Nesting and data assimilation considerations in regional operational ocean forecasting

References

• Amo A, Reffray G, Sotillo MG, Aznar R, Guihou K. 2021. Atlantic -Iberian Biscay Irish- Ocean Physics Analysis and Forecast Product: IBI_ANALYSISFORECA ST_PHY_005_001. Product user manual, Issue 7.1, Copernicus Marine Service. https://catalogue.marine.copernicus.eu/documents/PUM/CMEMS-IBI-PUM-005-001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barron CN, Kara AB, Martin PJ, Rhodes RC, Smedstad LF. 2006. Formulation, implementation and examination of vertical coordinate choices in the global navy coastal ocean model (NCOM). Ocean Modelling. 11(3-4):347–375. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron CN, Smedstad LF, Dastugue JM, Smedstad OM. 2007. Evaluation of ocean models using observed and simulated drifter trajectories: impact of sea surface height on synthetic profiles for data assimilation. JGR. 12. doi:10.1029/2006JC003982.
   Google Scholar
• Barth A, Azcarate AA, Rixen M, Beckers JM. 2005. Two-way nested model of mesoscale circulation features in the Ligurian Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 66:171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayo E, Debreu L. 2005. Revisiting open boundary conditions from the point of view of characteristic variables. Ocean Model. 9:231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett W, Harper S, Preller R, Jacobs G, LaCroix K. 2014. Overview of operational ocean forecasting in the US navy: past, present, and future. Oceanography. 27(3):24–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24862186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao Y, Li Z, Farrara J, McWilliams JC, Bellingham J, Capet X, Chavez F, Choi J-K, Davis R, Doyle J, et al. 2009. Development, implementation and evaluation of a data-assimilative ocean forecasting system off the central California coast. Deep-Sea Research II. 56:100–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassignet EP, Hurlburt HE, Smedstad OM, Halliwell GR, Hogan PJ, Wallcraft AJ, Baraille R, Bleck R. 2007. The HYCOM (HYbrid coordinate ocean model) data assimilative system. J. Mar. Syst. 65:60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker R, Maksymczuk J, Mittermaier M, Tonani M, Pequignet C. 2020. An approach to the verification of high-resolution ocean models using spatial methods. Ocean Sci. 16:831–845. doi:10.5194/os-16-831-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings J. 2005. Operational multivariate ocean data assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131:3583–3604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings JA, Smedstad OM. 2013. Variational data assimilation for the global ocean. data assimilation for atmospheric. Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications. II chapter 13:303–343.
   Google Scholar
• Denis B, Laprise R, Caya D, Côté J. 2002. Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models:the Big-brother experiment. Clim Dyn. 18:627–646. doi 10.1007/s00382-001-0201-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desamsetti S, Dasari HP, Langodan S, Titi ES, Knio O, Hoteit I. 2019. Efficient dynamical downscaling of general circulation models using continuous data assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 145:3175–3194. doi:10.1002/qj.3612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox DN, Teague WJ, Barron CN, Carnes MR, Lee CM. 2002. The modular ocean data assimilation system (MODAS). Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technoloy. 19:240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofa F, Boucouvala D, Louka P, Flocas HA. 2018. Spatial verification approaches as a tool to evaluate the performance of high resolution precipitation forecasts. Atmos Res. 208:78–87. ISSN 0169-8095 doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helber RW, Townsend TL, Barron CN, Dastugue JM, Carnes MR. 2013. Validation Test Report for the Improved Synthetic Ocean Profile (ISOP) System, Part I: Synthetic Profile Methods and Algorithm. NRL Memo. Report, NRL/MR/7320—13-9364.
   Google Scholar
• Hirose N, Usui N, Sakamoto K, et al. 2019. Development of a new operational system for monitoring and forecasting coastal and open-ocean states around Japan. Ocean Dyn. 69:1333–1357. doi:10.1007/s10236-019-01306-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara AB, Barron CN, Martin PJ, Smedstad LF, Rhodes RC. 2006. Validation of interannual simulations from the 1/8° global navy coastal ocean model (NCOM). Ocean Modelling. 11(3-4):376–398. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc AC, Rawlins F. 2005. Why does 4D-Var beat 3D-Var? Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131:3247–3257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin PJ. 2000. Description of the Navy Coastal Ocean Model Version 1.0. NRL/FR/7322–00-9962.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger EJ, Helber RW, Hogan PJ, Posey PG, Thoppil PG, Townsend TL, Wallcraft AJ, Smedstad OM, Franklin DS. 2017. Global Ocean Forecast System 3.1 Validation Testing NRL Report NRL/MR/7320–17-9722.
   Google Scholar
• Ngodock H, Carrier M. 2014a.A 4dVar system for the navy coastal ocean model. part I: system description and assimilation of synthetic observations in Monterey Bay. Mon. Wea. Rev. 142(6):2085–2107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa S, Wakamatsu T, Ishizaki H, Sakamoto K, Tanaka Y, Tsujino H, Yamanaka G, Kamach M, Ishikawa Y. 2021. Development of high-resolution future ocean regional projection datasets for coastal applications in Japan. Prog Earth Planet Sci. 8:7. doi:10.1186/s40645-020-00399-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dea EJ, Arnold AK, Edwards KP, Furner R, Hyder P, Martin MJ, Siddorn JR, Storkey D, While J, Holt JT, Liu H. 2012. An operational ocean forecast system incorporating NEMO and SST data assimilation for the tidally driven European north-west shelf. Journal of Operational Oceanography. 5(1):3–17. doi:10.1080/1755876X.2012.11020128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham VS, Hwang JH, Ku H. 2016. Optimizing dynamic downscaling in one-way nesting using a regional ocean model. Ocean Modelling. 106:104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemmich D, Boebel O, Freeland H, King B, LeTraon P-Y, Molinari R, Owens WB, Riser S, Send U, Takeuchi K, Susan Wijffels S. 2014. On the design and implementation of Argo. Source https://argo.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/361/2020/05/argo-design.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rossa A, Nurmi P, Ebert E. 2008. Overview of methods for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts. In: Michaelides S., editor. Precipitation: advances in measurement, estimation and prediction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 419–452. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77655-0_16.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro GI, Gonzalez-Ondina JM. 2022. An efficient method for nested high-resolution ocean modelling incorporating a data assimilation technique. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 10(3):432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spall MA, Holland WR. 1991. A nested primitive equation model of oceanic application. J Phys Oceanogr. 21:205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui N, Fujii Y, Sakamoto K, Kamachi M. 2015. Development of a four-dimensional variational assimilation system toward coastal data assimilation around Japan. Mon. Wea. Rev. 143:3874–3892. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00326.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbulcke L, Barth A, Rixen M, Alvera-Azcarate A, Ben Bouallegue Z, Beckers JM. 2006. Study of the combined effects of data assimilation and grid nesting in ocean models - application to the Gulf of Lions. Ocean Sci. 2:213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar