The Influence of Media Trust and Normative Role Expectations on the Credibility of Fact Checkers

References

• Amazeen, M. 2015. “Revisiting the Epistemology of Fact-Checking.” Critical Review 27 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/08913811.2014.993890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelman, A., and S. Sundar. 2016. “Measuring Message Credibility: Construction and Validation of an Exclusive Scale.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (1): 59–79. doi:10.1177/1077699015606057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, F., M. Haim, and J. Beck. 2019. “Fake News, Warning Messages, and Perceived Truth Value: Investigating the Differential Susceptibility Hypothesis Related to Political Orientation.” Publizistik 64 (2): 181–204. doi:10.1007/s11616-019-00484-4.
   Google Scholar
• Awad, I. 2011. “Latinas/os and the Mainstream Press: The Exclusions of Professional Diversity.” Journalism 12 (5): 515–532. doi:10.1177/1464884911408221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgärtner, M., F. Bohr, R. Höfner, T. Lehmann, A.-K. Müller, S. Röbel, M. Rosenbach, J. Schaible, W. Widemann-Schmidt, and S. Winter. 2020, May 14. Protests in Germany See Fringe Mix with the Mainstream. DER SPIEGEL. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-corona-conspiracy-theorists-protests-in-germany-see-fringe-mix-with-the-mainstream-a-8a9d5822-8944-407a-980a-d58e9d6b4aec.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N., and D. boyd. 2012. “Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (3): 320–329. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrischer Rundfunk [BR]. 2020, May 6. “ARD-Team auf Demo angegriffen [ARD Team Attacked on Demo].” Bayrischer Rundfunk. https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/ard-team-auf-demo-angegriffen,RyEu4cc.
   Google Scholar
• Brandtzaeg, P., and A. Følstad. 2017. “Trust and Distrust in Online Fact-Checking Services.” Communications of the ACM 60 (9): 65–71. doi:10.1145/3122803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtzaeg, P., A. Følstad, and M. Chaparro Domínguez. 2018. “How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services.” Journalism Practice 12 (9): 1109–1129. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1363657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. K., and D. T. Wegener. 2013. “Message Position, Information Processing, and Persuasion: The Discrepancy Motives Model.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by P. Devine, and A. Plant, 189–232. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• CORRECTIV- Recherchen für die Gesellschaft. 2020, June 5. “Urteil: OLG Karlsruhe beanstandet nicht Faktencheck von CORRECTIV, sondern nennt einzelne Verknüpfung missverständlich [Ruling: OLG Karlsruhe Does Not Complain About the Fact Check of CORRECTIV, But Names Individual Links Misleadingly].” https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2020/06/05/urteil-des-olg-karlsruhe/.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. 2018. “Media, Knowledge and Trust: The Deepening Epistemic Crisis of Democracy.” Javnost 25 (1-2): 20–27. doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, O., and E. Brähler. 2016. “Ein Jahrzehnt der Politisierung: Gesellschaftliche Polarisierung und gewaltvolle Radikalisierung in Deutschland zwischen 2006 und 2016 [A Decade of Politicization: Social Polarization and Violent Radicalization in Germany Between 2006 and 2016].” In Die enthemmte Mitte. Autoritäre und rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland. Die Leipziger Mitte Studie 2016. The uninhibited center. Authoritarian and extreme right-wing attitudes in Germany, edited by O. Decker, J. Kiess, & E. Brähler, 95–136. The Leipzig Centre Study 2016. Psychosozial-Verlag. doi:10.30820/9783837972337-95.
   Google Scholar
• European Comission. 2017, November 5. Standard Eurobarometer 88: Media Use in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/82787.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2020. Fact-Checking on Facebook: What Publishers Should Know. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/business/help/182222309230722.
   Google Scholar
• Fawzi, N. 2020. “Objektive Informationsquelle, Watchdog und Sprachrohr der Bürger? Die Bewertung der Gesellschaftlichen Leistungen von Medien Durch die Bevölkerung [Objective Source of Information, Watchdog and Mouthpiece for Citizens? The Evaluation of the Social Perfor].” Publizistik 65: 187–207. doi:10.1007/s11616-020-00572-w.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler, D. P. 2017. “Political Orientation Predicts Credulity Regarding Putative Hazards.” Psychological Science 28: 651–660. doi:10.1177/0956797617692108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, C., A. Tyson, B. Kennedy, and C. Johnson. 2020, September 29. Science and Scientists Held in High Esteem Across Global Publics. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/science-and-scientists-held-in-high-esteem-across-global-publics/.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R., and B. Weeks. 2017. “Epistemic Beliefs’ Role in Promoting Misperceptions and Conspiracist Ideation.” PLoS ONE 12 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, L. 2017. “Anatomy of a Fact Check: Objective Practice and the Contested Epistemology of Fact Checking.” Communication, Culture & Critique 10 (3): 518–537. doi:10.1111/cccr.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, L. 2018. “Boundaries Not Drawn.” Journalism Studies 19 (5): 613–631. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1196602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, L., and F. Cherubini. 2016. The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L., B. Nyhan, and J. Reifler. 2016. “Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking.” Journal of Communication 66 (1): 102–138. doi:10.1111/jcom.12198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T. 2007. “Deconstructing Journalism Culture: Toward a Universal Theory.” Communication Theory 17 (4): 367–385. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., and J. Seethaler. 2009. “Journalismuswelten – Ein Vergleich von Journalismuskulturen in 17 Ländern [Journalism Worlds – A Comparison of Journalism Cultures in 17 Countries].” Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft 57 (4): 464–483. doi:10.5771/1615-634x-2009-4-464.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., A. van Dalen, and N. Steindl. 2018. “Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/1940161217740695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., and T. Vos. 2018. “Journalism Beyond Democracy: A New Look into Journalistic Roles in Political and Everyday Life.” Journalism 19 (2): 146–164. doi:10.1177/1464884916673386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, K., and A. Haller. 2017. “What Does “Lügenpresse” Mean?: Expressions of Media Distrust on PEGIDA’s Facebook Pages.” Tidsskriftet Politik 20 (4): 42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, and J. Diez-Medrano. 2014. World Values Survey. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from Round Six – Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationW.
   Google Scholar
• Jackob, N. 2010. “No Alternatives? The Relationship Between Perceived Media Dependency, Use of Alternative Information Sources, and General Trust in Mass Media.” International Journal of Communication 4 (18): 589–606. doi:10.7146/politik.v20i4.101534.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., S. Ford, and J. Green. 2013. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kata, A. 2012. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm – An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the Anti-Vaccination Movement.” Vaccine 30 (25): 3778–3789. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohring, M. 2004. Vertrauen in Journalismus: Theorie und Empirie [Trust in Journalism: Theory and Empirics]. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., and S. Shin. 2019. “Mediated Misinformation: Questions Answered, More Questions to Ask.” The American Behavioral Scientist 65 (2): 259–276. doi:10.1177/0002764219869403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. 2019. SoSci Survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. https://www.soscisurvey.de; https://www.soscisurvey.de/help/doku.php/en:results:variables.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., U. Ecker, C. Seifert, N. Schwarz, and J. Cook. 2012. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 (3): 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienthal, V., and I. Neverla. 2017. “Lügenpresse“. Anatomie eines politischen Kampfbegriffs [“Lying Press.” Anatomy of a Political Combat Term]. Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., E. Nussbaum, and G. Sinatra. 2016. “Plausibility Judgments in Conceptual Change and Epistemic Cognition.” Educational Psychologist 51 (1): 35–56. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1113134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., V. Seyranian, and G. Sinatra. 2014. “Source Effects and Plausibility Judgments When Reading About Climate Change.” Discourse Processes: Comprehension and Validation of Text Information 51 (1-2): 75–92. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luengo, M., and D. García-Marín. 2020. “The Performance of Truth: Politicians, Fact-Checking Journalism, and the Struggle to Tackle COVID-19 Misinformation.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8: 405–427. doi:10.1057/s41290-020-00115-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1989. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion Sozialer Komplexität [Trust: A Mechanism for Reduction of Social Complexity]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., and R. Lewis. 2017. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/library/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and M. Kohring. 2003. “Operationalisierung von Vertrauen in Journalismus [operationalization of trust in journalism].” M&K Medien Und Kommunikationswissenschaft 51 (1): 5–23. doi:10.5771/1615-634x-2003-1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia, R., K. Beckermann, and C. Sullivan. 2018. “White Lies: A Racial History of the (Post)Truth.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15 (2): 109–126. doi:10.1080/14791420.2018.1456668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navin, M. 2013. “Competing Epistemic Spaces: How Social Epistemology Helps Explain and Evaluate Vaccine Denialism.” Social Theory and Practice 39 (2): 241–264. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201339214.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, C. 2018, August 31. “Journalismus und Digitalisierung: Profession, Partizipation und Algorithmen; Expertise für die Eidgenössische Medienkommission EMEK [Journalism and Digitization: Profession, Participation and Algorithms; Expertise for the Federal Media Commission EMEK].” LMU Universitätsbibliothek, Open Access LMU. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42804/.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, C., A. Bartsch, C. Reinemann, R. Fröhlich, T. Hanitzsch, and J. Schindler. 2019. “Der Digitale Wandel der Wissensordnung. Theorierahmen für die Analyse von Wahrheit, Wissen und Rationalität in der öffentlichen Kommunikation.” Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft (M&K) 67: 167–186. doi:10.5771/1615-634X-2019-2-167.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, and R. K. Nielsen. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. R. I. Journalism, & O. University. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/resources-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., and J. Reifler. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32 (2): 303–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., and J. Reifler. 2015, April 28. Estimating Fact-Checking’s Effects. Evidence from a Long-Term Experiment During Campaign 2014. American Press Institute. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Estimating-Fact-Checkings-Effect.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pantenburg, J., S. Reichardt, and B. Sepp. 2021. “Wissensparallelwelten der “Querdenker” [Parallel Worlds of Knowledge of the “Querdenker”].” In Die Misstrauensgemeinschaft der “Querdenker”. Die Corona-Proteste aus Kultur- und und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive [The Community of Distrust of the “Querdenker”. The Corona Protests from a Cultural and Social Science Perspective], edited by S. Reichardt, 29–66. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., N. Fawzi, and M. Obermaier. 2017. “Die Vertrauenskrise der Medien – Fakt Oder Fiktion? Zu Entwicklung, Stand und Ursachen des Medienvertrauens in Deutschland [The “Crisis of Confidence” of the Media – Fact or Fiction? On the Development, Status and Causes of Media Trust in Germany].” In “Lügenpresse”. Anatomie Eines Politischen Kampfbegriffs [“Lying Press.” Anatomy of a Political Combat Term], edited by V. Lilienthal, and I. Neverla, 77–94. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Rössler, P. 2011. Skalenhandbuch Kommunikationswissenschaft [Scale Handbook Communication Science]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., N. Jackob, M. Ziegele, O. Quiring, and C. Schemer. 2017. “Erosion des Vertrauens Zwischen Medien und Publikum? [Erosion of Trust Between Media and Audience?].” Media Perspektiven 47 (5): 246–259.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, H., A. Xiong, and D. Lee. 2019. “Trust It or Not: Effects of Machine-learning Warnings in Helping Individuals Mitigate Misinformation.” Proceedings of Websci ’19: 11th ACM Conference on Web Science. doi:10.1145/3292522.3326012.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., and K. Thorson. 2017. “Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Fact-Checking Messages on Social Media.” Journal of Communication 67 (2): 233–255. doi:10.1111/jcom.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standaert, O., T. Hanitzsch, and J. Dedonder. 2019. “In Their Own Words: A Normative-Empirical Approach to Journalistic Roles Around the World.” Journalism 22 (4): 919–936. doi:10.1177/1464884919853183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stempel, C., T. Hargrove, and G. Stempel. 2007. “Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84 (2): 353–372. doi:10.1177/107769900708400210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., I. Bråten, and M. A. Britt. 2011. “Do Students’ Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing Predict Their Judgement of Texts’ Trustworthiness?” Educational Psychology 31 (2): 177–206. doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.538039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. 2010. “Online News Exposure and Trust in the Mainstream Media: Exploring Possible Associations.” American Behavioral Scientist 54 (1): 22–42. doi:10.1177/0002764210376309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. 2015. “The Epistemology of Fact Checking (is Still Naìve): Rejoinder to Amazeen.” Critical Review 27 (2): 243–252. doi:10.1080/08913811.2015.1055892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt, M. 2018. Die “Lügenpresse” – Ein Nützliches Instrument für den (Rechts-)Populismus ? Politische Kommunikation der AfD. Eine Qualitative Analyse Anhand von Interviews mit Politikern der Alternative für Deutschland. [The “Lügenpresse” – A Useful Tool for (Right-Wing) Populism? Political Communication of the AfD. A Qualitative Analysis Based on Interviews with Politicians of the Alternative for Germany.]. Marburg: Büchner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, T. 2018. “Journalism.” In Journalism (Vol. Handbooks of Communication Science [HoCS], edited by T. Vos, P. J. Schulz, and P. Cobley, 1–18. Boston, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., and R. Tukachinsky. 2020. “A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Continued Influence of Misinformation in the Face of Correction: How Powerful Is It, Why Does It Happen, and How to Stop It?” Communication Research 47 (2): 155–177. doi:10.1177/0093650219854600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2018. “Media and Political Misperceptions.” In Misinformation and Mass Audiences, edited by B. G. Southwell, E. A. Thorson, and L. Sheble, 140–156. University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/314555-010
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2009. Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft [The Hour of Truth? On the Relationship of Science to Politics, Business and the Media in the Knowledge Society]. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wiss.
   Google Scholar
• Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen [ZDF]. 2020, May 2. Angriff auf heute-Show-Team [Attack on Today Show Team]. ZDF. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/panorama/zdf-team-angegriffen-100.html.
   Google Scholar