Exploring Autonomy as a Design Principle: Theoretical Review of Autonomy and Case Studies of Service Design for Seniors

References

• Arcury, Thomas, Joanne Sandberg, Kathryn Melius, Sara Quandt, Xiaoyan Leng, Celine Latulipe, David Miller, Jr., Alden Smith, and Alain Bertoni. 2020. “Older Adult Internet Use and eHealth Literacy.” Journal of Applied Gerontology 39 (2): 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818807468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, Anthony, Brian Flay, Dennis Embry, and Irwin Sandler. 2012. “The Critical Role of Nurturing Environments for Promoting Human Well-Being.” The American Psychologist 67 (4): 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisset, Fergus, and Dan Lockton. 2010. “Designing Motivation or Motivating Design? Exploring Service Design, Motivation and Behavioural Change.” Touchpoint: The Journal of Service Design 2 (1): 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, Rafael, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. “Autonomy in Technology Design.” In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 37–40. New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2560468
   Google Scholar
• Childress, James, and Tom Beauchamp. 1994. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collopy, Bart. 1988. “Autonomy in Long Term Care: Some Crucial Distinctions.” The Gerontologist 28 (suppl): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/28.suppl.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, Laura. 2015. “Philosophical Inclusive Design: Intellectual Disability and the Limits of Individual Autonomy in Moral and Political Theory.” Hypatia 30 (1): 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, Ewart J., Richard Pak, and Tyler H. Shaw. 2018. “From Automation to Autonomy: The Importance of Trust Repair in Human–Machine Interaction.” Ergonomics 61 (10): 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward, and Richard Ryan. 2008. “Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health.” Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 49 (3): 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion.” Acta politica 40 (3): 284–298.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. 2009. “Creating Persuasive Technologies: An Eight-Step Design Process.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont, CA, USA, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Batya. 1996. “Value-Sensitive Design.” Interactions 3 (6): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Marilyn A. 1986. “Autonomy and the Split-Level Self.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemes, Ken, and Simon May, eds. 2009. Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, Christian. 1990. Service Management and Marketing. Vol. 94. Lexington, MA: Lexington books.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, Martha, Mark Waymack, and Jennifer Parks. 2010. Ethics, Aging, and Society: The Critical Turn. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Michael, and John Bateson. 1991. “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience.” Journal of Consumer Research 18 (2): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1086/209250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Bruce. 2016. “Reconceptualizing Autonomy: A Relational Turn in Bioethics.” The Hastings Center Report 46 (3): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamii, Constance. 1984. “Autonomy: The Aim of Education Envisioned by Piaget.” The Phi Delta Kappan 65 (6): 410–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1785/1998. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpen, Ingo Oswald, Gerda Gemser, and Giulia Calabretta. 2017. “A Multilevel Consideration of Service Design Conditions: Towards a Portfolio of Organisational Capabilities, Interactive Practices and Individual Abilities.” Journal of Service Theory and Practice 27 (2): 384–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2015-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Miso. 2018. “Designing for Participation: Dignity and Autonomy of Service (Part 2).” Design Issues 34 (3): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, Robert, and Stephen Vargo. 2014. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar, eds. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moller, Arlen, and Edward Deci. 2010. “Interpersonal Control, Dehumanization, and Violence: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 13 (1): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209350318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Kathy, Adeline Cooney, and Dympna Casey. 2014. “Improving the Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Term Care Settings.” Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 3 (3): 301–315. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orem, Dorothea. 2001. Nursing: Concepts of Practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Penin, Lara, and Cameron Tonkinwise. 2009. “The Politics and Theatre of Service Design.” The 3rd International Association of Societies of Design Research World Conference (IASDR), Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Molly, Mary Ball, Frank Whittington, and Carole Hollingsworth. 2012. “Relational Autonomy in Assisted Living: A Focus on Diverse Care Settings for Older Adults.” Journal of Aging Studies 26 (2): 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poor, Tony, and Miso Kim. 2011. “Understanding Perceived Control: Principles & a Framework for Service Designers.” The 4th International Association of Societies of Design Research World Conference (IASDR), Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, Julian. 1966. “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762/2018. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard, and Edward Deci. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” The American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, Toni. 2018. “The History of Autonomy in Medicine from Antiquity to Principlism.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 21 (1): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9781-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Jamie, and Aqueasha Martin-Hammond. 2019. “Exploring Autonomy in the Design of an Intelligent Health Assistant for Older Adults.” In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces: Companion, Marina del Ray, CA, USA, 95–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308557.3308713
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, Alexander. 2020. “The Digital Exclusion of Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 63 (6-7): 674–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1764687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin, Susan, and Meghan Winsby. 2011. “A Relational Perspective on Autonomy for Older Adults Residing in Nursing Homes.” Health Expectations 14 (2): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00638.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorska-Simmons, Elzbieta, and James Wright. 2007. “Determinants of Resident Autonomy in Assisted Living Facilities: A Review of the Literature.” Care Management Journals 8 (4): 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1891/152109807782590646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steen, Marc, Menno Manschot, and Nicole De Koning. 2011. “Benefits of Co-Design in Service Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 5 (2): 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickdorn, Mark, and Jacob Schneider. 2011. This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• The Nuremberg Code. 1949. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under control council law 10: 181–182.
   Google Scholar
• Trischler, Jakob, Simon Pervan, Stephen Kelly, and Don Scott. 2018. “The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams.” Journal of Service Research 21 (1): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517714060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2020. “World Population. Ageing 2020 Highlights.” United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd-2020_world_population_ageing_highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Will, Jonathan. 2011. “A Brief Historical and Theoretical Perspective on Patient Autonomy and Medical Decision Making.” Chest 139 (3): 669–673. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar