Effect of corn shredlage on feed intake, rumen fermentation, and lactation performance of dairy cows fed a low-fibre diet

References

• AOAC International 2000. Official methods of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemists. 17th ed. Washington (DC): AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC International 2005. Official methods of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemists. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Powell JM, Aguerre MJ, Crump PM, Wattiaux MA. 2015. Feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows: repeatability, variation in digestion and metabolism of energy and nitrogen, and ruminal methanogens. J Dairy Sci. 98(6):3938–3950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach A, Joulie I, Chevaux E, Elcoso G, Ragués J. 2021. Milk performance and rumen microbiome of dairy cows as affected by the inclusion of corn silage or corn shredlage in a total mixed ration. Animal. 15(1):100014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA. 2018. Invited review: current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101(6):4762–4784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Yang WZ, Rode LM. 2003. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 86(2):630–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke KM, Bernard JK. 2005. Effect of length of cut and kernel processing on use of corn silage by lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 88(1):310–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretto LF, Shaver RD. 2012. Effect of Corn Shredlage on lactation performance and total tract starch digestibility by dairy cows. Prof. Anim. Sci. 28(6):639–647.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraretto LF, Shaver RD, Luck BD. 2018. Silage review: recent advances and future technologies for whole-plant and fractionated corn silage harvesting. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):3937–3951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filípek J, Dvořák R. 2009. Determination of the volatile fatty acid content in the rumen liquid: comparison of gas chromatography and capillary isotachophoresis. Acta Vet Brno. 78(4):627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 1997. International Standard, ISO 10520. Native Starch - Determination of Starch Content - Ewers Polarimetric Method. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jančík F, Kubelková P, Loučka R, Jambor V, Kumprechtová D, Homolka P, Koukolová V, Tyrolová Y, Výborná A. 2022. Shredlage processing affects the digestibility of maize silage. Agronomy. 12(5):1164.
   Google Scholar
• Khan NA, Yu P, Ali M, Cone JW, Hendriks WH. 2015. Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality. J Sci Food Agric. 95(2):238–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononoff PJ, Heinrichs AJ, Lehman HA. 2003. The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 86(10):3343–3353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause KM, Combs DK, Beauchemin KA. 2002. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows. I. Milk production and diet digestibility. J Dairy Sci. 85(8):1936–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause KM, Oetzel GR. 2006. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 126(3-4):215–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 80(7):1463–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int. 85(6):1217–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesgaran SD, Kuhla B, Dineen M, Silberberg M. 2020. Ruminal pH. In: Mesgaran SD, Baumont R, Munksgaard L, Humphries D, Kennedy E, Dijkstra J, Dewhurst R, Ferguson H, Terré M, Kuhla B, editors. Methods in cattle physiology and behaviour – Recommendations from the SmartCow consortium. Cologne: PUBLISSO.
   Google Scholar
• Muizelaar W, Bani P, Kuhla B, Larsen M, Tapio I, Yáñez-Ruiz D, van Gastelen S. 2020. Rumen fluid sampling via oral stomach tubing method. In: Mesgaran SD, Baumont R, Munksgaard L, Humphries D, Kennedy E, Dijkstra J, Dewhurst R, Ferguson H, Terré M, Kuhla B, editors. Methods in cattle physiology and behaviour – Recommendations from the SmartCow consortium. Cologne: PUBLISSO.
   Google Scholar
• NRC 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Salvati GGS, Santos WP, Silveira JM, Gritti VC, Arthur BV, Salvo PR, Fachin L, Ribeiro AP, Júnior NNM, Ferraretto LF, et al. 2021. Effect of kernel processing and particle size of whole-plant corn silage with vitreous endosperm on dairy cow performance. J Dairy Sci. 104(2):1794–1810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaunja LO, Baevre L, Junkkarinen L, Pedersen J, Setälä J. 1991. A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. Proc. 27th Session of International Committee for Recording Productivity of Milk Animals (ICRPMA), p. 156–157.
   Google Scholar
• Spurlock DM, Dekkers JCM, Fernando R, Koltes DA, Wolc A. 2012. Genetic parameters for energy balance, feed efficiency, and related traits in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 95(9):5393–5402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderwerff LM, Ferraretto LF, Shaver RD. 2015. Brown midrib corn shredlage in diets for high-producing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 98(8):5642–5652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherburn MW. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem. 39(8):971–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White RR, Hall MB, Firkins JL, Kononoff PJ. 2017. Physically adjusted neutral detergent fiber system for lactating dairy cow rations. I: deriving equations that identify factors that influence effectiveness of fiber. J Dairy Sci. 100(12):9551–9568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. 2006. Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89(7):2618–2633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebeli Q, Aschenbach JR, Tafaj M, Boguhn J, Ametaj BN, Drochner W. 2012. Invited review: role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 95(3):1041–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Steingass H, Metzler B, Drochner W. 2006. Effects of physically effective fiber on digestive processes and milk fat content in early lactating dairy cows fed total mixed rations. J Dairy Sci. 89(2):651–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar