4,043
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Livestock Systems, Management and Environment

Recalculating the global warming impact of italian livestock methane emissions with new metrics

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 125-135 | Received 14 Nov 2022, Accepted 06 Jan 2023, Published online: 27 Jan 2023

References

  • Allen MR, Fuglestvedt JS, Shine KP, Reisinger A, Pierrehumbert RT, Forster PM. 2016. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat Clim Change. 6(8):773–776.
  • Allen MR, Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Millar RJ, Cain M, Frame DJ, Macey AH. 2018. A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 1(1):1–8.
  • Cady R. 2020. A literature review of GWP*: a proposed method for estimating Global Warming Potential (GWP*) of short-lived climate pollutants like methane.
  • Cain M, Lynch J, Allen MR, Fuglestvedt JS, Frame DJ, Macey AH. 2019. Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 2(1):1–7.
  • Collins WJ, Frame DJ, Fuglestvedt JS, Shine KP. 2020. Stable climate metrics for emissions of short and long-lived species—combining steps and pulses. Environ Res Lett. 15(2):024018.
  • Del Prado A, Manzano P, Pardo G. 2021. The role of the European small ruminant dairy sector in stabilising global temperatures: lessons from GWP* warming-equivalent emission metrics. J Dairy Res. 88(1):8–15.
  • FAO 2022. Methane Emissions in Livestock and Rice Systems – Sources, quantification, mitigation and metrics (Draft for public review). Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership. Rome: FAO.
  • Forster P, Storelvmo T, Armour K, Collins W, Dufresne JL, Frame D, Lunt DJ, Mauritsen T, Palmer MD, Watanabe M, et al. 2021. The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B, editors. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 923–1054.
  • Froldi F, Lamastra L, Trevisan M, Mambretti D, Moschini M. 2022. Environmental impacts of cow’s milk in Northern Italy: effects of farming performance. J Clean Prod. 363:132600.
  • Hörtenhuber SJ, Seiringer M, Theurl MC, Größbacher V, Piringer G, Kral I, Zollitsch WJ. 2022. Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: a national case study. Animal. 16(10):100638.
  • IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1990. Climate change: the intergovernmental panel on climate change scientific assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2019. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories - Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other land Use – Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC
  • IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B, editors. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 2391.
  • Italian National Institute of Statistics [ISTAT]. 2021. I.Stat - Statistiche ISTAT; [accessed 2022 November]. https://www.istat.it/it/dati-analisi-e-prodotti/statistiche-a-z:-parole-chiave.
  • Italian National Institute for environmental protection and research- Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale [ISPRA]. 2022. [accessed 2022 November]. http://emissioni.sina.isprambiente.it/serie-storiche-emissioni/.
  • Liu S, Proudman J, Mitloehner FM. 2021. Rethinking methane from animal agriculture. CABI Agric Biosci. 2(1):1–13.
  • Meinshausen M, Nicholls Z. 2022. GWP* is a model, not a metric. Environ. Res. Lett. 17(4):041002.
  • Place SE, Mitloehner FM. 2021. Pathway to climate neutrality for U.S. beef and dairy cattle Production. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk7876/files/inline. files/CLEAR%20Center%20Climate%20Neutrality%20White%20Paper_2.pdf
  • Rogelj J, Schleussner CF. 2019. Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level. Environ Res Lett. 14(11):114039.
  • Romano D, Arcarese C, Bernetti A, Caputo A, Cordella M, De Lauretis R, Di Cristofaro E, Gagna A, Gonella B, Moricci F, et al. 2021. Italian greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2019. National Inventory Report. ISPRA.
  • Saunois M, Stavert AR, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, Raymond PA, Dlugokencky EJ, Houweling S, Patra PK, et al. 2020. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst Sci Data. 12(3):1561–1623.
  • Schleussner CF, Nauels A, Schaeffer M, Hare W, Rogelj J. 2019. Inconsistencies when applying novel metrics for emissions accounting to the Paris agreement. Environ. Res. Lett. 14(12):124055.
  • Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N. 2005. Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Change. 68(3):281–302.
  • Smith MA, Cain M, Allen MR. 2021. Further improvement of warming-equivalent emissions calculation. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 4(1):1–3.