Facing the climate change conundrum at the South Pole: actors’ perspectives on the implications of global warming for Chilean Antarctic governance

References

• Antarctic Treaty 1959. Accessed on the internet at http://www.ats.aq/documents/ats/treaty_original.pdf on 28 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Avango D. 2016. acting artifacts: on the meanings of material culture in Antarctica. In P. Roberts et al. (eds.): Antarctica and the humanities. Pp. 159–10. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barticevic E. 2014. INACH: boosting Chilean national Antarctic science for 50 years. In R. Canales. (ed.): Ilaia. Advances in Chilean Antarctic science. Pp. 35–37. Punta Arenas: La Prensa Austral.
   Google Scholar
• Beck U. 2010. Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society 27, 254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeby C.D. 1991. The Antarctic Treaty System: goals, performance and impact. In A. Jørgensen-Dahl et al. (eds.): The Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. Pp. 4–21. London: Macmillan/Frijtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman P. 2010. Common interests in the international space of Antarctica. Polar Record 46, 7–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson E. & Huang J. 2013. Antarctica and climate change. In R.S. Abate et al. (eds.): Ocean and coastal law in the climate change context: domestic and international regulatory challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi S. 2012. The Antarctic ‘climate security’ dilemma and the future of Antarctic governance. In A.D. Hemmings et al. (eds.): Antarctic security in the twenty-first century: legal and policy perspectives. Pp. 257–281. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clary D. & Winther J. 2010. Report on implications of climate change for Antarctic management and governance. Co-chairs’ executive summary with advice for actions. Paper presented at XXXIII Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, ATCM 4, CEP 9a, 9 April 2010, Svolvaer, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen H. 2011. Public participation in Antarctica: the role of non-governmental and intergovernmental organizations. In P.A. Berkman et al. (eds.): Science diplomacy. Antarctica, science, and the governance of international spaces. Pp. 271–277. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comba D. 2013. An analysis of the impacts of climate change for management and governance of the Antarctic region. In W. Leal Filho. (ed.): Climate change and disaster risk management. Pp. 311–320. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo de Política Antártica 2014. Plan Estratégico Antártico 2015-19. (Antarctic Strategic Plan 2015-19.) Punta Arenas: Antarctic Policy Council.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo de Política Antártica 2017. Política Antártica Nacional 2017. (National Antarctic Policy.) Santiago: Antarctic Policy Council. Accessed on the internet at http://www.minrel.gob.cl/minrel/site/artic/20121010/asocfile/20121010172919/pol__tica_ant__rtica_nacional_2017.pdf on 20 May 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Davis R.A. 2014. The durability of the ‘Antarctic Model’ and Southern Ocean governance. In T. Stephen & D. Vander-Zwaag (eds.): Polar oceans governance in an era of environmental change. Pp. 287–307. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz T., Ostrom E. & Stern P.C. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel K. & Saleska S. 2005. Subglobal regulation of the global commons: the case of climate change. Ecology Law Quarterly 32, 183–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg E. 2012. Antarctica as cultural critique: the gendered politics of scientific exploration and climate change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern B.S., Walbridge S., Selkoe K.A., Kappel C.V., Micheli F., d’Agrosa C., Bruno J., Casey K., Ebert C., Fox H., Fujita R., Heinemann D., Lenihan H., Madin E., Perry M., Selig E., Spalding M., Steneck R. & Watson R. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare W., Stockwell C., Flachsland C. & Oberthür C. 2010. The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective. Climate Policy 10, 600–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison K. & Sundstrom L.M. 2010. Global commons, domestic decisions: the comparative politics of climate change. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings A. 2007. Globalisation’s cold genius and the ending of Antarctic isolation. In L. Kriwoken et al. (eds.): Looking south: Australia’s Antarctic agenda. Pp. 176–191. Sidney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings A. 2017a. Antarctic politics in a transforming global geopolitics. In K. Dodds et al. (eds.): Handbook on the politics of Antarctica. Pp. 507–522. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings A. 2017b. The hollowing of Antarctic governance. In P. Goel et al. (eds.): Science and geopolitics of the white world: Arctic–Antarctic–Himalaya. Pp. 17–31. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings A., Rothwell D. & Scott K. 2012. Antarctic security in the twenty-first century: legal and policy perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herber B. 2007. Protecting the Antarctic commons: problems of economic efficiency. Tucson: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegh-Guldberg O. & Bruno J.F. 2010. The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328, 1523–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner C. 2011. Potential challenges to the Antarctic Treaty. In P. Berkman et al. (eds.): Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science, and the governance of international spaces. Pp. 97–102. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers M., Liggett D. & Amelung B. 2012. Strategic challenges of tourism development and governance in Antarctica: taking stock and moving forward. Polar Research 31, article no. 17219, doi: 10.3402/polar.v31i0.17219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long N. 2001. Development sociology: actor perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam S. & Tisdell E. 2015. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. 2016. Statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Chile, Heraldo Muñoz at the Opening Ceremony of the XXXIX Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Accessed on the internet at http://atcm39chile.gov.cl/2016/05/statement-by-the-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-chile-heraldo-munoz-at-the-opening-ceremony-of-the-xxxix-antarctic-treaty-consultative-meeting/ on 1 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. 2008. Plan de acción nacional de cambio climático 2008-2012 (PANCC). (National climate change action plan, 2008-2012 [PANCC].) Accessed on the internet at http://www.mma.gob.cl/1304/w3-article-54787.html on 10 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Molitor M. 2001. Sobre la hermenéutica colectiva. (On collective hermeneutics.) Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales 5, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Neimanis A., Åsberg C. & Hedrén J. 2015. Four problems, four directions for environmental humanities: toward critical posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Ethics & the Environment 20, 67–97.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly J. 2017. The technocratic Antarctic: an ethnography of scientific expertise and environmental governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola J. 2011. Climate change: the ultimate ‘Tragedy of the Commons’? In D.H. Cole & E. Ostrom (eds.): Property in land and other resources. Pp. 417–434. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pertierra L.R., Hughes K.A., Benayas J., Justel A. & Quesada A. 2013. Environmental management of a scientific field camp in maritime Antarctica: reconciling research impacts with conservation goals in remote ice-free areas. Antarctic Science 25, 307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roura R. & Bastmeijer K. 2007. Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica. In K. Bastmeijer (ed.): Theory and practice of transboundary environmental impact assessment. Pp. 175–219. Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar J. 2015. Anticipating Antarctica in the 21st century: a view from the social sciences. In R. Canales (ed.): Ilaia. Advances in Chilean Antarctic science. Pp. 36–39. Punta Arenas: La Prensa Austral.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar J.F. 2017. Speculative fabulation: researching worlds to come in Antarctica. In J.F. Salazar et al. (eds.): Anthropologies and futures: researching emerging and uncertain worlds. Pp. 151–170. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Shadian J. & Tennberg M. 2009. Legacies and change in polar science: historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Surrey: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke O. & Vidas D. 1996. Governing the Antarctic: the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tin T., Liggett D., Maher P. & Lamers M. 2014. Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Treml E.A., Fidelman P.I.J., Kininmonth S., Ekstrom J.A. & Bodin Ö. 2015. Analyzing the (mis)fit between the institutional and ecological networks of the Indo-West Pacific. Global Environmental Change 31, 263–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidas D. 2000. Implementing the environmental protection regime for the Antarctic. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler J. 2012. Global commons revisited. Global Policy 3, 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmann D. 2016. The polar regions as “barometers” in the Anthropocene: towards a new significance of non-state actors in international cooperation? The Polar Journal 6, 379–397.
   Google Scholar
• Woehler E., Ainley D. & Jabour J. 2014. Human impacts to Antarctic wildlife: predictions and speculations for 2060. In T. Tin et al. (eds.): Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. Pp. 27–60. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young O. 1999. The interplay of global and polar regimes. Polar Research 18, 397–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young O. 2016. Governing the antipodes: international cooperation in Antarctica and the Arctic. Polar Record 52, 230–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarankin A. & Salerno A.M. 2014. The “wild” continent? Some discussions on the Anthropocene in Antarctica. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1, 75–134.
   Google Scholar