Peripheral Science Journalism: Scientists and Journalists Dancing on the Same Floor

References

• Allan, S. 2011. “Introduction: Science Journalism in a Digital Age.” Journalism 12 (7): 771–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, M. A. Xenos, and P. Ladwig. 2014. “The ‘Nasty Effect’: Online Incivilty and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., D. Orr, A. Baer, E. Garty, Y. Golumbic, M. Halevi, Eitan Krein, et al. 2020. “The History and Evolution of Science Communication in Israel.” In The Emergence of Modern Science Communication, edited by T. Gascoigne, B. V. Lewenstein, L. Massaran, B. Schiele, P. Broks, M. Riedlinger, and J. Leach, 443–468. Acton: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barel-Ben David, Y., E. S. Garty, and A. Baram-Tsabari. 2020. “Can Scientists Fill the Science Journalism Void? Online Public Engagement with Science Stories Authored by Scientists.” PLoS One 15: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belair-Gagnon, V., A. E. Holton, and O. Westlund. 2019. “Space for the Liminal.” Media and Communication 7 (4): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, R. 2018. “Can Foundations Solve the Journalism Crisis?” Journalism 19 (8): 1059–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P. J., and E. Mitchelstein. 2013. The News Gap. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D. 2012. “A (Brave) New World? Challenges and Opportunities for Communication About Biotechnology in new Information Environments.” In Biotechnologie Kommunikation, edited by M. D. Weitze, and E. Al, 427–445. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brossard, D. 2013. “New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3): 14096–14101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., J. V. Price, and L. Steinman. 2013. “Science Communication to the General Public: Why we Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training.” The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 12 (1): 6–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brumfiel, B. 2009. “Science Journalism: Supplanting the old Media?” Nature 458 (7236): 274–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubela, T., M. C. Nisbet, R. Borchelt, F. Brunger, C. Critchley, E. Einsiedel, G. Geller, et al. 2009. “Science Communication Reconsidered Nature.” Nature Biotechnology 27 (6): 514–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M., and B. Trench. 2014. “Science Communication Research: Themes and Challernges.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by M. Bucchi and B. Trench, 1–14. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchi, M. 2017. “Microblogging as an Extension of Science Reporting.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (8): 953–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., and E. Hurcombe. 2019. “Digital Journalism as Symptom, Response, and Agent of Change in the Platformed Media Environment.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagé, J. 2016. Saving the Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2017. Journalistic Authority. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colson, V. 2011. “Science Blogs as Competing Channels for the Dissemination of Science News.” Journalism 12 (7): 889–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, E. A., Y. Kim, and D. A. Scheufele. 2011. “Leading US Nano-Scientists’ Perceptions About Media Coverage and the Public Communication of Scientific Research Findings.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (12): 7041–7055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2003. “The web and its Journalists: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online.” New Media & Society 5 (2): 203–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., and W. H. Dutton. 2014. “Empowering Citizens of the Internet age: The Role of A Fifth Estate.” In Society & The Internet, edited by M. Graham and W. H. Dutton, 238–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., and J. C. Besley. 2016. “Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S. 2014. “Science Journalism: Prospects in the Digital age.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by M. Bucchi and B. Trench, 27–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, D., and M. C. Nisbet. 2011. “The Science Journalist Online: Shifting Roles and Emerging Practices.” Journalism 12 (7): 778–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, A., M. Sullivan, and A. Grand. 2018. “Who are you Writing for? Differences in Response to Blog Design Between Scientists and Nonscientists.” Science Communication 40 (1): 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, L., J. Bischoff, A. Lowe, H. Marzinkowski, and M. Voigt. 2019. “Scientific Evidence and Science Journalism.” Journalism Studies 20 (1): 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida, A., and M. L. Young. 2019. “From Peripheral to Integral? A Digital-Born Journalism not for Profit in a Time of Crisis.” Media and Communication 7 (4): 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, A. E., and V. Belair-Gagnon. 2018. “Strangers to the Game? Interlopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production.” Media and Communication 6 (4): 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Z. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Zhu. 2018. “Engaging Scientists in Science Communication: The Effect of Social Proof and Meaning.” Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 1044–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, P. 2016. “The Communications gap Between Scientists and Public.” EMBO Reports 17 (11): 1513–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and I. Rafols. 2009. “A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (2): 348–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maille, M. E., J. Saint-Charles, and M. Lucotte. 2010. “The Gap Between Scientists and Journalists: The Case of Mercury Science in Quebec's Press.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (1): 70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoli, L. 2007. “Science on the Net: An Analysis of the Websites of the European Public Research Institutions.” Journal of Science Communication 6 (3): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelstein, M. E., and P. Boczkowski. 2009. “Betweem Tradition and Change: A Review of Recent Research on Online News Production.” Journalism 10 (5): 562–586.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelstein, M. E., P. Boczkowski, and M. C. Wagner. 2017. “The Boomerang Effect: Innovation in the Blogs of Mainstream News Sites, 2008-2012.” Media, Culture & Society 39 (8): 1231–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, L., and R. G. Picard. 2012. “Let's Start an Online News Site": Opportunities, Resources, Strategy, and Formational Myopia in Startups.” Journal of Media Business 9 (4): 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., W. H. Dutton, and G. Blank. 2014. “Social Media and the News: Implications for the Press and Society.” In Society & The Internet, edited by M. Graham and W. H. Dutton, 135–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulussen, S., and P. Ugille. 2008. “User Generated Content in the Newsroom: Professional and Organizational Constrains on Participatory Journalism.” Westminster Papersin Communication and Cultur 5 (2): 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. 2013. “Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 14102–14109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, S. 2015. “Scientific Objectivity in Journalism? How Journalists and Academics Define Objectivity, Asses its Attainability, and Rate its Desirability.” Journalism 16 (6): 730–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapals, A. K., P. Maares, and F. Hanusch. 2019. “Working on the Margins: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Motivations of Peripheral Actors in Journalism.” Media and Communication 7 (4): 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1995. The Power of News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secko, D. M., E. Amend, and T. Friday. 2013. “Four Models of Science Journalism.” Journalism Practice 7 (1): 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. 2003. “Who are These Guys?: The Online Challenge to the Notion of Journalistic Professionalism.” Journalism 4 (2): 139–163.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. 2006. “Journalism and News Bloggers: Complements, Contradictions and Challenges.” In Uses of Blogs, edited by A. Bruns and J. Jacobs, 23–32. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and M. L. Morgoch. 2020. “Science & Journalism: Bridging the Gaps Through Specialty Training.” Journalism Practice, Published Online: September 15: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C. 2019. “Journalism at the Periphery.” Media and Communication 7 (4): 138–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treise, D., and M. F. Weigold. 2002. “Advancing Science Communication.” Science Communication 23 (3): 310–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench, B. 2007. “How the Internet Changed Science Journalism.” In Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication: Between News and Public Relations, edited by M. Bauer and M. Bucchi, 133–141. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trench, B. 2008. “Internet: Turning Science Communication Inside-out.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by M. Bucchi and B. Trench, 185–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• You, J. 2014. “Who are the Science Stars of Twitter?” Science 19 (6203): 1440–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 2019. “Why Journalism is About More Than Digital Technology.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., D. Machin, and T. Song. 2015. “Visual Forms of Address in Social Media Discourse: The Case of a Science Communication Website.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar