Sliding wear behaviour of austempered ductile iron, boron steel and AISI 1045 steel of similar hardness: effect of microstructure, yield strength, and strain hardening

References

• Wang BL, Morris DS, Farshid S, et al. Rolling contact fatigue study of chilled and quenched/tempered ductile iron compared with AISI 1080 steel. Wear. 2021;478–479:203890, doi:10.1016/j.wear.2021.203890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenberg KR, Hayrynen KL. Agricultural applications of austempered ductile iron. Proc. 2002 World Conf: ADI; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Keough JR, Hayrynen KL, Popovski VM. Continuing developments in the science and application of austempered ductile iron (ADI). Monterrey, Mexico.: World Foundry Congr; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt RC, Eldoky LM, Chiou HS. Fracture of ductile cast irons with dual matrix structures. Trans Am Foundrymen’s Soc. 1986;94:645–656.
   Google Scholar
• Aranzabal J, Serramoglia G, Goria CA, et al. Development of a new mixed (ferritic-ausferritic) ductile iron for automotive suspension parts. Int J Cast Met Res ISSN. 2003;16:185–190. doi:10.1080/13640461.2003.11819580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilicli V, Erdogan M. Tensile properties of partially austenitised and austempered ductile irons with dual matrix structures. Mater Sci Technol. 2006;22:919–928. doi:10.1179/174328406X102390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilicli V, Erdogan M. The nature of the tensile fracture in austempered ductile iron with dual matrix microstructure. J Mater Eng Perform. 2010;19:142–149. doi:10.1007/s11665-009-9386-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley P, Kunding K, Spendelow H. Ferroalloys & alloying additives handbook, shieldalloy corp. Newfield (NJ): Metallurg Alloy Corp; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bhakat AK, Mishra AK, Mishra NS. Characterization of wear and metallurgical properties for development of agricultural grade steel suitable in specific soil conditions. Wear. 2007;263:228–233. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell J, Yousfi A, Lund M, et al. Abrasive wear behaviour of hardened high strength boron steel. Mater Surfaces Interfaces 2014;8:90–97. doi:10.1179/1751584X14Y.0000000068
   Google Scholar
• Bialobrzeska B, Kostencki P. Abrasive wear characteristics of selected low-alloy boron steels as measured in both field experiments and laboratory tests. Wear. 2015;149–159:149–159. doi:10.1016/J.WEAR.2015.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi I. A draught force estimator for disc harrow using the laws of classical soil mechanics. Biosyst Eng. 2018;171:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra U, Batra N, Sharma JD. Wear performance of Cu-alloyed austempered ductile iron. J Mater Eng Perform. 2013;22:1136–1142. doi:10.1007/s11665-012-0380-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrano OA, Gómez JA, Coronado JJ. The sliding wear behaviour of steels with the same hardness. Wear. 2019;201–207:201–207. doi:10.1016/J.WEAR.2018.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Bandstra JP, Koss DA. A simulation of growth and coalescence of voids during ductile fracture. Sci Eng A Complete. 2004: 399–403. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.092
   Google Scholar
• Du Y, Wang X, Zhang D, et al. A superior strength and sliding-wear resistance combination of ductile iron with nanobainitic matrix. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:1175–1183. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.104
   Google Scholar
• Batra U, Singh M, Sharma SK. Effect of austempering temperature on microstructure and tribological behaviour of hypoeutectic austempered ductile iron alloyed with copper. Mater Surfac Interfac. 2022. doi:10.1080/17515831.2022.2105990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez S, Hardell J, Courbon C, et al. High temperature friction and wear mechanism map for tool steel and boron steel tribopair. Tribol – Mater Surfac Interfac. 2014;8; doi:10.1179/1751584X13Y.0000000049
   Google Scholar
• Zdravecká E, Tkáčová J, Ondáč M. Effect of microstructure factors on abrasion resistance of high-strength steels. Agric Eng. 2014;60:115–120. doi:10.17221/20/2013-RAE
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Chang-Jun Z. An investigation of the role of secondary carbide in martensitic steel during three-body abrasion wear. Wear. 1994;176:103–109. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(94)90203-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourithis L, Papadimitriou G. Three body abrasion wear of low carbon steel modified surfaces. Wear. 2005;258:1775–1786. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2004.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachowiak GB, Stachowiak GW. The effects of particle characteristics on three-body abrasive wear. Wear. 2001;249:201–207. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00557-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axén N, Jacobson S, Hogmark S. Influence of hardness of the counterbody in three-body abrasive wear — an overlooked hardness effect. Tribol Int. 1994;27:233–241. doi:10.1016/0301-679X(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Zhou QD, Li YJ. An explanation of the relation between wear and material hardness in three-body abrasion. Wear. 1991;151:313–321. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(91)90258-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates JD. Two-body and three-body abrasion: a critical discussion. Wear. 1998;214:139–146. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00188-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrabě P, Müller M, Hadač V. Evaluation of techniques for ploughshare lifetime increase. Agric Eng. 2015;61:72–79. doi:10.17221/73/2013-RAE
   Google Scholar
• Natsis A, Papadakis G, Pitsilis J. The influence of soil type, soil water and share sharpness of a mouldboard plough on energy consumption, rate of work and tillage quality. J Agric Eng Res. 1999;72:171–176. doi:10.1006/jaer.1998.0360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• wei Yi D, pu Shi Y, guang Fu H, et al. Microstructures and erosion-corrosion behavior of Fe-B alloy containing chromium and nickel. China Foundry. 2019;16:307–312. doi:10.1007/s41230-019-9007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daber S, Rao PP. Formation of strain-induced martensite in austempered ductile iron. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:357–367. doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2258-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Soria S, Gan W, et al. Multi-scale phase analyses of strain-induced martensite in austempered ductile iron (ADI) using neutron diffraction and transmission techniques. J Mater Sci. 2021;56:5296–5306. doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05619-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarassov SY, Kolubaev AV. Effect of friction on subsurface layer microstructure in austenitic and martensitic steels. Wear. 1999;231:228–234. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00107-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan CQ, Peng Z, Zhou XC, et al. The characterization of wear transitions in sliding wear process contaminated with silica and iron powder. Tribol Int. 2005;38:129–143. doi:10.1016/J.TRIBOINT.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira MM, Costa HL, Silva WM, et al. Effect of iron oxide debris on the reciprocating sliding wear of tool steels. Wear. 2019;1065–1075:1065–1075. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2018.12.047
   Google Scholar
• Singh J, Alpas AT. Dry sliding wear mechanisms in a Ti50Ni47Fe3 intermetallic alloy. Wear. 1995;302–311:302–311. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(95)90037-3
   Google Scholar
• Gopinath K, Rayudu GVN, Narayanamurthi RG. Friction and wear of sintered iron. Wear. 1977;42:245–250. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(77)90055-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leheup ER, Deen Z, Moon JR. The effect of density on fretting wear of sintered iron. Wear. 1994;176:111–119. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(94)90204-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaphilippou C, Vardavoulias M, Jeandin M. The influence of humidity and the role of debris in the unlubricated wear of ductile cast iron against alumina. Wear. 1994;177:151–157. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(94)90240-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurricks PL. The mechanism of fretting — a review. Wear. 1970;15:389–409. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(70)90235-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell J, Hernandez S, Mozgovoy S, et al. Effect of oxide layers and near surface transformations on friction and wear during tool steel and boron steel interaction at high temperatures. Wear. 2015;223–229:223–229. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.040
   Google Scholar