To remember or not to remember? The Germans, National Socialism, and the Holocaust – a typology

Bibliography

• Assmann, Aleida. “Memory, Individual and Collective.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Robert E. Goodin, and Charles Tilly, 210–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, Aleida. “Weltmeister im Erinnern?: Über das Unbehagen an der deutschen Erinnerungskultur.” Vorgänge: Zeitschrift für Bürgerrechte und Gesellschaftspolitik 51, no. 2 (2012): 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, Aleida. Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur: Eine Intervention. 2nd ed. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, Aleida. Shadows of Trauma: Memory and the Politics of Postwar Identity. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Augstein, Franziska. “Deutschland.” In Verbrechen erinnern: Die Auseinandersetzung mit Holocaust und Völkermord, edited by Volkhard Knigge, and Norbert Frei, 221–232. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, Hans-Bernd, and Inga Huck. “Third-Person Effects.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by Wolfgang Donsbach, n. p. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brummett, Barry. Techniques of Close Reading. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, Hannelore, Andrea D. Bührmann, Christine Hanke, and Andrea Seier. “Diskursanalyse – (k)eine Methode? Eine Einleitung.” In Das Wuchern der Diskurse. Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults, edited by Hannelore Bublitz, Andrea D. Bührmann, and Christine Hanke, 10–21. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, Tom. “Transatlantic Broadcasts: Holocaust in America and West Germany.” Penn History Review 16, no. 2 (2009): 76–97.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, Anke. “Defying Memory? Tracing the Power of Hegemonic Memory in Everyday Discourse Using the Example of National Socialism in Germany.” International Journal of Communication 15 (2021): 3379–3396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Dispositive der Macht: Über Sexualität, Wissen und Macht. Berlin: Merve, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “The Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, edited by Robert Young, 51–78. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8, no. 4 (1982): 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin Books, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “Sex, Power, and the Politics of Identity.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Michael Foucault 1954–1984, edited by Paul Rabinow, 142–148. London: Penguin Books, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Paul Rabinow, 1:203–1:220. London: Penguin Books, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Frevert, Ute. “Geschichtsvergessenheit und Geschichtsversessenheit revisited: Der jüngste Erinnerungsboom in der Kritik.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte no. B 40-41 (2003): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, Jürgen, Lars Breuer, and Anna Delius. Kollektive Erinnerungen der europäischen Bürger im Kontext von Transnationalisierungsprozessen: Deutschland, Grossbritannien, Polen und Spanien im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. 8th ed. New York: International Publishers, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, Steffen, and Roby Nathanson. “Germany and Israel Today: United by the Past, Divided by the Present?” Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2015. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_LW_Germany_and_Israel_today_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerstein, Katrin. Gemeinsame Vergangenheit – getrennte Erinnerung? Der Nationalsozialismus in Gedächtnisdiskursen und Identitätskonstruktionen von Bundesrepublik Deutschland, DDR und Österreich. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Herf, Jeffrey. “Politics and Memory in West and East Germany Since 1961 and in Unified Germany Since 1990.” Journal of Israeli History 23, no. 1 (2004): 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353104042000241901.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, Margret, and Siegfried Jäger. Deutungskämpfe: Theorie und Praxis kritischer Diskursanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jedlowski, Paolo. “Memory and Sociology: Themes and Issues.” Time & Society 10, no. 1 (2001): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X01010001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jureit, Ulrike. “Geschichte als Identitätsressource: Wandlungsprozesse im Gedenken an den Holocaust.” Totalitarismus und Demokratie 16, no. 1 (2019): 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jureit, Ulrike, and Christian Schneider. Gefühlte Opfer: Illusionen der Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• König, Helmut. “Das Politische des Gedächtnisses.” In Gedächtnis und Erinnerung: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, edited by Christian Gudehus, Ariane Eichenberg, and Harald Welzer, 115–125. Metzler: Stuttgart, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, Reinhart. Sediments of Time: On Possible Histories. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Langenbacher, Eric. “Still the Unmasterable Past? The Impact of History and Memory in the Federal Republic of Germany.” German Politics 19, no. 1 (2010): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644001003588473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Daniel, and Natan Sznaider. “Memory Unbound: The Holocaust and the Formation of Cosmopolitan Memory.” European Journal of Social Theory 5, no. 1 (2002): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431002005001002.
   Google Scholar
• Link, Jürgen. “Sprache, Diskurs, Interdiskurs und Literatur.” In Sprache – Kognition – Kultur, edited by Heidrun Kämper, and Ludwig Eichinger, 115–134. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Meyen, Michael, Maria Löblich, Senta Pfaff-Rüdiger, and Claudia Riesmeyer. Qualitative Forschung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft: Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, William F. S. “Post-Communist Holocaust Commemoration in Poland and Germany.” The Journal of Holocaust Education 9, no. 1 (2000): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2000.11087098.
   Google Scholar
• Molden, Berthold. “Resistant Pasts Versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective Memory.” Memory Studies 9, no. 2 (2016): 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015596014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Katalin. “Is It Possible to Understand the Holocaust? Insights from Some German School Contexts.” Holocaust Studies 23, no. 4 (2017): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2017.1284376.
   Google Scholar
• Niven, Bill. “Remembering Nazi Anti-Semitism in the GDR.” In Memorialization in Germany Since 1945, edited by Bill Niven, and Chloe Paver, 205–213. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, Cees. Rituelen. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Olick, Jeffrey K. “Das soziale Gedächtnis.” In Gedächtnis und Erinnerung: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, edited by Christian Gudehus, Ariane Eichenberg, and Harald Welzer, 109–114. Metzler: Stuttgart, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Olick, Jeffrey K., and Daniel Levy. “Collective Memory and Cultural Constraint: Holocaust Myth and Rationality in German Politics.” American Sociological Review 62, no. 6 (1997): 921–936. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwoni, Eunike. “Latent but Not Less Significant: The Holocaust as an Argumentative Resource in German National Identity Discourse.” German Politics and Society 31, no. 3 (2013): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2013.310301.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. “Ernesto Laclau: Diskurse, Hegemonien, Antagonismen.” In Kultur: Theorien der Gegenwart, 2nd ed., edited by Stephan Moebius, and Dirk Quadflieg, 300–310. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, Ronny. “Die Erinnerungskultur im Spannungsfeld von Anerkennung und Geschichtsrevisionismus.” In Offene oder geschlossene Kollektividentität: Von der Entstehung einer neuen politischen Konfliktlinie, edited by Yves Bizeul, Ludmila Lutz-Auras, and Jan Rohgalf, 221–249. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, Michael, and Yasemin Yildiz. “Memory Citizenship: Migrant Archives of Holocaust Remembrance in Contemporary Germany.” Parallax 17, no. 4 (2011): 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzborn, Samuel. Kollektive Unschuld: Die Abwehr der Shoah im deutschen Erinnern. Leipzig: Hentrich & Hentrich, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasin, Philipp. “Die Wirklichkeit der Fiktion: Zum Konzept der Imagined Communities.” In Politische Kollektive: Die Konstruktion nationaler, rassischer und ethnischer Gemeinschaften, edited by Ulrike Jureit, 22–45. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Siebeck, Cornelia. “Dies- und jenseits des Erinnerungskonsenses: Kritik der postnationalsozialistischen Selbstvergewisserung.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 67, no. 42–43 (2017): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Silbermann, Alphons, and Manfred Stoffers. Auschwitz: Nie davon gehört?: Erinnern und Vergessen in Deutschland. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Strozier, Robert M, and Subjectivity Foucault. and Identity: Historical Constructions of Subject and Self. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt, Anne, Anne Klein, Miguel Tamayo Korte, and Sibel Dalman-Eken. “Discourse in Everyday Life—Everyday Life in Discourse: A Contribution Towards Empirically Based Methodology of Social Science Discourse Research.” Historical Social Research 33, no. 1 (2008): 313–343. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.33.2008.1.313-343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Zheng. Memory Politics, Identity, and Conflict: Historical Memory as a Variable. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, Susanne. “Geschichten von ‘Nähe und Distanz:’ Wie Radiojournalismus heute den Holocaust vermittelt.” In Holocaust Education Revisited: Wahrnehmung und Vermittlung – Fiktion und Fakten – Medialität und Digitalität, edited by Anja Ballis, and Markus Gloe, 347–357. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, Allison. “Who Are We?: Modern Identities between Taylor and Foucault.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35, no. 5 (2009): 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453709103426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzer, Harald, Sabine Moller, and Karoline Tschuggnall. Opa war kein Nazi: Nationalsozialismus und Holocaust im Familiengedächtnis. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfgram, Mark A. “The Holocaust Through the Prism of East German Television: Collective Memory and Audience Perceptions.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 20, no. 1 (2006): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/hgs/dcj003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfrum, Edgar. “Geschichte der Erinnerungskultur in der DDR und BRD,” 2008. https://www.bpb.de/themen/erinnerung/geschichte-und-erinnerung/39814/geschichte-der-erinnerungskultur-in-der-ddr-und-brd/.
   Google Scholar
• Zick, Andreas, Jonas Rees, Michael Papendick, and Franziska Wäschle. “MEMO: Multidimensional Memory Monitor,” 2020. https://www.stiftung-evz.de/assets/1_Was_wir_fördern/Bilden/Bilden_fuer_lebendiges_Erinnern/MEMO_Studie/MEMO_3_2020/EVZ_Studie_MEMO_2020_engl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zülsdorf-Kersting, Meik. Sechzig Jahre danach: Jugendliche und Holocaust: eine Studie zur geschichtskulturellen Sozialisation. Berlin: Lit, 2007.
   Google Scholar