Pig production systems and related effects on pre-slaughter animal welfare and meat quality

References

• Abbott TA, Hunter EJ, Guise HJ, Penny RHC. 1997. The effect of experience of handling on pigs’ willingness to move. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 54(4):371–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboagye G, Dall’Olio S, Tassone F, Zappaterra M, Carpino S, Nanni Costa L. 2018. Apulo-Calabrese and crossbreed pigs show different physiological response and meat quality traits after short distance transport. Animals. 8(10):177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluwé M, Heyrman E, Almeida J, Babol J, Battacone G, Čítek J, Font I Furnols M, Getya A, Karolyi D, Kostyra E, et al. 2020. Exploratory survey on European consumer and stakeholder attitudes towards alternatives for surgical castration of piglets. Animals. 10(10):1758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton-Gade P. 2008. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Animal. 2(8):1238–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorek N, Čandek-Potokar M, Bonneau M, van Milgen J. 2012. Meta-analysis of the effect of immunocastration on production performance, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds in pigs. Animal. 6(8):1330–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertol TM, Braña DV, Ellis M, Ritter MJ, Peterson BA, Mendoza OF, McKeith FK. 2011. Effect of feed withdrawal and dietary energy source on muscle glycolytic potential and blood acid-base responses to handling in slaughter-weight pigs. J Anim Sci. 89(5):1561–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaard BK, Boekhorst LJS, Oosting SJ, Sørensen JT. 2011. Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livest Sci. 140(1-3):189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SN, Knowles TG, Edwards JE, Warriss PD. 1999. Relationship between food deprivation before transport and aggression in pigs held in lairage before slaughter. Vet Rec. 145(22):630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Xin H, Gates RS. 2004. A literature review of swine heat production. Trans ASABE. 47:259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Čobanović N, Suvajdžić B, Vićić I, Vasilev D, Karabasil N. 2023. Prevalence of carcass lesions and their effects on welfare, carcass composition and meat quality in slaughtered pigs. Ann Anim Sci. 23[accessed 2023 February 27]: [(2):597–609. p.]. 10.2478/aoas-2022-0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa JA. 2011. Effect of farm handling and transport on physiological response, losses and meat quality of commercial pigs. Adv Pork Prod. 22:249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa OA, Dalla Costa FA, Feddern V, Dos Santos Lopes L, Coldebella A, Gregory NG, Monteiro de Lima GJM. 2019. Risk factors associated with pig pre-slaughtering losses. Meat Sci. 155:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa FA, Devillers N, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Faucitano L. 2016. Effects of applying preslaughter feed withdrawal at the abattoir on behaviour, blood parameters and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 119:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa OA, Faucitano L, Coldebella A, Ludke JV, Peloso JV, Dalla Roza D, Paranhos da Costa MR. 2007. Effects of the season of the year, truck type and location on truck on skin bruises and meat quality in pigs. Livest Sci. 107(1):29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa OA, Ludke JV, Coldebella A, Kich JD, Costa M, Faucitano L, Peloso JV, Dalla Roza D. 2009. [Effect of preslaughter handling on some physiological parameters in heavy gilts]. Cienc Rural. 39(3):852–858. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong IC, Prelle IT, van de Burgwal JA, Lambooij E, Korte SM, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. 2000. Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling and mixing at transport. Can J Anim Sci. 80(3):451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Roest K, Montanari C, Fowler T, Baltussen W. 2009. Resource efficiency and economic implications of alternatives to surgical castration without anaesthesia. Animal. 3(11):1522–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey C, Haley C, Widowski T, Poljak Z, Friendship R. 2009. Factors associated with in-transit losses of fattening pigs. Anim Welf. 18(4):355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokmanović M, Ivanović J, Janjić J, Bošković M, Laudanović M, Pantić S, Baltić MŽ. 2017. Effect of lairage time, behaviour and gender on stress and meat quality parameters in pigs. Anim Sci J. 88:500–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. Efsa J. 91:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis M, Bertol TM. 2001. Effects of slaughter weight on pork and fat quality. Proceedings of the 2nd International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality; Concordia, Brazil. p. 213–224. Embrapa Swine & Poultry, Concordia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Fàbrega E, Manteca X, Font J, Gispert M, Carrión D, Velarde A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre JR, Diestre A. 2002. Effects of halothane gene and pre-slaughter treatment on meat quality and welfare from two pig crosses. Meat Sci. 62(4):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fàbrega E, Marcet-Rius M, Vidal R, Escribano D, Cerón JJ, Manteca X, Velarde A. 2019. The effects of environmental enrichment on the physiology, behaviour, productivity and meat quality of pigs raised in a hot climate. Animals. 9(5):235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fàbrega E, Velarde A, Cros J, Gispert M, Suarez P, Tibau J, Soler J. 2010. Effect of vaccination against gonodotropingreleasing hormone, using Improvac, on growth performance, body composition, behaviour and acute phase proteins. Livest Sci. 132(1-3):53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucitano L. 2001. Causes of skin damages to pig carcasses. Can J Anim Sci. 81(1):39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucitano L. 2018. Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality. J Anim Sci. 96(2):728–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Chevillon P, Ellis M. 2010. Effects of feed withdrawal prior to slaughter and nutrition on stomach weight, and carcass and meat quality in pigs. Livest Sci. 127(2-3):110–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Conte S, Pomar C, Paiano D, Duan Y, Zhang P, Drouin G, Rina S, Guay F, Devillers N. 2020. Application of extended feed withdrawal time preslaughter and its effects on animal welfare and carcass and meat quality of enriched-housed pigs. Meat Sci. 167:108163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Goumon S. 2018. Transport to slaughter and associated handling. In: spînka M, editor. Advances in pig welfare. 1st ed. London, UK: Woodhead Publishing; p. 261–294.
   Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Martelli G, Nannoni E, Manteca X. 2022. Fundamentals of animal welfare in meat animals and consumer attitudes to animal welfare. In: Purslow P, editor. Meat quality aspects: from genes to ethics. 2nd ed. London, UK: Woodhead Publishing; p. 667–703.
   Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Raj M. 2022. Pigs. In: Faucitano L, editor. Preslaughter handling and slaughter of meat animals. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 179–230.
   Google Scholar
• Faucitano L, Saucier L, Correa JA, Méthot S, Giguère A, Foury A, Mormède P, Bergeron R. 2006. Effects of feed texture, meal frequency and pre-slaughter fasting on carcass and meat quality, and urinary cortisol in pigs. Meat Sci. 74(4):697–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete J, Castaing J, Lavorel O. Leuillet M. 1983. Utilisation de céréales dans les aliments simples pour porcelets sevrés. Comparaison des formes de présentation farine et granulés. Journées Rech. Porcine en France 15:363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald RF, Stalder KJ, Matthews JO, Schultz-Kaster CM, Johnson AK. 2009. Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir. J Anim Sci. 87(3):1156–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foury A, Lebret B, Chevillon P, Vautier A, Terlouw C, Mormede P. 2011. Alternative raising systems in pigs: consequences on stress indicators at slaughter and meat quality. Animal. 5(10):1620–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii J, Otsu K, Zorzato F, de Leon S, Khanna VK, Weiler JE, O'Brien PJ, MacLennan DH. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science. 253(5018):448–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geverink NA, De Jong IC, Lambooij E, Blokhuis HJ, Wiegant VM. 1999. Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Can J Anim Sci. 79(3):285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geverink NA, Kappers A, van de Burgwal JA, Lambooij E, Blokhuis HJ, Wiegant VM. 1998. Effects of regular moving and handling on the behavioral and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for subsequent meat quality. J Anim Sci. 76(8):2080–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gispert M, Faucitano L, Oliver MA, Guàrdia MD, Coll C, Siggens K, Harvey K, Diestre A. 2000. A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Sci. 55(1):97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gispert M, Font I Furnols M, Gil M, Velarde A, Diestre A, Carrión D, Sosnicki A, Plastow GS. 2007. Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types. Meat Sci. 77(3):397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gispert M, Oliver MA, Velarde A, Suárez P, Pérez J, Font I Furnols M. 2010. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs. Meat Sci. 85(4):664–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goumon S, Bergeron R, Faucitano L, Crowe T, Connor ML, Gonyou HW. 2013. Effect of previous ramp exposure and regular handling on heart rate, ease of handling and behaviour of near market-weight pigs during a simulated loading. Can J Anim Sci. 93(4):461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin TA. 1993. Introduction: effect of customer requirements, international standards and marketing structure on handling and transport of livestock and poultry. In: Grandin TA, editor. Livestock handling and transport. 1st ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin TA. 1994. Methods to reduce PSE and bloodsplash. Proceedings of the 21st Allen D. Leman Swine Conference; p. 206–209. Veterinary Outreach Programs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Gross S, Waldrop ME, Roosen J. 2021. How does animal welfare taste? Combining sensory and choice experiments to evaluate willingness to pay for animal welfare pork. Food Qual Pref. 87:104055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guatteo R, Levionnois O, Fournier D, Guémené D, Latouche K, Leterrier C, Mormède P, Prunier A, Servière J, Terlouw C, et al. 2012. Minimising pain in farm animals: the 3S approach - “Suppress, Substitute, Soothe. Animal. 6(8):1261–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay K, Salgado G, Thompson G, Backus B, Sapkota A, Chaya W, McGlone JJ. 2013. Behavior and handling of physically and immunologically castrated market pigs on farm and going to market. J Anim Sci. 91(11):5410–5417.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFIP 2022. The pig castration situation in the European Union. IFIP Institut du porc. https://www.pig333.com/authors/ifip-institut-du-porc_821/. [accessed 2022 January 28].
   Google Scholar
• Keith FK. 2009. Implications of using immunological technologies to control boar taint on growth, carcass quality and meat quality of finishing pigs. Proceedings of the Pfizer International Swine Symposium; Ottawa, Canada. p. 38–50. Pfizer Animal Health Canada, Kirkland, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kephart KB, Mills EW. 2005. Effect of withholding feed from swine before slaughter on carcass and viscera weights and meat quality. J Anim Sci. 83(3):715–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klont RE, Hulsegge B, Hoving-Bolink AH, Gerritzen MA, Kurt E, Winkelman-Goedhart HA, De Jong IC, Kranen RW. 2001. Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. J Anim Sci. 79(11):2835–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress K, Millet S, Labussière É, Weiler U, Stefanski V. 2019. Sustainability of pork production with immunocastration in Europe. Sustainability. 11(12):3335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebret B. 2008. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal. 2(10):1548–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebret B, Čandek-Potokar M. 2022. Review: pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat. Animal. 16:100402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebret B, Meunier-Salaun MC, Foury A, Mormede P, Dransfield E, Dourmad JY. 2006. Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. J Anim Sci. 84(9):2436–2447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebret B, Prunier A, Bonhomme N, Foury A, Mormède P, Dourmad JY. 2011. Physiological traits and meat quality of pigs as affected by genotype and housing system. Meat Sci. 88(1):14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepron É, Robert S, Faucitano L, Pomar C, Bernier JF, Bergeron R. 2003. Effect of genetic line on activity and ease of handling of growing pigs. Proceedings of the 37th Congress of the International Society of Animal Ethology (ISAE); Abano Terme, Italy. p. 218.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis CRG, Hulbert LE, McGlone JJ. 2008. Novelty causes elevated heart rate and immune changes in pigs exposed to handling, alleys, and ramps. Livest Sci. 116(1-3):338–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Gariépy C, Jin Y, Font I Furnols M, Fortin J, Rocha LM, Faucitano L. 2015. Effects of ractopamine administration and castration method on muscle fibre characteristics and sensory quality of the longissimus muscle in two Piétrain genotypes. Meat Sci. 102:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L-A, Xia D, Bao E-D, Wei S, Xiao J-S, Bao J-W, Chen W-H, Chen J, Hartung J, Zhao R-Q. 2008. Erhualian and Pietrain pigs exhibit distinct behavioral, endocrine and biochemical responses during transport. Livest Sci. 113(2-3):169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MAPA] Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento 2020. Decreto n° 9.013, de 29 de março de 2017, alterado pelo Decreto n° 10.468, de 18 de agosto de 2020. Regulamento da Inspeção Industrial e Sanitária de Produtos de Origem Animal. seção 1, Brasília: Diário Oficial da União. n. 159, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant-Forde JN, Lay C, Jr Pajor EA, Richert BT, Schinckel AP. 2003. The effects of ractopamine on the behaviour and physiology of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 81(2):416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merks JWM, Mathur PK, Knol EF. 2012. New phenotypes for new breeding goals in pigs. Animal. 6(4):535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin M, Berthiaume G, Rivest J, Cloutier L, Fortin F, Allard Y, Maignel L. 2015. Technical and economic study on heavier market pigs (140 kg). Poster session presented at the Banff Pork Seminar, Banff, Canada. http://www.cdpq.ca/getmedia/a35fbd26-e230-4c84-85ea-658f0be31a1f/Banff-MMorin.pdf.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Murray AC. 2001. Reducing losses from farm gate to packer: a Canadian perspective. Proceedings of the 1st International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality; p. 72–84. Embrapa Swine & Poultry, Concordia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• NFACC 2014. Code of practice for the care and handling of pigs. Ottawa, Canada: National Farm Animal Care Council. https://www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/pig_code_of_practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nonneman DJ, Brown-Brandl T, Jones SA, Wiedmann RT, Rohrer GA. 2012. A defect in dystrophin causes a novel porcine stress syndrome. BMC Genomics. 13:233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak BL, Young JM, Newman DJ, Johnson AK, Wagner SA. 2020. A ramp in nursery housing affects nursery pig behavior and speeds loading of market hogs. Appl Anim Sci. 36(4):574–581.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson V, Pickova J. 2005. The effects of production systems on meat quality, with emphasis on pork. Ambio. 34(4):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacelle W. 2014. Banned in 160 Nations, why is ractopamine in U.S. Pork? https://www.livescience.com/47032-time-for-us-to-ban-ractopamine.html
   Google Scholar
• Passafaro TL, Van De Stroet D, Bello NM, Williams NH, Rosa GJM. 2019. Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs. J Anim Sci. 97(5):2025–2034.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patience JF, Shand P, Pietrasik Z, Merrill J, Vessie G, Ross KA, Beaulieu AD. 2009. The effect of ractopamine supplementation at 5 ppm of swine finishing diets on growth performance, carcass composition and ultimate pork quality. Can J Anim Sci. 89(1):53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletto R, Meisel RL, Richert BT, Cheng HW, Marchant-Forde JN. 2010. Behavior and peripheral amine concentrations in relation to ractopamine feeding, gender and social rank of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 88(3):1184–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomar C, Remus A. 2019. Precision pig feeding: a breakthrough toward sustainability. Anim Front. 9(2):52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommier SA, Pomar C, Godbout D. 1998. Effect of the halothane genotype and stress on animal performance, carcass composition and meat quality of crossbred pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 78(3):257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid RL, Mills SC. 1962. Studies of carbohydrate metabolism metabolism of sheep. XVI: the adrenal response to physiological stress. Aust J Agric Res. 13(2):282–294.
   Google Scholar
• Renaudeau D, Gourdine J, St-Pierre N. 2011. A meta-analysis of the effects of high ambient temperature on growth performance of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 89(7):2220–2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter MJ, Ellis M, Hollis GR, McKeith FK, Orellana DG, Van Genugten P, Curtis SE, Schlipf JM. 2008. Frequency of the HAL-1843 mutation of the ryanodine receptor gene in dead and nonambulatory-noninjured pigs on arrival at the packing plant. J Anim Sci. 86(3):511–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter MJ, Johnson A, Benjamin M, Carr SN, Ellis M, Faucitano L, Grandin T, Salak-Johnson JL, Thomson DU, Calvo-Lorenzo MS, et al. 2017. Effects of Ractopamine Hydrochloride (PAYLEAN®) on the welfare of market weight pigs: a review. Transl Anim Sci. 1(4):533–558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rocha LM, Bridi AM, Foury A, Mormède P, Weschenfelder AV, Devillers N, Bertoloni W, Faucitano L. 2013. Effects of ractopamine administration and castration method on the response to pre-slaughter stress and carcass and meat quality in pigs of two Piétrain genotypes. J Anim Sci. 91(8):3965–3977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha LM, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Saucier L, Faucitano L. 2016. Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)? J Anim Sci. 94(1):359–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydhmer L, Canario L. 2014. Behavioral genetics in pigs and relations to welfare. In: Grandin TA, Deesing M, editors. Genetics and the behavior of domestic animals. London, UK: Academic Press; p. 397–434.
   Google Scholar
• Rydhmer L, Hansson M, Lundström K, Brunius C, Andersson K. 2013. Welfare of entire male pigs is improved by socialising piglets and keeping intact groups until slaughter. Animal. 7(9):1532–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydhmer L, Lundheim N. 2008. Breeding pigs for improved welfare. In: Faucitano L, Schaefer AL, editors. The welfare of pigs - from birth to slaughter. Wageningen, The Netherlands Wageningen: Academic Publishers; p. 243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier L, Bernier D, Bergeron R, Méthot S, Giguère A, Faucitano L. 2007. Effect of feed texture, meal frequency and pre-slaughter fasting on behaviour, stomach weight and microbial carcass contamination in pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 87(4):479–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCAHAW 2002. The welfare of animals during transport (details for horses, pigs, sheep and cattle). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, European Commission; 130. p.
   Google Scholar
• Schinckel AP, Richert BT, Herr CT, Einstein ME, Kendall DC. 2001. Effects of ractopamine on swine growth, carcass composition, and quality. Proceedings of 2nd International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality; Concordia, Brazil. p. 324–335.
   Google Scholar
• Squires EJ, Bone C, Cameron J. 2020. Pork production with entire males: directions for control of boar taint. Animals. 10(9):1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart G, Ritter MJ, Culbertson M, Mann G, Wofford R. 2008. Effects of previous handling and feed withdrawal prior to loading on transport losses in market weight pigs. Proceedings of the 2008 American Association of Swine Veterinarians; San Diego, CA. p. 359–362.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira DL, Boyle LA. 2014. A comparison of the impact of behaviours performed by entire male and female pigs prior to slaughter on skin lesion scores of the carcass. Livest Sci. 170:142–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terlouw EMC, Picard B, Deiss V, Berri C, Hocquette JF, Lebret B, Lefevre F, Hamill R, Gagaoua M. 2021. Understanding the determination of meat quality using biochemical characteristics of the muscle: stress at slaughter and other missing keys. Foods. 10(1):84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terlouw EMC, Porcher J, Fernandez X. 2005. Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. II. Effect of reactivity to humans on aggression during mixing and on meat quality. J Anim Sci. 83(7):1664–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terlouw EMC, Rybarczyk P. 2008. Explaining and predicting differences in meat quality through stress reactions at slaughter: the case of Large White and Duroc pigs. Meat Sci. 79(4):795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner SP, Camerlink I, Baxter EM, D’Eath MB, Desire S, Roehe R. 2018. Breeding for pig welfare: opportunities and challenges., In: Špinka M, editor. Advances in pig welfare. Duxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing; p. 399–414.
   Google Scholar
• USDA 2023. Livestock and meat domestic data. Meat statistics tables, historical. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/livestock-and-meat-domestic-data/livestock-and-meat-domestic-data/#All%20Meat%20Statistics
   Google Scholar
• Van Staaveren N, Teixeira DL, Hanlon A, Boyle LA. 2015. The effect of mixing entire male pigs prior to transport to slaughter on behaviour, welfare and carcass lesions. PLoS One. 10(4):e0122841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde A, Cruz J, Gispert M, Carrión D, de la Torre Ruiz JL, Diestre A, Manteca X. 2007. Aversion to carbon dioxide stunning in pigs: effect of carbon dioxide concentration and halothane genotype. Anim Welf. 16(4):513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde A, Gispert M, Faucitano L, Alonso P, Manteca X, Diestre A. 2001. Effects of the stunning procedure and the halothane genotype on meat quality and incidence of haemorrhages in pigs. Meat Sci. 58(3):313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vero JG. 2021. Effects of space allowance during transport on blood parameters and meat quality in pigs of two slaughter weights. Remote video presentation at the AAFC Sherbrooke R&D Centre Symposium, Sherbrooke, Canada. [accessed 2023 February 13]. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18cr-DEyojlVFEw3NPn9FbtHiWh3k2Xl?usp=sharing.
   Google Scholar
• Warriss PD, Brown SN. 1985. The physiological responses of fighting between in pigs and the consequences for meat quality. J Sci Food Agric. 36(2):87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality® 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs. In: Dalmau A, Velarde A, Scott K, Edwards S, Veissier I, Keeling L, Butterworth A, editors. Welfare quality assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Lelystad, The Netherlands: Welfare Quality Consortium; p. 122. p.
   Google Scholar
• Weschenfelder AV, Torrey S, Devillers N, Crowe T, Bassols A, Saco Y, Piñeiro M, Saucier L, Faucitano L. 2012. Effects of trailer design on animal welfare parameters and carcass and meat quality of three Pietrain crosses being transported over a long distance. J Anim Sci. 90(9):3220–3231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weschenfelder AV, Torrey S, Devillers N, Crowe T, Bassols A, Saco Y, Piñeiro M, Saucier L, Faucitano L. 2013. Effects of trailer design on animal welfare parameters and carcass and meat quality of three Pietrain crosses being transported over a short distance. Livest Sci. 157(1):234–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Vierck KR, DeRouchey JM, O'Quinn TG, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Dritz SS, Woodworth JC. 2017. A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment. Transl Anim Sci. 1(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zira S, Rydhmer L, Ivarsson E, Hoffmann R, Röös E. 2021. A life cycle sustainability assessment of organic and conventional pork supply chains in Sweden. Sustain Prod Consum. 28:21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurbrigg K, van Dreumel T, Rothschild MF, Alves D, Friendship R, O'Sullivan T. 2017. Pig-level risk factors for in-transit losses in swine: a review. Can J Anim Sci. 97:339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar