Toward a decolonial American rhetoric: Embracing an Anglo-Latin American dialogue

References

• Abbott, D. P. (1996). Rhetoric in the new world: Rhetorical theory and practice in colonia spanish America. University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, A., Butterworth, M. L., & Gómez, N. R. (2021). Rhetorics of democracy in the Americas. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asante, M. K. (2013). Paradigmatic issues in intercultural communication studies: An afrocentric-asiacentric dialogue. China Media Research, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Baca, D., & Villanueva, V. (2010). Rhetorics of the Americas: 3114 BCE to 2012 CE. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, P., and Sowards, S. K. (2022). Working across languages/cultures in international and environmental communication fieldwork. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1850844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barranquero, A. (2019). Praxis in Latin American communication thought. In H. C. Stephansen, & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice: Currents, connections, challenges (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barranquero, A., & Sáez Baeza, C. (2017). Latin American critical epistemologies toward a biocentric turn in communication for social change: Communication from a good living perspective. Latin American Research Review, 52(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. (2007). Galileo’s revenge: Ways of construing knowledge and translation strategies in the era of globalization. Social Semiotics, 17(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701311470
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, E. (1978). Rhetorical criticism: A study in method (2nd Ed. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. (2004). The rhetoric of rhetoric: The quest for effective communication. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carolina Escosteguy, A. (2001). Cultural studies: A Latin American narrative. Media, Culture & Society, 23, 861-873. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023006010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catt, I. E., & Eicher-Catt, D. (2012). Semiotics in mainstream American communication studies: A review of principal USA journals in the context of communicology. Review of Communication, 12(3), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2012.666260
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #Communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros, J. D. (2014). The border crossed us: Rhetorics of borders, citizenship, and Latino/a identity. University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, L. M., & Stuckey, M. E. (2021). Rebooting rhetoric and public address. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 24(1-2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coseriu, E., & Polo, J. (1986). Introducción a la lingüística. Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, J., & Park, M. J. (2000). Beyond globalization theory. In J. Curran, & M. J. Park (Eds.), De-Westernizing media studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De los Santos, R. A. (2012). La ola Latina: Recent scholarship in Latina/o and Latin American rhetorics. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98(3), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2012.692166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De los Santos, R. A. (2015). “The future of our history’: Rhetorics of transformation and power in Plutarco Elías Calles’ 1928 Informe.
   Google Scholar
• de Onís, C. M. (2017). What is an “x”? An exchange about the politics of “Latinx.”. Chiricú Journal, 1(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2979/chiricu.1.2.07
   Google Scholar
• DeChaine, D. R. (2012). Introduction: For border studies. In D. R. DeChaine (Ed.), Border rhetorics: Citizenship and identity on the US-Mexico border (pp. 1–15). University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• del Sarto, A., Ríos, A., & Trigo, A. (eds.). (2004). The Latin American cultural studies reader. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B., & Huesca, R. (1997). Reaching for the communicating in participatory communication: A meta-theoretical analysis. Journal of International Communication, 4(2), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.1997.9751854
   Google Scholar
• deTar, M. (2021). Why “anticolonial” international rhetorical studies? Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 24(1-2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2009). Metis, ‘mêtis,’ ‘mestiza,’ medusa: Rhetorical bodies across rhetorical traditions. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190802540690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, A., & Mattlelart, A. (1971). Para leer al pato Donald. Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaiso.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. J., & Pal, M. (2020). Theorizing from the global south: Dismantling, resisting, and transforming communication theory. Communication Theory, 30(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enghel, F., & Becerra, M. (2018). Here and there: (Re)situating Latin America in international communication theory. Communication Theory, 28(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero, L. (1998). La federación Latinoamericana de semiótica: Existen los semiólogos Latinoamericanos? Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, 7, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.5944/signa.vol7.1998.32819
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2003). Constructing rhetorical borders: Peons, illegal aliens, and competing narratives of immigration. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(4), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000142025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2016). Between abundance and marginalization: The imperative of racial rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1183871
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S., Foss, K., & Trapp, R. (2002). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric (3rd Ed. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco Salazar, J. (2009). Self-determination in practice: The critical making of indigenous media. Development in Practice, 19(4-5), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520902866397
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1981). Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches. Social Science Information/sur les Sciences Sociales, 20(6), 817–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848102000601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, R., & Cortez, J. M. (2020). The trace of a mark that scatters: The anthropoi and the rhetoric of decoloniality. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 50(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1714703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, P., & Keith, W. M. (2014). Introduction: A brief history of the National Communication Association. In A century of communication studies: The unfinished conversation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• González, L. (1983). Racismo e sexismo na cultura Brasileña. In L. A. Silva (Ed.), Movimentos sociais urbanos, minorías étnicas e outros estudos. ANPOCS Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• González, L. (1988). A categoria político-cultural de amefricanidade. Tempo Brasileiro, 92/93, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• González-Oñate, C., Fanjul-Peyró, C., & Salvador-Harsh, E.-L. (2021). La influencia de la anglomanía en la jerga de los/las profesionales de la comunicación en España. Historia y comunicación social, 26(2), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.69204
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. N., & Endres, D. (2021). Decolonizing settler public address: The role of settler scholars. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 24(1-2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Hegemonía y estrategia socialista: Hacia una radicalización de la democracia. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Lander, E. (2000a). Eurocentrism and colonialism in Latin American social thought. Nepantla: Views from South, 1, 519–532.
   Google Scholar
• Lander, E. (2000b). Ciencias sociales: Saberes coloniales y Eurocéntrico. In E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales (pp. 4–23). CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lechuga, M. (2020). An anticolonial future: Reassembling the way we do rhetoric. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829659
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, E. (2006). Del sujeto cautivo a los consumidores nomádicos. In G. Sunkel (Ed.), El cultural en américa latina (pp. 96–113). Convenio Andrés Bello.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, C. (2018). Apropiación tecnológica por comunicadores mapuche. Reflexiones desde la praxis comunicacional. Chasqui, 138, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i138.3368
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Thinking through the decolonial turn: Post-continental interventions in theory, philosophy, and critique—an introduction. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5070/T412011805
   Google Scholar
• Mario, J., & Osorio, F. (2009). Praxis and liberation in the context of Latin American theory. In M. Montero, & C. C. Soon (Eds.), Psychology of Liberation (pp. 11–36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marques de Melo, J. (2007). Pensamiento comunicacional Latinoamericano: Entre el saber y el poder. Comunicación Social.
   Google Scholar
• Marques de Melo, J., Gobbi, M., & Kunsch, L. (2002). Matrizes comunicacionais latino-americanas - marxismo e cristianismo. UNESCO–UMESP.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, J. (1987). De los medios a las mediaciones. comunicación, cultura y hegemonía. Gili.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, J. (1993). Communication, culture and hegemony: From the media to mediations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, J. (2021). What Latin American communication research owes to Brazil: Personal account of an intercultural experience. MATRIZes, 15(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i2p127-146
   Google Scholar
• Masotta, O. ed. (1967). Happenings. Editorial Jorge Álvarez.
   Google Scholar
• Mato, D. (2001). Estudios y otras prácticas Latinoamericanas en cultura y poder. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 7, 83–110.
   Google Scholar
• Mattlelart, A., Mattlelart, M., & Piccini, M. (1970). Cuadernos de la realidad nacional. Universidad Católica de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, E. A. M. (2013). A retórica no Brasil: Um pouco da história. Revista Latinoamericana de Retórica, 1, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, B. (2010). La epistemologia del sur, la colonialidad de género y el Feminismo Latinoamericano. In Y. Espinosa Miñoso (Ed.), Aproximaciones críticas a las prácticas teórico-políticasdel feminismo Latinoamericano, Vol. 1 (pp. 19–38). En la Frontera.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2002). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-1-57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2005). The idea of Latin America. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and de-colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 7–8.: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W., & Schiwy, F. (2002). Beyond dichotomies: Translation and the colonial difference. In E. Mudimbe-Boyi (Ed.), Beyond dichotomies (pp. 251–286). Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miike, Y. (2010). An anatomy of eurocentrism in communication scholarship: The role of asiacentricity in de-westernizing theory and research. China Media Research, 6, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Miike, Y., & Jin, Y. (2022). Introduction. Global interventions in search of communication theory in human diversity. In Y. Miike, & Y. Jin (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 1–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaja de Arnoux, E. (2007). Hacia una reflexión autónoma sobre la escritura. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxia, 34, 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaja de Arnoux, E. (2013). La formación retórica de la elite criolla en la etapa de construcción del estado nacional. Revista Estudios, 29, 189–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira Coelho, M. C. M. (2015). António Vieira between Greeks, Romans, and Brazilians: Comments on rhetoric and the Jesuit tradition in Brazil. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1032854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothstine, W. L., Blair, C., & Copeland, G. A. (1994). Professionalization and the eclipse of critical invention. In W. L. Nothstine, C. Blair, & G. A. Copeland (Eds.), Critical questions: Invention, creativity, and the criticism of discourse and media (pp. 15–70). St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, C., & De los Santos, R. (2015). Expanding the idea of América. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 98(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1032848
   Google Scholar
• Orozco Gómez, G. (1994). Televidencia. Perspectivas para el análisis de los procesos de recepción televisiva. Cuadernos de Comunicación y Prácticas Sociales, 6, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, R. (2004). Mundialización y cultura. Convenio Andrés Bello.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, P. (2015). Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematic. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(5-6), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palczewski, C. H. (1996). Bodies, borders, and letters: Gloria Anzaldúa’s ‘speaking in tongues: A letter to 3rd world women writers. Southern Communication Journal, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949609373035
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). La representación de la realidad. Paidos.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramiro Beltran, L. (1976). Alien premises, objects, and methods in Latin American Communication research. Communication Research, 3(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R’boul, H. (2020). Postcolonial interventions in intercultural communication knowledge: Meta-intercultural ontologies, decolonial knowledges, and epistemological polylogue. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1829676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincón, O., & Marroquín, A. (2019). The Latin American lo popular as a theory of communication. In H. C. Stephansen, & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice: Currents, connections, challenges (pp. 42–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Cusicanqui, S. (2010). Ch'ixinakax utxiwa. Una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores. Tinta limón.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo-Mendizábal, I. (2018). Análisis del discurso en Latinoamérica: un estado de arte. Chasqui, 139, 15–66.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, S. (2013). Rhetoric in Latin America. In P. Simonson, J. Peck, R. T. Craig, & J. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of communication history (pp. 397–411). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romney, A. (2013). By ‘inevitable association’: Latin American modernist anti-rhetoric and the inescapable figure of the rhetorician. Revista Latinoamericana de Retórica, 1, 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Romney, A. (2015). Rhetoric from the margins: Juan francisco manzano’s autobiografia de un escalvo. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1032855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1990). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. (2006). Renovar la teoría crítica y reinventar la emancipación social. CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sloop, J. M., & Ono, K. A. (2002). Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto Vega, K., & Chávez, K. (2018). Latinx rhetoric and intersectionality in racial rhetorical criticism. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1533642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowards, S. (2010). Rhetorical agency as haciendo caras and differential consciousness through lens of gender, race, ethnicity, and class: An examination of Dolores Huerta’s rhetoric. Communication Theory, 20(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Haspel, K. (2002). Language and social interaction: Its institutional identity, intellectual landscape, and discipline-shifting agenda. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 788–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigo, A. (2004). General introduction. In A. D. Sarto, A. Ríos, & A. Trigo (Eds.), The Latin American cultural studies reader (pp. 1–14). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., Marroquín, L., & Angel, A. (2018). In search of a Latin American approach to organizational communication: A critical review of scholarship. Communication Theory, 28(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verón, E. (1967). Mensajes y señales. Seix Barral.
   Google Scholar
• Verón, E. (1969). Lenguaje y comunicación social. Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Verón, E. (1987). La semiosis social. Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, A. (2015). Rhetoric in Argentina: An overview. Res Rhetorica, 11, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2014). United and fragmented: Communication and media studies in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Communication Research, 4, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2016). Communication studies without frontiers? Translation and cosmoplitanism across academic cultures. International Journal of Communication, 10, 868–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-Westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. (1996). Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2015). The New York Young Lords and the struggle for liberation. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2018). Decolonial rhetoric and a future yet-to-become: A loving response. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 21(3), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2018.1526551
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2019). Rhetoric’s rac(e/ist) problems. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1669068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarowsky, M. (2008). Entre París y Santiago de Chile: Circulación de ideas y redes intelectuales en la recepción de Armand Mattelart de la semiología y la problemática ideológica. Question, 1, 1–8.
   Google Scholar