalanathan, J. Fitzpatrick, X. Han, and J. Eisenstein. 2018. “Interactional Stancetaking in Online Forums.” Computational Linguistics 44 (4): 683–718. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingscott, G. 2002. “Technical Translation and Related Disciplines.” Perspectives 10 (4): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2002.9961449.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R., and E. L. Usher. 2010. “Self-Efficacy in Educational Settings: Recent Research and Emerging Directions.” In The Decade Ahead: Theoretical Perspectives on Motivation and Achievement, edited by T. C. Urdan and S. A. Karabenick, 1–33. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A004.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. 1991. “Improving Human Decision Making Through Case-Based Decision Aiding.” AI Magazine 12 (2): 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v12i2.895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G.1985. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachner, A., and M. Nückles. 2015. “Bothered by Abstractness or Engaged by Cohesion? Experts’ Explanations Enhance Novices’ Deep-Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (1): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorraca, R. 2018. “Think Aloud as a Tool for Implementing Observational Learning in the Translation Classroom.” Perspectives 26 (5): 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1407804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Jahnke, H. 2005. “New Cognitive Approaches in Process-Oriented Translation Training.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 50 (2): 359–377. https://doi.org/10.7202/010942ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2011. “Think-Aloud Teaching in Translation Class: Implications from Taps Translation Research.” Perspectives 19 (2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2010.506955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. 2006. Winsteps (Version 3.63) [Computer software]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. 2007. “How to simulate Rasch data.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 21 (3): 1125.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredi, M. 2014. Translating Text and Context: Translation Studies and Systemic Functional Linguistics. Volume 2: From Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. Bologna: Asterisco.
   Google Scholar
• Massof, R. W., and D. C. Fletcher. 2001. “Evaluation of the NEI Visual Functioning Questionnaire as an Interval Measure of Visual Ability in Low Vision.” Vision Research 41 (3): 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00249-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister, L. 2017. “Threshold Concepts and Ways of Thinking and Practising: The Potential of a Framework for Understanding in Translation Didactics.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11 (1): 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2016.1198181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. M., and L. Geraci. 2011. “Unskilled but Aware: Reinterpreting Overconfidence in Low-Performing Students.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 37 (2): 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misaki, A., S. Miyanaga, M. Terui, and J. Noguchi. 2012. “A Genre-Based Approach to Japanese-To-English Translation for a Professional Training Course.” Taiwan International ESP Journal 4 (2): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Montalt Resurrecció, V., P. Ezpeleta Piorno, and I. García Izquierdo 2011. “Developing Communicative and Textual Competence Through Genres”. Accessed July 13, 2022. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/25245/30807.pdf?seq.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., and M. Kuteeva. 2011. “Fostering Metacognitive Genre Awareness in L2 Academic Reading and Writing: A Case Study of Pre-Service English Teachers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 20 (2): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., and L. McGrath. 2018. “Scaffolding Genre Knowledge and Metacognition: Insights from an L2 Doctoral Research Writing Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing 40:12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi, J., A. Misaki, S. Miyanaga, and M. Terui. 2016. “Towards a Robust, Genre-Based Translation Model and Its Application.” In Handbook of Japanese Applied Linguistics, edited by M. Minami, 385–414. Vol. 10. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511830-019.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, C. 1991. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Applications of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis, Translated by C. Nord and P. Sparrow. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. 2015. Scientific and Technical Translation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• PACTE. 2011. “Results of the Validation of the PACTE Translation Competence Model: Translation Problems and Translation Competence.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, edited by C. Alvstad, A. Hild, and E. Tiselius, 317–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.22pac.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2003. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Motivation, and Achievement in Writing: A Review of the Literature.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 19 (2): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.
   Google Scholar
• Pesudovs, K., E. Garamendi, and D. B. Elliott. 2004. “The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: Development and Validation.” Optometry and Vision Science 81 (10): 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200410000-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielmeier, H., and P. O’Mara. 2020. CSA Research. The State of the Linguist Supply Chain. Translators and Interpreters in 2020, Report of 28 January 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto Ramos, F. 2021. “The Use of Resources for Legal Terminological Decision-Making: Patterns and Profile Variations Among Institutional Translators.” Perspectives 29 (2): 278–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1803376.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G.1993. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. 2015. Specialised Translation: Shedding the “Non-literary” Tag. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schjoldager, A., K. Wølch Rasmussen, and C. Thomsen. 2008. “Précis-Writing, Revision and Editing: Piloting the European Master in Translation.” Meta: journal des traducteurs /Meta: Translators’ Journal 53 (4): 798–813. https://doi.org/10.7202/019648ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedlok, F., and P. Hibbert. 2014. “The Organization of Interdisciplinary Research. Modes, Drivers and Barriers.” International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (2): 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M., R. H. Buck, B. Jacobson, R. LaMance, M. Pawlowski, J. R. Slinkard, and S. M. Vogel. 2022. “‘It’s Complicated and nuanced’: Teaching Genre Awareness in English for General Academic Purposes.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 57:101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, T. 1990. Genres in Discourse, translated by C. Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trosborg, A. 1997. “Text Typology: Register, Genre and Text Type.” In Text Typology and Translation, edited by A. Trosborg, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.26.03tro.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiplakou, S., and G. Floros. 2013. “Never Mind the Text Types, Here’s Textual Force: Towards a Pragmatic Reconceptualization of Text Type.” Journal of Pragmatics 45:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.004. 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., S. Hutchins, T. Carolan, and J. Cumming. 2013. “Effectiveness of Part-Task Training and Increasing-Difficulty Training Strategies: A Meta-Analysis Approach.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 55 (2): 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812451994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman, D. C., and G. Lintern. 1985. “Part-Task Training for Tracking and Manual Control.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 27 (3): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, E., and E. Smith. 2007. “Instrument Development Tools and Activities for Measure Validation using Rasch Models: Part I – Instrument Development Tools.” Journal of Applied Measurement 8 (1): 97–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, B. 1996. “Reliability and Separation.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 9 (4): 472.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, B., X. Dai, and H. Liu. 2019. “Application of Translation Style Guides in Translation Teaching.” Shanghai Journal of Translation 2 :89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zell, E., and Z. Krizan. 2014. “Do People Have Insight into Their Abilities? A Metasynthesis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (2): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613518075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar